Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The package for stable-security is available at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/flexbackup
So far so good. But your package doesn't build correctly. You forgot to
build-depend on dpatch.
Thanks. I've corrected that and uploaded -4 to
On Sunday 03 September 2006 01:29, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
Christoph Haas wrote:
Your package is already uploaded.
I didn't get any email from debian ftp-master and this package doesn't
appear on my QA page. Are you sure to have uploaded it ? ;-)
I plea for mental confusion, your
On Saturday 02 September 2006 21:13, Tobias Klauser wrote:
On 2006-09-02 at 19:19:43 +0200, Tobias Klauser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. I'll make a package with a new snapshot then. With the benefit
that there needn't be a debian/patches.
The updated package based on a CVS snapshot as of
On Sunday 03 September 2006 00:13, Francesco Namuri wrote:
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 07:54:05PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
Also strange that I can't find an entry in my KDE start menu. I had
expected it under Debian-Applications-Network but it's not there.
Perhaps not your fault. But as I'm
On Sunday 03 September 2006 08:08, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote:
Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The package for stable-security is available at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/flexbackup
So far so good. But your package doesn't build correctly. You forgot
to build-depend
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package tuxguitar.
* Package name: tuxguitar
Version : 0.8-2
Upstream Author : Julian Casadesus akdmia[a]users.sourceforge.net
* URL : http://freshmeat.net/projects/tuxguitar/
* License : LGPL
Section :
Hello Christoph,
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 09:20:48AM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
On Sunday 03 September 2006 00:13, Francesco Namuri wrote:
ok, I have added the lopster.desktop file and the lopster.xpm icon.
hoping it's ok... :)
I think so. But please do not put them into the upstream's
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package lisaac.
* Package name: lisaac
Version : 0.84-1
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://isaacos.loria.fr/li.html
* License : Cecillv2 (compatible GPL)
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 05:16:13 +0200
Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on Museek+ packaging and I have a problem.
There is an arch dependent file in python-museekd (mucipher.so) and it
should be built for python2.4 and 2.3.
But the package doesn't include a
On Sunday 03 September 2006 12:33, Francesco Namuri wrote:
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 09:20:48AM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
But please do not put them into the upstream's directory.
Fixed, :)
now everything is in debian/ directory, and the patch of src/log.c is
made using dpatch.
Yes, now
Hi Christoph,
thanks very much for sponsorship... :)
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 03:24:43PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
Just that I still don't get an icon in the menus anywhere. Perhaps the
desktop file needs to contain Categories=KDE;Network but I'm not sure.
Whether desktop files work or
The upstream tarball for a package I maintain is in .tar.bz2 format.
I've been downloading it and recompressing it into .tar.gz format.
This seems like a very common situation.
1. Should I still follow the section on best practices for
.orig.tar.gz files in the Developer's Reference, and include
Thanks for the first upload!
On 2006-09-02 at 21:13:43 +0200, Tobias Klauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006-09-02 at 19:19:43 +0200, Tobias Klauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. I'll make a package with a new snapshot then. With the benefit that
there needn't be a debian/patches.
The
Francesco Namuri wrote:
Rejected: lopster_1.2.2-3.dsc refers to lopster_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz, but I
can't find it in the queue or in the pool.
maybe I have made a mistake updating debian revision?
Someone has probably uploaded the -3 version of the package but without
the orig.tar.gz which will
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 10:10 -0400, Eric Cooper wrote:
The upstream tarball for a package I maintain is in .tar.bz2 format.
I've been downloading it and recompressing it into .tar.gz format.
This seems like a very common situation.
Yes very common.
1. Should I still follow the section on
Hi Tony,
On 9/1/06, tony mancill wrote:
As I understand it, you're supposed to be checking in the state of the
package in the build directory, and if the debian diff removed one of those
files, then that's ok.
It seemed a good solution, but for the package in exam
(wmspaceweather) I've found
On Sunday 03 September 2006 17:10, Eric Cooper wrote:
The upstream tarball for a package I maintain is in .tar.bz2 format.
I've been downloading it and recompressing it into .tar.gz format.
This seems like a very common situation.
1. Should I still follow the section on best practices for
Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please run lintian on the package. I get three errors here.
