Re: Re: Bug#639995: epigrass does not start on GNOME
Hello Jakub, I still have the error reported into bug 639995 (epigrass: missing dependency on python-pkg-resources): Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/epigrass, line 5, in module from pkg_resources import load_entry_point File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 2676, in module parse_requirements(__requires__), Environment() File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 552, in resolve raise DistributionNotFound(req) pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: distribute I urgently need EPIGRASS for my study so pls give me any advice to bypass this error. how can I get this missing dependency (it seems a python module) I'm using Ubuntu 11.10. thanks ! Davide Barillari
Re: Bug#653799: FTBFS: CMake Error at cmake_modules/FindOpenCV.cmake:77 (file): file STRINGS file /usr/include/opencv/cvver.h cannot be read.
Hi, On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 08:00:20AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: This version is not yet available on the mirror I'm using. Once it is there I will test the following changes: I can confirm that I was able to build after adding to opencv libs explicitely to the linker flags which now looks like: -DCMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS=-lboost_system -lopencv_core -lopencv_highgui It would be more fun if cmake would be able to detect this automagically but I'm no cmake expert and I'll leave this to upstream. Kind regards and thanks for the patch in the first place Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120202141608.gi2...@an3as.eu
Re: sponsorship-requests
* Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org, 2012-01-30, 22:44: We could ask listmasters to filter out BTS bot messages. Based on the feedback I received so far, I'm going to do that. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120202170457.ga6...@jwilk.net
creating an orig.tar.gz from a CVS
Hello List: what is the best Debian way to create a package orig.tar.gz from a CVS ? Thanks in advance. Best, Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2ace53.7030...@rezozer.net
Re: creating an orig.tar.gz from a CVS
Hello! Checkout from CVS. Run ./configure or equal. Run 'make tar' or 'make package' or 'make rpm' or 'make dist' or whatever the corresponding target in makefile is named. Then rename the produced tar.gz / bz2 to orig.tar.gz / bz2 Cheers, Björn. 2012/2/2 Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net: Hello List: what is the best Debian way to create a package orig.tar.gz from a CVS ? Thanks in advance. Best, Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2ace53.7030...@rezozer.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cams3egoraaojbdh+30bgb+b2pnh9xoh9xmw5vh+kaarzrce...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: dwb
I filled a formal RFS template for dwb and this is a follow-up in case it didn't get noticed. dwb is a lightweight browser that also supports vi-like key shortcuts. The package is at http://mentors.debian.net/package/dwb or use dput http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dwb/dwb_2011.10.29-4.dsc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2ae4af.5000...@gmx.us
Re: creating an orig.tar.gz from a CVS
Hello List: Let assume that the make target dist is not implemented :-) Cheers, Jerome On 02/02/12 19:14, Björn Esser wrote: Hello! Checkout from CVS. Run ./configure or equal. Run 'make tar' or 'make package' or 'make rpm' or 'make dist' or whatever the corresponding target in makefile is named. Then rename the produced tar.gz / bz2 to orig.tar.gz / bz2 Cheers, Björn. 2012/2/2 Jerome BENOITg62993...@rezozer.net: Hello List: what is the best Debian way to create a package orig.tar.gz from a CVS ? Thanks in advance. Best, Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2ace53.7030...@rezozer.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2ae71e.6050...@rezozer.net
Re: creating an orig.tar.gz from a CVS
Le 02/02/12 18:56, Jerome BENOIT a écrit : Hello List: what is the best Debian way to create a package orig.tar.gz from a CVS ? Thanks in advance. Best, Jerome cvs export -d directory module ... tar cvf - directory | gzip -9 package_version.orig.tar.gz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2ae927.9050...@users.sourceforge.net
Re: creating an orig.tar.gz from a CVS
In short, I have to do it by hand. Jerome On 02/02/12 20:51, Thibaut Paumard wrote: Le 02/02/12 18:56, Jerome BENOIT a écrit : Hello List: what is the best Debian way to create a package orig.tar.gz from a CVS ? Thanks in advance. Best, Jerome cvs export -ddirectory module ... tar cvf -directory | gzip -9 package_version.orig.tar.gz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2b0386.9050...@rezozer.net
Re: RFS: dmaths
