Re: flexbackup 'grave' Bug Resolved

2006-09-03 Thread Kurt B. Kaiser
Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The package for stable-security is available at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/flexbackup So far so good. But your package doesn't build correctly. You forgot to build-depend on dpatch. Thanks. I've corrected that and uploaded -4 to

Re: RFS: msntp -- A very simple and portable SNTP client/server for UNIX [uploaded]

2006-09-03 Thread Christoph Haas
On Sunday 03 September 2006 01:29, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: Christoph Haas wrote: Your package is already uploaded. I didn't get any email from debian ftp-master and this package doesn't appear on my QA page. Are you sure to have uploaded it ? ;-) I plea for mental confusion, your

Re: RFS: cscope (updated package) [sponsored]

2006-09-03 Thread Christoph Haas
On Saturday 02 September 2006 21:13, Tobias Klauser wrote: On 2006-09-02 at 19:19:43 +0200, Tobias Klauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK. I'll make a package with a new snapshot then. With the benefit that there needn't be a debian/patches. The updated package based on a CVS snapshot as of

Re: RFS: lopster (updated package)

2006-09-03 Thread Christoph Haas
On Sunday 03 September 2006 00:13, Francesco Namuri wrote: On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 07:54:05PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: Also strange that I can't find an entry in my KDE start menu. I had expected it under Debian-Applications-Network but it's not there. Perhaps not your fault. But as I'm

Re: flexbackup 'grave' Bug Resolved

2006-09-03 Thread Christoph Haas
On Sunday 03 September 2006 08:08, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote: Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The package for stable-security is available at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/flexbackup So far so good. But your package doesn't build correctly. You forgot to build-depend

RFS: tuxguitar - Multitrack guitar tablature editor and player (gp3 to gp5)

2006-09-03 Thread Philippe Coval
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package tuxguitar. * Package name: tuxguitar Version : 0.8-2 Upstream Author : Julian Casadesus akdmia[a]users.sourceforge.net * URL : http://freshmeat.net/projects/tuxguitar/ * License : LGPL Section :

Re: RFS: lopster (updated package)

2006-09-03 Thread Francesco Namuri
Hello Christoph, On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 09:20:48AM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: On Sunday 03 September 2006 00:13, Francesco Namuri wrote: ok, I have added the lopster.desktop file and the lopster.xpm icon. hoping it's ok... :) I think so. But please do not put them into the upstream's

RFS: lisaac

2006-09-03 Thread PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lisaac. * Package name: lisaac Version : 0.84-1 Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://isaacos.loria.fr/li.html * License : Cecillv2 (compatible GPL)

Re: RFH: python-support and arch dependant file

2006-09-03 Thread James Westby
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 05:16:13 +0200 Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm working on Museek+ packaging and I have a problem. There is an arch dependent file in python-museekd (mucipher.so) and it should be built for python2.4 and 2.3. But the package doesn't include a

Re: RFS: lopster (updated package) [sponsored]

2006-09-03 Thread Christoph Haas
On Sunday 03 September 2006 12:33, Francesco Namuri wrote: On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 09:20:48AM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: But please do not put them into the upstream's directory. Fixed, :) now everything is in debian/ directory, and the patch of src/log.c is made using dpatch. Yes, now

Re: RFS: lopster (updated package) [sponsored]

2006-09-03 Thread Francesco Namuri
Hi Christoph, thanks very much for sponsorship... :) On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 03:24:43PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: Just that I still don't get an icon in the menus anywhere. Perhaps the desktop file needs to contain Categories=KDE;Network but I'm not sure. Whether desktop files work or

upstream tarball repackaging from bz2 to gz

2006-09-03 Thread Eric Cooper
The upstream tarball for a package I maintain is in .tar.bz2 format. I've been downloading it and recompressing it into .tar.gz format. This seems like a very common situation. 1. Should I still follow the section on best practices for .orig.tar.gz files in the Developer's Reference, and include

RFS: cscope (updated package, again)

