Possible Pre-Depends usage in openoffice.org-voikko

2008-05-13 Thread Timo Jyrinki
Hi, I haven't gotten a reply on debian-devel mailing list [1] or #debian-devel on this specific issue, also Rene (my sponsor) would like to have others' opinions before proceeding. I introduced an etch - lenny bug #476573 [2] with the latest upload of openoffice.org-voikko [3], which I'm trying

Re: RFS: obm

2008-05-13 Thread Sylvain Garcia
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 00:40 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du mardi 06 mai 2008, vers 11:56, Sylvain Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait: It builds these binary packages: obm- Open Business Management obm-conf - Open Business Management

RFS: xplanet (updated package)

2008-05-13 Thread Ruben Molina
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.0-6 of the package xplanet, which I'm adopting. It builds these binary packages: xplanet- render images of the earth xplanet-images - day and night earth image maps for xplanet After some changes in debian/control and

Re: RFS: figtoipe

2008-05-13 Thread Alexander Bürger
Hi, Fill an ITP when working on a package and close it in your changelog. I submitted one, so I can close #481022 in the changelog. ... figtoipe was provided by ipe in the past, ... Replaces ... Conflicts ... I do not understand Replaces/Conflicts very well. I believe that all ipe packages

Re: Developer names within debian/changelog

2008-05-13 Thread Ben Finney
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I don't know if it's worth being more formal here in Policy or not. It might be more of a devref thing. I'm less interested in strictness in Policy than I am in finding out how this is *specified* for all consumers, rather than merely *implemented* in

Re: Developer names within debian/changelog

2008-05-13 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Hi, Le 13 mai 08 à 13:24, Ben Finney a écrit : Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I don't know if it's worth being more formal here in Policy or not. It might be more of a devref thing. I'm less interested in strictness in Policy than I am in finding out how this is *specified* for all

Re: Developer names within debian/changelog

2008-05-13 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 13:24, Ben Finney wrote: I'm less interested in strictness in Policy than I am in finding out how this is *specified* for all consumers, rather than merely *implemented* in specific programs. Maybe you can specify what problem you are trying to solve. Thijs -- To

Re: Developer names within debian/changelog

2008-05-13 Thread Ben Finney
Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Maybe you can specify what problem you are trying to solve. That's a fair question. Thibaut Paumard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Le 13 mai 08 à 13:24, Ben Finney a écrit : I'm less interested in strictness in Policy than I am in finding out how

Re: Developer names within debian/changelog

2008-05-13 Thread Ben Finney
Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Maybe you can specify what problem you are trying to solve. That's a fair question. And I didn't really answer it directly. Here's another try: I'm trying to know that what I put into the changelog is going

Re: Developer names within debian/changelog

2008-05-13 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 16:28, Ben Finney wrote: All the answers I've had so far indicate that there *is* no specification for developer names within a changelog entry, and that any format at all is allowed so long as the loose definition in Policy is followed. My issue with that is that it

Re: Developer names within debian/changelog

2008-05-13 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, so to answer your question: the information was until now only ever intended to be human-readable. python-debian states that can parse debian/changelog: maybe you can explore how it works, and if it parses names

RFS: nautilus-clamscan

2008-05-13 Thread Clement Lorteau
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package nautilus-clamscan. * Package name: nautilus-clamscan Version : 0.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Clement Lorteau [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://launchpad.net/nautilus-clamscan * License : GPLv3 Section

Re: Developer names within debian/changelog

2008-05-13 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I don't know if it's worth being more formal here in Policy or not. It might be more of a devref thing. I'm less interested in strictness in Policy than I am in finding out how this is *specified* for all

RFS: lynis (updated package)

2008-05-13 Thread Francisco García
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.2-1 of my package lynis. It builds these binary packages: lynis - security auditing tool for Unix based systems Description: security auditing tool for Unix based systems Lynis is an auditing tool for Unix. It scans the

Re: Developer names within debian/changelog

2008-05-13 Thread Ben Finney
Thijs, Goswin: Please follow the Debian mailing list code of conduct URL:http://www.debian.org/MailingLists#codeofconduct, in particular please don't send me copies of messages also sent to the list. Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Nearly all of the changelog is currently not

Re: Developer names within debian/changelog

2008-05-13 Thread Russ Allbery
Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Nearly all of the changelog is currently not machine-parsable, with notable exclusion of the first and last line (-- author), and the closes: statements. Everything else, like descriptions of files changed, bugs fixed, translations updated, release

RFS: debpool (updated package)

2008-05-13 Thread Andres Mejia
Hello all, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.0 of the package debpool. I think Magnus (co-maintainer) has been very busy so I'm looking for a sponsor at mentors.debian.net as well. Some information about debpool. debpool (or DebPool) is a package archive maintanance utility