* Innocent De Marchi tangram.pe...@gmail.com, 2012-01-28, 17:33: Are these files mini_memo_dmaths_1.5.odt memo_OOo_dmaths_1.5.odt Lisez-moi.odt install.odt used for anything? If they are not, I'd appreciate if you could remove them from .orig.tar, too. It'll make future reviews easier. I have reviewed: no reference to them in macros files. I've deleted them (in the script for repackaging). Oh, I just realized that they were documentation files installed into /usr/share/doc/. Well, in that case maybe it's worth keeping them. (On the other hand they are all in French, so I have no idea how useful they are.) -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120202220116.gb8...@jwilk.net
Re: RFS: libpam-abl , bug fix , package is already in Debian
* Alex Mestiashvili a...@biotec.tu-dresden.de, 2012-02-01, 18:51: What does +testing.1 mean? Is that a pre-release thing? If this is the case, then use ~ instead of +. Yes , it is pre-release version . The upstream had -testting.1 in his version and I had to change this to meet the upstream_version requirements . - is allowed in upstream_version. But please notice that: 0.4.3-1 0.4.3+testing.1-1 0.4.3-testing.1-1 So you'll have a big problem once upstream releases the final 0.4.3. That's why you should use ~: 0.4.3~testing.1-1 0.4.3-1 -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120202220803.gc8...@jwilk.net
Re: creating an orig.tar.gz from a CVS
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 10:43:34PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: In short, I have to do it by hand. Tarballs are usually created by upstream when making a release. There are a variety of build system (autotools, CMake, etc) that provide a standard way to prepare a release tarball: if your upstream uses one of those, you can usually follow the same steps to create a CVS snapshot, taking care to choose a sensible version number. If upstream uses no such standardized build system, they probably have rolled their own script to prepare a release. Again, use the same steps to build your snapshot. So, in short: since it depends a lot on what upstream’s habits are, your best bet is simply asking them. -- Andrea Bolognani e...@kiyuko.org Resistance is futile, you will be garbage collected. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#658426: RFS: xfonts-bolkhov [ITA] -- Cyrillic fonts for X
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package xfonts-bolkhov. * Package name: xfonts-bolkhov Version : 1.1.20001007-7 * URL : (Abandoned) * License : GPL Section : fonts It builds those binary packages: xfonts-bolkhov-75dpi - 75 dpi Unicode Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-cp1251-75dpi - 75 dpi CP1251 encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-cp1251-misc - Character-cell CP1251 encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-isocyr-75dpi - 75 dpi ISO 8859-5 encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-isocyr-misc - Character-cell ISO-8859-5 encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-koi8r-75dpi - 75 dpi KOI8-R encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-koi8r-misc - Character-cell KOI8-R encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-koi8u-75dpi - 75 dpi KOI8-U encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-koi8u-misc - Character-cell KOI8-U encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-misc - Character-cell Unicode Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/xfonts-bolkhov Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfonts-bolkhov/xfonts-bolkhov_1.1.20001007-7.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Daniel Martí -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#658432: RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo
package: sponsorship-requests severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package xeji. * Package name: xeji Version : 1.2-15 * URL : (No upstream available; abandoned) * License : GPL Section : x11 It builds those binary packages: xeji - Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/xeji Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xeji/xeji_1.2-15.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Daniel Martí -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: libconfig (requires transition)
Hi, Jonathan My apologies if you did send an e-mail and I didn't read it. My inbox is severely overloaded as of lately... Isn't it good style to notify the maintainer and/or coordinate with them before an NMU ? On 31/01/12 00:08, Jonathan McCrohan wrote: Julien Cristaujcris...@debian.org wrote: Please don't change the -dev package name. Yup! All of the packages except one have versioned Build-depends on libconfig8-dev. Surely this needs to be replaced with libconfig-dev or at least libconfig9-dev? No it doesn't? You can rename the -dev package to libconfig-dev if you want, but certainly don't *need* to, and if you do it, then it would be way better from our point of view to keep building libconfig8-dev as a transitional package until the reverse deps are updated, and to do that separately from the SONAME bump. Yes, please. Being bitten a couple times already after not checking buildability of r-deps... it is the library maintainer's responsibility, after all. If its ok, I'll leave the package as is. Sigh. I can change it if it makes it easier for you so. Your paragraph above made it sound as if it didn't matter which way