Yes, I see that also. However, I'm trying to follow the directive in
the Developer's Reference 5.8.5.3:
Do NOT include any changes in your package which are not directly
related to fixing the
Hi,
On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:04:49 +0300, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 03 September 2006 17:10, Eric Cooper wrote:
(I don't think I can justify asking upstream to publish a more
wasteful version of the same bits on his website just to suit Debian.)
True.
another
On Sunday 03 September 2006 19:18, Toni Mueller wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:04:49 +0300, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sunday 03 September 2006 17:10, Eric Cooper wrote:
(I don't think I can justify asking upstream to publish a more
wasteful version of the same
Hi,
On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:45:23 +0300, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 03 September 2006 19:18, Toni Mueller wrote:
another question is whether we can possibly adapt the policy and tools
to directly allow .bz2 files in Debian - we would benefit from smaller
files,
Andrew Donnellan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does this do that python-xmms/pyxmms does not do?
Maybe this might just be a *standalone application* rather than a library?
The standalone application corresponding to (and relying on) PyXMMS is
PyXMMS-remote (found in the pyxmms-remote Debian
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.04-18
of my package wmspaceweather.
It builds these binary packages:
wmspaceweather - WindowMaker dock app that shows the weather in space
The package is lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 354963
The package can be
On Sunday 03 September 2006 18:30, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote:
Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please run lintian on the package. I get three errors here.
Yes, I see that also. However, I'm trying to follow the directive in
the Developer's Reference 5.8.5.3:
Do NOT include any changes
On Sun September 3 2006 08:10, Francesco Namuri wrote:
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 03:24:43PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
Just that I still don't get an icon in the menus anywhere. Perhaps
the desktop file needs to contain Categories=KDE;Network but I'm
not sure. Whether desktop files work or
Eric Cooper wrote:
The upstream tarball for a package I maintain is in .tar.bz2 format.
I've been downloading it and recompressing it into .tar.gz format.
This seems like a very common situation.
...FWIW, my opinion to that:
On Sunday 03 September 2006 16:10, Francesco Namuri wrote:
thanks very much for sponsorship... :)
You're welcome.
It's strange because I have the desktop entry in debian menu and in
KDE/gnome menus too, I have purged and reinstalled many times the
package to verify this... Now I check if I
Toni Mueller wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:04:49 +0300, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sunday 03 September 2006 17:10, Eric Cooper wrote:
(I don't think I can justify asking upstream to publish a more
wasteful version of the same bits on his website just to suit
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package audacious.
* Package name: audacious
Version : 1.1.2-1
Upstream Author : George Averill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Giacomo Lozito [EMAIL PROTECTED]
William Pitcock
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package museek+.
* Package name : museek+
Version : 0.1.11-1
Upstream Author : Hyriand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daelstorm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SeeSchloss [EMAIL
Hi Adam,
audacious - Small and fast audio player which supports lots of audio
formats
audacious-common - Small and fast audio player which supports lots of
audio formats
audacious-locales - Small and fast audio player which supports lots of
audio formats
audacious-plugins - Small and fast
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package audacious.
* Package name: audacious
Version : 1.1.2-1
Upstream Author : George Averill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Giacomo Lozito [EMAIL PROTECTED]
William Pitcock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi mentors,
some days have passed since this RFS, and I still don't know what to do...
As per email come:
1. erf.c has a license BSD-like
2. BSD licenses are DFSG-compatible
3. BSD-with-4-clause could lead to issues combining that code with
GPL-ed one (as main of the rest of the code)
So, what
On 9/4/06, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 01:43:32AM +, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
Is anyone interested in sponsoring this package? I'm happy to fix any
problems and I'm in close contact with upstream.
(VoIP team cc'd, maybe this would interest you guys)
I'm
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please don't hijack threads. If you wish to start a new thread, click 'new
message' rather than replying to an existing message and changing the
subject.
- Matt
--
To
Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:45:23 +0300, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sunday 03 September 2006 19:18, Toni Mueller wrote:
another question is whether we can possibly adapt the policy and tools
to
Dear all,
I am preparing the package of a software which provides regression tests
in a separate directory, for which there is no make clean available.
For the moment, I copy the directory somewhere else, perform the tests
in (it generates many files), and delete the directory in debian/rules
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package jlhafrontend.
* Package name: jlhafrontend
Version : 0.1.3-1
Upstream Author : Ying-Chun Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/jlhafrontend/
* License : Cryptix General License
Sandro Tosi wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.04-18
of my package wmspaceweather.
sponsored
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
39 matches
Mail list logo