Bug#699824: Updated package
Hi, [ I do not intend to sponsor this package. ] On 02/15/2013 00:51, Benjamin Eltzner wrote: 11) The only alternatives I see to shipping the binary file are: a) Patch to skip the initialization of the database at first program start. This will probably result in the intelligent word sequencing not working. b) Patch to enhance performance of database initialization, handling database initialization in a separate thread and providing a lock on the database while initialization. This would be very hard work for me and probably take quite some time. Could you create the template database when building the binary package instead of including it in the debian/ directory? Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/511e1923.9080...@debian.org
Bug#699824: Updated package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Could you create the template database when building the binary package instead of including it in the debian/ directory? That seems like a good idea (except that it will increase build time a lot). I look into it next week. Thanks for the input. Regards, Benjamin Eltzner -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRHh7qAAoJEK27BRz67lmpKVcQAIoHeTwcUUTF7i4SW3VA86xF xA46a4xYkyz+zKU91fCzq3CHAhccDvB0AT1h5o4Ye/LS+ZdBeAN9LA4xphXzrTW0 aQ6USbFd4LUhS4NpoRN0PZ/rHVj74E9zKNRTcP6vbhjOJa0N1ub4GHcJinamvxm5 MlkydL3MdBNBl81dEYEJ56q7sQ5o3f5/Mf4EmaGLpWOHRnMyoAPnixidbh0jvcmt Bj1Rd8J6J2GfH6koqF71xDcIrMoT6cX1njfrLuKsh4g3BbOjO41DuYX2hQtdGng6 CZ7PpFR3S7mvN3c/gl4PiTzn6M9T3OuC9RFrkRXrCJxvDO3HBj0rh5kNONIGrGuE btnsFzqwlmn11WPdAuLsUE0n0oeXxUPLN4MjgaW4rAouAHVX9QlZqlbwv0MI9QMd qOD1BribiZhuWJV+0K9YpY1kjSWttQULTsX5kK94OG5De40Y4fO/QzfyVMMxx45K VSN7RQ8tTVBh0+yUSHyQ9o+VPP2MVD/BhG714H6RKsyHKfgez/biWFHJVaivoxmR zjLBGoaZzHqAJymZACYjNbwaGYBwhK1Kt3Zp3CqlfbveZzKSDBVwE/kxmuKntLCG fRanC/rqKc9WgoHBlaWoB6bi+3JextRPu1Hq9d0IISGZ4siyNtU9Q5WifkCPg1L2 SH9GD2LwOjAL6UoV6c9R =MEAv -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/511e1efc.1050...@gmx.de
Re: mathgl: missing-dependency-on-libc needed
Hello Anton,
Thanks for looking at it. I have built the package with pbuilder under
distribution experimental and architecture amd64. Other combinations (unstable
+ amd64, experimental + i386 etc.) will probably fail due to symbols
mismatches.
I use the commands
$sudo pbuilder --create --basetgz /var/cache/pbuilder/base-experimental-
amd64.tgz --distribution experimental --architecture amd64
$sudo pbuilder --update --basetgz /var/cache/pbuilder/base-experimental-
amd64.tgz --distribution experimental --architecture amd64 --override-config
for creating and updating the clean chroot environment. Then I use
$BUILDER=pbuilder git buildpackage --git-pbuilder --git-dist=experimental --
git-arch=amd64 --git-debian-branch=experimental
for building.
The package can be found at
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-
science/packages/mathgl.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/experimental
Best regards
Dimitris
Στις Παρ 15 Φεβ 2013 00:32:41 Anton Gladky γράψατε:
Hi Dimitrios,
I was trying to build your package from git (on deb-science) to check
the issue. But it fails to build at the last stage:
=
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@
fl_XdndURIList@Base 2.1.2
fl_access@Base 2.1.2
fl_alphasort@Base 2.1.2
- fl_ascii_strcasecmp@Base 2.1.2
+#MISSING: 2.1.2-1# fl_ascii_strcasecmp@Base 2.1.2
fl_background_pixel@Base 2.1.2
fl_bg2@Base 2.1.2
fl_bg@Base 2.1.2
dh_makeshlibs: dpkg-gensymbols -plibmgl-wnd7.0.0
-Idebian/libmgl-wnd7.0.0.symbols -Pdebian/libmgl-wnd7.0.0 returned exit
code 1
make: *** [binary] Error 1
=
There are a lot of such errors. Please, give a link on your package
Cheers,
Anton
On 02/14/2013 10:21 PM, Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos wrote:
Hello,
During packaging the latest upstream version 2.1.2 of mathgl, I came
across the following lintian error and description:
E: mathgl: missing-dependency-on-libc needed by usr/bin/mgl.cgi and 2
others N:
N:The listed file appears to be linked against the C library, but the
N:package doesn't depend on the C library package. Normally this
indicates N:that ${shlibs:Depends} was omitted from the Depends line
for this N:package in debian/control.
