Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.2.4-2
of my package libapache2-mod-authnz-external.
It builds these binary packages:
libapache2-mod-authnz-external - authenticate Apache against external
authentication services
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.1+svn67-2
of my package libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup.
It builds these binary packages:
libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup - access control based on on unix group
membership for Apache
This upload is to fix bug about apache .load
[mezgani ali, 2009-06-25]
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Evgeni Golov evg...@debian.org wrote:
Here are some quick findings, more to come:
0. why is the package native? it shouldn't be.
Done
not really :-P
5. Please use python-central or python-support and not hardcode python
= 2.0
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org wrote:
[mezgani ali, 2009-06-25]
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Evgeni Golov evg...@debian.org wrote:
Here are some quick findings, more to come:
0. why is the package native? it shouldn't be.
Done
not really
Hi all,
I'm packaging something with has an installable file called License.hi
which is not a license file, but gets caught by the extra-license-file
lintian warning.
I can add a pkgname.lintian-override file, but the path in the override
file has the package version number embedded in it.
Is
On Thursday 25,June,2009 05:35 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Hi all,
I'm packaging something with has an installable file called License.hi
which is not a license file, but gets caught by the extra-license-file
lintian warning.
I can add a pkgname.lintian-override file, but the path in
Chow Loong Jin wrote:
You could, but I am not aware of any lintian tag specifying the version
of the package in it. Could you post the output of lintian exactly?
Sorry, I think you misunderstood. Lintian complains about the file:
On Thursday 25,June,2009 06:52 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Chow Loong Jin wrote:
You could, but I am not aware of any lintian tag specifying the version
of the package in it. Could you post the output of lintian exactly?
Sorry, I think you misunderstood. Lintian complains about the
Chow Loong Jin wrote:
I see. In that case, you can generate the pkg.lintian-overrides file in
any of the CDBS extension rules before dh_lintian is called. dh_lintian
is called in binary-install/pkg. So just stick it into any rule before
that.
Thanks, I'll try that.
Cheers,
Erik
--
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 08:52:30PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Chow Loong Jin wrote:
You could, but I am not aware of any lintian tag specifying the version
of the package in it. Could you post the output of lintian exactly?
Sorry, I think you misunderstood. Lintian complains about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Erik de Castro Lopo schrieb:
Hi all,
I'm packaging something with has an installable file called License.hi
which is not a license file, but gets caught by the extra-license-file
lintian warning.
I can add a pkgname.lintian-override file, but
Peter Pentchev wrote:
Thus, you could try something like:
libghc6-cabal-dev binary: extra-license-file */Distribution/License.hi
Wow, thats an even nicer solution. Thanks.
Erik
--
--
Erik de Castro Lopo
On 24 jun, 21:40, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:
In 135eeb1d0906241156q69cfcf9fqeb7bfbe733ddc...@mail.gmail.com, Juan Jesús
Ojeda Croissier wrote:
* The version numbering is for native package without reason.
Well, this is a native package, I think. Maybe I'm wrong with
On Thursday 25,June,2009 09:00 PM, Juan Jesús Ojeda Croissier wrote:
Hummm So, I wasn't wrong :-P
Yes you were.
This software was created for a Debian-derived distribution
(Guadalinex). Maybe it's possible to change the packaging or compile
from the sources, but it wasn't the initial idea
Thanks a lot :)
i have uploaded a modified package.
Could you please have a look at it?
Any suggestion and criticism is appreciated.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Jan Hauke Rahmi...@jhr-online.de wrote:
IANADD.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 05:11:07PM +0800, Henry Huang wrote:
I am looking for
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:54:44PM +0800, Henry Huang wrote:
i have added the watch file in my package:)
If only it were working...
uscan warning: In debian/watch,
no matching hrefs for watch line
http://www.drcom-client.org/en/downloads/
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:54:44PM +0800, Henry Huang wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Jan Hauke Rahmi...@jhr-online.de wrote:
[snip]
As far as I can tell your package looks quite nice. Your debian/rules
could be much shorter, though. Comments could be deleted and since
you've
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 04:12:39PM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:54:44PM +0800, Henry Huang wrote:
However, i need to specify the name of init script and drcomclient
manpage as follows:
dh_installinit --name=drcom
dh_installman --name=drcom
No
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 05:16:11PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:54:44PM +0800, Henry Huang wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Jan Hauke Rahmi...@jhr-online.de wrote:
[snip]
As far as I can tell your package looks quite nice. Your debian/rules
could be much
my dh = 7.0.13 7.0.50
It seems override could not take effects.
How to solve this problem -- i got no idea :(
uscan warning: In debian/watch,
no matching hrefs for watch line
http://www.drcom-client.org/en/downloads/
http://www.drcom-client.org/downloads/packages/src/drcom-pum-(.*)\.tar\.gz
On Thursday 25,June,2009 10:39 PM, Henry Huang wrote:
my dh = 7.0.13 7.0.50
It seems override could not take effects.
