Re: wwwoffle
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 03:12:46AM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: I've seen wwwoffle was dropped from Debian and Ubuntu. As I really need it, I'm willing to step in as maintainer. I'm currently in process of importing the available releases into an git repo and adding the latest patches. I've never really contributed to Debian yet, so please let me know what should be done here. The very first thing you do is file an intent to package (ITP) bug report. In this case there already is a request for package (RFP) as #649860, so you retitle that RFP bug as ITP and set yourself as the owner. If you need help with maintaining wwwoffle, feel free to ask me. Helmut -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120613063631.ga18...@alf.mars
Bug#676991: RFS: pyhoca-gui/0.2.0.0-3 [ITP #655603] -- Graphical X2Go Client System Tray Applet
I'm slightly surprised by these package-contains-broken-symlink lintian warnings, as the package seems to have correct depends, so I've asked the lintian maintainers about it. Please keep an eye on these warnings and probably remove the overrides one day :) This is probably related to bug 672297 (although then the description should be updated if it is). By the way, I believe that lintian asks not to override lintian warnings if lintian needs to be fixed instead. I.e. if lintian produces a warning that is a false positive and should be fixed in lintian, you should not provide a lintian override. This is in contrast to false positives that are difficult or impossible to fix in lintian, e.g. because your case is a corner case. Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#674483: RFS: haxe/1:2.9+20120414-1 [ITA] -- Web-oriented universal programming language
Hi,
2012/5/25 Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package haxe.
haxe has been removed one year ago due to FTBFS on kfreebsd still
reproducible http://deb.li/3KVzx. This version builds fine.
* Package name : haxe
Version : 1:2.9+20120414-1
2.9? I think that the latest version is 2.09.
http://haxe.org/download
Upstream Author : Nicolas Cannasse ncannasse at motion-twin.com
* URL : http://haxe.org
* License : GPL-2+
Section : devel
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/haxe/haxe_2.9+20120414-1.dsc
* New upstream release.
* Adopting package, replace maintainer (Closes: #628948).
* Enable hardening w/o PIE.
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.3, no changes.
You can found some lintian report. Could you check ?
http://mentors.debian.net/package/haxe
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CABMQnVJrRxrk3cwLWBfZU6saJ=gDtjw5dzsO_spd1vE_2_k=8...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#674483: RFS: haxe/1:2.9+20120414-1 [ITA] -- Web-oriented universal programming language
2012/6/13 Bart Martens ba...@debian.org:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 04:56:26PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
2012/5/25 Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package haxe.
haxe has been removed one year ago due to FTBFS on kfreebsd still
reproducible http://deb.li/3KVzx. This version builds fine.
* Package name : haxe
Version : 1:2.9+20120414-1
2.9? I think that the latest version is 2.09.
http://haxe.org/download
This command produces exit code 0 :
dpkg --compare-versions 2.9 eq 2.09 ; echo $?
So it doesn't really matter much I guess.
You are right. Sorry for the noise.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/cabmqnvltbabdnu-kdihc_ushmcgpvkefjv544ycxsbc1cm8...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: cl-asdf (updated package)
Faré fah...@gmail.com writes: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2:2.22-1 of my package cl-asdf. Is there an easily accessible changelog to see what changed in 2.22-1 since the last upload? (VCS-Browser could work too, but a .changes file would be nice. Alternatively, pasting the changes to the RFS mail can go a long way aswell) -- |8] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87pq93sj0u.fsf@algernon.balabit
Re: Bug#677277: lists.debian.org: new list: sponsorship-reque...@lists.debian.org
Hi, On 06/12/2012 11:55 PM, Don Armstrong wrote: 4) Those who don't want to receive BTS mail can trivially filter it out If they know how to do so. Please keep in mind that we want new contributors to subscribe to -mentors and we already throw a lot of stuff to learn at them. Putting even more on that list might not be a good idea. On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Michael Gilbert wrote: I'll just try this selectricity poll for now so we don't get billions of votes here: http://selectricity.org/quickvote/debianrfslist So, I don't think those options accurately describe the choices. The options really are: 1. Send useful bts discussion as well as verbose control messages to -mentors 2. Send useful bts discussion to both -mentors and sponsorship-requests, with verbose control messages to sponsorship-requests only These two options would require listmaster@ to specifically filter out messages that were sent to debian-mentors. No, as far as I know the current plan was to change the maintainer for the pseudo-package and then subscribe -mentors@ to only the discussion part via the PTS (the bts keyword there, but not bts-control). Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd85d89.6040...@debian.org
