Re: Re: Bug#639995: epigrass does not start on GNOME

2012-02-02 Thread erB@rilloo
Hello Jakub,
I still have the error reported into bug 639995 (epigrass: missing
dependency on python-pkg-resources):

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/bin/epigrass, line 5, in module
from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 2676, in
module
parse_requirements(__requires__), Environment()
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 552, in
resolve
raise DistributionNotFound(req)
pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: distribute


I urgently need EPIGRASS for my study so pls give me any advice to
bypass this error. how can I get this missing dependency (it seems a python
module)

I'm using Ubuntu 11.10.

thanks !
Davide Barillari


Re: Bug#653799: FTBFS: CMake Error at cmake_modules/FindOpenCV.cmake:77 (file): file STRINGS file /usr/include/opencv/cvver.h cannot be read.

2012-02-02 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi,

On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 08:00:20AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
 This version is not yet available on the mirror I'm using.  Once
 it is there I will test the following changes:

I can confirm that I was able to build after adding to opencv libs
explicitely to the linker flags which now looks like:

-DCMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS=-lboost_system -lopencv_core -lopencv_highgui

It would be more fun if cmake would be able to detect this automagically
but I'm no cmake expert and I'll leave this to upstream.

Kind regards and thanks for the patch in the first place

  Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120202141608.gi2...@an3as.eu



Re: sponsorship-requests

2012-02-02 Thread Jakub Wilk

* Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org, 2012-01-30, 22:44:

We could ask listmasters to filter out BTS bot messages.


Based on the feedback I received so far, I'm going to do that.

--
Jakub Wilk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120202170457.ga6...@jwilk.net



creating an orig.tar.gz from a CVS

2012-02-02 Thread Jerome BENOIT

Hello List:

what is the best Debian way to create a package orig.tar.gz from a CVS ?

Thanks in advance.

Best,
Jerome


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2ace53.7030...@rezozer.net



Re: creating an orig.tar.gz from a CVS

2012-02-02 Thread Björn Esser
Hello!

Checkout from CVS.
Run ./configure or equal.
Run 'make tar' or 'make package' or 'make rpm' or 'make dist' or
whatever the corresponding target in makefile is named.
Then rename the produced tar.gz / bz2 to orig.tar.gz / bz2

Cheers,

Björn.

2012/2/2 Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net:
 Hello List:

 what is the best Debian way to create a package orig.tar.gz from a CVS ?

 Thanks in advance.

 Best,
 Jerome


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2ace53.7030...@rezozer.net



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cams3egoraaojbdh+30bgb+b2pnh9xoh9xmw5vh+kaarzrce...@mail.gmail.com



RFS: dwb

2012-02-02 Thread Nathan Owens
I filled a formal RFS template for dwb and this is a follow-up in case 
it didn't get noticed.
dwb is a lightweight browser that also supports vi-like key shortcuts. 
The package is at http://mentors.debian.net/package/dwb


or use dput 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dwb/dwb_2011.10.29-4.dsc



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2ae4af.5000...@gmx.us



Re: creating an orig.tar.gz from a CVS

2012-02-02 Thread Jerome BENOIT

Hello List:

Let assume that the make target dist is not implemented :-)

Cheers,
Jerome

On 02/02/12 19:14, Björn Esser wrote:

Hello!

Checkout from CVS.
Run ./configure or equal.
Run 'make tar' or 'make package' or 'make rpm' or 'make dist' or
whatever the corresponding target in makefile is named.
Then rename the produced tar.gz / bz2 to orig.tar.gz / bz2

Cheers,

Björn.

2012/2/2 Jerome BENOITg62993...@rezozer.net:

Hello List:

what is the best Debian way to create a package orig.tar.gz from a CVS ?

Thanks in advance.

Best,
Jerome


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2ace53.7030...@rezozer.net




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2ae71e.6050...@rezozer.net



Re: creating an orig.tar.gz from a CVS

2012-02-02 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le 02/02/12 18:56, Jerome BENOIT a écrit :
 Hello List:
 
 what is the best Debian way to create a package orig.tar.gz from a CVS ?
 
