> I'm slightly surprised by these package-contains-broken-symlink lintian
> warnings, as the package seems to have correct depends, so I've asked the
> lintian maintainers about it. Please keep an eye on these warnings and
> probably remove the overrides one day :)
This is probably related to b
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 03:12:46AM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> I've seen wwwoffle was dropped from Debian and Ubuntu.
> As I really need it, I'm willing to step in as maintainer.
>
> I'm currently in process of importing the available releases into
> an git repo and adding the latest patches.
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 677239 RFS: fractalnow/0.8.0-1 [ITP #673395] -- Fast, advanced
> fractal generator
Bug #677239 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: fractalnow [ITP #673395] -- Fast,
advanced fractal generator
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: fractalnow/0.8.0-1 [ITP #6
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2012 04:14:17 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: presage/0.8.8-1 (updated package, new upstream
release)
has caused the Debian Bug report #676936,
regarding RFS: presage/0.8.8-1 (updated package, new upstream release)
to be marked as done.
This mea
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 10:21 -0400, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:03:53AM -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 08:36 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> >
> > > * Package name: ledgersmb
> > > Version : 1.3.18-1
> >
> > Note that the Mentors QA i
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > I'll just try this selectricity poll for now so we don't get billions
> > of votes here:
> >
> > http://selectricity.org/quickvote/debianrfslist
>
> So, I don't think those options accurately describe the choices. The
> options really are:
>
> 1.
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> This drives people who sponsor off the list -- we therefore loose
> people, not gain any.
Except that anyone who sponsors has to learn about the sponsorship
request. I'm not particularly interested in sending the same mail to
two different lists.
Do
> I'll just try this selectricity poll for now so we don't get billions
> of votes here:
>
> http://selectricity.org/quickvote/debianrfslist
So, I don't think those options accurately describe the choices. The
options really are:
1. Send useful bts discussion as well as verbose control messages
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Arno Töll wrote:
>> upon rough consensus and after discussing with formorer [1] I'd like
>> to to request a new list dedicated to sponsorship requests. The list
>> would be used to manage sponsorship-requests bug traffic
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Arno Töll wrote:
> upon rough consensus and after discussing with formorer [1] I'd like
> to to request a new list dedicated to sponsorship requests. The list
> would be used to manage sponsorship-requests bug traffic as a
> pseudo-package owner [2].
I'd personally prefer that
Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
upon rough consensus and after discussing with formorer [1] I'd like to to
request
a new list dedicated to sponsorship requests. The list would be used to manage
sponsorship-requests bug traffic as a pseudo-package owner [2].
Name
At your
(I don't intend to sponsor this package.)
* Daniel Martà , 2012-06-12, 20:43:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/heybuddy/heybuddy_0.2.3-1.dsc
Build-dependency on python is insufficient. As per dh_python2 manpage,
it should be (>= 2.6.6-3~).
Similarly, Depends of the binary pack
> I've read quite a bit on the kfreebsd-i386 problems with ELF, but I
> have encountered a different solution in every thread on the internet.
> Some said to patch libelf.h, which is sadly not shipped with prelink. We
> have libelf-0.7.0.patch, but that patchs a nonexistent file. We do have
> libel
Dear Mentors,
It's been almost four months now since I first uploaded this package,
and the last reply I got is almost eight weeks old. Heybuddy is a great
piece of software and I'd very much like to get it into Debian.
Package name: heybuddy
Version : 0.2.3-1
Upstream Author
Dear Mentors,
There's a new version of prelink up at mentors.debian.net.
Here is the full changelog:
prelink (0.0.20111012-1) unstable; urgency=low
* QA upload.
* New upstream release. (LP: #731719)
* Switched to source format 3.0 (quilt).
- Refreshed all patches.
* Bumped debhelper
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:14:44 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: x2goclient/3.99.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #676643,
regarding RFS: x2goclient/3.99.2.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 676608 RFS: python-x2go/0.2.0.4-1
Bug #676608 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: python-x2go/0.2.0.3-1
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: python-x2go/0.2.0.4-1' from 'RFS:
python-x2go/0.2.0.3-1'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Jakub Wilk writes:
> * Ben Finney , 2012-06-12, 11:48:
> >>The package FTBFS if built twice in a row:
> > That didn't happen for me with a âpbuilder --build
> > --twiceâ, which I run specifically to find problems like this.
> > Any idea why the results would be different?
>
> I think it's bec
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 670195 RFS: lierolibre/0.4-1 [ITP]
Bug #670195 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: lierolibre/0.3-1 [ITP]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: lierolibre/0.4-1 [ITP]' from 'RFS: lierolibre/0.3-1
[ITP]'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2012 17:44:49 +0200
with message-id <4fd763f1.7060...@debian.org>
and subject line ember and ember-media have been uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #664766,
regarding RFS: ember/0.6.2+dfsg-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2012 17:44:49 +0200
with message-id <4fd763f1.7060...@debian.org>
and subject line ember and ember-media have been uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #664765,
regarding RFS: ember-media/0.6.2.1-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
> No, most of my changes were aimed at bringing prelink to more
> architectures, but this one is stubborn for some reason, and its the
> last one.
Ah, thanks then.
> >> Some references that may be useful related to that:
> >> https://github.com/OpenELEC/OpenELEC.tv/issues/812
> >> https://bugs.ge
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Daniel Martí wrote:
>> Would you mind incorporating the libtool fixes that I pushed in the -6
>> upload?
>
> Sure. But please, if you want to incorporate more changes, either do it
> all at once or email them to me so I can add them to the newer package.
> I'm sta
> Would you mind incorporating the libtool fixes that I pushed in the -6 upload?
Sure. But please, if you want to incorporate more changes, either do it
all at once or email them to me so I can add them to the newer package.
I'm starting to get a bit lost after so many revisions.
> Also, could yo
Hi,
Could someone have a look at this 2-month-old RFS?
Kind regards, Thibaut.
Le 19/04/12 11:35, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I've updated the package which now installs the headers in a
> subdirectory of /usr/include:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/gyoto
> http://mentors.debian.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for someone to sponsor my first package "fractalnow".
* Package name: fractalnow
Version : 0.8.0
Upstream Author : Marc Pegon
* URL : http://fractalnow.sourceforge.net
* License : LGP
Hello,
since I offered Patrick Winnertz, the maintainer, to co-maintain about two
weeks ago and he was also CC'ed in parts of this thread but got no response
from him, I am hoping someone could sponsor my updates to the powertop
package, which can be found under http://rbw.goe.net/jw/. I tried
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:03:53AM -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 08:36 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
>
> > * Package name: ledgersmb
> > Version : 1.3.18-1
>
> Note that the Mentors QA item "Package is not the latest upstream
> version"[1] is incorrect, a
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 08:36 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> * Package name: ledgersmb
> Version : 1.3.18-1
Note that the Mentors QA item "Package is not the latest upstream
version"[1] is incorrect, as v1.3.18 is the most recent release. The
"Newest" version mentioned, 1.3.999020
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 18:41 +0200, Martin Erik Werner wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 19:59 +0200, Martin Erik Werner wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:14 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Martin Erik Werner wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for
>
>
>
> Wait half an hour and retry: works.
>
umm i try this.. and nothinh,.. but i'll try this again with my key
uploaded in a public server .. maybe replication its slowly
> Conclusion (in my case): it can take some time before
> a freshly uploaded key is taken into account.
>
my ley are into a
Hi guys,
it's been two months since I initially posted this RFS, and the release
is getting nearer...
Regards, Thibaut.
Le 26/05/12 11:05, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
> Le 08/05/12 09:43, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
>> Hi guys,
>
>> I'd love it if someone could have a look at this package:
>> http
Hi,
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:42:12 -0430
> i try to upload my dsc packages and sources but i get key singin errors, i
> generated the 4096 key and put in debian mentors profile.. but when i upload
> this happened:
>
> GnuPG signature check failed on XX.changes
> gpg: Signature mad
* Ben Finney , 2012-06-12, 11:48:
The package FTBFS if built twice in a row:
That didn't happen for me with a âpbuilder --build --twiceâ, which I
run specifically to find problems like this. Any idea why the results
would be different?
I think it's because I had python2.6 installed in my
dpkg-source: warning: failed to verify signature on ./python-
x2go_0.2.0.4-1.dsc
dpkg-source: info: extracting python-x2go in python-x2go-0.2.0.4
dpkg-source: info: unpacking python-x2go_0.2.0.4.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: info: unpacking python-x2go_0.2.0.4-1.debian.tar.gz
I: Building the package
I:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 676991 by 676608
Bug #676991 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: pyhoca-gui/0.2.0.0-3 [ITP #655603] --
Graphical X2Go Client System Tray Applet
676991 was not blocked by any bugs.
676991 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 676991: 6
Hi Holger,
On Di 12 Jun 2012 09:23:43 CEST Holger Levsen wrote:
tags 676991 - pending
thanks
Hi,
gah, it fails to build in pbuilder:
$ sudo pbuilder --build pyhoca-gui_0.2.0.0-3.dsc
I: using fakeroot in build.
I: Current time: Tue Jun 12 09:18:42 CEST 2012
I: pbuilder-time-stamp: 1339485522
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "drwright".
* Package name : drwright
Version : 3.5.0-1
Upstream Author :
* URL : http://git.gnome.org/browse/drwright and
http://live.gnome.org/drwright
* License : GPL-2.0+
Section : gnome
Description: Typing monitor to force typing breaks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 676991 - pending
Bug #676991 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: pyhoca-gui/0.2.0.0-3 [ITP #655603] --
Graphical X2Go Client System Tray Applet
Removed tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
tags 676991 - pending
thanks
Hi,
gah, it fails to build in pbuilder:
$ sudo pbuilder --build pyhoca-gui_0.2.0.0-3.dsc
I: using fakeroot in build.
I: Current time: Tue Jun 12 09:18:42 CEST 2012
I: pbuilder-time-stamp: 1339485522
I: Building the build Environment
I: extracting base tarball [/var/c
tags 676991 + pending
thanks
On Montag, 11. Juni 2012, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyhoca-gui"
I'm uploading this at the moment... :)
I'm slightly surprised by these package-contains-broken-symlink lintian
warnings, as the package seems to have correct depen
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 676991 + pending
Bug #676991 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: pyhoca-gui/0.2.0.0-3 [ITP #655603] --
Graphical X2Go Client System Tray Applet
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
6
42 matches
Mail list logo