Bug#677347: RFS: rt-extension-jsgantt/0.18-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package rt-extension-jsgantt * Package name: rt-extension-jsgantt * Version : 0.18-1 * Upstream Author : SUNNAVY sunn...@gmail.com * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~sunnavy/RT-Extension-JSGantt-0.18/ * License : GPL-2+ * Section : perl It builds those binary packages: rt4-extension-jsgantt - Gantt charts for your tickets (for RT4) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/rt-extension-jsgantt Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rt-extension-jsgantt/rt-extension-jsgantt_0.18-1.dsc regards, -- KURASHIKI Satoru -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120613104852.18884.78852.report...@acacia.in.yoikaze.org
Bug#677354: RFS: hyperestraier/1.4.13-5 [RC]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package hyperestraier * Package name: hyperestraier Version : 1.4.13-5 Upstream Author : Mikio Hirabayashi mi...@fallabs.com * URL : http://fallabs.com/hyperestraier/ * License : LGPL-2.1+ Section : text It builds those binary packages: hyperestraier - full-text search system for communities libestraier-dev - full-text search system Libraries [development] libestraier-java - Hyper Estraier Node API Libraries for Java libestraier-perl - Hyper Estraier node API Libraries for Perl libestraier-ruby - Hyper Estraier Node API Libraries for Ruby (transitional package) libestraier-ruby-doc - Hyper Estraier Node API Libraries for Ruby doc (transitional pack libestraier-ruby1.8 - Hyper Estraier Node API Libraries for Ruby 1.8 (transitional pack libestraier-ruby1.9.1 - Hyper Estraier Node API Libraries for Ruby 1.9.1 (transitional pa libestraier8 - full-text search system Libraries [runtime] ruby-hyperestraier - Hyper Estraier Node API Libraries for Ruby ruby-hyperestraier-doc - Hyper Estraier Node API Libraries for Ruby (documentation) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/hyperestraier Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hyperestraier/hyperestraier_1.4.13-5.dsc This update fixes RC bug to drop building java bindings for some architectures. cf. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673164 Changes since the last upload: * Drop to build Java binding in some Archs. (Closes: #673164) * Apply hardening build flags. regards, -- KURASHIKI Satoru -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120613110354.19343.25632.report...@acacia.in.yoikaze.org
Re: Bug#672290: RFS: uhub/0.4.0-1 (updated) -- High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 10:58:57PM +0300, Boris Pek wrote: This version of package should fix FTBFS on s390 and s390x. Which is now important as I see in debian-devel-announce mailing list [2]. Sorry, but no: 117 files changed, 7945 insertions(+), 1683 deletions(-) I'm ok with sponsoring targetted fixes, but not new upstream versions. Please ask on mentors or your former sponsor. (This looks like drive-by sponsoring which makes me sad.) Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#675701: What is wrong with ptop
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:19:14AM +, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote: In the comment on mentors you say copyright is wrong. But William LeFebvre is listed as one of the main copyright holders. I don't have to specify witch he wrote en witch wong worked on, right? Hi Bas, http://mentors.debian.net/package/ptop I have read the comment again. I think that the comment is very clear. What part don't you understand ? Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120613114152.ga23...@master.debian.org
Bug#675701: What is wrong with ptop
Sorrie it is not clear, William is mention in the copyright file. So what is wrong, you can spyfy every file in the copyright. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Bart Martens [mailto:ba...@master.debian.org] Namens Bart Martens Verzonden: woensdag 13 juni 2012 13:42 Aan: Bas van den Dikkenberg CC: 675...@bugs.debian.org Onderwerp: Re: What is wrong with ptop On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:19:14AM +, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote: In the comment on mentors you say copyright is wrong. But William LeFebvre is listed as one of the main copyright holders. I don't have to specify witch he wrote en witch wong worked on, right? Hi Bas, http://mentors.debian.net/package/ptop I have read the comment again. I think that the comment is very clear. What part don't you understand ? Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/B1AA70CF260D6446B5DBB7B8C7E4CED50A26FA94@srv03.dikkenberg.local
Bug#677379: RFS: x52pro/0.1.1-3
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package x52pro
* Package name: x52pro
Version : 0.1.1-3
Upstream Author : Eduard Hasenleithner edu...@hasenleithner.at
* URL : http://plasma.hasenleithner.at/x52pro/
* License : LGPL-2.1
Section : libs
It builds those binary packages:
libx52pro-dev - MFD and LED library for Saitek X52pro joysticks - dev files
libx52pro0 - MFD and LED library for Saitek x52pro joysticks
x52pro-tools - utility for MFD and LED library for Saitek X52pro joysticks
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/x52pro
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/x52pro/x52pro_0.1.1-3.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* Add 0002-add-multiarch-support.patch
* Bump compatibility level to 9.
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (no changes).
* Add Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends} to libx52pro0.
* Set libx52pro0 Multi-Arch: foreign, and libx52pro-dev Multi-Arch: same
* Install the libraries in the multiarch patch.
* Add new package x52pro-tools.
* Update debian/copyright information.
Regards,
--
Grzegorz Kolorz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120613131424.GA20700@titan
Bug#677384: RFS: hoteldruid/2.0.0-1 [ITP] -- Web based hotel management system
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package hoteldruid * Package name: hoteldruid Version : 2.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Marco M. F. De Santis ma...@digitaldruid.net * URL : http://www.hoteldruid.com * License : AGPL-3 Programming Lang: PHP Section : web It builds those binary packages: hoteldruid - web based property management system for your hotel or BB To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/hoteldruid Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hoteldruid/hoteldruid_2.0.0-1.dsc More information on HotelDruid: HotelDruid is designed to manage hotel rooms, bed and breakfast apartments or any other kind of daily rental, from your browser. Reservations can be assigned to rooms automatically with user defined rules. You can create website pages to display and check availability. Includes point of sale and statistics reports. Multi-user with groups and privileges system. Supports printing, saving and emailing of documents and invoices. It is written in PHP, by default uses Sqlite as its database, with possibility to migrate to MySQL or PostgreSQL. I am also the upstream author and maintainer, if the packege gets uploaded I am willing to maintain and update it in the future. Currently there is no other hotel management system included in Debian (at least I haven't found it). Let me know if you have comments or questions. Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #676699) Thank you, Marco Maria Francesco De Santis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd89ad7.8010...@digitaldruid.net
Re: Bug#672290: RFS: uhub/0.4.0-1 (updated) -- High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub
Hi, Thank you for a reply. 117 files changed, 7945 insertions(+), 1683 deletions(-) Yes, two years passed since previous stable release of uHub. Please ask on mentors or your former sponsor. Unfortunately my regular sponsor (Dmitry E. Oboukhov) currently is busy. Package is waiting for upload since the beginning of April [1]. RFS for mentors was done in beginning of May: http://bugs.debian.org/672290 But there was no any reply to it. In the middle of May I sent [2] request for help to check build on s390/s390x because I have no possibility to check it myself. There was no any reply. New stable release of uHub happened in the end of May. It is more stable and should be compiled fine on all architectures supported in Debian. I believe this new version of program should be in Wheeze, but the freeze will be soon... Now I am waiting any interested person who could upload the package or just test build on s390/s390x. If it still FTBFS on these architectures I can prepare the patch (but for this new version of package, not for previous). Best regards, Boris [1] History of uploads available here: http://mentors.debian.net/package/uhub [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-s390/2012/05/msg00053.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/339061339597...@web4f.yandex.ru
Processed: retitle to RFS: python-x2go/0.2.0.5-1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 676608 RFS: python-x2go/0.2.0.5-1 Bug #676608 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: python-x2go/0.2.0.4-1 Changed Bug title to 'RFS: python-x2go/0.2.0.5-1' from 'RFS: python-x2go/0.2.0.4-1' stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 676608: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676608 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133960405527450.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Bug#677277: lists.debian.org: new list: sponsorship-reque...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: No, as far as I know the current plan was to change the maintainer for the pseudo-package and then subscribe -mentors@ to only the discussion part via the PTS (the bts keyword there, but not bts-control). Ah; I didn't realize the PTS split these out. Of course, that means that anyone who subscribes to -mentors and -requests gets to get mail twice, which is annoying. Don Armstrong -- I finally developed a computer with feelings. It just doesn't have feelings for me. -- a softer world #633 http://www.asofterworld.com/index.php?id=633 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120613164629.gm32...@rzlab.ucr.edu
Re: Bug#677277: lists.debian.org: new list: sponsorship-reque...@lists.debian.org
Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes: On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: No, as far as I know the current plan was to change the maintainer for the pseudo-package and then subscribe -mentors@ to only the discussion part via the PTS (the bts keyword there, but not bts-control). Ah; I didn't realize the PTS split these out. Of course, that means that anyone who subscribes to -mentors and -requests gets to get mail twice, which is annoying. But that's an annoyance I can opt in to. Currently, if I don't care about sponsorship control messages (which, right now, I don't) I have to opt out, and filter them. I don't like opt-out, opt-in is much friendlier. And as far as duplicate messages count: no problem. I'll have context on the -requests list too, and summary on -mentors. I think that's a great feature, rather than an annoyance. -- |8] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/878vfrqhjv.fsf@algernon.balabit