 Thanks in advance.
 
 Best,
 Jerome
 
 

cvs export -d directory module ...

tar cvf - directory | gzip -9  package_version.orig.tar.gz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2ae927.9050...@users.sourceforge.net



Re: creating an orig.tar.gz from a CVS

2012-02-02 Thread Jerome BENOIT

In short, I have to do it by hand.

Jerome

On 02/02/12 20:51, Thibaut Paumard wrote:

Le 02/02/12 18:56, Jerome BENOIT a écrit :

Hello List:

what is the best Debian way to create a package orig.tar.gz from a CVS ?

Thanks in advance.

Best,
Jerome




cvs export -ddirectory  module ...

tar cvf -directory  | gzip -9  package_version.orig.tar.gz





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2b0386.9050...@rezozer.net



Re: RFS: dmaths

2012-02-02 Thread Jakub Wilk

* Innocent De Marchi tangram.pe...@gmail.com, 2012-01-28, 17:33:

Are these files
mini_memo_dmaths_1.5.odt
memo_OOo_dmaths_1.5.odt
Lisez-moi.odt
install.odt
used for anything? If they are not, I'd appreciate if you could remove
them from .orig.tar, too. It'll make future reviews easier.


I have reviewed: no reference to them in macros files. I've deleted 
them (in the script for repackaging).


Oh, I just realized that they were documentation files installed into 
/usr/share/doc/. Well, in that case maybe it's worth keeping them. (On 
the other hand they are all in French, so I have no idea how useful they 
are.)


--
Jakub Wilk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120202220116.gb8...@jwilk.net



Re: RFS: libpam-abl , bug fix , package is already in Debian

2012-02-02 Thread Jakub Wilk

* Alex Mestiashvili a...@biotec.tu-dresden.de, 2012-02-01, 18:51:
What does +testing.1 mean? Is that a pre-release thing? If this is 
the case, then use ~ instead of +.

Yes , it is pre-release version .
The upstream had -testting.1 in his version and I had to change this 
to meet the upstream_version requirements .


- is allowed in upstream_version. But please notice that:

0.4.3-1  0.4.3+testing.1-1  0.4.3-testing.1-1

So you'll have a big problem once upstream releases the final 0.4.3. 
That's why you should use ~:


0.4.3~testing.1-1  0.4.3-1

--
Jakub Wilk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120202220803.gc8...@jwilk.net



Re: creating an orig.tar.gz from a CVS

2012-02-02 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 10:43:34PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:

 In short, I have to do it by hand.

Tarballs are usually created by upstream when making a release.

There are a variety of build system (autotools, CMake, etc) that provide
a standard way to prepare a release tarball: if your upstream uses one
of those, you can usually follow the same steps to create a CVS snapshot,
taking care to choose a sensible version number.

If upstream uses no such standardized build system, they probably have
rolled their own script to prepare a release. Again, use the same steps
to build your snapshot.

So, in short: since it depends a lot on what upstream’s habits are, your
best bet is simply asking them.

-- 
Andrea Bolognani e...@kiyuko.org
Resistance is futile, you will be garbage collected.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#658426: RFS: xfonts-bolkhov [ITA] -- Cyrillic fonts for X

2012-02-02 Thread Daniel Martí
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package xfonts-bolkhov.

 * Package name: xfonts-bolkhov
   Version : 1.1.20001007-7
 * URL : (Abandoned)
 * License : GPL
   Section : fonts

