Processed: RFS: rspamd/0.5.2-1 [ITP] -- fast spam filtering system

2012-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 685697 RFS: rspamd/0.5.2-1 [ITP] -- fast spam filtering system Bug #685697 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: rspamd/0.5.2-1 -- fast spam filtering system Changed Bug title to 'RFS: rspamd/0.5.2-1 [ITP] -- fast spam filtering system' from 'RFS:

Processed: rspamd: block ITP 683746 by RFS 685697

2012-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 683746 by 685697 Bug #683746 [wnpp] ITP: rspamd -- fast spam filtering system 683746 was not blocked by any bugs. 683746 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 683746: 685697 > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me i

Re: Handling of sponsorship requests

2012-08-23 Thread Bart Martens
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 09:43:30AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > > > a) How should we handle requests, where the maintainer *may* be MIA? > > Just for an example #658114 - a realy simple question is unanswered for > > about 6 months! > > IMO th

Re: Handling of sponsorship requests

2012-08-23 Thread Bart Martens
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 07:20:23PM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:06:27AM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > > Hello list, > > Hello! > > > > > as sponsor I realy welcome the decission and changes to handle > > sponsoring requests about our bugtracker, but there are sti

pam-auth-update: how to write a pam-configs profile

2012-08-23 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello: I am pacakging a pam module, libpam-ssh to name it, and I would like to update its pam profile. In particular, I want its session mode to run after pam_tmpdir: how can it be done ? Formally I would place it in a Session-PostFinal field as pam_tmpdir is placed in the Session-Final field

Re: Handling of sponsorship requests

2012-08-23 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > a) How should we handle requests, where the maintainer *may* be MIA? > Just for an example #658114 - a realy simple question is unanswered for > about 6 months! > IMO they should be pinged one more time, maybe they have overseen the > respo

Re: Handling of sponsorship requests

2012-08-23 Thread Bart Martens
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:06:27AM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Hello list, > > as sponsor I realy welcome the decission and changes to handle > sponsoring requests about our bugtracker, but there are still two > questions/disadvantages from my side: > > a) How should we handle requests, where

Processed: RFS: rspamd/0.5.2-1 -- fast spam filtering system

2012-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 685697 RFS: rspamd/0.5.2-1 -- fast spam filtering system Bug #685697 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: rspamd -- fast spam filtering system Changed Bug title to 'RFS: rspamd/0.5.2-1 -- fast spam filtering system' from 'RFS: rspamd -- fast spa

Re: Handling of sponsorship requests

2012-08-23 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:06:27AM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Hello list, Hello! > > as sponsor I realy welcome the decission and changes to handle > sponsoring requests about our bugtracker, but there are still two > questions/disadvantages from my side: > > a) How should we handle reques

Handling of sponsorship requests

2012-08-23 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Hello list, as sponsor I realy welcome the decission and changes to handle sponsoring requests about our bugtracker, but there are still two questions/disadvantages from my side: a) How should we handle requests, where the maintainer *may* be MIA? Just for an example #658114 - a realy simple ques

Re: tool to create .deb for proprietary software?

2012-08-23 Thread Eric Cooper
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 03:46:08PM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: > Is there a tool to create a .deb from a directory of files? See the "equivs" package. -- Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsu

Re: tool to create .deb for proprietary software?

2012-08-23 Thread Matt Zagrabelny
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 03:46:08PM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: >> Is there a tool to create a .deb from a directory of files? I am >> thinking of a Mathematica install I just had to perform and I'd rather >> put a .deb in our local rep

Re: tool to create .deb for proprietary software?

2012-08-23 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 03:46:08PM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: > Is there a tool to create a .deb from a directory of files? I am > thinking of a Mathematica install I just had to perform and I'd rather > put a .deb in our local repo and have clients pull it rather than > manually installing this

Re: tool to create .deb for proprietary software?

2012-08-23 Thread Matt Zagrabelny
Hi Arno, Comments inline. On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Arno Töll wrote: > Hi, > > On 23.08.2012 22:46, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: >> I know I could use "ar" and "tar" to get things done, but wasn't sure >> if there was a more elegant approach. > > Depending on your own ambition there are several

Re: tool to create .deb for proprietary software?

2012-08-23 Thread Arno Töll
Hi, On 23.08.2012 22:46, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: > I know I could use "ar" and "tar" to get things done, but wasn't sure > if there was a more elegant approach. Depending on your own ambition there are several approaches. The easiest and simplest way is to use "dpkg-deb -b" which does right what y

tool to create .deb for proprietary software?

2012-08-23 Thread Matt Zagrabelny
Greetings, After apt-cache searching and doing some googling, I have a question for the mentors. Is there a tool to create a .deb from a directory of files? I am thinking of a Mathematica install I just had to perform and I'd rather put a .deb in our local repo and have clients pull it rather tha

Bug#667511: RFS: updeb/1.0.3 [NEW] -- Non-interactive upgrade Debian system

2012-08-23 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote: > > idea... Also there is already unattended-upgrades in the archive if you > > want to automatically install security updates. > I know this package for a long time, but is not make the work the updeb > does. Look at report it produce. would you mi

Bug#667511: marked as done (RFS: updeb/1.0.3 [NEW] -- Non-interactive upgrade Debian system)

2012-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:50:43 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: updeb/1.0.3 [NEW] -- Non-interactive upgrade Debian system has caused the Debian Bug report #667511, regarding RFS: updeb/1.0.3 [NEW] -- Non-interactive upgrade Debian system to be marked as done. Th

Bug#667854: marked as done (RFS: nautilus-sound-converter/3.0.1 [ITP])

2012-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:50:47 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: nautilus-sound-converter/3.0.1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #667854, regarding RFS: nautilus-sound-converter/3.0.1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#685697: RFS: rspamd -- fast spam filtering system

2012-08-23 Thread Vsevolod Stakhov
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Subject: RFS: rspamd Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rspamd". * Package name:rspamd Version: 0.5.2 Upstream Author: Vsevolod Stakhov (vsevo...@highsecure.ru) * URL: https://bitbucket.org/vstakho