Re: RFS: Cacti
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 02:19:19PM +0700, Mahyuddin Susanto wrote: Hi, cacti - Frontend to rrdtool for monitoring systems and services This upload will be fixed #653863 which is RC bug. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: Diff looks sensible, so uploaded. Hope your team members don't mind. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120102095502.ga6...@sho.bk.hosteurope.de
Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-rpaf
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 01:36:51PM +0300, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote: Hi, It builds those binary packages: libapache2-mod-rpaf - module for Apache2 which takes the last IP from the 'X-Forwarded-For' header in theory I'm willing to sponsor an upload (well I did the QA upload of this package a few month ago) but I don't like people setting DMUA on public sponsoring requests. It's IMHO something different if we've some history of working together but on a maybe onetime upload I don't see how I can judge if you're able to handle the package or not. But maybe someone else has a different opionion on how DMUA should be used. Ok now back to the technical stuff: I'm not sure how near we're to new Apache release but maybe the deprecation notice would be more appropriate in a NEWS file? But maybe that can wait until we acutally have it in Debian. The other issue is the module naming. I adopted the crazy file renaming from the original package just to keep the usual mod_foo.c naming. I've no idea if we currently have that as a policy or not. Actually most packages seem to stick to the mod_foo.c naming but there is at least the alias_module which diverts. So this is not a show stopper. Cheers, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120102103810.gb6...@sho.bk.hosteurope.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes: I am looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight. dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1.dsc Why do you list temporary files in debian/source/include-binaries? They should be removed by the clean target (dh_clean). Keeping dh_testdir in the clean target also should not hurt. Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87k45aqu6a@deep-thought.43-1.org
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes: And the version with unpatch and the include removed? From the error I suspect you moved the dh_testdir one line up behind the clean. With: # include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make # clean: unpatch clean: dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_clean build-stamp That is wrong. dh_testdir is not a prerequsite, but part of the recipe (the shell commands run for the target). You might want to read a bit about make; maybe [1] or any similar introduction. Regards, Ansgar [1] http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Introduction.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87fwfyqty0@deep-thought.43-1.org
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi Ansgar, thank you for your hints. Why do you list temporary files in debian/source/include-binaries? They should be removed by the clean target (dh_clean). You're right. I just forgot to remove the file. Fixed. Keeping dh_testdir in the clean target also should not hurt. Thanks. Added to clean target. I've recreated and reuploaded the package. thank you and regards, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f018aea.2010...@aloah-from-hell.de
RFS: gemrb
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gemrb. I have recently updated it to the newest gemrb version 0.7.0 and therefore trying to request sponsorship one more time. * Package name: gemrb Version : 0.7.0-1 Upstream Author : http://gemrb.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gemrb/gemrb;a=blob;f=AUTHORS;hb=HEAD * URL : http://www.gemrb.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : games It builds those binary packages: gemrb - portable open-source implementation of the Baldur's Gate engine gemrb-data - data for the portable open-source implementation of the Baldur's gemrb-docs - docs for the portable open-source implementation of the Baldur's gemrb-libs - libraries for the portable open-source implementation of Baldur's To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gemrb Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gemrb/gemrb_0.7.0-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Oliver Sauder -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f018e34.3070...@esite.ch
Re: RFS: boot-repair