It builds those binary packages:

xfonts-bolkhov-75dpi - 75 dpi Unicode Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection)
 xfonts-bolkhov-cp1251-75dpi - 75 dpi CP1251 encoded Cyrillic fonts for X 
(Cyr-RFX collection)
 xfonts-bolkhov-cp1251-misc - Character-cell CP1251 encoded Cyrillic fonts for 
X (Cyr-RFX collection)
 xfonts-bolkhov-isocyr-75dpi - 75 dpi ISO 8859-5 encoded Cyrillic fonts for X 
(Cyr-RFX collection)
 xfonts-bolkhov-isocyr-misc - Character-cell ISO-8859-5 encoded Cyrillic fonts 
for X (Cyr-RFX collection)
 xfonts-bolkhov-koi8r-75dpi - 75 dpi KOI8-R encoded Cyrillic fonts for X 
(Cyr-RFX collection)
 xfonts-bolkhov-koi8r-misc - Character-cell KOI8-R encoded Cyrillic fonts for X 
(Cyr-RFX collection)
 xfonts-bolkhov-koi8u-75dpi - 75 dpi KOI8-U encoded Cyrillic fonts for X 
(Cyr-RFX collection)
 xfonts-bolkhov-koi8u-misc - Character-cell KOI8-U encoded Cyrillic fonts for X 
(Cyr-RFX collection)
 xfonts-bolkhov-misc - Character-cell Unicode Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX 
collection)

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/xfonts-bolkhov

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfonts-bolkhov/xfonts-bolkhov_1.1.20001007-7.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards,

Daniel Martí

-- 
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#658432: RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo

2012-02-02 Thread Daniel Martí
package: sponsorship-requests
severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package xeji.

 * Package name: xeji
   Version : 1.2-15
 * URL : (No upstream available; abandoned)
 * License : GPL
   Section : x11

It builds those binary packages:

xeji  - Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/xeji

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xeji/xeji_1.2-15.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards,

Daniel Martí

-- 
Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: RFS: libconfig (requires transition)

2012-02-02 Thread Jose Luis Tallón

Hi, Jonathan

My apologies if you did send an e-mail and I didn't read it. My inbox is 
severely overloaded as of lately...


Isn't it good style to notify the maintainer and/or coordinate with them 
before an NMU ?



On 31/01/12 00:08, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:

Julien Cristaujcris...@debian.org  wrote:


Please don't change the -dev package name.


Yup!


All of the packages except one have versioned Build-depends
on libconfig8-dev. Surely this needs to be replaced with
libconfig-dev or at least libconfig9-dev?


No it doesn't?  You can rename the -dev package to
libconfig-dev if you want, but certainly don't *need* to, and
if you do it, then it would be way better from our point of
view to keep building libconfig8-dev as a transitional package
until the reverse deps are updated, and to do that separately
from the SONAME bump.

Yes, please.
Being bitten a couple times already after not checking buildability of 
r-deps... it is the library maintainer's responsibility, after all.

If its ok, I'll leave the package as is.


Sigh.

I can change it if it makes it easier for you so. Your paragraph above
made it sound as if it didn't matter which way it was done.


To clarify, what is the process for this transition? Will the
package be uploaded to experimental to allow me to report bug
reports and patches against dependant packages?


I'm not sure I understand what you're asking.

This is my first upload which requires a transition, and I am unsure
of what happens next.


Please read the library maintainer's guide first (or re-read if needed).
It does avoid many a headache...


  It seems common for packages to be uploaded to
experimental for a time prior to the actual transistion to allow other
maintainers update their packages accordingly. I was wondering will
this be the case with this transition?
Well, unfortunately for the world (some would say ;) ), not too many 
packages depend on libconfig; Nor are they very complex.
Therefore, a full transition via experimental and involving the RM is 
not needed, AFAIK. Just notifying the depending maintainers should 
suffice (it would be different during freeze, of course)



Just drop me a line if I can be of any help.

TIA

J.L.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2b2f47.2000...@adv-solutions.net



Re: Work-needing packages report for Feb 3, 2012

2012-02-02 Thread Jerome BENOIT

Hello Lists:

May I add that there are also packages waiting for a sponsor for uploading ?

Cheers,
Jerome

On 03/02/12 01:26, w...@debian.org wrote:

The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.

Total number of orphaned packages: 395 (new: 1)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 150 (new: 0)
Total number of packages requested help for: 59 (new: 0)

Please refer to http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ for more information.



