RFS: libmp3-tag-perl -- Module for reading tags of MP3 audio files

2006-07-10 Thread Ian Beckwith
Hello. As my previous sponsor isn't responding to emails, I'm seeking a new sponsor for libmp3-tag-perl (MP3::Tag, a perl module for reading and writing ID3v1 and ID3v2 tags in mp3 files). The major changes from a packaging perspective relative to the last version in debian are the promotion of s

Re: Bug#377420: mod-bt - FTBFS: Not resolvable build dependencies

2006-07-10 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On amd64 (and other 64 bit arches?) we're seeing something simular: bt_nice_size.c: In function 'bt_nice_size': bt_nice_size.c:34: warning: format '%llu' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'u_int64_t' bt_nice_size.c:34: warning: format '%llu' expects type 'long long uns

Re: Empty files in pbuilder chroot

2006-07-10 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le jeudi 06 juillet 2006 à 17:13 +0200, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : > Hello, > > I'm trying to set up pbuilder, but I end up with empty files (0 size, > access rights set to a-rwx). In particular, cc is empty. When running > pbuilder build, ldconfig complains about many libraries that are also > emp

Re: pbuilder on sarge

2006-07-10 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le lundi 10 juillet 2006 à 14:05 +0100, Michael Stevens a écrit : > I think it'll be simplest for me to get a machine/vm running sid > though, in the long term. I use a sid chroot to debug my packaging, but I try to always do my final build with pbuilder (to test the build-depends). So I would sug

Re: pbuilder on sarge

2006-07-10 Thread Loïc Minier
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006, Tyler MacDonald wrote: > I only did this before because of the weird 'tar' problems in > unstable... What's bad about building a package out of testing? This is not what the buildds of the other arches will do, and you will create a weird package on $arch-you-uploaded

Re: pbuilder on sarge

2006-07-10 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le lundi 10 juillet 2006 à 13:23 +0200, Adam Borowski a écrit : [...] > > Then add the following to /etc/apt/preferences : [...] > > Package: cdebootstrap > > Pin: release a=sarge-backports > > Pin-Priority: 999 [...] > uhm, why? > > The whole point of setting the priority at 200 when the default

RFS: fetchexc

2006-07-10 Thread Ted Percival
Hi folks, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "fetchexc". * Package name: fetchexc Version : 1.10-1 Upstream Author : Juhani Rautiainen * URL : http://personal.inet.fi/atk/fetchexc/ * License : GPL Section : net It builds one binary package: fet

Re: pbuilder on sarge

2006-07-10 Thread Adam Borowski
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 11:54:43AM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > > E: Couldn't download slang1a-utf8 > > pbuilder: debootstrap failed > > Use pbuilder and cdebootstrap from http://www.backports.org/ . > > To do that, put: > deb http://www.backports.org/debian/ sarge-backports main > in your /e

Re: pbuilder on sarge

2006-07-10 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le dimanche 09 juillet 2006 à 19:56 +0100, Michael Stevens a écrit : > Hi. > > I've got a new package which seems to be all good to me so far. The > only problem is that I've built it on sarge, so now I want to get it > updated and building against sid. > > How do I setup pbuilder to manage this?

Re: RFS: fetchexc (updated: 1.10-2)

2006-07-10 Thread Arjan Oosting
Op ma, 10-07-2006 te 11:02 +1000, schreef Ted Percival: > > I seem to remember seeing somewhere that uploading 1.10-2 would mean > > that the ITP "Closes" in the changelog from the 1.10-1 package won't be > > processed. I can easily re-roll the changelog to include the new closes > > line if that's