Hi Andrew,
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 15:16 -0400, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org wrote:
Anyway, regarding your packaging:
1.) adding autotools-dev would be still a plus for your package.
2.) debian/copyright is not (yet) in
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, Ben Finney wrote:
Asheesh Laroia ashe...@asheesh.org writes:
* I'm importing all the data onto expo.debian.net over the next day.
[…]
Here's what to expect, by the end of Thu Aug 11:
Please note times in UTC, so users around the globe can know when you
mean :-)
Hello Vitaly,
I'm glad to see you're going to maintain tkpath, as it's really useful
piece of software (and I thought of making a package myself once).
However, your packaging ([1]) has some problems which would be good to
fix.
Also, I'm not a DD so I can't upload, sorry :)
Well, let's start.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
Thanks to huge work by Johnny Lamb, Christoph Haas, Jan Dittberner, Kalle
Söderman, Serafeim Zanikolas, David Paleino, and Paul Wise, we have had a
alpha-level product called Debexpo that can replace mentors.debian.net as
the place we do
Hello,
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:46:48 +0300
Andrew O. Shadoura bugzi...@tut.by wrote:
ix) Vcs-* fields. Put your packaging under version control and upload
it to Alioth using whatever VCS you like (it may be Git or Mercurial
or anything else). There are some tools which simplify (or not
Hi!
Is it possible to specify the following type of package dependency?
Either
python-wxgtk2.8
or
python-qt4 and python-qt4-gl
or
python-fltk
or
python-gtk2 and python-gtkglext1
Or would I need to create meta-packages and use something like:
python-wxgtk2.8 | python-qt4-and-qt4-gl-meta
* Torquil Macdonald Sørensen torq...@gmail.com, 2011-08-11, 17:52:
Either
python-wxgtk2.8
or
python-qt4 and python-qt4-gl
or
python-fltk
or
python-gtk2 and python-gtkglext1
You can use something as ugly as:
Depends:
python-wxgtk2.8 | python-qt4 | python-fltk | python-gtk2,
* KURASHIKI Satoru lur...@gmail.com, 2011-08-11, 08:44:
I want to make libqdbm14 dropping gdbm emulation, and add a new
exclusive libqdbm14-gdbm package to provide compatibility for people
who uses its gdbm emulation. But, I have trouble with packaging to
satisfy dpkg-gensymbols, and stop
On 11/08/11 18:23, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Torquil Macdonald Sørensen torq...@gmail.com, 2011-08-11, 17:52:
Either
python-wxgtk2.8
or
python-qt4 and python-qt4-gl
or
python-fltk
or
python-gtk2 and python-gtkglext1
You can use something as ugly as:
Depends:
python-wxgtk2.8 | python-qt4 |
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Håkon,
On 11.08.2011 01:27, Håkon Nessjøen wrote:
is a git log Changelog good enough?
Depends how verbose you are in your changelogs and if the reader can
denote the package _version_ from your git logs.
For what its worth, it is to note, an
[...]
You can use something as ugly as:
Depends:
python-wxgtk2.8 | python-qt4 | python-fltk | python-gtk2,
python-wxgtk2.8 | python-qt4 | python-fltk | python-gtkglext1,
python-wxgtk2.8 | python-qt4-gl | python-fltk | python-gtk2,
python-wxgtk2.8 | python-qt4-gl | python-fltk |
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11.08.2011 19:04, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
I wish I could do something as simple as
Depends:
python-wxgtk2.8 | (python-qt4, python-qt4-gl) | python-fltk |
(python-gtk2, gtkglext1)
I'm pretty sure someone suggested such a syntax
One issue that I see with your changes, although I don't know enough
about libraries to tell know if I am right, is that you reduced the
symbols (as lesstif doesn't have them after your change).
Interestingly, an other discussion on this list [1], mentions the Debian
policy (8.1) where it is
A new release of roxterm is in the pipeline. I've made a lot of changes,
mostly to replace libglade with GtkBuilder and to get it to work with
gtk3. I'd ideally like to call it version 2 and have the clear
distinction that version 1 was for gtk2 and version 2 is for gtk3.
However, I suspect a lot
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:06:29 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
On top of that, there are a few spelling corrections, and a couple
cases of refactoring/improving the code in the standalone version.
If this is really the case, I would propose to get these improvements
into the libxpm package (and
Hi, I implemented your feedback. The updated version
now concerns PmWiki's current upstream stable release 2.2.29.
Please find the package files at: http://share.gloriabyte.de/pmwiki/
Best regards,
Robert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:40:34 +0100
Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
I'm pretty sure I once read something about how to get a single source
package to build multiple binary packages from the same source with
different configure options. Unfortunately I can't remember what I
read and it
17 matches
Mail list logo
