Processed: retitle to RFS: e2defrag/0.80-1 ITP: #678598

2012-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 678705 RFS: e2defrag/0.80-1 ITP: #678598 Bug #678705 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598 Changed Bug title to 'RFS: e2defrag/0.80-1 ITP: #678598' from 'RFS: e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598' stop Stopping processing here.

Bug#678468: marked as done (RFS: sgml-data/2.0.7 [RC] [QA] -- common SGML and XML data)

2012-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2012 06:20:19 + with message-id e1sigbh-0007d5...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: sgml-data/2.0.7 [RC] [QA] -- common SGML and XML data has caused the Debian Bug report #678468, regarding RFS: sgml-data/2.0.7 [RC] [QA] -- common SGML and XML data

Processed: retitle to RFS: phonetisaurus/0.4-1 [ITP] -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool

2012-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 663916 RFS: phonetisaurus/0.4-1 [ITP] -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool Bug #663916 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: phonetisaurus/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool Changed Bug title to 'RFS: phonetisaurus/0.4-1 [ITP]

Bug#675701: RFS: ptop

2012-06-24 Thread Bart Martens
Hi Bas, http://mentors.debian.net/package/ptop Uploaded: 2012-06-23 20:07 Some of my comments on RFS 675701 are not yet processed in this package. I also have the following additional comments. The file pg_top.c contains Copyright (c) 1989 - 1994, William LeFebvre, Northwestern

Re: Bug#675701: RFS: ptop

2012-06-24 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 06:37:42AM +, Bart Martens a écrit : Files: filename1, filename2 for exceptions. Actually, it should be: Files: filename1 filename2 (The separator is a space, not a comma plus a space). Cheers, -- Charles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Bug#675701: RFS: ptop

2012-06-24 Thread Bart Martens
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 03:59:11PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 06:37:42AM +, Bart Martens a écrit : Files: filename1, filename2 for exceptions. Actually, it should be: Files: filename1 filename2 (The separator is a space, not a comma plus a space).

Bug#673098: marked as done (RFS: libphidget21/2.1.8.20120514-1 [ITP])

2012-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:02:22 + with message-id 20120624080221.gg19...@master.debian.org and subject line RFS: libphidget21 has caused the Debian Bug report #673098, regarding RFS: libphidget21/2.1.8.20120514-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#676701: RFS: pyhoca-cli

2012-06-24 Thread Bart Martens
Hi Mike, The package at mentors is not there anymore. What happened ? Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Bug#676701: RFS: pyhoca-cli

2012-06-24 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi Bart, Python X2Go (python-x2go) has been uploaded to unstable. pyhoca-cli and pyhoca-gui depend on that. Both will be updated on mentors on Tuesday/Wednesday. To avoid confusions (failing builds) as long as python-x2go is not yet in unstable I have removed the package. They will be

Processed: retitle to RFS: sblim-wbemcli/1.6.2-5 [ITP #675232] through the BTS this time

2012-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 676646 RFS: sblim-wbemcli/1.6.2-5 [ITP #675232] through the BTS this time Bug #676646 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: sblim-wbemcli/1.6.2-4 [ITP #675232] through the BTS this time Changed Bug title to 'RFS: sblim-wbemcli/1.6.2-5 [ITP

Processed: e2defrag: block ITP 678598 by RFS 678705

2012-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 678598 by 678705 Bug #678598 [wnpp] ITP: e2defrag -- ext[234] filesystem defragmenter 678598 was not blocked by any bugs. 678598 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 678598: 678705 stop Stopping processing here. Please

Processed: block RFS pyhoca-cli by RFS python-x2go

2012-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 676701 by 676608 Bug #676701 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: pyhoca-cli/0.2.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Command line X2Go Client 676701 was not blocked by any bugs. 676701 was blocking: 655607 Added blocking bug(s) of 676701: 676608 stop Stopping

Bug#677564: RFS: metaphoneptbr/1.12.34 [ITP]

2012-06-24 Thread Bart Martens
Hi Carlos, This RFS is marked [ITP], but is there an ITP bug ? Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Processed: ITP: cppreference-doc-en -- C++ standard library reference manual for English language

2012-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 645513 ITP: cppreference-doc-en -- C++ standard library reference manual for English language Bug #645513 [wnpp] RFP: cppreference-doc-en -- C++ standard library reference manual for English language Changed Bug title to 'ITP:

Processed: ITP: ruby-juicer -- CSS and JavaScript packaging tool

2012-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 641973 ITP: ruby-juicer -- CSS and JavaScript packaging tool Bug #641973 [wnpp] RFP: juicer -- CSS and JavaScript packaging tool Changed Bug title to 'ITP: ruby-juicer -- CSS and JavaScript packaging tool' from 'RFP: juicer -- CSS and

Processed: RFS: python-cups/1.9.61-0.1 [NMU]

2012-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 675388 RFS: python-cups/1.9.61-0.1 [NMU] Bug #675388 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: python-cups/1.9.61-0.1 [RC] [NMU] Changed Bug title to 'RFS: python-cups/1.9.61-0.1 [NMU]' from 'RFS: python-cups/1.9.61-0.1 [RC] [NMU]' severity 675388

Re: How to build flavored package if upstream doesn't grok OOT build

2012-06-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Marc Haber mh+debian-ment...@zugschlus.de writes: On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 03:23:03PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: On 23.06.2012 15:17, Marc Haber wrote: How can I build two flavors of a program with different configure parameters if upstream does not properly handle out-of-tree building and I

Bug#678803: RFS: sgml-data/2.0.8 [QA] -- common SGML and XML data

2012-06-24 Thread Boris Pek
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for the package sgml-data. It builds binary package: sgml-data - common SGML and XML data To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

Re: RFS: fceux - Cross-platform Famicom/NES emulator (updated package, old source package was named fceu)

2012-06-24 Thread Alexander Toresson
Hello yet again, I've managed to fix the crash with nvidia binary drivers, by patching FCEUX. The patch has been submitted to upstream. I've also adjusted the package description slightly, and made the source package support parallel=n and noopt in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS. The files can be found at the

Processed: retitle RFS to add ITP or ITA in title

2012-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 669565 RFS: gammaray/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Tool for examining the internals of Qt application Bug #669565 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: gammaray/1.1.0-1 -- Tool for examining the internals of Qt application Changed Bug title to 'RFS:

Processed: ITP: gnome-ksnapshot

2012-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 670839 wontfix Bug #670839 [wnpp] ITP: gnome-ksnapshot -- Install ksnapshot inside Gnome Added tag(s) wontfix. close 671816 Bug #671816 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: gnome-ksnapshot/1.0 [ITP] Marked Bug as done stop Stopping processing here.

Processed: block haxe by neko

2012-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 674483 by 678480 Bug #674483 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: haxe/1:2.9+20120414-1 [ITA] 674483 was not blocked by any bugs. 674483 was blocking: 628948 Added blocking bug(s) of 674483: 678480 block 628948 by 628939 Bug #628948 [wnpp] ITA: haxe

symbols file for libquazip

2012-06-24 Thread Eric Maeker
Hi all, I'm working on the packaging of libquazip (c++/Qt wrapper to ZIP/UNZIP). The packaging is done in the Debian Med team and available at svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk/packages/libquazip/trunk/ The libquazip, libquazip-dev and the libquazip-dbg are correctly created.

Bug#678836: RFS: qpdfview/0.3-1

2012-06-24 Thread Benjamin Eltzner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package qpdfview * Package name: qpdfview Version : 0.3-1 Upstream Author : Adam Reichold adamreich...@myopera.com * URL

Bug#678705: RFS: e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598

2012-06-24 Thread Roger Leigh
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 05:03:39PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package e2defrag. This package used to be known as defrag, and was removed from the archive back in 2008 due to being abandoned by its authors and rotting for many years. I have taken over

Bug#677433: marked as done (RFS: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-17 (adopted; hardenend))

2012-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2012 16:33:17 + with message-id e1sipkt-0008lv...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-17 (adopted; hardenend) has caused the Debian Bug report #677433, regarding RFS: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-17 (adopted;

Bug#678705: RFS: e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598

2012-06-24 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/24/2012 12:00 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: Have you taken over upstream maintainership as well? Yes. This was always a tool which needed to be used with great caution, and was removed for good reason. Is this safe to use with all ext2, ext3 and

Bug#678705: RFS: e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598

2012-06-24 Thread Eugene Paskevich
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:13:15 +0300, Phillip Susi ps...@ubuntu.com wrote: Could you provide more details? Also an e2image of the fs ( preferably before defrag ) would be helpful in debugging. I wasn't very cautious to preserve any data before or after the defrag, even more I've killed the

Bug#678705: RFS: e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598

2012-06-24 Thread Eugene Paskevich
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 19:00:10 +0300, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: This was always a tool which needed to be used with great caution, and was removed for good reason. Is this safe to use with all ext2, ext3 and ext4 filesystems? Just my 2 cents... Tried to use it on my

Bug#678705: RFS: e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598

2012-06-24 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/24/2012 04:36 PM, Eugene Paskevich wrote: Just my 2 cents... Tried to use it on my non-critical ext3 FS. The FS structure was corrupted, fsck recovered some data (about 1%) into lost+found, 80% of data is lost w/o any trace. Well, it's up

