Bug#658065: RFS: atlas-cpp/0.6.2-1 [ITA] -- WorldForge wire protocol library
Hi, Stephen M. Webb stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca writes: * There are files licensed under the GFDL in tutorial/example. [...] I have reworded debian/changelog for clarification and added a clause to debian/copyright for the example files. A new source package has been uploaded to mentors.debian.net. Please don't assume specific versions of licenses if upstream does not say so (debian/copyright says GFDL-1.3+ while the example files in the tarball say just GFDL unless I missed something). Also you mentioned the LGPL-2.1 instead of the GFDL later. Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87d39kfhrp@deep-thought.43-1.org
Bug#659243: marked as done (RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo])
Your message dated Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:15:48 +0100 with message-id 4f37ad74.7090...@debian.org and subject line Re: RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo] has caused the Debian Bug report #659243, regarding RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 659243: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659243 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Packages available at ftp://backports-master.debian.org/pub/UploadQueue Original Message Subject: RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo] Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:52:39 +0100 From: Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com To: Debian Backports debian-backpo...@lists.debian.org CC: Debian Mentors debian-mentors@lists.debian.org [ cc'ing d-mentors for RFS and mentors.d.o problems ] Hi, following [0], first upload has to be sponsored. Could anyone please upload sweethome3d and sunflow to backports for me? http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sunflow/sunflow_0.07.2.svn396+dfsg-9~bpo60+1.dsc [sweethome3d link is missing, uploaded to mentors but I got no response and it's not in package list] At the moment, you can pick them up both on backports.d.o under pub/UploadQueue because of my uploads without sponsor. Thanks. [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/2011/12/msg00011.html -- Gabriele ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi Gabriele, I've just uploaded sweethome3d and sunflow to squeeze-backports. They should show up in NEW queue soon. Thanks for you work. On 11/02/2012 01:49, Gabriele Giacone wrote: [CC'ing Luca Falavigna] (TODO: Next time poke just one sponsor at a time) On 02/11/2012 01:15 AM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: I'll check with gannef on IRC and try to get back to you when got a reply / a process to follow. gg0 Ganneff: I found one (or two) sponsors for testing DMUA in backports uploads Ganneff you dont need me. unless it breaks. until then i dont care. Ganneff get them sponsored once. wait until they are ACCEOTED. Ganneff then wait until you have reason to upload yourself Ganneff either it breaks and then i care - or it just works. Ganneff and i hope and right now assume it just works :) -- Damien - Debian Developper http://wiki.debian.org/DamienRaudeMorvan ---End Message---
RFS: policyd-weight
Dear mentors, I've recreated a new version of my package policyd-weight (previous version 0.1.15.2-1 was already uploaded to unstable. This version includes another bugfix, delivers the /etc/default/policyd-weight and has some modifications within the init-script. Hence I'm looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight :) * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-2 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f37b8d9.3060...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: RFS: libconfig (requires transition)
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 19:21:02 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote: I have upload a new version of libconfig to mentors, with the following changelog: this change to debian/rules looks weird: - $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp + $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp install the loop around dh_makeshlibs looks kind of crazy too. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RE: New release of Burp
Bartosz, I forgot to add a patch to serries file. I know stupid , Could you please upload again? To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/burp Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/burp/burp_1.3.0-3.dsc Bas -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Bartosz Feński [mailto:bart...@fenski.pl] Verzonden: zondag 12 februari 2012 8:00 Aan: Bas van den Dikkenberg CC: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Onderwerp: Re: New release of Burp W dniu 12.02.2012 00:52, Bas van den Dikkenberg pisze: Bartosz, I have worked almost around the clock with author of burp. To fixe most of the issues that where addressed bye Paul Wise (pabs) 3 thing are fix right away and the 2 other bugs wil be fixed in the next upstream release. Would you be so kind to upload the new version ? To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/burp Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/burp/burp_1.3.0-2.dsc With kind regards, Bas van den Dikkenberg Uploaded regards fEnIo