N:
N:All shared libraries and compiled binaries must be run through
N:dpkg-shlibdeps to find out any libraries they are linked against
(often N:via the dh_shlibdeps debhelper command). The package
containing these N:files must then depend on ${shlibs:Depends} in
debian/control to get the N:proper package dependencies for those
libraries.
N:
N:Refer to Debian Policy Manual section 8.6 (Dependencies between the
N:library and other packages - the shlibs system) for details.
N:
N:Severity: serious, Certainty: possible
N:
N:Check: binaries, Type: binary, udeb
However, ${shlibs:Depends} is included in the Depends field of the mathgl
binary package. Also, an attempt to include libc6 explicitely in the
Depends field of the mathgl binary package, cancelled the lintian error
but raised a lintian warning that this should not be done.
Any suggestion on how to overcome this?
Thanks
Dimitris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201302151617.13420.eftax...@otenet.gr
Bug#662955: rubyripper Re: Bug#662955: Is there any progress?
On 12/02/13 20:28, Steffen Möller wrote: Hello, I would be prepred to sponsor the package, if Scott and/or Benjamin are around to perform the maintenance. It seems a bit like the package just found no sponsor, which is then a sad thing. Steffen Hi Steffen, Yes, I thought it might be difficult to find a sponsor while in release freeze and so was waiting before I pinged the mentors list again. However I'd be glad to perform maintenance if you are willing to sponsor the package now. This is my first attempt at maintainership, so please let me know about any issues with the package currently uploaded at debian mentors. I've used/tested the current package quite a bit since I put it up, so if there are no packaging issues I think it is ready for uploading to the archive. Regards, Scott Leggett. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/511e451d.10...@sl.id.au
Re: mathgl: missing-dependency-on-libc needed
2013/2/15 Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos eftax...@otenet.gr: Hello Anton, Thanks for looking at it. I have built the package with pbuilder under distribution experimental and architecture amd64. Other combinations (unstable + amd64, experimental + i386 etc.) will probably fail due to symbols mismatches. I think, when you upload your package into experimental branch, the build-depends packages will be taken from unstable-branch. So you should build your package under sid. I may be wrong. Cheers, Anton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/calf6qjn1-zpelswappoqgerhbb0glgoktwfhcigrhpynsaw...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#693556: (no subject)
Thanks for the review, Jakub! I fixed the lintian and lintian4python warnings. I talked about the license with upstream and debian-legal and we changed it to BSD-3-clause. Priority has been changed from 'extra' to 'optional'. The gnome-keyring dependency was removed and a mercruial dependency added :). I didn't add entries to the changelog but updated the existing entry because the package has never really been released. The new package is at: http://mentors.debian.net/package/mercurial-keyring Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mercurial-keyring/mercurial-keyring_0.5.4-1.dsc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/511e9987.4060...@gmail.com
Bug#688310: marked as done (RFS: wbar/2.3.4-1 [ITA] -- light and fast launch bar)
Your message dated Sat, 16 Feb 2013 04:20:29 + with message-id e1u6zgh-0003cj...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: wbar/2.3.4-1 [ITA] -- light and fast launch bar has caused the Debian Bug report #688310, regarding RFS: wbar/2.3.4-1 [ITA] -- light and fast launch bar to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 688310: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688310 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package wbar which i would like to adopt. Package name: wbar Version : 2.3.3-1 Upstream Author : Rodolfo Granata warlock...@gmail.com, Yadickson Soto yadick...@gmail.com URL : http://code.google.com/p/wbar License : GPL3+ Section : x11 It builds those binary packages: wbar - light and fast launch bar wbar-config - GUI tool to configure wbar To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/wbar Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wbar/wbar_2.3.3-1.dsc More information about wbar can be obtained from http://bugs.debian.org/678865. Most important changes since the last upload: * New maintainer. * Latest upstream release and first update since November 2009. * New GUI tool to customize wbar. * License updated to GPL3+. * Now wbar fully complies with the DFSG. No repack necessary. * Pristine source tarball. * Package format 3.0, copyright format 1.0. * Hardening, built with --as-needed. * New bash_completion snippet. * New recommended packages to make wbar work out-of-the-box. Regards, Markus Koschany signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package wbar version 2.3.4-1 is in unstable now. http://packages.qa.debian.org/wbar---End Message---