Bug#678705: RFS: e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598

2012-06-24 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/24/2012 05:25 PM, Eugene Paskevich wrote: I wasn't very cautious to preserve any data before or after the defrag, even more I've killed the file system already. Sorry, I won't be useful in debugging. How about at least an overview of the

Bug#678705: RFS: e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598

2012-06-24 Thread Eugene Paskevich
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:48:37 +0300, Phillip Susi ps...@ubuntu.com wrote: How about at least an overview of the complaints that e2fsck had? And I It's output went off the scroll buffer, sorry. But it was quite a long list. assume that e2defrag finished without error? Yes, at least I

Bug#678705: RFS: e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598

2012-06-24 Thread Nicholas Breen
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 02:31:23PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote: On 06/24/2012 12:00 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: This was always a tool which needed to be used with great caution, and was removed for good reason. Is this safe to use with all ext2, ext3 and ext4 filesystems? Obviously there may

Bug#678705: RFS: e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598

2012-06-24 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Dear Phillip, Thank you for replying to all the comments and resolving issues quickly. I haven't checked them yet, but I am sure they are fine now. See further comments: On 24/06/12 03:50, Phillip Susi wrote: Bugs there were closed due to removing the package from the archive should be

Bug#678705: RFS: e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598

2012-06-24 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 24/06/12 23:58, Nicholas Breen wrote: On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 02:31:23PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote: On 06/24/2012 12:00 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: This was always a tool which needed to be used with great caution, and was removed for good reason. Is this safe to use with all ext2, ext3 and

Bug#670334: Sponsoring of notion, a first look

2012-06-24 Thread Axel Beckert
tag 670334 + pending tag 647048 + pending kthxbye Hi Philipp and Arnout, Philipp Hartwig wrote: I know debian/copyright is already quite lengthy, but basically everything in the source package should also be mentioned in the debian/copyright package as it's at least redistributed via the

Processed: Re: Bug#670334: Sponsoring of notion, a first look

2012-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 670334 + pending Bug #670334 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: notion/3+2012042300-1 [ITP] -- Notion tiling tabbed window manager Added tag(s) pending. tag 647048 + pending Bug #647048 [wnpp] ITP: notion -- Tiling, tabbed window manager for the X

Bug#678594: RFS: driftnet/0.1.6+cvs20040426-1 [ITA] (updated package: documented upstream repackaging)

2012-06-24 Thread david . sephirot
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package driftnet Package name : driftnet Version: 0.1.6+cvs20040426-1 Upstream Author : Chris Lightfoot ch...@ex-parrot.com URL : http://www.ex-parrot.com/~chris/driftnet/ License

Bug#678914: RFS: fuse-convmvfs/0.2.6-2

2012-06-24 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version of my package fuse-convmvfs. This upload enables for build on kFreeBSD (Bug #634216). Kudos to Robert Millan for providing a patch. Related changes: fuse-convmvfs (0.2.6-2) unstable;

Bug#678705: RFS: e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598

2012-06-24 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/24/2012 07:40 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: Let me rephrase. Is upstream aware of the above bugs which affected the last version of defrag in debian, which were not fixed in the upstream code? They appear to fall into 3 categories: ftbs,

Bug#678705: RFS: e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598

2012-06-24 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/24/2012 07:41 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: There is already an ext4-specific (depends on creation with -O extent) e4defrag tool in e2fsprogs since 1.42~WIP-2011-07-02-1. Is there a reason you would use one tool over the other? The

Bug#677013: RFS: time

2012-06-24 Thread Bob Proulx
Russ Allbery wrote: * There seems to be something odd about the time info file. If I run info time, and then press space, rather than proceeding to the next child node the way that info normally does, info just reports no more nodes in this file. The same is true at a few points in the

Bug#677013: RFS: time

2012-06-24 Thread Bob Proulx
Bart Martens wrote: Back to the time package itself. Is this your newest version of time you are requesting sponsorship for ? Or do you want to update it first ? http://www.proulx.com/~bob/debian/pool/sid/main/time/2012-06-22/time_1.7-24.dsc It was. But then Russ Allbery noted some oddities!

Re: RFS: metaphoneptbr/1.12.34 [ITP]

2012-06-24 Thread Bart Martens
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:32:28AM -0300, Carlos Jordão wrote: 2012/6/24 Bart Martens ba...@debian.org Hi Carlos, This RFS is marked [ITP], but is there an ITP bug ? Regards, Bart Martens Hi Bart, I'm sorry, I didn´t understand your question. No problem. I developed it,

Bug#677564: Info received (RFS: metaphoneptbr/1.12.34 [ITP])

2012-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will