The following packages have been orphaned:

prelink (#657967), orphaned 3 days ago
  Description: ELF prelinking utility to speed up dynamic linking
  Reverse Depends: prelink
  Installations reported by Popcon: 1895

394 older packages have been omitted from this listing, see
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/orphaned for a complete list.



No new packages have been given up for adoption, but a total of 150 packages
are awaiting adoption.  See http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/rfa_bypackage
for a complete list.



For the following packages help is requested:

apache2 (#646208), requested 103 days ago
  Description: Apache HTTP Server
  Reverse Depends: aegis-web apache2 apache2-dbg apache2-mpm-event
apache2-mpm-itk apache2-mpm-prefork apache2-mpm-worker
apache2-prefork-dev apache2-suexec apache2-suexec-custom (178 more
omitted)
  Installations reported by Popcon: 60734

apt-xapian-index (#567955), requested 731 days ago
  Description: maintenance tools for a Xapian index of Debian packages
  Reverse Depends: adept ept-cache fuss-launcher packagesearch
  Installations reported by Popcon: 51120

asymptote (#517342), requested 1070 days ago
  Description: script-based vector graphics language inspired by
MetaPost
  Installations reported by Popcon: 2993

athcool (#278442), requested 2655 days ago
  Description: Enable powersaving mode for Athlon/Duron processors
  Installations reported by Popcon: 96

balsa (#642906), requested 130 days ago
  Description: An e-mail client for GNOME
  Reverse Depends: balsa-dbg debreaper
  Installations reported by Popcon: 272

bastille (#592137), requested 544 days ago
  Description: Security hardening tool
  Installations reported by Popcon: 252

boinc (#511243), requested 1120 days ago
  Description: BOINC distributed computing
  Reverse Depends: boinc boinc-amd-opencl boinc-app-milkyway
boinc-app-seti boinc-dbg boinc-nvidia-cuda
  Installations reported by Popcon: 1868

cardstories (#624100), requested 283 days ago
  Description: Find out a card using a sentence made up by another
player
  Installations reported by Popcon: 5

chromium-browser (#583826), requested 613 days ago
  Description: Chromium browser
  Reverse Depends: chromium chromium-browser chromium-browser-dbg
chromium-browser-inspector chromium-browser-l10n chromium-dbg
chromium-l10n mozplugger
  Installations reported by Popcon: 9876

cryptsetup (#600777), requested 470 days ago
  Description: configures encrypted block devices
  Reverse Depends: cryptsetup cryptsetup-udeb libcryptsetup-dev
libguestfs0 libpam-mount ltsp-client mandos-client partman-crypto-dm
rescue-mode systemd
  Installations reported by Popcon: 7390

cvs (#354176), requested 2170 days ago
  Description: Concurrent Versions System
  Reverse Depends: cvs-autoreleasedeb cvs-buildpackage cvs2cl cvs2html
cvschangelogbuilder cvsconnect cvsd cvsps cvsservice cvssuck (8 more
omitted)
  Installations reported by Popcon: 17682

dctrl-tools (#448284), requested 1559 days ago
  Description: Command-line tools to process Debian package
information
  Reverse Depends: aptfs debian-goodies debtree dlocate
haskell-devscripts javahelper libsbuild-perl linux-patch-debianlogo
postgresql-server-dev-all simple-cdd (1 more omitted)
  Installations reported by Popcon: 14892

debtags (#567954), requested 731 days ago
  Description: Enables support for package tags
  Reverse Depends: goplay packagesearch
  Installations reported by Popcon: 2578

doc-central (#566364), requested 740 days ago
  Description: web-based documentation browser
  Installations reported by Popcon: 217

dpkg (#282283), requested 2629 days ago
  Description: dselect: a user tool to manage Debian packages
  Reverse Depends: a2ps acct ace-gperf acl2-doc
ada-reference-manual-info adacontrol advi advi-examples alien
alqalam (709 more omitted)
  Installations reported by Popcon: 

Re: Work-needing packages report for Feb 3, 2012

2012-02-02 Thread Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
 On 03/02/12 01:26, w...@debian.org wrote:

 The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
 through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
 last week.