How to solve this problem -- i got no idea :(
Install a newer debhelper package, and specify in your package's
build-depends debhelper (= 7.0.50). =)
uscan warning: In
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 03:00:59PM +0200, Juan Jesús Ojeda Croissier wrote:
This software was created for a Debian-derived distribution
(Guadalinex). Maybe it's possible to change the packaging or compile
from the sources, but it wasn't the initial idea and it is not
supported by us. It is
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:39:13PM +0800, Henry Huang wrote:
my dh = 7.0.13 7.0.50
It seems override could not take effects.
Yep, so take a look at my message describing the use of --before
and --remaining. You can still shorten your rules file a lot.
How to solve this problem -- i got no
Hello. What's the content of the copyright file if I'm adopting a
package? It's the previous maintainer or myself whom is stated there?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
In 135eeb1d0906250600y552b3c5du980a01d3e3d3e...@mail.gmail.com, Juan Jesús
Ojeda Croissier wrote:
On 24 jun, 21:40, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:
In 135eeb1d0906241156q69cfcf9fqeb7bfbe733ddc...@mail.gmail.com, Juan
Jesús
Ojeda Croissier wrote:
* The version numbering
In d3150baf0906250848g107d1012k1a2196d7b1b84...@mail.gmail.com, Adrian
Perez wrote:
What's the content of the copyright file if I'm adopting a
package?
Same as for any other package and documented in policy. Do you have a
specific question?
It's the previous maintainer or myself whom is
Thank you for the help.
i have re-uploaded the modified package.
Could you please have a look?
i managed the overrides by the following way:
#!/usr/bin/make -f
%:
dh $@
binary: binary-arch
binary-arch:
dh install --before init
dh_installinit --name=drcom
dh
Patrick Matthäi pmatth...@debian.org writes:
Erik de Castro Lopo schrieb:
I'm packaging something with has an installable file called
License.hi which is not a license file, but gets caught by the
extra-license-file lintian warning.
I can add a pkgname.lintian-override file, but the path in
2009/6/25 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net:
In 135eeb1d0906250600y552b3c5du980a01d3e3d3e...@mail.gmail.com, Juan Jesús
Ojeda Croissier wrote:
On 24 jun, 21:40, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:
In 135eeb1d0906241156q69cfcf9fqeb7bfbe733ddc...@mail.gmail.com, Juan
Hey,
That's my first post, don't know if it's the right place to ask, so
please be gentle :).
I work at a company where we use Debian on our servers. Whenever we
want to deploy new versions of our software, we build a package,
upload it to our private deb repository and then install it on the
On Friday 26,June,2009 02:48 AM, Michał Jaszczyk wrote:
2009/6/25 Chow Loong Jin hyper...@gmail.com:
On Friday 26,June,2009 02:31 AM, Michał Jaszczyk wrote:
I'd like to create a package that uses CDBS. I thought I could use the
autotools.mk class but it assumes that configure script already
Russ Allbery wrote:
What *is* the content of the file? In other words, more fundamentally,
why is it there and what does it do?
Its a haskell interface definition file. When ghc6 compiles the Haskell
source code file License.hs it generates an object file and the itnerface
file License.hi. In
Erik de Castro Lopo mle+deb...@mega-nerd.com writes:
Russ Allbery wrote:
What *is* the content of the file? In other words, more
fundamentally, why is it there and what does it do?
Its a haskell interface definition file. When ghc6 compiles the
Haskell source code file License.hs it
Russ Allbery wrote:
Yeah, that sounds like a good Lintian exception.
I see no good reason to make lintian aware of this particular
exception. It might however make sense to make lintian ignore
any file named license* if that file is a binary file.
The Distribution/License.hi file I'm looking
Erik de Castro Lopo mle+deb...@mega-nerd.com writes:
Russ Allbery wrote:
Yeah, that sounds like a good Lintian exception.
I see no good reason to make lintian aware of this particular
exception. It might however make sense to make lintian ignore any file
named license* if that file is a
Russ Allbery wrote:
We have a ton of exceptions already by file extension, so it's trivial
to add another one. Given your description of an *.hi file, I have a
hard time imagining anything named copyright.hi or license.hi will be
anything other than a false positive.
Ok, License.hi is the
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package brewtarget.
* Package name: brewtarget
Version : 1.1-1
Upstream Author : Philip G. Lee rocketman...@gmail.com
* URL : brewtarget.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Section : x11
It builds these
Le Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 08:56:24PM -0500, Philip Lee a écrit :
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package brewtarget.
Dear Philip,
if I am not mistaken, you forgot to file an ITP (intend to package) bug. Given
they are automagically forwarded on debian-de...@l.d.o, that has
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.5.1-1
of my package ampache. This is a new upstream maintenance
release which partially fixes a RC bug.
It builds these binary packages:
ampache- web-based audio file management system
The package appears to be lintian clean.
39 matches
Mail list logo