Re: New release of Burp
W dniu 12.02.2012 16:03, Bas van den Dikkenberg pisze: Bartosz, I forgot to add a patch to serries file. I know stupid , Could you please upload again? Done. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/burp Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/burp/burp_1.3.0-3.dsc Bas -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Bartosz Feński [mailto:bart...@fenski.pl] Verzonden: zondag 12 februari 2012 8:00 Aan: Bas van den Dikkenberg CC: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Onderwerp: Re: New release of Burp W dniu 12.02.2012 00:52, Bas van den Dikkenberg pisze: Bartosz, I have worked almost around the clock with author of burp. To fixe most of the issues that where addressed bye Paul Wise (pabs) 3 thing are fix right away and the 2 other bugs wil be fixed in the next upstream release. Would you be so kind to upload the new version ? To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/burp Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/burp/burp_1.3.0-2.dsc With kind regards, Bas van den Dikkenberg Uploaded regards fEnIo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f37dffc.9020...@fenski.pl
Re: RFS: libconfig (requires transition)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/02/12 13:44, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 19:21:02 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote: I have upload a new version of libconfig to mentors, with the following changelog: this change to debian/rules looks weird: - $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp + $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp install Whoops. That shouldn't be like that. the loop around dh_makeshlibs looks kind of crazy too. That is how it was done in previous releases. I've changed that to use hardcoded values now. I've fixed these and reuploaded 1.4.8-1 to mentors now. Jon -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPOAi8AAoJEJ6XA7Whh53bLhcIAI9xUQAOx1RE+ospMmM0kWQO 0qtxw2lcCxBMAVXL0aT4ES2JLxu819PWMHn1JJyCjbCupWlJT4OinxlG1mbrjgZB OQIU3IBPYaZTiihgwJlUFW08IEDsvOmjhuLhIXBstGwH+MK7CMBEVYO4d9TvOVJq HhP4nCEAezIRUegaN9C4C2RsQ8oewi3Ru8wuL8M9EPSWEu/JL8Eaf1az117dBryX 5ArDiVgndsoC8vPMicioDzGYmg3KEuV35ZKUanJB3QvZzV35dR6XVuIo3W0lsC7a AeqycPKFmKdQvcexE2Sk0P3eAmBbHvczLTSrPlZ9gUDXebg2UJBtJKF0mFmuEPU= =LP2b -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f3808bc.3090...@gmail.com
Problem finding posix_types_32.h when using pbuilder on the fis-gtm package.
Debian-mentors, I'm working on packaging fis-gtm, The configuration files that I'm using are here: svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk/packages/fis-gtm/fis-gtm/trunk/debian http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/fis-gtm/fis-gtm/trunk/debian/ These are setup to get the tarball by using: uscan --verbose --force-depends I manage to build the package locally by using debuild, but, when I use the pdebuild command, I get the following output: - Start the build - Linux Host 32 Linux Host linux i386 x86_regs Source Directory List: sr_linux sr_i386 sr_x86_regs sr_unix_gnp sr_unix_cm sr_unix_nsb sr_unix sr_port_cm sr_port make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B' mkdir -p /tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/pro/map tcsh -f /tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_unix/gen_gtm_threadgbl_deftypes.csh /tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B sr_port pro/obj sr_linux sr_i386 sr_x86_regs sr_unix_gnp sr_unix_cm sr_unix_nsb sr_unix sr_port_cm sr_port Entering gen_gtm_threadgbl_deftypes.csh to build gtm_threadgbl_deftypes.h ~/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/pro/obj ~/fis-gtm-5.4-002B Replacing /tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_linux/gtm_threadgbl_deftypes.h ~/fis-gtm-5.4-002B Exiting gen_gtm_threadgbl_deftypes.csh make -C /tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/pro/obj -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/pro/obj -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_linux -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_i386 -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_x86_regs -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_unix_gnp -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_unix_cm -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_unix_nsb -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_unix -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_port_cm -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_port -f /tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_unix/comlist.mk CURRENT_BUILDTYPE=pro all Linux Host 32 Linux Host linux i386 x86_regs Source Directory List: sr_linux sr_i386 sr_x86_regs sr_unix_gnp sr_unix_cm sr_unix_nsb sr_unix sr_port_cm sr_port make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/pro/obj' cc1: note: obsolete option -I- used, please use -iquote instead /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/asm/posix_types.h:2:30: fatal error: posix_types_32.