2006-09-03 Thread Tobias Klauser
Thanks for the first upload! On 2006-09-02 at 21:13:43 +0200, Tobias Klauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2006-09-02 at 19:19:43 +0200, Tobias Klauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK. I'll make a package with a new snapshot then. With the benefit that there needn't be a debian/patches. The

Re: RFS: lopster (updated package) [sponsored]

2006-09-03 Thread Paul Cupis
Francesco Namuri wrote: Rejected: lopster_1.2.2-3.dsc refers to lopster_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz, but I can't find it in the queue or in the pool. maybe I have made a mistake updating debian revision? Someone has probably uploaded the -3 version of the package but without the orig.tar.gz which will

Re: upstream tarball repackaging from bz2 to gz

2006-09-03 Thread Bart Martens
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 10:10 -0400, Eric Cooper wrote: The upstream tarball for a package I maintain is in .tar.bz2 format. I've been downloading it and recompressing it into .tar.gz format. This seems like a very common situation. Yes very common. 1. Should I still follow the section on

Re: svn-inject wants to remove some files

2006-09-03 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hi Tony, On 9/1/06, tony mancill wrote: As I understand it, you're supposed to be checking in the state of the package in the build directory, and if the debian diff removed one of those files, then that's ok. It seemed a good solution, but for the package in exam (wmspaceweather) I've found

Re: upstream tarball repackaging from bz2 to gz

2006-09-03 Thread George Danchev
On Sunday 03 September 2006 17:10, Eric Cooper wrote: The upstream tarball for a package I maintain is in .tar.bz2 format. I've been downloading it and recompressing it into .tar.gz format. This seems like a very common situation. 1. Should I still follow the section on best practices for

Re: flexbackup 'grave' Bug Resolved

2006-09-03 Thread Kurt B. Kaiser
Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please run lintian on the package. I get three errors here. Yes, I see that also. However, I'm trying to follow the directive in the Developer's Reference 5.8.5.3: Do NOT include any changes in your package which are not directly related to fixing the

Re: upstream tarball repackaging from bz2 to gz

2006-09-03 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:04:49 +0300, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 03 September 2006 17:10, Eric Cooper wrote: (I don't think I can justify asking upstream to publish a more wasteful version of the same bits on his website just to suit Debian.) True. another

Re: upstream tarball repackaging from bz2 to gz

2006-09-03 Thread George Danchev
On Sunday 03 September 2006 19:18, Toni Mueller wrote: Hi, On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:04:49 +0300, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 03 September 2006 17:10, Eric Cooper wrote: (I don't think I can justify asking upstream to publish a more wasteful version of the same

Re: upstream tarball repackaging from bz2 to gz

2006-09-03 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:45:23 +0300, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 03 September 2006 19:18, Toni Mueller wrote: another question is whether we can possibly adapt the policy and tools to directly allow .bz2 files in Debian - we would benefit from smaller files,

Re: RFS: xmmsctrl

2006-09-03 Thread Florent Rougon
Andrew Donnellan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What does this do that python-xmms/pyxmms does not do? Maybe this might just be a *standalone application* rather than a library? The standalone application corresponding to (and relying on) PyXMMS is PyXMMS-remote (found in the pyxmms-remote Debian

RFS: wmspaceweather (updated package)

2006-09-03 Thread Sandro Tosi
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.04-18 of my package wmspaceweather. It builds these binary packages: wmspaceweather - WindowMaker dock app that shows the weather in space The package is lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 354963 The package can be

Re: flexbackup 'grave' Bug Resolved

2006-09-03 Thread Christoph Haas
On Sunday 03 September 2006 18:30, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote: Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please run lintian on the package. I get three errors here. Yes, I see that also. However, I'm trying to follow the directive in the Developer's Reference 5.8.5.3: Do NOT include any changes

Re: RFS: lopster (updated package) [sponsored]

