Bug#710473: RFS: bats/0.2.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package bats * Package name: bats Version : 0.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Sam Stephenson sstephen...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/sstephenson/bats * License :

Re: How to avoid all arch notice in dpkg-buildpackage.

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:38:30PM -0400, linux at iocellnetworks wrote: I am working on the debian package for 7.0 ndas. I would like to have it build without comment, notice or error. I use the instructions here Where? Sorry. These are the build instructions:

Bug#710103: The mentor package URL changed as well

Hi everyone, Since I am not sure if there is a way of editing the original bug description, just wanted to inform that since the source package name changed, also the URLs are different. More information about the package: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-evdev Source package:

Re: Bug#710248: RFS: fitsverify/4.16 [ITP] -- FITS File Format-Verification Tool

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thibaut, Am 29.05.2013 14:38, schrieb Thibaut Paumard: I don't think the FTP master will let the package in with just this short notice (so short that I missed it despite looking for it). Maybe they would be OK if you reproduced said e-mail in

Bug#710103: RFS: python-evdev/0.3.3-1 -- [ITP] python bindings for the generic input event interface

Hi everyone, First of all, I apologize to attaching the same information to a single bug twice, but I was not aware that the subject of a bug reply matters. I'm re-sending this one so that the RFS string is in the subject so that this information reaches the mentors list as well (thanks

Bug#710017: marked as done (RFS: distcc/3.2~rc1-2 [RC] -- simple distributed compiler)

Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2013 19:52:33 +0800 with message-id can3vere5fvgi1okvkuu+u1a55dik96lzfmtjmjncgrxjtbn...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: Bug#710017: RFS: distcc/3.2~rc1-2 [RC] -- simple distributed compiler has caused the Debian Bug report #710017, regarding RFS:

Aw: Wanting to maintain Debian packages

Hello, I had always been hoping to maintain some useful debian packages. Now that I've successfully revived some abandoned debian packages, my confident is gaining and want to pick up more. I took a look at the orphaned package list, to my biggest surprise, there are a *lot* of

Bug#710103: The mentor package URL changed as well

Hi Łukasz! Yes, you (or anyone) can change the bug title. You should send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org, without subject, and put into the body: retitle #710103 provides bindings to the generic input event interface You musn't initiate the description using the package name or an

Re: How to avoid all arch notice in dpkg-buildpackage.

Hi and thanks again. On 05/31/2013 02:58 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:38:30PM -0400, linux at iocellnetworks wrote: I am working on the debian package for 7.0 ndas. I would like to have it build without comment, notice or error. I use the instructions here Where?

Re: How to avoid all arch notice in dpkg-buildpackage.

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:21:04AM -0400, linux at iocellnetworks wrote: To understand how debian/rules works, and get on my way to a clean, acceptable package creation is why I am writing for help. You probably need to start with creating a simple package from scratch following some tutorial,

Re: How to avoid all arch notice in dpkg-buildpackage.

On 05/31/2013 03:49 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:21:04AM -0400, linux at iocellnetworks wrote: To understand how debian/rules works, and get on my way to a clean, acceptable package creation is why I am writing for help.