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. cc1: note: obsolete option -I- used, please use -iquote instead cc1: note: obsolete option -I- used, please use -iquote instead /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/asm/posix_types.h:2:30: fatal error: posix_types_32.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. ... and goes on an on, repeating the error about posix_types_32.h. BTW: Please disregard the message: cc1: note: obsolete option -I- used, please use -iquote instead This is a known issue, and probably not related to the problem with posix_types_32.h. I get the same cc1 warnings when building with dbuild and yet in that case the build is successful. I'm doing this in a Virtual Machine, in which uname -a returns: Linux debian-med 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Mon Jan 16 16:04:25 UTC 2012 i686 GNU/Linux The host of this VM, returns for uname -a: Linux macondo 2.6.32-38-generic #83-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jan 4 11:12:07 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux Login into pbuilder, it was possible to verify that the header file is actually there, under: ls ./usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/asm/posix* -l -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 92 Feb 6 01:32 ./usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/asm/posix_types.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1316 Feb 6 01:32 ./usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/asm/posix_types_32.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1306 Feb 6 01:32 ./usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/asm/posix_types_64.h I'm having trouble understanding why is that the build process finds: ./usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/asm/posix_types.h but fails to find posix_types_32.h Any suggestions will be appreciated, Thanks Luis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cabauzprbxvinepvnkjtgcobgobf83ukuy8dvxcy8a7i4yj5...@mail.gmail.com
Re: upstream changelog in LaTeX format
Hello List: On 11/02/12 22:56, Don Armstrong wrote: On Sat, 11 Feb 2012, Jerome BENOIT wrote: The upstream changelog of my package is in LaTeX format: as the LaTeX is rough enough to be translated to HTML format by TtH, I will put the HTML translation within the package. Given that, what I am supposed to do with the LaTeX changelog source ? May I put it within the package as well ? What about its PDF version ? You should at the very least include the LaTeX source in the source package (hopefully upstream already does this). Of course. During the build process, build a text-only version (using catdvi FE) I tried catdvi to compare against the combination (html2text * tth): the text output produced by catdvi is really worth, so I will use the combination (html2text * tth). , and optionally include the PDF if that is helpful in addition. I will because the Config.tex plays a lot with font types. Thanks, Jerome Don Armstrong -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f385900.8020...@rezozer.net
how to manage d/changelog for updated but not yet sponsored package
Hello List: I am on the edge to put on m.d.n an updated version of one of my not yet sponsored packages: since between the two versions the upstream maintainer kindly integrated some patches that I submitted to him as Debian patches, I want to keep trace of it in the d/changelog by keeping my first version entry and adding a second entry. Can I do that ? Will it confuse some Debian robots ? Thanks in advance, Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f385be6.20...@rezozer.net
Re: how to manage d/changelog for updated but not yet sponsored package
Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net writes: I want to keep trace of it in the d/changelog by keeping my first version entry and adding a second entry. Can I do that ? Will it confuse some Debian robots ? It's fine. I consider uploading the package to ‘mentors.debian.net’ a release of the package, since at that point interested people (e.g. reviewers) can rely on it, and the version should refer uniquely to what I uploaded at that time. Be aware, though, that some people disagree (on the grounds that it's not a new version until it enters Debian). So I'd say: after you've uploaded a version, keep things clear. Make a new version in ‘debian/changelog’ when you're preparing a new upload. -- \ “Contentment is a pearl of great price, and whosoever procures | `\it at the expense of ten thousand desires makes a wise and | _o__) happy purchase.” —J. Balguy | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87y5s71mnm@benfinney.id.au
