On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for new version 1.10-2 (updated) of my package
>> "xiterm+thai".
>
> Typo in txiterm.1:
>
> "...\fBtxiterm\fP is a wrapper around the \fBxite
http://fmtyewtk.blogspot.com/2012/01/proof-general-build-results.html
here is my results
it seems that it is missing dependanies for latex which is failing in the build
mike
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Mike Dupont
wrote:
> This is good news. I tried out proof general at one point, good to se
This is good news. I tried out proof general at one point, good to see
you working on it. I will try our your package when I find time.
mike
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Hendrik Tews wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "proofgeneral".
>
> * Package name :
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "proofgeneral".
* Package name: proofgeneral
Version : 4.2~pre120104-1
Upstream Author : David Aspinall and others
* URL : http://proofgeneral.inf.ed.ac.uk/
* License : GPL 2
Section : scie
Thanks killan.
Tn Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Bastien,
>
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 03:10:05PM +0100, bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>> Le Monday 9 January 2012 00:28:04, Paul Wise a écrit :
>> > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:17 AM, bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>> > > A new version of
Hi Bastien,
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 03:10:05PM +0100, bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> Le Monday 9 January 2012 00:28:04, Paul Wise a écrit :
> > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:17 AM, bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > > A new version of autoconf-archive.
> >
> > At the very least you should be linking to the dsc
Le Monday 9 January 2012 00:28:04, Paul Wise a écrit :
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:17 AM, bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > A new version of autoconf-archive.
>
> At the very least you should be linking to the dsc file.
Sorry available here:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/autoconf-archive
and
http:/
Package: eiskaltdcpp
Followup-For: Bug #655184
Dear Mentors,
please take a look at the package update from Boris Pek and maybe consider
uploading the package.
It fixes a FTBFS due to the libboost transition.
You can find the package here:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/eiskaltdcpp
http://m
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "propaganda-debian".
Package name : propaganda-debian
Version : 13.5.9
Section : graphics
It builds those binary packages:
propaganda-debian - Propaganda background image volume for Debian
To access further inform
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ola,
i have a question regarding one of the packages i'm co-maintaining
("puredata", a graphical realtime computer music language).
when "puredata" was packaged first (~1999), this was done under the name
of "pd".
later it has been re-named to "pured
* Simon Chopin , 2012-01-09, 13:38:
As a side note, for extra safety it'd be good to make sure that if
ever these symbols are used, the generated dependency is either
unsatisfiable or strictly versioned. Unfortunately, the latter option
is currently a bit difficult to implement; see bug #615940
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 06:01:39PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
[...]
>
> As a side note, for extra safety it'd be good to make sure that if
> ever these symbols are used, the generated dependency is either
> unsatisfiable or strictly versioned. Unfortunately, the latter
> option is currently a bit di
Hi,
> On 08.01.2012 15:52, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
>> It would just be one modification to fix that bug (e.g. comment out the
>> non functional blacklist). What is the right way to go here? This Bug is
>> fixed in my latest uploaded package to unstable.
>
> Wait until the bug migrated to
Dear mentors,
I have just uploaded an updated version of my "mosquitto" package and
am looking for a sponsor. This is for a new upstream version and also
incorporates some of the changes suggested after it was uploaded
previously.
* Package name: mosquitto
Version : 0.14.4-1
Up
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 07:08:09PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Source: sitplus
> Version: 1.0.1-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> Package failed to build in a clean sid chroot:
>
> -- checking for one of the modules 'glib-2.0'
> -- Found GLib2: glib-2
Hi Ansgar,
> sorry that I could not look at your package even after I said that I
> would earlier, but I did not have enough free time. But it was uploaded
> in the end anyway :)
No problem - I've just fixed another bug (#641538) in my local packet.
> It is not possible to change the package a
Andrew Shadura writes:
> Tcl API is stable enough to just depend on the lowest version it builds
> against; however, it's better to build-depend on unversioned packages
> (eg tcl and tk instead of tcl8.5 and tk8.5) but use versioned
> dependencies on unversioned packages for your binaries (like, t
17 matches
Mail list logo