Hello, [ I don't intend to upload this package ] On 2011-12-30 11:14, yannubu...@gmail.com wrote: and i read that Canonical plans to integrate it into Ubuntu 12.04 CD (i think deadline is mid-January) Why Debian as project should care about deadlines of some commercial companies? Quick solution: upload these 5 packages separately (Lintian clean): http://mentors.debian.net/package/boot-repair http://mentors.debian.net/package/clean http://mentors.debian.net/package/clean-gui http://mentors.debian.net/package/clean-ubiquity http://mentors.debian.net/package/os-uninstaller [...] Instead of writing about external companies and number of users, consider writing more interesting information in RFSes, such as what this software actually does. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120102112629.GA31514@r500-debian
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes: I've recreated and reuploaded the package. It looks okay, but you should no longer need neither the build dependency on quilt (the include in d/rules is gone) nor the d/README.source (it's a standard format and d/changelog already mentions it was deleted). There also is an empty directory debian/patched which is not needed (I think dpatch used it). You can also remove the old clean rule in d/rules which is currently commented out. If you apply the changes, I can upload the package later today. Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877h1aqrsu@deep-thought.43-1.org
Re: RFS: Cacti
Hi On 02/01/12 16:55, Sven Hoexter wrote: Diff looks sensible, so uploaded. Hope your team members don't mind. My team mate still on vacation Thanks for sponsoring! -- [ Mahyuddin Susanto ] - http://udienz.web.id GPG: 4096R/90B36C5B signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi Ansgar, thanks - again :) It looks okay, but you should no longer need neither the build dependency on quilt (the include in d/rules is gone) nor the d/README.source (it's a standard format and d/changelog already mentions it was deleted). deleted quilt dependency, deleted debian/README.source There also is an empty directory debian/patched which is not needed (I think dpatch used it) deleted. You can also remove the old clean rule in d/rules which is currently commented out. deleted. If you apply the changes, I can upload the package later today. That would be great :) I've reuploaded the package. Cheers, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f01aa36.1070...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: boot-repair
Hello consider writing more interesting information in RFSes, such as what this software actually does. Sorry if i expressed wrong, i just wanted to say to Boot-Repair can be a useful software for Debian. Here is the long description (thanks Thomas for your advice): Description: Graphical tool to repair boot problems In some situation, you might loose access to one or several of your operating systems, because of a buggy update, a bootloader problem, a broken filesystem, or after installing a new OS (e.g. installing Windows breaks Linux bootloader). . Boot-Repair is a graphical tool that will repair these problems, generally by reinstalling GRUB, which then restores access to the operating systems you had installed before the issue. . Boot-Repair also has advanced options for reinstalling GRUB, adding kernel options, restoring a generic MBR, or repair a broken filesystem. It can also restore the original bootsector if it has been saved previously by Clean-Ubiquity. Screenshots: https://sourceforge.net/p/boot-repair/home/Home/ Regards Yann
Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-rpaf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, On 02.01.2012 11:38, Sven Hoexter wrote: I'm not sure how near we're to new Apache release but maybe the deprecation notice would be more appropriate in a NEWS file? But maybe that can wait until we acutally have it in Debian. Httpd 2.4 is due very soon. We're starting to work to package 2.3 very soon too, which will maybe end up in Experimental if 2.4 is not released until we're done with it. Once 2.4 is released (for those who don't know: Apache follows an old-Linux-like versioning scheme with odd numbers denoting unstable releases) we will make a transition and remove the 2.2 package slowly. For now, we have no immediate plans to break existing packages though. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPAb5AAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtfvkP/ie45kGHpKtUjUL7oTSFje1B ps9xwYDCSYZGS2x/62ol5cyHO6/FAI5Pzc0ft8m3L/b+SKZrREyS+tJembGnwyKP UPXGTq4Jjw7CQOrFC/7CQDFjhAqNXrDdjo74TQ1pB0hMJv3HIFDddwqmpRoNhiU2 PVUIPJjtAndZFwMxAhT9johDeH9mbO8SoRw9WENhp4Kz9DyuJYlGCZpc26idno7G fTemiP3zHBOjn9Fz+hieQS/TioSVJeqUqzxnpGpJdeYxPKA+OA1u6MaIDmpw+m5t 4NHMjsdXJpE+9uJqUWRdpJgIxshEQ2mrlqePmuzX/xR10A52SRHZbzY9xph5agbj fHUhonO2e9Q1/L1Kjp0VZyE50DLo2sV7JyA1YBpfLIXkOvelTVFliRRQXQKytaEn 5xvP4SUpP1ZMfqEoordqSMMRAyjkUFLlSHFX0p97k6Hn9qgLWJh0lbYEl76zeAYT g55E1udbRiB1J8aQ5mGKasPB6qtELG7GECa+apCmfcLlb7oMXRH8zf0KW9mv+hHM Lxg4/3HOzpaykeZNa9mnyOMCnP64gkZKYy1X57eClwtgUVJNeQ8DAlBkIARdo08d 2Tkg2IcaCgk8ByyJTVxfUbkBs42GtFjduTfGVpqu53uqkuVN7T4wZgz1rVcJ7Xy/ Q2YGfhvp0wnRDFzd46uB =iGE3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f01be40.4090...@toell.net
Re: RFS: boot-repair