2006-09-03 Thread Bruce Sass
On Sun September 3 2006 08:10, Francesco Namuri wrote: On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 03:24:43PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: Just that I still don't get an icon in the menus anywhere. Perhaps the desktop file needs to contain Categories=KDE;Network but I'm not sure. Whether desktop files work or

Re: upstream tarball repackaging from bz2 to gz

2006-09-03 Thread Daniel Baumann
Eric Cooper wrote: The upstream tarball for a package I maintain is in .tar.bz2 format. I've been downloading it and recompressing it into .tar.gz format. This seems like a very common situation. ...FWIW, my opinion to that:

Re: RFS: lopster (updated package) [sponsored]

2006-09-03 Thread Christoph Haas
On Sunday 03 September 2006 16:10, Francesco Namuri wrote: thanks very much for sponsorship... :) You're welcome. It's strange because I have the desktop entry in debian menu and in KDE/gnome menus too, I have purged and reinstalled many times the package to verify this... Now I check if I

Re: upstream tarball repackaging from bz2 to gz

2006-09-03 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Toni Mueller wrote: Hi, On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:04:49 +0300, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 03 September 2006 17:10, Eric Cooper wrote: (I don't think I can justify asking upstream to publish a more wasteful version of the same bits on his website just to suit

RFS: audacious

2006-09-03 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package audacious. * Package name: audacious Version : 1.1.2-1 Upstream Author : George Averill [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giacomo Lozito [EMAIL PROTECTED] William Pitcock

RFS: museek+

2006-09-03 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package museek+. * Package name : museek+ Version : 0.1.11-1 Upstream Author : Hyriand [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daelstorm [EMAIL PROTECTED] SeeSchloss [EMAIL

Re: RFS: audacious

2006-09-03 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hi Adam, audacious - Small and fast audio player which supports lots of audio formats audacious-common - Small and fast audio player which supports lots of audio formats audacious-locales - Small and fast audio player which supports lots of audio formats audacious-plugins - Small and fast

Re: RFS: audacious

2006-09-03 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package audacious. * Package name: audacious Version : 1.1.2-1 Upstream Author : George Averill [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giacomo Lozito [EMAIL PROTECTED] William Pitcock [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: tstat

2006-09-03 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hi mentors, some days have passed since this RFS, and I still don't know what to do... As per email come: 1. erf.c has a license BSD-like 2. BSD licenses are DFSG-compatible 3. BSD-with-4-clause could lead to issues combining that code with GPL-ed one (as main of the rest of the code) So, what

Re: RFS: jabbin

2006-09-03 Thread Andrew Donnellan
On 9/4/06, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 01:43:32AM +, Andrew Donnellan wrote: Is anyone interested in sponsoring this package? I'm happy to fix any problems and I'm in close contact with upstream. (VoIP team cc'd, maybe this would interest you guys) I'm

Re: RFS: audacious

2006-09-03 Thread Matthew Palmer
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] +[EMAIL PROTECTED] +[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please don't hijack threads. If you wish to start a new thread, click 'new message' rather than replying to an existing message and changing the subject. - Matt -- To

Re: upstream tarball repackaging from bz2 to gz

2006-09-03 Thread Joe Smith
Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:45:23 +0300, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 03 September 2006 19:18, Toni Mueller wrote: another question is whether we can possibly adapt the policy and tools to

Can a package using a cow-shell be cow-builded?

2006-09-03 Thread Charles Plessy
Dear all, I am preparing the package of a software which provides regression tests in a separate directory, for which there is no make clean available. For the moment, I copy the directory somewhere else, perform the tests in (it generates many files), and delete the directory in debian/rules

RFC/RFS: jlhafrontend -- command-line lzh archiver written in Java

2006-09-03 Thread Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package jlhafrontend. * Package name: jlhafrontend Version : 0.1.3-1 Upstream Author : Ying-Chun Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/jlhafrontend/ * License : Cryptix General License

Re: RFS: wmspaceweather (updated package)

2006-09-03 Thread tony mancill
Sandro Tosi wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.04-18 of my package wmspaceweather. sponsored signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature