Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.12.0-1
of the package gnustep-dl2, which i intend to adopt.
It builds these binary packages:
gnustep-dl2 - Objective-C Classes needed for Database Access
gnustep-dl2-postgresql-adaptor - gnustep-dl2 adaptor to connect to PostgreSQL
Hi,
i'm the maintainer of nodejs (MIT license), and upstream author announced
he is willing to switch to openssl.
I know there are issues with the GPL license and the openSSL license, so
i wonder if :
- the openSSL license is compatible with the MIT license ? Knowing that
the code linking to
On 3/20/2010 3:54 AM, Federico Giménez Nieto wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.12.0-1
of the package gnustep-dl2, which i intend to adopt.
It builds these binary packages:
gnustep-dl2 - Objective-C Classes needed for Database Access
David Baird dhba...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd be in favor of calling the Google implementation of Go google-go,
and if another implementation is ever created, it could be called
something-else-go.
or as short version: ggo
Fondest regards,
Joachim Wiedorn
signature.asc
Description: PGP
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0.0~svn4035-1
of my package n2n.
It builds these binary packages:
n2n- Peer-to-Peer VPN network daemon
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.1
of my package grub2-splashimages.
It builds these binary packages:
grub2-splashimages - a collection of great GRUB2 splashimages
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 509778, 534210, 565872
Hello,
since yesterday I am Debian Maintainer, but now I have a question:
How is the actual status of using the DM-Upload-Allowed field/bit?
In http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer [1] is said, that I should
add a new line in debian/control file with: DM-Upload-Allowed: yes
and upload the
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote:
How is the actual status of using the DM-Upload-Allowed field/bit?
Initially the plan was for DMUA to be set on package X only by sponsor
Y after they are satisfied with the quality of uploads of package X by
maintainer
Paul Wise wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote:
How is the actual status of using the DM-Upload-Allowed field/bit?
Initially the plan was for DMUA to be set on package X only by sponsor
Y after they are satisfied with the quality of uploads of
Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote:
How is the actual status of using the DM-Upload-Allowed field/bit?
Initially the plan was for DMUA to be set on package X only by sponsor
Y after they are satisfied with the
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 22:00, Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote:
Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote:
How is the actual status of using the DM-Upload-Allowed field/bit?
Initially the plan was for DMUA to be
Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote:
No, the correct process would be:
1. prepare a package
2. upload it to mentors.d.n
3. find a sponsor
4. reiterate 1-3 for some times then ask the sponsor to add the DM
flag. This should be done by the sponsor since he trusts you can
manage that package
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 22:19, Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote:
Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote:
No, the correct process would be:
1. prepare a package
2. upload it to mentors.d.n
3. find a sponsor
4. reiterate 1-3 for some times then ask the sponsor to add the DM
flag. This
Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 22:19, Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote:
Then the DMUA line inside the package is the older way and no more
recommended for an Debian Maintainer?
Sorry for this misunderstanding question.
mh? As Paul said, and I
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 02:12:29AM +0700, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote:
How is the actual status of using the DM-Upload-Allowed field/bit?
Initially the plan was for DMUA to be set on package X only by sponsor
Y after they are
I demand that Sandro Tosi may or may not have written...
[snip]
the DMUA flag should be set by the sponsor (or by the sponsoree after a
request for the sponsor),
At the request of the sponsor, surely.
[snip]
--
| Darren Salt| linux at youmustbejoking | nr. Ashington, | Doon
|
On 21.03.2010 00:20, Darren Salt wrote:
I demand that Sandro Tosi may or may not have written...
[snip]
the DMUA flag should be set by the sponsor (or by the sponsoree after a
request for the sponsor),
At the request of the sponsor, surely.
I think this is realy [tm] from sponsor to
Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org writes:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 22:00, Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de wrote:
So I am right to do in this way?
1. Set the DMUA first time inside the package (debian/control)
2. upload to mentors.d.o
3. ask for (last) sponsoring (RFS)
As I'm sure is
Le Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 08:03:31PM +0100, Joachim Wiedorn a écrit :
How is the actual status of using the DM-Upload-Allowed field/bit?
Hi Joachim and all,
just for the record, in the Debian Med packaging team, we add the
DM-Upload-Allowed: yes field to all our packages, and regulate DM upload
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just FYI - lal is extremely light weight an recommended frequently for
use in WM's such as openbox.
Blogs that suggest it:
http://urukrama.wordpress.com/openbox-guide/#Clocks
http://www.minuslab.net/d/?p=62
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package commit-patch.
* Package name: commit-patch
Version : 2.3-1
Upstream Author : David Caldwell da...@porkrind.org
* URL : http://porkrind.org/commit-patch/
* License : GPLv2
Section : vcs
It builds
21 matches
Mail list logo