Bug#677070: marked as done (RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.18-1 -- Financial accounting and ERP program)
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:04:07 +0200 with message-id 20120613190407.ga11...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com and subject line Re: New LedgerSMB Debian package, 1.3.18-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #677070, regarding RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.18-1 -- Financial accounting and ERP program to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 677070: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677070 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package ledgersmb * Package name: ledgersmb Version : 1.3.18-1 Upstream Author : The LedgerSMB Core Team * URL : www.ledgersmb.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : web It builds those binary packages: ledgersmb - Financial accounting and ERP program To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/ledgersmb Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/ledgersmb/ledgersmb_1.3.18-1.dsc Note that this upload will resolve bug # 676639; that issue was fixed in upstream version 1.3.16. More information about LedgerSMB can be obtained from http://www.ledgersmb.org. Changes since the last upload: ledgersmb (1.3.18-1) unstable; urgency=low * Changes to debian/patches/: - Update 05_confdir.patch for the new cssdir configuration item. - Update 10_httpdconf.patch for the new cssdir configuration item. * Changes to debian/ledgersmb.postinst: - Add code that creates the initial default set of css files from the example files. - Correct a typo in the similar code for /var/lib/ledgersmb/templates. * Add the application css directory to the debian/ledgersmb.examples file and remove it from the debian/ledgersmb.install file. * Add code in ledgersmb.postrm to remove /var/lib/ledgersmb/css during a package purge. (Like for /var/lib/ledgersmb/templates, which was actually added with 1.3.17-1.) * Removed the no longer needed references to libexcel-template-plus-perl from debian/control and debian/README.Debian. * Removed blib/man3/LedgerSMB::Template::XLS.3pm from ledgersmb.manpages. * Add the removal of empty example language specifc template directories to debian/rules. -- Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us Sun, 10 Jun 2012 22:51:41 -0400 ledgersmb (1.3.17-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. * Add a note regarding libimage-size-perl to README.Debian. * Changes to debian/patches/05_confdir.patch: - Update the templates path to be /var/lib/ledgersmb/templates. * No longer need to set ownership of /etc/ledgersmb/templates in debian/rules. * Add the application templates directory to the debian/ledgersmb.examples file and remove it from the debian/ledgersmb.install file. * Changes to debian/control: - Add libtemplate-plugin-latex-perl module to Recommends. - Add the libexcel-template-plus-perl and libimage-size-perl modules to Suggests. * Add code in ledgersmb.postinst to create the initial default set of templates from the example templates. * Add code with debian/ledgersmb.preinst to, if it exists, move the directory /etc/ledgersmb/templates to /var/lib/ledgersmb. -- Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us Sat, 02 Jun 2012 20:59:37 -0400 ledgersmb (1.3.16-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. * Resolves package ITP. (Closes: #406935) * Update and rewrite debian/TODO and README.Debian. * Update debian/NEWS, debian/templates and README.Debian regarding the initial configuration of the package. * Add update of PostgreSQL contrib_dir variable to patches/05_confdir.patch. -- Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us Tue, 08 May 2012 07:55:30 -0400 Regards, Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi, On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Robert James Clay wrote: I went ahead submitted that Request for Sponsor bug because I didn't know how busy you might be at the moment. If you can take care it, though, I'd appreciate it as you're already more familiar with it than someone else might be. Uploaded. Some comments for the next time: 1/ I would not install the css and templates directories as examples. Because the postinst requires those files and this will break for people who are using dpkg's --path-exclude to drop /usr/share/doc/ (to save space). Put them in /usr/share/ledgersmb/. The templates symlink there is not useful anyway
Bug#660128: RFS: heybuddy/0.2.3-1 [ITP] (16th week)
Build-dependency on python is insufficient. As per dh_python2
manpage, it should be (= 2.6.6-3~).
Fixed.
Similarly, Depends of the binary package is not sufficient. Please
use ${python:Depends} (instead of hard-coded python (= 2.6)),
so that dh_python2 can generate the dependency automatically.
Fixed.
What is /usr/share/pixmaps/heybuddy.png for? Also, aren't files in
/usr/share/pixmaps/ supposed to be in XPM format? (Please forgive my
ignorance on this subject.)
heybuddy.png is its icon image file. A quick scroogle search for debian
filelist /usr/share/pixmap png shows many packages shipping both .xpm
and .png files, and as there are no lintian complaints in respect to
that, I'm going to assume that's not a problem.
Shebang of the script is #!/usr/bin/env python.
#!/usr/bin/python is strongly preferred (see Python Policy 3.1).
Added a quilt patch to solve that, thanks.
Copyright/license of CertificateValidatingHTTPSHandler.py is not
documented in debian/copyright. Is CC-BY-SA-3.0 compatible with
GPL-3?
CC-BY-SA 3.0 is accepted by the DFSG, but not by the GPLv3. I've emailed
the upstream author about the subject. For now, debian/copyright has
been solved.
A new .dsc file is up at mentors.debian.net:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/heybuddy/heybuddy_0.2.3-1.dsc
Thanks for your help, Jakub.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpaRRmAl2IrJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bug#677433: RFS: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-17 (adopted; hardenend)
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, the old maintainer allowed an NMU, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653539#15 and after some mails in the last days he allowed me to adopt his package because of lacking in time. So I am looking for a sponsor for my package capi4hylafax. * Package name: capi4hylafax Version : 1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-17 Upstream Author : AVM GmbH * URL : ftp://ftp.avm.de/tools/capi4hylafax.linux * License : GPL-2.0+ Section : comm It builds those binary packages: capi4hylafax - Faxing over CAPI 2.0 device To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/capi4hylafax Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/capi4hylafax/capi4hylafax_01.03.00.99.svn.300-17.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: capi4hylafax (1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-17) unstable; urgency=medium * New maintainer (adopted). * Move to source formate 3.0 (quilt). * Generate explicit patches of old source changes. * Fix configure.in to work with newer automake/autoconf. * Optimize some fprintf params (thanks to M. Muehlhoff). * Fix datatype issue: use __WORDSIZE for checking 64 bit arch. * debian/control: - Bump to Standards-Version 3.9.3. - Move to build dependency debhelper (= 8). - Move to build dependency libtiff-dev. - Remove old versions in dependencies. - Remove old conflicts field. - Add recommended targets build-arch and build-indep. - Enable hardenend build flags. Closes: #653539 * Update postrm, preinst, prerm scripts. Remove old version checks. * Add postinst script to create /dev/faxCAPI as symlink. * Move default logfile to /var/log/hylafax directory. * Add logrotate configuration for logfile. Closes: #647164 * Rename to filename capi4hylafax.init and move LSB INIT INFO to header. * Fix small typo in manpage c2faxsend.1. * Update all automake/autoconf files (autoreconf). -- Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:55:25 +0200 Regards, Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120614005315.5c190...@jupiter.home
Bug#661309: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-1 [ITP] (fix policy violation)
Alexander Inyukhin shur...@sectorb.msk.ru writes: On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:12:04AM -0300, David Bremner wrote: David Bremner brem...@debian.org writes: I'll have a look at this. I sent a separate mail about some warnings from cppcheck and compilation. These might not be blockers, but the following is, your package currently violates policy 10.1 The conflict is resolved by renaming ts to tsp. The packaging looks OK now (at least I didn't find any problems). You should probably choose priority optional rather than extra. Did you have a chance to discuss those cppcheck warnings with upstream? David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87d352afi0.fsf@zancas.localnet
Bug#661309: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.3-1 [ITP] (fix policy violation)
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:44:55PM -0300, David Bremner wrote: Alexander Inyukhin shur...@sectorb.msk.ru writes: On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:12:04AM -0300, David Bremner wrote: David Bremner brem...@debian.org writes: I'll have a look at this. I sent a separate mail about some warnings from cppcheck and compilation. These might not be blockers, but the following is, your package currently violates policy 10.1 The conflict is resolved by renaming ts to tsp. The packaging looks OK now (at least I didn't find any problems). You should probably choose priority optional rather than extra. Ok. Did you have a chance to discuss those cppcheck warnings with upstream? Unfortunately, I could not find your mail about cppcheck, so I ran cppcheck by myself. I think these warnings are fixable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120614011827.ga9...@shurick.grid.su
Processed: retitle to RFS: taskcoach/1.3.15-2 [ITP] -- friendly task manager
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 663431 RFS: taskcoach/1.3.15-2 [ITP] -- friendly task manager Bug #663431 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: taskcoach/1.3.15-1 [ITP] -- friendly task manager Changed Bug title to 'RFS: taskcoach/1.3.15-2 [ITP] -- friendly task manager' from 'RFS: taskcoach/1.3.15-1 [ITP] -- friendly task manager' stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 663431: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663431 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133964728.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
