On 10/17/06, François Févotte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
exaile - an AmaroK-like media player
It's a minor issue, but Amarok upstream just uses a capital A and
lowercase k as of somewhere in the 1.4.x series.
--
Andrew Donnellan
-- Email - ajdlinuxATgmailDOTcom (primary)
-- Email -
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 01:25, François Févotte wrote:
The package is lintian clean.
Hello,
* Lintian complains about a templated README.Debian.
* Upstream changelog says exaile uses gamin to monitor directories, but your
package doesn't depend on it.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 08:38, George Danchev took the opportunity to say:
* Upstream changelog says exaile uses gamin to monitor directories, but
your package doesn't depend on it.
The code seems to cope with lack of python-gamin, so the package can merely
recommend or suggest it.
--
On Friday 06 October 2006 03:35, Brian Nelson wrote:
Mashrab Kuvatov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 05 October 2006 04:10, Brian Nelson wrote:
I agree with Russ--lintian is being too picky and should be ignored.
By the way, my last built does not have the above fix.
Please add
Hello,
On 10/17/06, Andrew Donnellan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/17/06, François Févotte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
exaile - an AmaroK-like media player
It's a minor issue, but Amarok upstream just uses a capital A and
lowercase k as of somewhere in the 1.4.x series.
Thanks for the
Arjan Oosting wrote:
This was also my first reaction, but it is a package for non-free. IIRC
those are not autobuild, are they?
they are autobuilt, but need to be whitelisted by aba.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cunit (2.1-0.dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low
* added watch file version mangle
* new README.Debian-source
* documentation is distributed under the GNU FDL
Where this in the _change_ in this log entry?
If you mean the change in debian/copyright, then say so, be more
verbose.
Dear mentors,
I wonder what is the best practice to remove a diversion from a package,
when the new version will own the file itself, and no more steals it by a
diversion.
The situation is that my package (thailatex), has previously diverted
a file from another package (tetex-base). But now
Hi Philipp,
Philipp Benner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This probably is a good idea as to show the ftp-masters that this has
been checked. I added this statement to debian/copyright:
The documentation is distributed under the GNU Free Documentation
License. It does not contain any secondary sections
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 09:05:46PM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
I wonder what is the best practice to remove a diversion from a package,
when the new version will own the file itself, and no more steals it by a
diversion.
The situation is that my package (thailatex), has
Dear mentors,
I fixed some issues in my exaile package and uploaded a new, cleaner version:
* fixed Amarok spelling issue
* fixed copyright issues
* used dpatch to modify sources (instead of direct modification of the sources)
* used python-support to simplify python dependencies
The package is
Update: I have done a little refinement and uploaded it as 0.1.1-2.
So, please use this one instead:
dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libdatrie/libdatrie_0.1.1-2.dsc
And please be reminded to add -sa -v0.1.1-0 options for
dpkg-genchanges, so the ITP bug mentioned in 0.1.1-1
Hello again mentors!
I am looking for a sponsor for my package orbital-eunuchs-sniper.
This was sponsored previously, but ftpmaster caught a missed copyright
notice that I've now fixed. It's ready once again, if anyone is
available to sponsor it.
* Package name: orbital-eunuchs-sniper
Hello,
As requested earlier on 9nd October:
Could someone please sponsor a New Maintainer upload of swish++?
http://www.imsc.res.in/~kapil/debian/swish++/swish++_6.1.4-1.dsc
or
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/swish++/swish++_6.1.4-1.dsc
Features
14 matches
Mail list logo
