Re: RFC/RFS: bfilter, aspell-hr, myspell-hr

2006-06-15 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Vedran Fura? wrote: > % cat debian/openoffice.org-hyphenation-hr.dictlistinfo > HYPH hr HR hyph_hr_HR > > also: > > % cat debian/myspell-hr.dictlistinfo > DICT hr HR hr_HR Yes, OK... If I oversaw the first, sorry. > > irrelevant. not used by any myspell-using app. > > I know, but you ment

Re: RFS: llk-linux (bug #373754)

2006-06-15 Thread Adam Borowski
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 09:11:54PM +0800, Wei Mingzhi wrote: > I'm looking for a sponsor for the following package: Good luck! As it's in my interest to save the time of actual DDs, let me help you with the more obvious issues. > * Package name: llk-linux * Of course, the issue I mentioned ea

Re: Debian 3.1 packaging documentation

2006-06-15 Thread robert jennings
Great Vincent. So after looking at your material I fixed up my files and then as suggested in your place and other places I removed my relocation question from the preinst and let the dpkg handle it via the --instdir directive (which I assume is the right thing to do) and it seemed to install corr

Re: RFS: llk-linux (bug #373754)

2006-06-15 Thread Adam Borowski
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 09:11:54PM +0800, Wei Mingzhi wrote: > * Package name: llk-linux > Description : LianLianKan game for GNU/Linux Well, and (released) Debian, what OS it is? The name and desc of your package doesn't make any sense to me -- the "-linux" part is totally redundant.

Re: RFS: urw-garamond-no8

2006-06-15 Thread Kevin Bube
Hi all, I uploaded a new package version to mentors.debian.net. The changelog file lists all changes done. I think I addressed all problems which still remained. A slight catch: I did not Inherit FontName in defoma.hints, as I understand the defoma documentation this is not necessary as I declare

Re: Debian 3.1 packaging documentation

2006-06-15 Thread robert jennings
Thank you Vincent! I do appreciate your kind words of encouragement! Although I only spent a few days researching what I thought was an easy process has turned out to have interesting twists and turns. There appears to be very specific rules of engagement I need to learn to build my debian. Ju

RE: Bachelors, {}Masters, MBA and/or Doctorate (PhD)

2006-06-15 Thread Jose Thayer
In just 2 years you can have a masters degree from a national university. A better job, more income and a better life can all be yours in just 2 years. No books to buy, no classes to go to, and no entrance exams. Learn in your own home at your own pace. We supply all the study materials, all

Re: RFC/RFS: bfilter, aspell-hr, myspell-hr

2006-06-15 Thread Vedran Furač
Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > Vedran Fura? wrote: > >> you tell me what exactly should I remove from debian/rules? But, yes, it >> works. > > perefarbly, just the loops and the whole unneeded stuff and just > install your files. but minor point as long as it works OK! I don't have time curren

Re: RFC/RFS: bfilter, aspell-hr, myspell-hr

2006-06-15 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Vedran Fura? wrote: > I just copied debian/rules and control from myspell-en or something. Could openoffice.org-dictionaries, yes. (openoffice.org-dictionaries is the source package for myspell-en-us/myspell-en-gb) > you tell me what exactly should I remove from debian/rules? But, yes, it >

RFS: llk-linux (bug #373754)

2006-06-15 Thread Wei Mingzhi
Hello, I'm looking for a sponsor for the following package: * Package name: llk-linux Version : 2.3beta1 Upstream Author : Zhao Mingxian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/llk-linux * License : GPLv2 Programming Lang: C Description

Re: [RFS] museek+: file-sharing application for the SoulSeek peer-to-peer network

2006-06-15 Thread Margarita Manterola
Hi! On 6/10/06, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Margarita Manterola wrote: > Your package does weird things, related to the fact that it uses scons > for building. For example, it checks for build-dependencies at clean > time: > > # Run scons -c for cleaning > scons QTDIR=/us

Re: RFC/RFS: bfilter, aspell-hr, myspell-hr

2006-06-15 Thread Vedran Furač
Rene Engelhard wrote: > Rene Engelhard wrote: >> Rene Engelhard wrote: >>> - Please make everything -1 since the whole thing is your "* Initial >>> release" No problem, but there is a lot of packages where "initial release" and "first upload to debian" are not the same releases. Currently it is

Re: Package does not build on ia64 and sparc

2006-06-15 Thread Benjamin Mesing
Thanks you all for your explanations. To summarize, I will take no action regarding sparc and inform the apt-front developers regarding the failure on ia64. Best regards Ben -- Please do not send any email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- all email not originating from the mailing list will be deleted.

Re: Library packages and build dependencies

2006-06-15 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Nikolai Lusan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all, > > I am relatively new to building my own packages (previously I have been > able to just alter sources from the main debian archives to suit my > needs when I needed something customised) and I am having a couple of > "issues". > > I am stuck

Re: Homepage-field in description

2006-06-15 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 11:13 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote: > It is the case (20-character-wide windows or less) with some terminals > for blind people... In this case, one more character increase the cost > of the terminal, so there are not many. If the terminal is not more wide than 20 characters

Re: Homepage-field in description

2006-06-15 Thread Vincent Danjean
Russ Allbery wrote: > Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> When the URL is something like http://www.myniceproject.org, I don't see >> that would be the difference in having the extra space or not. > > Well, it matters to people with 20-character-wide windows, if there are > any s

Re: Debian 3.1 packaging documentation

2006-06-15 Thread Vincent Danjean
robert jennings wrote: > Thank you Carlo, > > Actually, I was cutting a few corners and did a quick > read through the Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 Bible as well as > a few other sites (I like IBM's site for quick answers > for lots of little tid bits!) and I created the DEBIAN > directory with associated

Re: Homepage-field in description

2006-06-15 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
There's two points to this discussion: 1) The original issue I touched, which is whether the extended advice on a space in front of the Homepage 'field' is necessary; 2) A spin-off discussion: do we need a homepage field at all or do we need to provide it in another way. As to the first poin

Re: Homepage-field in description

2006-06-15 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 6/15/06, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That is a point, but still the users might find the link useful. > Also, checking if something fresher is present is in upstream could > be facilitated because there is no need to look for the copyright > file and ge the info from there. Thi