On 01/02/2012 10:05 AM, yannubu...@gmail.com wrote: Happy new year ! I disabled the update from PPA, removed the setup.py, created the packages.install files, moved data to debian/tmp and changed the rule to %:dh_install --sourcedir=debian/tmp See http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/boot-repair.git But now I get this error when i try to package: dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-genchanges gave error exit status 2 debuild: fatal error at line 1348: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc failed any idea? Regards zigo@GPLHost:buzig_ /tmp/boot-repair$ git clone http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/boot-repair.git; Cloning into boot-repair... fatal: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/boot-repair.git/info/refs not found: did you run git update-server-info on the server? Please fix it. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f01d061.7030...@goirand.fr
Re: RFS: boot-repair
On 01/02/2012 10:05 AM, yannubu...@gmail.com wrote: Happy new year ! I disabled the update from PPA, removed the setup.py, created the packages.install files, moved data to debian/tmp and changed the rule to %:dh_install --sourcedir=debian/tmp See http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/boot-repair.git But now I get this error when i try to package: dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-genchanges gave error exit status 2 debuild: fatal error at line 1348: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc failed any idea? Regards Sorry, ignore my previous message. On your Git repository, there's only one branch called master, containing the debian folder. Please read on how to use git-buildpackage. Just FYI, you should use 2 branches, one for your upstream code, and one containing that + the debian folder, so that one can use git-buildpackage. Cheers, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f01d190.2030...@debian.org
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi, Since I might be interested in using this software, I had a quick look to the packaging. I've noticed some issues that are remaining. Ansgar, feel free to correct me if you don't agree with my remarks! * Please run lintian with the options -Ii -E --pedantic so it will show you more issues (like spelling mistakes in the man pages, etc.). I wont details them here, since Lintian does it better than me! :) * Your debian/copyright doesn't mention yourself, I think you should add yourself in the Files: debian/*. The debian/copyright is also badly formatted, and generally speaking seems to be using a very old definition of the DEP5 specifications. It'd be great if you could update that. * The debian/init.d script doesn't use lsb-base for printing messages. Please switch to it (and depend on lsb-base) and replace the echoes. Also, the set -e should be (IMHO) set earlier in the script. As a bonus point, use the default in /lib/init/vars.sh with something like that: . /lib/init/vars.sh . /lib/lsb/init-functions case $1 in start) [ $VERBOSE != no ] log_daemon_msg Starting $DESC $NAME * debian/postinst does some checkings against version 0.1.14-beta-3, yet, version 0.1.14.17-5 is in ole-stable, meaning that right now, you will always get the same result. It'd be great, IMO, to fix this, and remove the tests and all, since you already know the result of them. By the way, since the package is already in Debian, I think it would be fine to have it uploaded without the above fixes, and fix that on the next upload. I hope that helps, Cheers, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f01daf8.2030...@goirand.fr
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi Thomas, hi Ansgar, thanks for the hints. I will improve the package as suggested by you and let you know when I'm done :) Cheers, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f01e08b.9020...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi, * Your debian/copyright doesn't mention yourself, I think you should add yourself in the Files: debian/*. The debian/copyright is also badly formatted, and generally speaking seems to be using a very old definition of the DEP5 specifications. It'd be great if you could update that. Question: what is the correct Format: entry in debian/copyright? I don't understand what i need to define there. Lintian throws me an error like: P: policyd-weight source: unversioned-copyright-format-uri http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ N: N:Format URI of the machine-readable copyright file is not versioned. N: N:Please use N:http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?revision=revisi N:on as the format URI instead. OK, got it *but* what revision do i have to use? http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?revision=? Thanks, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f01ff31.5000...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi, ntian with the options -Ii -E --pedantic so it will show you more issues (like spelling mistakes in the man pages, etc.). I wont details them here, since Lintian does it better than me! :) Thanks for the hint. How do you handle spelling errors by the upstream author in the relevant manpages? Should i create patches for it? How's the workflow handling spelling errors by the upstream author? Thanks, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f01ff98.7020...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi, As per: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5/ the latest revision seem to be 240. Thanks, that worked for me :) Cheers, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f02101b.4060...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