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net wrote:
 Hello Lists:

 May I add that there are also packages waiting for a sponsor for uploading ?

An automated wnpp-like report for the sponsorship-request package
would be nice. Though maybe just sent to the debian-mentors list
rather than to devel.

-- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio

   Ubuntu Developer https://launchpad.net/~andrewsomething
   Debian Maintainer
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=a.starr.b%40gmail.com
   PGP/GPG Key ID: D53FDCB1


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cal6k_ay-axfnwcpl2ytc9kr0eh+m12f3gpsxs1vyufphbpf...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#658432: RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo

2012-02-02 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

tags 658432 +moreinfo +wontfix
thanks

Hi Daniel,

On 02.02.2012 23:45, Daniel Martí wrote:
 dget -x
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xeji/xeji_1.2-15.dsc

First let me point out, I don't see much reasons to upload this
package to Debian (not that I could anyway). It was orphaned and
should rather be removed than uploaded. You even say yourself your
primary purpose is to learn packaging [1], hence I'd suggest you to
pick a package you really care for instead.

The package you picked has a low popcon [2] no reverse dependencies
and seems generally not helpful at all. That said, if you really want
to maintain this package that's up to you. Here is a review:

* You modified the orig.tar.gz tarball somehow:

$ md5sum deb-version/xeji_1.2.orig.tar.gz
mentors-version/xeji_1.2.orig.tar.gz
afc838ca6174ac98d67b1580832e24d4  deb-version/xeji_1.2.orig.tar.gz
68893c38485b8063cdd6fbe81da76e11  mentors-version/xeji_1.2.orig.tar.gz

That's not acceptable, especially since the tarball was already
uploaded to Debian archives. Thus, you are not allowed to change the
tarball anymore, once it was uploaded without pushing a new upstream
version.

Feel free to remove the wontfix tag once you addressed the tarball
issue. Everything else is of lower importance.


* debian/compat 6 is somewhat outdated these days. Joey released
debehelper 9 just recently. Note, using compat 6 is not a tragedy, but
you would profit from using compat 7 or higher a lot.

* The synopsis line of the package is not really helpful (yet another
whatever does not help anyone) and does not match our guidelines [3].

* You use the old copyright format, consider upgrading to DEP-5
instead (that's optional of course).

* Why do you install manpages manually in debian/rules? You should use
dh_installman instead. This makes both, the install rule and the
dirs file unneeded.

* You should use the short dh form. Check [5] and dh(1) for examples.
Most people consider the old-style debhelper form deprecated. While
you are it, remove the source and diff targets. They are obsolete
since ages it appears.

* The package breaks the hardening release goal [6]. See [7] to learn
how to apply hardening flags.

* Since you upgraded to 3.0/quilt there is no point to add manpages as
a patch anymore. Just put the file into debian/ and install it as I
outlined above.

* patches/xeji_c.patch misses an appropriate DEP-3 header (that's
optional again)

* Don't override I: and W: tags in Lintian. Moreover, note your
explanation for overriding
copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl is wrong.
That's not what the tag is about.

* Remove the README.Debian file. The URL is dead and its information
is redundant to debian/copyright.


[1] bugs.debian.org/592977
[2] http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=xeji
[3]
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-pkg-synopsis
[4] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/
[5] /usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.tiny
[6] http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SecurityHardeningBuildFlags
[7] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/09/msg1.html
[8] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/

- -- 
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=6oHw
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2b44a9.8060...@toell.net



Processed: Re: Bug#658432: RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo

2012-02-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 658432 +moreinfo +wontfix
Bug #658432 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the 
Mouse X demo
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #658432 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the 
Mouse X demo
Added tag(s) wontfix.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
658432: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658432
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132823569524021.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Re: RFS: libapr-memcache0

2012-02-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote:

 libapr-memcache0-dev - apr_memcache developer package is a client for
 memcache

The dev package should be named libapr-memcache-dev instead.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caktje6hywf_htnvdrkxzvupa+5aze3grp8hyqnmzjax62nm...@mail.gmail.com



