Re: RFS: libopenobex (also includes openobex-apps and ircp)

2006-02-20 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Hello, Am Montag, 20. Februar 2006 02:43 schrieb Simon Richter: Hendrik Sattler schrieb: The new package can be found at: http://www.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de/~ubq7/debian/ The source package got renamed (libopenobex1.0 - libopenobex) as it was once (in oldstable) and the binary packages

Re: RFS: libopenobex (also includes openobex-apps and ircp)

2006-02-20 Thread Simon Richter
Hello, Hendrik Sattler wrote: Is the API/ABI sufficiently stable? I see that the Debian patch introduces a new parameter to a function. This is inside the apps/ subdirectory which is not part of the lib. The patch was already in the openobex-apps package and I took it over since it still

Re: RFS: libopenobex (also includes openobex-apps and ircp)

2006-02-20 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Montag, 20. Februar 2006 12:33 schrieben Sie: That leaves the question if the previously seperated changelogs should be included? It would help to have it documented somehow, not as if I would ever read a file called README. I'll see what can be done to include them... Intention was

Re: RFS: libopenobex (also includes openobex-apps and ircp)

2006-02-20 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, Hendrik Sattler wrote: I didn't but upstream did. Previously, upstream seperated the source in three packages but gave up on that with the current release (it is a configure parameter now to build the apps). Yes, but it shows up as added files in the Debian patch, which it shouldn't

Re: RFS: python-harvestman

2006-02-20 Thread Margarita Manterola
On 2/18/06, Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.ee.iitm.ac.in/~ee03b091/debpkgs As they are built using pdebuild, I guess this would be really all right. Ok, it had only a very small problem: it used DH_COMPAT=5, and the debhelper dependecy said = 4, I bumped this to 5 and

Re: debian/rules build/build-indep/build-arch

2006-02-20 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Hi Paul, Paul Wise wrote: According to my reading of debian-policy 4.8 and 7.6, this should be correct: debian/rules: build: build-indep build-arch build-indep: build arch-indep stuff (like docs) build-arch: configure build some binaries However the autobuilders use

first package pcftisio

2006-02-20 Thread Cedric BRINER
hi, I'd like to package pcfitsio: http://panoramix.stsci.edu/~npirzkal/python/pcfitsio/ I was thinking to rename it as: python-cfitsio. after searching for a copyright, I sent him an email about it: HI,

Re: Depending on both runtime and dev packages?

2006-02-20 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Martin Meredith wrote: Kevin B. McCarty wrote: Davide Puricelli wrote: Hi, I'm building a package (a Scheme-to-C compiler) and I split it into three different debs: libfoo0 (runtime libs), libfoo-dev (.a and .la files and includes) and foo-bin (compiler and other tools). The depends are a

Re: first package pcftisio

2006-02-20 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, Cedric BRINER wrote: after searching for a copyright, I sent him an email about it: There is not copyright on pCFITSIO. No guaranties either :-) so I was wondering, if such kind of 'NO COPYRIGHT' can be included in debian ? Sure. It's public domain. I'd write a small

Re: RFS: python-harvestman

2006-02-20 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 10:57:31AM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote: On 2/18/06, Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.ee.iitm.ac.in/~ee03b091/debpkgs As they are built using pdebuild, I guess this would be really all right. Ok, it had only a very small problem: it used

Re: first package pcftisio

2006-02-20 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 03:55:28PM +0100, Cedric BRINER wrote: hi, I'd like to package pcfitsio: http://panoramix.stsci.edu/~npirzkal/python/pcfitsio/ I was thinking to rename it as: python-cfitsio. after searching for a copyright, I sent him an email about it: HI,

Re: Depending on both runtime and dev packages?

2006-02-20 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Martin Meredith wrote: Dont most -dev packages auto-depend on the libs they're assosciated with anyway? Adding to Kevin's explanation, please keep in mind that taking shortcuts in the dependencies is a bad practice in general (as in don't do it) and there's no reason for starting it here. This

Re: RFS: xshisen_1.51-2 --- Shisen-sho game for X11

2006-02-20 Thread Margarita Manterola
On 2/10/06, Zak B. Elep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As usual the source package can be found at mentors.debian.net .[1] [1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xshisen/ Zak, I've been looking at the package. It looks quite good. However, I found that at the changelog you close many

Re: RFS: xshisen_1.51-2 --- Shisen-sho game for X11

2006-02-20 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 02:17:10PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote: On 2/10/06, Zak B. Elep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As usual the source package can be found at mentors.debian.net .[1] [1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xshisen/ Zak, I've been looking at the package. It

Re: RFS: ElementTree, ElementTidy, cElementTree

2006-02-20 Thread Torsten Marek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Margarita Manterola schrieb: Hi, All the packages are missing the stupid space befor the homepage, as documented in: http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-upstream-info I hate that stupid space,

Re: RFS: xshisen_1.51-2 --- Shisen-sho game for X11

2006-02-20 Thread Nicolas François
Hello, On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 02:17:10PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote: Also, I got all these lintian errors: W: xshisen: manpage-has-errors-from-man usr/share/man/man6/xshisen.6.gz 140: a space character is not allowed in an escape name This first warning is caused by a '\' not

RFS: multixterm -- drive multiple xterms separately or together

2006-02-20 Thread gregor herrmann
I'm looking for a sponsor for the following package: Title: multixterm -- drive multiple xterms separately or together ITP: #353777 Details: * Package name: multixterm Version : 1.8 Upstream Author : Don Libes [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL :

Re: RFS: stegsnow -- whitespace steganography for text files

2006-02-20 Thread John Buttery
* On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 02:24:09PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Seems highly similar to snowdrop which is already packaged.. Um, they're completely different apps. This stegsnow app is a steganography codec (with optional encryption), whereas snowdrop does watermarking. -- John ! Since this