On 01/03/2012 03:02 AM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: Hi, * Your debian/copyright doesn't mention yourself, I think you should add yourself in the Files: debian/*. The debian/copyright is also badly formatted, and generally speaking seems to be using a very old definition of the DEP5 specifications. It'd be great if you could update that. Question: what is the correct Format: entry in debian/copyright? I don't understand what i need to define there. Lintian throws me an error like: P: policyd-weight source: unversioned-copyright-format-uri http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ N: N:Format URI of the machine-readable copyright file is not versioned. N: N:Please use N:http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?revision=revisi N:on as the format URI instead. OK, got it *but* what revision do i have to use? http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?revision=? Thanks, Werner As per: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5/ the latest revision seem to be 240. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f020f4c.7090...@debian.org
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi Thomas, * Your debian/copyright doesn't mention yourself, I think you should add yourself in the Files: debian/*. The debian/copyright is also badly formatted, and generally speaking seems to be using a very old definition of the DEP5 specifications. It'd be great if you could update that. done * The debian/init.d script doesn't use lsb-base for printing messages. Please switch to it (and depend on lsb-base) and replace the echoes. Also, the set -e should be (IMHO) set earlier in the script. As a bonus point, use the default in /lib/init/vars.sh with something like that: . /lib/init/vars.sh . /lib/lsb/init-functions case $1 in start) [ $VERBOSE != no ] log_daemon_msg Starting $DESC $NAME done * debian/postinst does some checkings against version 0.1.14-beta-3, yet, version 0.1.14.17-5 is in ole-stable, meaning that right now, you will always get the same result. It'd be great, IMO, to fix this, and remove the tests and all, since you already know the result of them. done * Please run lintian with the options -Ii -E --pedantic so it will show you more issues (like spelling mistakes in the man pages, etc.). I wont details them here, since Lintian does it better than me! :) I're rebuild and uploaded the latest package with those fixes. The only thing that needs now to be fixed are the spelling-errors by the upstream author in the manpages. How do you handle spelling errors by the upstream author in the relevant manpages? Should i create patches for it? How's the workflow handling spelling errors by the upstream author? Cheers and thank you, Werner Detter I got those Messages left werner@smaint:~/git/wd-deb-policyd-weight$ lintian -Ii -E --pedantic policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_amd64.changes I: policyd-weight: spelling-error-in-manpage usr/share/man/man5/policyd-weight.conf.5.gz childs children N: N:Lintian found a spelling error in the manpage. Lintian has a list of N:common misspellings that it looks for. It does not have a dictionary N:like a spelling checker does. N: N:If the string containing the spelling error is translated with the help N:of gettext (with the help of po4a, for example) or a similar tool, N:please fix the error in the translations as well as the English text to N:avoid making the translations fuzzy. With gettext, for example, this N:means you should also fix the spelling mistake in the corresponding N:msgids in the *.po files. N: N:Severity: minor, Certainty: possible N: N:Check: manpages, Type: binary N: I: policyd-weight: spelling-error-in-manpage usr/share/man/man5/policyd-weight.conf.5.gz childs children I: policyd-weight: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man5/policyd-weight.conf.5.gz:307 N: N:This manual page seems to contain a hyphen where a minus sign was N:intended. By default, - chars are interpreted as hyphens (U+2010) by N:groff, not as minus signs (U+002D). Since options to programs use minus N:signs (U+002D), this means for example in UTF-8 locales that you cannot N:cut and paste options, nor search for them easily. The Debian groff N:package currently forces - to be interpreted as a minus sign due to N:the number of manual pages with this problem, but this is a N:Debian-specific modification and hopefully