Adam Borowski scrisse:
As the diff is small (except for file deletions), this shouldn't take
much of your time. If someone could upload this, that would be cool.
I've seen that you've already found Kapil available, fine :).
Anyway your gzipped diff is 70K (almost as big as the original
On Thursday 24 January 2008 04:40, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
* Vcs-Svn and Vcs-Browser.
Shouldn't the Vcs-Svn entry start with svn: instead of http:?
SVN can be run over a variety of protocols, next to svn including ssh and
http(s). Which is an excellent feature if you ask me :-)
Thijs
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:25:05AM +0100, Luca Bruno wrote:
Adam Borowski scrisse:
As the diff is small (except for file deletions), this shouldn't take
much of your time. If someone could upload this, that would be cool.
I've seen that you've already found Kapil available, fine :).
* Andreas Hoenen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080123 22:19]:
causes patch-stamp to be executed as first action before the build-stamp
commands get executed. Symmetrical to this the construct
clean: clean1 unpatch
clean1:
causes unpatch to be executed as last action after all clean1
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:10:11AM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Hello,
Some quick comments.
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Adam Borowski wrote:
* Buffer overflow on RMD160:
It will cause only a crash instead of executing arbitrary code, and
considering the typical usage this is nearly
Hello,
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:10:11AM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Has this patch been submitted upstream?
Yes, albeit only a week ago.
Is upstream still working on this package? The last upload seems to
have been in 2004!
On Thu, 24 Jan
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 04:44:48PM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:25:05AM +0100, Luca Bruno wrote:
Anyway your gzipped diff is 70K (almost as big as the original
tarball), which seems to clash with your previous
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.1+cvs20080124.0900-1
of my package gnash.
It builds these binary packages:
gnash - free Flash movie player
gnash-common - free Flash movie player - common files/libraries
gnash-cygnal - free Flash movie player - Media server
On 24/01/2008, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
PS: I have added the label XS-DM-Upload-Allowed: yes to
debian/control to allow Debian Maintainers uploads (that's me). If
you're not comfortable with that, please ignore this sponsorship
request.
Hi Miry.
It's no longer an XS- field, see the changelog entry
Peter Collingbourne wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my packages ladr and prover9-manual
I'll take care of this request.
Cheers,
Bernd
--
Bernd Zeimetz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bzed.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Michal Čihař [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Uploaded, thanks for your effort. Next time you want to upload it,
please ask directly me with [sponsoring] in subject.
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
Thanks for your upload. I will do as you suggested.
Hi,
There is a package in the Ubuntu distro called gfceu which is a gnome front
end for the NES emulator fceu.
How did I get a Ubuntu package into the Debian distro? I am not a Debian
developer, so I can not upload packages directly into the Debian archive.
-Matt
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 03:54:34PM -0600, Matthew Williams wrote:
How did I get a Ubuntu package into the Debian distro? I am not a Debian
developer, so I can not upload packages directly into the Debian archive.
You do the packaging using debian unstable (using a debian unstable
chroot, for
You should read the Debian Policy Manual at
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ and make sure that your
package at least follows the guidelines denoted by must and
required. Your package should also conform to the guidelines denoted
as should and recommended as not following them is generally
Hello,
Sorry about the delay in responding. Different time zones!
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Adam Borowski wrote:
Actually, it seems that reverting to upstream autotooling doesn't break
anything (except obviously being unfriendly to those who want to update
autotoolage themselves). I would need to
Hi folks,
Sorry for the cross-post but since these are QA uploads, I wasn't sure
which list would be preferred. I have 4 packages from the Orphaned
Packages with incorrect maintainer lists that I have put on mentors if
someone has time to review/upload.
Hi,
Here is another orphaned package from the list.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/g/grokking-the-gimp/grokking-the-gimp_1.0-2.dsc
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Here is another QA upload. Mainly setting maintainer to QA and a couple
of lintian fixes.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/amavis-stats/amavis-stats_0.1.12-9.dsc
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 06:19:57AM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Hello,
Sorry about the delay in responding. Different time zones!
Hah, it's 4am, it's me who's hitting the bed now...
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Adam Borowski wrote:
Actually, it seems that reverting to upstream autotooling
19 matches
Mail list logo
