Re: RFS: adun.app (updated package):wq

2008-01-20 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Charles Plessy wrote: For biology-related packages, do not hesitate to CC [EMAIL PROTECTED] PS: maybe we (debia-med) should adopt the package ? Definitely. If the package is orphaned we can easily do this without stepping on someones shoes. So I'd be in favour of adding

Re: RFS: adun.app (updated package):wq

2008-01-20 Thread Yavor Doganov
Andreas Tille wrote: > > Yavor, do you agree with these steps before an upload? Of course! > Are you specifically interested in biology related programs No, I don't even qualify as a user of such programs (which automatically means I cannot be maintainer). My intention was to offer this for ad

Re: RFS: dblatex: long term / current release 0.2.8-3

2008-01-20 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:04:52 +0100 Andreas Hoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [3] - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dblatex > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable > main contrib non-free > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/

Re: RFS: dblatex: long term / current release 0.2.8-3

2008-01-20 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Andreas Hoenen wrote: > as my default sponsor recently has not found the time for sponsoring, > and as he agrees I should better search another sponsor - well, here I > am :-) and: > To finalize my advertisement: the dblatex package is not very > complicated (architect

Re: RFS: adun.app (updated package)

2008-01-20 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 05:01:44PM +0200, Yavor Doganov a écrit : > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.2-1 > of the package "adun.app" (QA upload). > > It builds these binary packages: > adun.app - Molecular Simulator for GNUstep > > The package appears to be

Re: RFS: ladr and prover9-manual (updated package)

2008-01-20 Thread Peter Collingbourne
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 09:02:02PM +0100, David Bremner wrote: > 1) lintian will now complain about standards version 3.7.2 as being >old Fixed. > > 2) I didn't really understand why you use >cp -a bin/* debian/tmp/usr/bin > > instead of dh_install or something. The packages now copy

Re: RFS: rafb

2008-01-20 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Please. Pretty please with sugar on top. Use “list-reply” and stop sending mail copies unless someone asks for it. On 20/01/2008, Moe Smith wrote: > Hmm, okay, where would I fetch the deb? > I'm actually running etch (pinned) but with lenny and unstable in my > sources.list. "apt-get install -t un

Re: RFS: rafb

2008-01-20 Thread Moe Smith
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 21:20 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > On 20/01/2008, Moe Smith wrote: > > I just uploaded a fixed version 1.0-6, my lintian (from lenny) doesn't > > complain about that one anymore. Please let me know if there are still > > problems. > > Please always use the latest one. Sin

Re: RFS: alml 2005.01.01-3

2008-01-20 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Barry deFreese wrote: > Thanks. I don't know if you got it but the upload was rejected because > I made it a non-native package and it can't find the orig.tar.gz. I was > thinking this morning that I'm not sure that is even viable since it is > the same version. Is that allowable?? My bad, I for

Re: RFS: rafb

2008-01-20 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Moe, * Moe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-20 21:06]: > On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 20:13 +0100, David Bremner wrote: [...] > Anyways, what is the general debian policy about one trick ponies? There is no real policy for this but people don't like the overhead of a package for simple stuff they

Re: RFS: uncrustify

2008-01-20 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi
Hi Johann, On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 17:13 +0100, Johann Rudloff wrote: > I am looking for a new sponsor for my updated package "uncrustify". Your package has two things to mention. First is that your package builds fine without autotools-dev, don't know why it is a build-dependency. Moreover 'Homepa

Re: RFS: rafb

2008-01-20 Thread Moe Smith
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 20:00 +0100, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi Moe, > * Moe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-20 17:40]: > [...] > > It builds these binary packages: > > rafb - Reads text from stdin and posts it to the pastebin at rafb.net > > Why should someone want rafb.net if there is > pa

Re: RFS: rafb

2008-01-20 Thread Moe Smith
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 20:10 +0100, David Paleino wrote: > Il giorno Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:00:43 +0100 > Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > > > Hi Moe, > > * Moe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-20 17:40]: > > [...] > > > It builds these binary packages: > > > rafb - Reads text fro

Re: RFS: rafb

2008-01-20 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 20/01/2008, Moe Smith wrote: > I just uploaded a fixed version 1.0-6, my lintian (from lenny) doesn't > complain about that one anymore. Please let me know if there are still > problems. Please always use the latest one. Since it's a Perl-based package, it shouldn't cause any problem to fetch t

Re: RFS: rafb

2008-01-20 Thread Moe Smith
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 20:13 +0100, David Bremner wrote: > Hi Moe; > > Your package seems to be native, and has lintian warnings (with the > latest lintian in sid). Sorry, my bad. I just uploaded a fixed version 1.0-6, my lintian (from lenny) doesn't complain about that one anymore. Please let me

Re: RFS: rafb

2008-01-20 Thread David Bremner
Hi Moe; Your package seems to be native, and has lintian warnings (with the latest lintian in sid). At the risk of the pot calling the kettle black (see wdg-offline-validator), I think you also need to sell people a bit on why a 100 line perl script needs its own package. best, David -- To

