Your message dated Wed, 22 Aug 2012 06:51:13 +
with message-id <20120822065113.gb25...@master.debian.org>
and subject line RFS: scim-tables/0.5.9-2 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #685582,
regarding RFS: scim-tables/0.5.9-2 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Hi William,
I had a look at the package at mentors uploaded there on 2012-08-21 23:06.
I see that the package adds "DM-Upload-Allowed: yes". Was this agreed with
some sponsor who is going to upload this ?
I suggest to also fix bug 685419 by removing the Homepage field from
debian/control. I'm
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I have got the approval to upload scim-tables to testing-proposed-updates
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685368).
I didn't get any response from my sponsor for several days, so I am looking
for a sponsor to upload
Howdy, darling! How are you? What's new?
I am Tanya.
So, I don't know from what to start. Maybe from it.
One of my girlfriends demonstrated me ur photo shots and I liked them so much!
I look for intelligent, serious pal for for a very long time but there're tons
of idiots who r just seducing me t
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vfu"
* Package name: vfu
Version : 4.12-1
Upstream Author : Vladi Belperchinov-Shabanski
* URL : http://cade.datamax.bg/vfu/
* License : GPL
Section
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "recoverjpeg"
* Package name: recoverjpeg
Version : 2.2-1
Upstream Author : Samuel Tardieu
* URL : http://www.rfc1149.net/devel/recoverjpeg.html
* License
On 21.08.2012 19:51, Bart Martens wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:29:28AM +0100, Nick Leverton wrote:
>> Thanks also Bart for reminding me of the other approach.
>
> My pleasure.
>
>> (sorry I am
>> a bit distracted by home things at the moment).
>
> No problem at all.
>
>> di
On 20.08.2012 22:39, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Hi Felix,
>
> On 20.8.2012 18:26, Felix Geyer wrote:
>> Upstream has released version 1.2.1 in the meantime.
>
> I see, imported to our repo.
>
>> I noticed that you've removed 3rdparty/qt/private in the upstream tarball.
>> This needs to be documented in
Your message dated Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:14:59 +
with message-id <20120821161459.gc27...@master.debian.org>
and subject line RFS: gammaray/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Tool for examining the
internals of Qt application
has caused the Debian Bug report #669565,
regarding RFS: gammaray/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Tool f
Hi Nick,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:29:28AM +0100, Nick Leverton wrote:
> Thanks also Bart for reminding me of the other approach.
My pleasure.
> (sorry I am
> a bit distracted by home things at the moment).
No problem at all.
> diff -Nru nullmailer-1.11/debian/postinst nullmailer-1.11/debian/
Thanks also Bart for reminding me of the other approach. (sorry I am
a bit distracted by home things at the moment). After some thought I
think it makes sense to change to the umask approach anyway, as it is more
efficient (fewer fork/execs), and also covers the case where the symlink
exists but
11 matches
Mail list logo