it was done. To clarify, what is the process for this transition? Will the package be uploaded to experimental to allow me to report bug reports and patches against dependant packages? I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. This is my first upload which requires a transition, and I am unsure of what happens next. Please read the library maintainer's guide first (or re-read if needed). It does avoid many a headache... It seems common for packages to be uploaded to experimental for a time prior to the actual transistion to allow other maintainers update their packages accordingly. I was wondering will this be the case with this transition? Well, unfortunately for the world (some would say ;) ), not too many packages depend on libconfig; Nor are they very complex. Therefore, a full transition via experimental and involving the RM is not needed, AFAIK. Just notifying the depending maintainers should suffice (it would be different during freeze, of course) Just drop me a line if I can be of any help. TIA J.L. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2b2f47.2000...@adv-solutions.net
Re: Work-needing packages report for Feb 3, 2012
Hello Lists: May I add that there are also packages waiting for a sponsor for uploading ? Cheers, Jerome On 03/02/12 01:26, w...@debian.org wrote: The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 395 (new: 1) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 150 (new: 0) Total number of packages requested help for: 59 (new: 0) Please refer to http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ for more information. The following packages have been orphaned: prelink (#657967), orphaned 3 days ago Description: ELF prelinking utility to speed up dynamic linking Reverse Depends: prelink Installations reported by Popcon: 1895 394 older packages have been omitted from this listing, see http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/orphaned for a complete list. No new packages have been given up for adoption, but a total of 150 packages are awaiting adoption. See http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/rfa_bypackage for a complete list. For the following packages help is requested: apache2 (#646208), requested 103 days ago Description: Apache HTTP Server Reverse Depends: aegis-web apache2 apache2-dbg apache2-mpm-event apache2-mpm-itk apache2-mpm-prefork apache2-mpm-worker apache2-prefork-dev apache2-suexec apache2-suexec-custom (178 more omitted) Installations reported by Popcon: 60734 apt-xapian-index (#567955), requested 731 days ago Description: maintenance tools for a Xapian index of Debian packages Reverse Depends: adept ept-cache fuss-launcher packagesearch Installations reported by Popcon: 51120 asymptote (#517342), requested 1070 days ago Description: script-based vector graphics language inspired by MetaPost Installations reported by Popcon: 2993 athcool (#278442), requested 2655 days ago Description: Enable powersaving mode for Athlon/Duron processors Installations reported by Popcon: 96 balsa (#642906), requested 130 days ago Description: An e-mail client for GNOME Reverse Depends: balsa-dbg debreaper Installations reported by Popcon: 272 bastille (#592137), requested 544 days ago Description: Security hardening tool Installations reported by Popcon: 252 boinc (#511243), requested 1120 days ago Description: BOINC distributed computing Reverse Depends: boinc boinc-amd-opencl boinc-app-milkyway boinc-app-seti boinc-dbg boinc-nvidia-cuda Installations reported by Popcon: 1868 cardstories (#624100), requested 283 days ago Description: Find out a card using a sentence made up by another player Installations reported by Popcon: 5 chromium-browser (#583826), requested 613 days ago Description: Chromium browser Reverse Depends: chromium chromium-browser chromium-browser-dbg chromium-browser-inspector chromium-browser-l10n chromium-dbg chromium-l10n mozplugger Installations reported by Popcon: 9876 cryptsetup (#600777), requested 470 days ago Description: configures encrypted block devices Reverse Depends: cryptsetup cryptsetup-udeb libcryptsetup-dev libguestfs0 libpam-mount ltsp-client mandos-client partman-crypto-dm rescue-mode systemd Installations reported by Popcon: 7390 cvs (#354176), requested 2170 days ago Description: Concurrent Versions System Reverse Depends: cvs-autoreleasedeb cvs-buildpackage cvs2cl cvs2html cvschangelogbuilder cvsconnect cvsd cvsps cvsservice cvssuck (8 more omitted) Installations reported by Popcon: 17682 dctrl-tools (#448284), requested 1559 days ago Description: Command-line tools to process Debian package information Reverse Depends: aptfs debian-goodies debtree dlocate haskell-devscripts javahelper libsbuild-perl linux-patch-debianlogo postgresql-server-dev-all simple-cdd (1 more omitted) Installations reported by Popcon: 14892 debtags (#567954), requested 731 days ago Description: Enables support for package tags Reverse Depends: goplay packagesearch Installations reported by Popcon: 2578 doc-central (#566364), requested 740 days ago Description: web-based documentation browser Installations reported by Popcon: 217 dpkg (#282283), requested 2629 days ago Description: dselect: a user tool to manage Debian packages Reverse Depends: a2ps acct ace-gperf acl2-doc ada-reference-manual-info adacontrol advi advi-examples alien alqalam (709 more omitted) Installations reported by Popcon:
Re: Work-needing packages report for Feb 3, 2012
On 03/02/12 01:26, w...@debian.org wrote: The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net wrote: Hello Lists: May I add that there are also packages waiting for a sponsor for uploading ? An automated wnpp-like report for the sponsorship-request package would be nice. Though maybe just sent to the debian-mentors list rather than to devel. -- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio Ubuntu Developer https://launchpad.net/~andrewsomething Debian Maintainer http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=a.starr.b%40gmail.com PGP/GPG Key ID: D53FDCB1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cal6k_ay-axfnwcpl2ytc9kr0eh+m12f3gpsxs1vyufphbpf...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#658432: RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tags 658432 +moreinfo +wontfix thanks Hi Daniel, On 02.02.2012 23:45, Daniel Martí wrote: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xeji/xeji_1.2-15.dsc First let me point out, I don't see much reasons to upload this package to Debian (not that I could anyway). It was orphaned and should rather be removed than uploaded. You even say yourself your primary purpose is to learn packaging [1], hence I'd suggest you to pick a package you really care for instead. The package you picked has a low popcon [2] no reverse dependencies and seems generally not helpful at all. That said, if you really want to maintain this package that's up to you. Here is a review: * You modified the orig.tar.gz tarball somehow: $ md5sum deb-version/xeji_1.2.orig.tar.gz mentors-version/xeji_1.2.orig.tar.gz afc838ca6174ac98d67b1580832e24d4 deb-version/xeji_1.2.orig.tar.gz 68893c38485b8063cdd6fbe81da76e11 mentors-version/xeji_1.2.orig.tar.gz That's not acceptable, especially since the tarball was already uploaded to Debian archives. Thus, you are not allowed to change the tarball anymore, once it was uploaded without pushing a new upstream version. Feel free to remove the wontfix tag once you addressed the tarball issue. Everything else is of lower importance. * debian/compat 6 is somewhat outdated these days. Joey released debehelper 9 just recently. Note, using compat 6 is not a tragedy, but you would profit from using compat 7 or higher a lot. * The synopsis line of the package is not really helpful (yet another whatever does not help anyone) and does not match our guidelines [3]. * You use the old copyright format, consider upgrading to DEP-5 instead (that's optional of course). * Why do you install manpages manually in debian/rules? You should use dh_installman instead. This makes both, the install rule and the dirs file unneeded. * You should use the short dh form. Check [5] and dh(1) for examples. Most people consider the old-style debhelper form deprecated. While you are it, remove the source and diff targets. They are obsolete since ages it appears. * The package breaks the hardening release goal [6]. See [7] to learn how to apply hardening flags. * Since you upgraded to 3.0/quilt there is no point to add manpages as a patch anymore. Just put the file into debian/ and install it as I outlined above. * patches/xeji_c.patch misses an appropriate DEP-3 header (that's optional again) * Don't override I: and W: tags in Lintian. Moreover, note your explanation for overriding copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl is wrong. That's not what the tag is about. * Remove the README.Debian file. The URL is dead and its information is redundant to debian/copyright. [1] bugs.debian.org/592977 [2] http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=xeji [3] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-pkg-synopsis [4] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ [5] /usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.tiny [6] http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SecurityHardeningBuildFlags [7] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/09/msg1.html [8] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPK0SpAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtQKMP/jktuMN/RzQDF2YfoKnCzbLx VXb9mB9jx1fdFTpqAXu6ANpnTeaa1gvBhoMrpqxVWGakgqFT2ctbp3l9xHmTEKhB /SftLz+/AyDPREt99p3Mv1GXbWeo7tWLrIr++vnW95fm62g2VNxR0qpjzyejvK6S agE/oOiQU2R1OoSj10GhMREZOWCU77DkVOd99XJjC77/4N7BLOC0xk+SKKtsz+9d 2ARsS+VfypBnvtF6rphvoHiV4r8gZOrSJ3KvWo5VNJ+S+d3YLlZIgRx4anoqe1dx 3inUhWPTxDO45tGNP7f5vwbWwDBykqjCsAKM/Vl5HVcJf+pOQ9IHxcSiBXFfq1Zs HDd7YfrtogZB570OINvoMBgOtVIFf5scpsyI2/F5VqVA7NtUZaIWWpbr3Tb6qzWD V1n3HuXmnv3CpW/DKrMt/psK1QR2PvqH2R5x6fE4xggTgKG+VdRXMmVJKO7vvPlT /XEpWvNCA7uWhb3x8oXM2X0FHe5b9Na6ISZbyWprzPVRdUAD1JoPHjeAC16xG6Et k77bCT9fp2GaWzs3IYq8nzwiK56q5307ouAXZwNrj7/EgQbhFTrJufE/nWnNnrrF 4F/PXAHBbt82WTaskRaabD8RbqWVt4IyJeHTav4qJvulb057dzeHYp4bN9RHPZJH 0ezb6XBuHhAhK7DBgtqT =6oHw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2b44a9.8060...@toell.net
