On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Arno Töll deb...@toell.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Paul,
On 10.10.2011 09:26, Paul Elliott wrote:
Because of previous difficulty dput'ing swe-standard-data with http
I decided to upload it with ftp. Here is the console
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Liang Guo bluestonech...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Arno Töll deb...@toell.net wrote:
01:10:08,161 ERROR [debexpo.importer.3192] Rejected: You are not
uploading to one of those Debian distributions: oldstable stable
unstable experimental
Hi to all the list,
I'm back after a long idle period :)
I'm trying to fix bug 627267 [¹], but I can't reproduce it, all the
tries on a amd64 system are going successfully, So I'm thinking to
request a rebuild to release team. My doubt: is it a good approach?
Thank you.
Francesco Namuri
On Wednesday 12 October 2011 08:17:39 Jan-Pascal van Best wrote:
This hit me also and it took some time to figure out.
- indent multi-line fields with a space
- use 'space dot' - ' .' for empty lines in a multi-line field.
This formatting is also taken care of by DEP-5 parser/editor mentioned
* Francesco Namuri france...@namuri.it, 2011-10-13, 11:44:
I'm trying to fix bug 627267 [¹], but I can't reproduce it, all the
tries on a amd64 system are going successfully,
Indeed, this FTBFS cannot be currently reproduced in unstable, thanks to
a bug/misfeature in the linker:
Dear mentors (and those BCC'd whom I've been speaking to about flex-sdk),
I am looking for a sponsor for my package flex-sdk-4.5.
Bugs #591969 (package typo3-src) and #632478 (package nicofox) are
both waiting on this package so that these packages can build their
swf files from source. I've
hi,
At Thu, 6 Oct 2011 09:58:54 +0900,
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
in debian/control...
Homepage: http://fallabs.com/qdbm/
Standards-Version: 3.9.1
Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/qdbm.git
Standards-Version was set to 3.9.1.
But debian/changelog has New Standards-Version:
It's 9 months since the patch to upgrade trac-bitten was committed to
Debian repository and it's not packaged yet. Can anybody release it?
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-apps/packages/trac-bitten/trunk/debian/changelog?r1=6417r2=6416pathrev=6417
--
anatoly t.
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, Joey Parrish wrote:
Dear mentors (and those BCC'd whom I've been speaking to about flex-sdk),
I am looking for a sponsor for my package flex-sdk-4.5.
I'm on it. Expect an upload later today.
This is the latest released version of Flex from Adobe, but if either
of
You never need to duplicate license text in a DEP 5 document
URL:http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/#stand-alone-license-paragraph.
Thank you, Ben! I have updated my copyright file one more time,
although Lintian did not complain about the remaining mistakes in the
previous version.
--
To
http://ddumont.wordpress.com/2011/01/13/debian-copyright-dep5-parsereditorvalidatormigrator-is-released/
It seems a good idea to me to integrate a recent version of this
libconfig-model-perl with lintian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi,
I'm seeking for advice for how to handle this rather complicated
solution. I'm packaging a large software base that builds a number of
libraries and applications. In order to simplify things:
- foo (source package) builds:
- libfoo-dev, libfoo0, libfoo0-bin, ...
- and build depends on
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 15:26, Reinhard Tartler siret...@debian.org wrote:
In my tests, it *seems* that apt indeed prefers a real package over a
virtual package. I'm aware of the following drawbacks:
It does, but you are better of handling this as an internal detail
- because it is
On 2011-10-13, Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org wrote:
However this seems like something that's eminently fixable. Your first
order of business should be to set up a public git repository on alioth so
that you can get the wider Debian community to help.
Does the Debian community standardize
Hi,
Le 13/10/11 15:26, Reinhard Tartler a écrit :
One solution would be to throw all sources into a big source package and
build everything from that.
Looks like the sane solution to me.
Another would be to, on the contrary, split the source packages, if
possible, to completely break the
Am 12.10.2011 20:20, schrieb Julian Taylor:
Else the package looks nice, good work.
I implemented all changes from you and Sylvestre and re-uploaded the
package:
* Package name: cpl
Version : 5.3.1-1
Upstream Author : ESO Project Team cpl-h...@eso.org
* URL :
Am 12.10.2011 21:10, schrieb Julian Taylor:
Its missing a bunch of links: [...]
as with cpl there are a couple of file from the FSF in the source not
mentioned in debian/copyright [...]
you use dh-autoreconf so you don't need to depend on autotools-dev.
I added the needed library, changed the
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gogglesmm.
* Package name: gogglesmm
Version : 0.12.4-3
Upstream Author : Sander Jansen s.jan...@gmail.com
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/gogglesmm/
* License : GPLv3
Section : sound
It
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, Joey Parrish wrote:
Does the Debian community standardize on git, or is an svn repo also
acceptable? I don't have any experience with git yet, but I'm a
frequent user of svn.
Git is definitely more popular (and my preference) but there's nothing
wrong with svn.
--
Quoting anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
It's 9 months since the patch to upgrade trac-bitten was committed to
Debian repository and it's not packaged yet. Can anybody release it?
Problem is: I can't (currently) test new versions properly - no time.
Second issue: I really want to have
On 10/13/2011 06:04 PM, Ole Streicher wrote:
Am 12.10.2011 20:20, schrieb Julian Taylor:
Else the package looks nice, good work.
I implemented all changes from you and Sylvestre and re-uploaded the
package:
it still does not build. Its missing a dependency on libltdl-dev for
ltdl.m4 as
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of the qemulator package, months ago I was contacted
by Daniele Lacamera, Daniele is the upstream author of virtualbricks a
fork/replacement of qemulator, he asked me about the possibility of the
substitution of qemulator with Virtualbricks.
Qemulator is not longer
On 13/10/11 16:13, Joey Parrish wrote:
[...]
Does the Debian community standardize on git, or is an svn repo also
acceptable? I don't have any experience with git yet, but I'm a
frequent user of svn.
If you like SVN you may be interested in checking out Mercurial; it
speaks git, so you can hg
Guido van Steen vanst...@users.sourceforge.net writes:
You never need to duplicate license text in a DEP 5 document
URL:http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/#stand-alone-license-paragraph.
Thank you, Ben! I have updated my copyright file one more time,
although Lintian did not complain about
Stupid fools who depend on Lintian :-) Isn't there enough for them to learn!?
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Guido van Steen vanst...@users.sourceforge.net writes:
You never need to duplicate license text in a DEP 5 document
I have an account on Alioth, but I'm no longer using or contributing to
Debian. Can I remove or deactivate my account, or should I just abandon it?
— Jason Heeris
26 matches
Mail list logo