eventually can be removed. N: N:- must be escaped (\-) to be interpreted as minus. If you really N:intend a hyphen (normally you don't), write it as \(hy to emphasise N:that fact. See groff(7) and especially groff_char(7) for details, and N:also the thread starting with N:http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200303/msg01481.h N:tml N: N:If you use some tool that converts your documentation to groff format, N:this tag may indicate a bug in the tool. Some tools convert dashes of N:any kind to hyphens. The safe way of converting dashes is to convert N:them to \-. N: N:Because this error can occur very often, Lintian shows only the first 10 N:occurrences for each man page and give the number of suppressed N:occurrences. If you want to see all warnings, run Lintian with the N:-d/--debug option. N: N:Refer to /usr/share/doc/groff-base/README.Debian and the groff_char(7) N:manual page for details. N: N:Severity: wishlist, Certainty: possible N: N:Check: manpages, Type: binary N: I: policyd-weight: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man5/policyd-weight.conf.5.gz:308 I: policyd-weight: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man5/policyd-weight.conf.5.gz:309 I: policyd-weight: spelling-error-in-manpage usr/share/man/man5/policyd-weight.conf.5.gz additionaly additionally I: policyd-weight: spelling-error-in-manpage usr/share/man/man8/policyd-weight.8.gz childs children -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
On 01/03/2012 03:03 AM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: Thanks for the hint. How do you handle spelling errors by the upstream author in the relevant manpages? Should i create patches for it? How's the workflow handling spelling errors by the upstream author? Best is to create a patch, include it in your Debian package, and forward that patch to upstream so he can have his manpage fixed upstream as well (so you will later remove the debian-specific patch). Thomas P.S: I'm registered to the list, no need to Cc: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f021834.70...@debian.org
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Am Dienstag, den 03.01.2012, 04:10 +0800 schrieb Thomas Goirand: OK, got it *but* what revision do i have to use? http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?revision=? Thanks, Werner As per: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5/ the latest revision seem to be 240. Thomas Mmmh, Wouldn't it be a great idea to mention this also in the documention at http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ ? There it tells you to use http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ (which gives you a 404...) coldtobi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1325541631.4741.2.ca...@mordor.loewenhoehle.ip
Re: RFS: python-mplayer
* Olivier Schwander olivier.schwan...@chadok.info, 2011-12-30, 17:28:
I'd recommend using the upstream name (mplayer.py) for the source
package name.
The upstream author seems to change the name of the project nearly at
each release but, ok, I'll try to stick to it.
Actually it seems I can't commit a rename of the project directory in
the repository ? I get Authorization failed.
That's weird. I did the rename for you (r19840).
The module doesn't handle filenames with special characters correctly:
| mplayer.Player('eggsham.avi')
| Traceback (most recent call last):
| File stdin, line 1, in module
| File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/mplayer/core.py, line 102, in
__init__
| self.args = args
| File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/mplayer/core.py, line 142, in args
| args = shlex.split(args)
| File /usr/lib/python2.7/shlex.py, line 279, in split
| return list(lex)
| File /usr/lib/python2.7/shlex.py, line 269, in next
| token = self.get_token()
| File /usr/lib/python2.7/shlex.py, line 96, in get_token
| raw = self.read_token()
| File /usr/lib/python2.7/shlex.py, line 172, in read_token
| raise ValueError, No closing quotation
| ValueError: No closing quotation
It works well for me. What are your python and mplayer version ?
$ dpkg-query -W python2.7 mplayer
mplayer 2:1.0~rc4.dfsg1+svn33713-5
python2.7 2.7.2-9
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120102224308.ga4...@jwilk.net
Re: RFS: policyd-weight
Hi again :) Best is to create a patch, include it in your Debian package, and forward that patch to upstream so he can have his manpage fixed upstream as well (so you will later remove the debian-specific patch). I've created a new Patch which fixes the spelling errors and mentioned that in debian/changelog. lintian --verbose -Ii -E --pedantic policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_amd64.changes is clean now :) The URL of your package is: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight The respective dsc file can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1.dsc Thank you, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f023523.8050...@aloah-from-hell.de
