Bug#665354: RFS: viennacl/1.3.0+dfsg-1 (for experimental)

Hi Michael, About the package at mentors uploaded there on 2012-08-03 05:49 : You seem to have responded to my previous comment by writing this in debian/copyright : | Source: http://sourceforge.net/projects/viennacl/files/ | To obtain the DFSG-free source, use the following option with

Bug#665354: RFS: viennacl/1.3.0+dfsg-1 (for experimental)

I fixed the issue of the misplaced information on obtaining the DFSG-clean sources; it is now in debian/copyright as the best practices require. Again, I uploaded to m.d.n. As usual, you can find more info here: http://mentors.debian.net/package/viennacl And download the package with dget from th

Bug#665354: RFS: viennacl/1.3.0+dfsg-1 (for experimental)

Hi Michael, About the package at mentors uploaded there on 2012-08-02 12:01 : http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-origtargz "Detailed information on how the repackaged source was obtained, and on how this can be reproduced should be provided in de

Re: Packaging debian-obly package (no upstream)

Le 01/08/2012 20:01, Bart Martens a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 07:48:01PM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote: >> Le 01/08/2012 18:48, Bart Martens a écrit : >>> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:24:20AM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote: Hello mentors, I am working on one bug of mine (http://bugs

Re: Minutes from "Getting your packages into Debian"

Hi, On 02.08.2012 05:07, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote: > this stupid DM process only make debian packagin more slower to evolution, > i have a problem uploading a debian mentors sig file and nobody respond and > solves my problem I cannot see how the DM process is related to sponsoring in the first p

Bug#665354: RFS: viennacl/1.3.0+dfsg-1 (for experimental)

I re-imported a DFSG-clean upstream source of the 1.3.0 version by removing the file doc/manual/figures/TU_Signet_CMYK.eps containing PostScript code that is copyrighted by Adobe Inc. and unclear license status. The packaging has been rebased on top of that import, additionally the debian/watch fi

Processed: Retitle for DFSG-mangled version

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 665354 RFS: viennacl/1.3.0+dfsg-1 (for experimental) Bug #665354 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: viennacl/1.3.0-1 (for experimental) Changed Bug title to 'RFS: viennacl/1.3.0+dfsg-1 (for experimental)' from 'RFS: viennacl/1.3.0-1 (for experim

Bug#683500: RFS: freefoam/0.1.0+dfsg-1 [RC]

Hi Bart On 08/02/2012 07:35 AM, Bart Martens wrote: > Hi Michael, > > About your package "freefoam" at mentors uploaded there on 2012-08-01 08:37. > If nobody increases the bug severities to at least "important" then I suggest > that you reduce the changes to what is likely acceptable for an unbl