RFS: taskcoach

2012-02-02 Thread Nicolas Boulenguez
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for

 * Package name: taskcoach
   Version : 1.3.6-1
   Upstream Author : Task Coach developers develop...@taskcoach.org
 * URL : http://www.taskcoach.org
 * License : GPL-3+, wxwindows, LGPL-2.1+, PSF-2.7.2, MIT, BSD
   Section : utils

It builds one binary package, architecture-independant since the
source is pure python:

taskcoach  - friendly task manager

Upstream has been maintaining this program actively since 2005 on
Windows, Mac OS X, Linux, BSD, iPhone, iPad, and iPod Touch. Users
have contributed 32 languages. The soft has been downloaded 1.5
million times on Sourceforge last year.

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/taskcoach

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/taskcoach/taskcoach_1.3.6-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Please CC me any answer or information, I am not on the list.

Kind regards,


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120203025620.GA17408@pegase



Re: Bug#639995: epigrass does not start on GNOME

2012-02-02 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Davide,

thanks for using EpiGrass and I hope to get it up and running for your study.

On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 12:21:27PM +0100, erB@rilloo wrote:
 Hello Jakub,
 I still have the error reported into bug 639995 (epigrass: missing
 dependency on python-pkg-resources):
 
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File /usr/bin/epigrass, line 5, in module
 from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 2676, in
 module
 parse_requirements(__requires__), Environment()
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 552, in
 resolve
 raise DistributionNotFound(req)
 pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: distribute
 
 
 I urgently need EPIGRASS for my study so pls give me any advice to
 bypass this error. how can I get this missing dependency (it seems a python
 module)
 
 I'm using Ubuntu 11.10.

I admit I never used Ubuntu and I'm just wild guessing.  So please take
this advise with a grain of salt because there will be a chance to break
your system when doing so.

If I understood things correctly the bug was not in epigrass but rather
in python-networkx.  It was fixed in python-networkx package version
1.6-1.  So you can try to install this very package version on top of
your Ubuntu system.  I repeat my warning:  There are chances to crash
several things by mixing packages from different distributions - just
ask an Ubuntu expert for more detailed advise.

Another option would be to install Debian and upgrade to testing - it
just depends *how* urgently you need EpiGrass.  I also could give
backporting EpiGrass a try to backports.debian.org if you confirm that
you prefer to run a Debian stable system.

Kind regards

   Andreas.


-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120203073316.gf...@an3as.eu



Re: RFS: libpam-abl , bug fix , package is already in Debian

2012-02-02 Thread Alex Mestiashvili
On 02/02/2012 11:08 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
 * Alex Mestiashvili a...@biotec.tu-dresden.de, 2012-02-01, 18:51:
 What does +testing.1 mean? Is that a pre-release thing? If this is
 the case, then use ~ instead of +.
 Yes , it is pre-release version .
 The upstream had -testting.1 in his version and I had to change
 this to meet the upstream_version requirements .

 - is allowed in upstream_version. But please notice that:

 0.4.3-1  0.4.3+testing.1-1  0.4.3-testing.1-1

 So you'll have a big problem once upstream releases the final 0.4.3.
 That's why you should use ~:

 0.4.3~testing.1-1  0.4.3-1

I see.Great hint!  thank you ,
Alex


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2b8e22.20...@biotec.tu-dresden.de



RE: RFS: libapr-memcache0

2012-02-02 Thread Bas van den Dikkenberg
Renamed the package

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: paul.is.w...@gmail.com [mailto:paul.is.w...@gmail.com] Namens Paul Wise
Verzonden: vrijdag 3 februari 2012 4:02
Aan: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Onderwerp: Re: RFS: libapr-memcache0

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote:

 libapr-memcache0-dev - apr_memcache developer package is a client for 
 memcache

The dev package should be named libapr-memcache-dev instead.

--
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caktje6hywf_htnvdrkxzvupa+5aze3grp8hyqnmzjax62nm...@mail.gmail.com