Re: s390 build box?

Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > but it also seems like a waste of time to upload it if it just has more > > problems under the s390 arch. Should I continue attempting to find an s390 > > box, is there something somebody out there can do to help, or should I just > > have my new pa

Re: s390 build box?

Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > apt-get install hercules. > > and then: > http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/giving_s_390_a_try.html > http://blog.zobel.ftbfs.de/stuff/installing-debian-sarge-on-s390 Thanks, I'll give it a shot :) (BTW, love your domain name, and the ir

Re: s390 build box?

Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=mod-bt > > You'll see that it failed in five more architectures (mips powerpc sparc > hppa m68k). In this case in particular, seems like all the big endian > ones. :-) Aaahh very useful page, thanks :

Re: s390 build box?

Hi Tyler, On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 11:37:09AM -0700, Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please see: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=378375 > > I would like to test this bug fix on a s390 box before uploading it. Except > I don't have access to an s390 box. :

Re: s390 build box?

* Tyler MacDonald [Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:37:09 -0700]: Hi Tyler, let's see if I can give an useful answer to your questions and concerns. > Please see: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=378375 > I would like to test this bug fix on a s390 box before uploading it. Except > I

RFS: chameleon-cursor-theme

Meep? Whee? Hey, lookie! Shiny! RFS: * Package name: chameleon-cursor-theme Version : 0.5-1 Upstream Author : Giuseppe Benigno * URL (upstream) : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=38459 * License : GPL Section : x11 Binaries : chameleon-curs

Re: s390 build box?

Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What's the Debian way of handling this? I know that if I upload the new > > package to unstable, it will at least be no worse than the previous version, > > but it also seems like a waste of time to upload it if it just has more > > problems under the s39

Re: s390 build box?

On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 11:37 -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote: > Please see: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=378375 > > I would like to test this bug fix on a s390 box before uploading it. Except > I don't have access to an s390 box. :-/ I asked Bastian if he would be > will

s390 build box?

Please see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=378375 I would like to test this bug fix on a s390 box before uploading it. Except I don't have access to an s390 box. :-/ I asked Bastian if he would be willing to test this before I get my sponsor to upload, but he hasn't repl

RE: Question about variably depending packages

I accomplish this by In the control file for test-application_1_i386.deb Depends: test-database ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@) | test-database-server-installed, test-storage ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@) | test-storage-server-installed, libxml-libxslt-perl Then if the empty package test-database-server-installed

Re: Question about variably depending packages

"Jerry DuVal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > :o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" > xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" > xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40";> > > Can a package have a variable depends in the control file?  :p> Yes. But not the way you mean. What you mean

Re: pgplot5 binary package

On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Adeodato Simó wrote: Since nowadays non-free is supposed to be autobuilt, I think the reasonable thing to do befor #1 or #2 would be to contact the maintainers of this buildd network to see if pgplot5 needs some manual pushing so that is "seen" by these autobuildders. See

Re: jlj package

On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 21:35 +0100, Michael Stevens wrote: > #debian-mentors suggest this is unacceptably vague. Any suggested > approaches to the upstream author? I've failed to get a response from > him on other matters so far. Contacting him is of course the best way to resolve the issue. I thin

Re: jlj package

Hi! * Michael Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060715 22:35]: > 2) The licence is "All of these are completely FREEWARE. Use them all > you want, send me stuff only if you want.. an e-mail would be nice. :] > ENJOY!" Freeware is commonly understood as "free as in beer". You may distribute it, but n

Re: pgplot5 binary package

* Carlo Segre [Mon, 17 Jul 2006 23:43:40 -0500]: > Hello All: Hi! > I have started to help maintain pgplot5. It is in non-free but is, > unfortunately, the only option for many Fortran programs which need to > plot to and interact with X. The upstream source is very stable and does > not ch

dont work for him anymore

Hi, School isnt for everyone! This is why we have invented a program where anyone can get a 4year Deg*ree in less then 2weeks, 100*%verifiale. For more information *call us *24hours a day 7 days a week 206-333-0341 Goodbye, Jonah Small -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Question about variably depending packages

Can a package have a variable depends in the control file?    I have created the following packages   test-database_1_i386.deb test-application_1_i386.deb test-storage_1_i386.deb   On my server I have a /etc/test.properties   IP=192.168.1.60 DATABASEIP=192.168.1.65 STORAGEIP=