Processed: Re: Bug#658432: RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 658432 +moreinfo +wontfix Bug #658432 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo Added tag(s) moreinfo. Bug #658432 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo Added tag(s) wontfix. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 658432: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658432 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132823569524021.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: RFS: libapr-memcache0
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote: libapr-memcache0-dev - apr_memcache developer package is a client for memcache The dev package should be named libapr-memcache-dev instead. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caktje6hywf_htnvdrkxzvupa+5aze3grp8hyqnmzjax62nm...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: taskcoach
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for * Package name: taskcoach Version : 1.3.6-1 Upstream Author : Task Coach developers develop...@taskcoach.org * URL : http://www.taskcoach.org * License : GPL-3+, wxwindows, LGPL-2.1+, PSF-2.7.2, MIT, BSD Section : utils It builds one binary package, architecture-independant since the source is pure python: taskcoach - friendly task manager Upstream has been maintaining this program actively since 2005 on Windows, Mac OS X, Linux, BSD, iPhone, iPad, and iPod Touch. Users have contributed 32 languages. The soft has been downloaded 1.5 million times on Sourceforge last year. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/taskcoach Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/taskcoach/taskcoach_1.3.6-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Please CC me any answer or information, I am not on the list. Kind regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120203025620.GA17408@pegase
Re: Bug#639995: epigrass does not start on GNOME
Hi Davide, thanks for using EpiGrass and I hope to get it up and running for your study. On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 12:21:27PM +0100, erB@rilloo wrote: Hello Jakub, I still have the error reported into bug 639995 (epigrass: missing dependency on python-pkg-resources): Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/epigrass, line 5, in module from pkg_resources import load_entry_point File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 2676, in module parse_requirements(__requires__), Environment() File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 552, in resolve raise DistributionNotFound(req) pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: distribute I urgently need EPIGRASS for my study so pls give me any advice to bypass this error. how can I get this missing dependency (it seems a python module) I'm using Ubuntu 11.10. I admit I never used Ubuntu and I'm just wild guessing. So please take this advise with a grain of salt because there will be a chance to break your system when doing so. If I understood things correctly the bug was not in epigrass but rather in python-networkx. It was fixed in python-networkx package version 1.6-1. So you can try to install this very package version on top of your Ubuntu system. I repeat my warning: There are chances to crash several things by mixing packages from different distributions - just ask an Ubuntu expert for more detailed advise. Another option would be to install Debian and upgrade to testing - it just depends *how* urgently you need EpiGrass. I also could give backporting EpiGrass a try to backports.debian.org if you confirm that you prefer to run a Debian stable system. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120203073316.gf...@an3as.eu
Re: RFS: libpam-abl , bug fix , package is already in Debian
On 02/02/2012 11:08 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Alex Mestiashvili a...@biotec.tu-dresden.de, 2012-02-01, 18:51: What does +testing.1 mean? Is that a pre-release thing? If this is the case, then use ~ instead of +. Yes , it is pre-release version . The upstream had -testting.1 in his version and I had to change this to meet the upstream_version requirements . - is allowed in upstream_version. But please notice that: 0.4.3-1 0.4.3+testing.1-1 0.4.3-testing.1-1 So you'll have a big problem once upstream releases the final 0.4.3. That's why you should use ~: 0.4.3~testing.1-1 0.4.3-1 I see.Great hint! thank you , Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2b8e22.20...@biotec.tu-dresden.de
RE: RFS: libapr-memcache0
Renamed the package -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: paul.is.w...@gmail.com [mailto:paul.is.w...@gmail.com] Namens Paul Wise Verzonden: vrijdag 3 februari 2012 4:02 Aan: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Onderwerp: Re: RFS: libapr-memcache0 On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote: libapr-memcache0-dev - apr_memcache developer package is a client for memcache The dev package should be named libapr-memcache-dev instead. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caktje6hywf_htnvdrkxzvupa+5aze3grp8hyqnmzjax62nm...@mail.gmail.com