Re: RFS: rafb

2008-01-20 Thread David Paleino
Il giorno Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:00:43 +0100 Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Hi Moe, > * Moe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-20 17:40]: > [...] > > It builds these binary packages: > > rafb - Reads text from stdin and posts it to the pastebin at rafb.net > > Why should someone

Re: RFS: alml 2005.01.01-3

2008-01-20 Thread Barry deFreese
Thomas Viehmann wrote: Barry deFreese wrote: I personally wouldn't care if it was removed, I was just trying to help with the RC list. I'd be happy to change the url and/or package the new upstream too if that makes sense or was this just more work for nothing again?? In terms of getti

Re: RFS: rafb

2008-01-20 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Moe, * Moe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-20 17:40]: [...] > It builds these binary packages: > rafb - Reads text from stdin and posts it to the pastebin at rafb.net Why should someone want rafb.net if there is paste.debian.net? ;-P Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [

Re: RFS: alml 2005.01.01-3

2008-01-20 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Barry deFreese wrote: > I personally wouldn't care if it was removed, I was just trying to help > with the RC list. I'd be happy to change the url and/or package the new > upstream too if that makes sense > or was this just more work for nothing again?? In terms of getting your fixes uploaded, no.

RFS: gcin (updated package)

2008-01-20 Thread Wen-Yen Chuang
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.8-1 of my package "gcin". It closes bug #419366, #420504, #436914. It builds these binary packages: gcin - a GTK+ based input method platform for Chinese users gcin-qt3-immodule - a QT input method module with gcin as backend

Re: RFS: mirmon

2008-01-20 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, Mario Isle told me that he will be a sponsor for my package on October, but he has not done any action yet and there is no reponse to my asking. Maybe he would be busy. So, I'm looking for an another sponsor for "mirmon" package. Can anyone upload my package? On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:

Re: RFS: mirmon

2008-01-20 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 01:49:38 +0900 Hideki Yamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mario Isle told me that he will be a sponsor for my package on October, Sorry for Mario Iseli. > but he has not done any action yet and there is no reponse to my asking. > Maybe he would be busy. > > So, I'm lo

RFS: rafb

2008-01-20 Thread Moe Smith
Subject: RFS: rafb Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rafb". * Package name: rafb Version : 1.0-4 Upstream Author : Moe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : Sorry, none yet * License : BSD Section : web It builds these binary pack

RFS: uncrustify

2008-01-20 Thread Johann Rudloff
Dear mentors, I am looking for a new sponsor for my updated package "uncrustify". * Package name: uncrustify Version : 0.43-1 Upstream Author : Ben Gardner * URL : http://uncrustify.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Section : devel It builds these bin

Re: RFS: alml 2005.01.01-3

2008-01-20 Thread Barry deFreese
Thomas Viehmann wrote: Barry deFreese wrote: I am CC'ing because it's an orphaned package and is basically a QA upload. It closes an RC bug as well as has some significant packaging clean-up. Your changes look very good, but I was not able to test it. Did you get the example to work?

Re: RFS: alml 2005.01.01-3

2008-01-20 Thread Paul Wise
On Jan 20, 2008 8:25 PM, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, the upstream URL seems to have changed to > http://na.mirror.garr.it/mirrors/appuntilinux/ > there also seems to be a new upstream version. > > Is there any indication that anyone is actually using this except for the >

Re: RFS: alml 2005.01.01-3

2008-01-20 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Barry deFreese wrote: > I am CC'ing because it's an orphaned package and is basically a QA > upload. It closes an RC bug as well as has some significant packaging > clean-up. Your changes look very good, but I was not able to test it. Did you get the example to work? Also, the upstream URL seems

Re: RFS: wordgrinder

2008-01-20 Thread David Given
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Colin Tuckley wrote: [...] > Uploaded! Gosh, that was quick! Thanks very much. - -- ┌─── dg@cowlark.com ─ http://www.cowlark.com ─ │ "Wizards get cranky, / Dark days dawn, / Riders smell manky, / The │ road goes on. / Omens are lowering, / El

Re: RFS: wordgrinder

2008-01-20 Thread Colin Tuckley
David Given wrote: > Ta muchly. Uploaded! regards, Colin -- Colin Tuckley | +44(0)1903 236872 | PGP/GnuPG Key Id Debian Developer | +44(0)7799 143369 | 0x1B3045CE A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject. - Winston Churchill -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: RFS: wordgrinder

2008-01-20 Thread David Given
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Colin Tuckley wrote: [...] > I'll take a closer look tomorrow and if I don't find anything wrong I'll > sponsor it for you. Ta muchly. - -- ┌─── dg@cowlark.com ─ http://www.cowlark.com ─ │ "Wizards get cranky, / Dark days dawn, / Riders smell