Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-07-30 Thread Jakub Wilk
This is only a very rudimentary review. I don't have time to review this properly for the time being. Anybody else is welcome to do it for me. :) * Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-07-29, 22:27: dget -x

Bug#677379: New upstream version.

2012-07-30 Thread Grzegorz Kolorz
Changes since the last upload: * Imported Upstream version 0.1.2 * Cleaned file licenses -- Grzegorz Kolorz 'kAjKo' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Bug#677379: New upstream version.

2012-07-30 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Grzegorz Kolorz gkol...@gmail.com writes: * Imported Upstream version 0.1.2 * Cleaned file licenses Just curious: 1) What software uses this library? I don't see any reverse dependencies. 2) Is the upstream planning to have a public version control system? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Make CDBS and debhelper not build one binary package

2012-07-30 Thread P. J. McDermott
On 2012-07-29 10:16, P. J. McDermott wrote: Is there a way to make CDBS and its debhelper class not build a particular binary package? With debhelper alone, I'd just use the -N/--no-package option. I've tried adding that option to DH_OPTIONS, I've realized that I had forgotten to export

Processed: retitle to RFS: x52pro/0.1.2-1

2012-07-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 677379 RFS: x52pro/0.1.2-1 Bug #677379 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: x52pro/0.1.1-3 Changed Bug title to 'RFS: x52pro/0.1.2-1' from 'RFS: x52pro/0.1.1-3' stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 677379:

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-07-30 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 10:48 Mon 30 Jul , Jakub Wilk wrote: This is only a very rudimentary review. I don't have time to review this properly for the time being. Anybody else is welcome to do it for me. :) Thanks.. Wonder how many more silly stuffs show up on actual review ;-) * Vasudev Kamath

Processed: Close sponsorship requests

2012-07-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: close 672981 Bug #672981 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: eiskaltdcpp/2.2.7-1 (updated) -- Direct Connect and Advanced Direct Connect client Marked Bug as done close 672290 Bug #672290 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: uhub/0.4.0-1 (updated) -- High

Bug#683336: RFS: ninja-build/120508+git638b033

2012-07-30 Thread Gary Kramlich
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package ninja-build * Package name: ninja-build Version : 120508+git638b033 Upstream Author : Google * URL :

Processed: retitle to RFS: m2m-aligner/1.1-1 [ITP] -- many-to-many alignments for string transduction

2012-07-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 663455 RFS: m2m-aligner/1.1-1 [ITP] -- many-to-many alignments for string transduction Bug #663455 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: m2m-aligner/1.0-1 [ITP] -- many-to-many alignments for string transduction Changed Bug title to 'RFS:

Processed: ninja-build: block ITP 683332 by RFS 683336

2012-07-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 683332 by 683336 Bug #683332 [wnpp] ITP: ninja-build -- small build system closest in spirit to Make Bug #68 [wnpp] ITP: ninja-build -- small build system closest in spirit to Make 683332 was not blocked by any bugs. 683332 was not