Bug#728360: RFS: open-axiom/1.5.0~svn3056-1
2013/11/24 Boris Pek tehn...@debian.org: I have looked at your debian/copyright in git repo. It may be much simpler: http://paste.debian.net/plain/67414 As you see, all blocks were sorted by license, instead of specific files or copyright holders. Oh, I think I was misunderstanding the purpose of debian/copyright I've updated Git [1] and uploaded sources to mentors [2] [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-open-axiom/pkg-open-axiom.git [2] https://mentors.debian.net/package/open-axiom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CALL-Q8xugTCN9o5nojxpjXb=obuvhoq7gpvo_ujadum0bqy...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#732084: marked as done (RFS: slowhttptest/1.6-1 [ITP] -- Application layer Denial of Service attacks simulation tool)
Your message dated Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:48:08 +1100 with message-id 201312152048.08573.only...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#732084: RFS: slowhttptest/1.6-1 [ITP] -- Application layer Denial of Service attacks simulation tool has caused the Debian Bug report #732084, regarding RFS: slowhttptest/1.6-1 [ITP] -- Application layer Denial of Service attacks simulation tool to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 732084: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732084 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package slowhttptest * Package name: slowhttptest Version : 1.6-1 Upstream Author : Sergey Shekyan shek...@gmail.com * URL : http://code.google.com/p/slowhttptest * License : Apache-2.0 Section : net It builds those binary packages: slowhttptest - Application layer Denial of Service attacks simulation tool To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/slowhttptest Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/slowhttptest/slowhttptest_1.6-1.dsc Regards, Neutron Soutmun signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 17:55:31 Neutron Soutmun wrote: uploaded to mentors, please review again. Looks good, uploaded. :) -- All the best, Dmitry Smirnov.---End Message---
Bug#728360: RFS: open-axiom/1.5.0~svn3056-1
Hi Igor, I've updated Git [1] and uploaded sources to mentors [2] [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-open-axiom/pkg-open-axiom.git [2] https://mentors.debian.net/package/open-axiom There is new lintian error tags now: E: open-axiom-databases: copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl (And the same for other packages.) Fix should be simple: http://paste.debian.net/plain/70930 (But I have not checked it.) Hope this is the last issue before upload. Best regards, Boris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/129361387106...@web2h.yandex.ru
Bug#732188: RFS: freedict -- free bilingual dictionary databases
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, after the FreeDict packages got orphaned I started to prepare new Debian packages because Debian as a international project needs free dictionary databases in its archive. Now I'm looking for sponsors for my package(s): * Package name: freedict * Version : 2013.11.30 * Upstream Author : The FreeDict project * URL : http://freedict.org * License : various (depending on dictionary, included in copyright notice) * Section : text The list of packages might seem a bit large at the first glance, but it has to be noted that the package's packaging is mostly auto-generated and therefore the packages are mostly identical (except for the data, of course). It builds those binary packages: dict-freedict-afr-deu dict-freedict-afr-eng dict-freedict-ara-eng dict-freedict-bre-fra dict-freedict-ces-eng dict-freedict-ckb-kmr dict-freedict-cym-eng dict-freedict-dan-eng dict-freedict-deu-eng dict-freedict-deu-fra dict-freedict-deu-ita dict-freedict-deu-kur dict-freedict-deu-nld dict-freedict-deu-por dict-freedict-deu-tur dict-freedict-eng-afr dict-freedict-eng-ara dict-freedict-eng-ces dict-freedict-eng-cym dict-freedict-eng-deu dict-freedict-eng-ell dict-freedict-eng-fra dict-freedict-eng-gle dict-freedict-eng-hin dict-freedict-eng-hrv dict-freedict-eng-hun dict-freedict-eng-ita dict-freedict-eng-lat dict-freedict-eng-lit dict-freedict-eng-nld dict-freedict-eng-pol dict-freedict-eng-por dict-freedict-eng-rom dict-freedict-eng-rus dict-freedict-eng-spa dict-freedict-eng-srp dict-freedict-eng-swe dict-freedict-eng-tur dict-freedict-fra-bre dict-freedict-fra-deu dict-freedict-fra-eng dict-freedict-fra-nld dict-freedict-gla-deu dict-freedict-gle-eng dict-freedict-gle-pol dict-freedict-hrv-eng dict-freedict-hun-eng dict-freedict-isl-eng dict-freedict-ita-deu dict-freedict-ita-eng dict-freedict-jpn-deu dict-freedict-kha-deu dict-freedict-kha-eng dict-freedict-kur-deu dict-freedict-kur-eng dict-freedict-kur-tur dict-freedict-lat-deu dict-freedict-lat-eng dict-freedict-lit-eng dict-freedict-mkd-bul dict-freedict-nld-deu dict-freedict-nld-eng dict-freedict-nld-fra dict-freedict-nno-nob dict-freedict-oci-cat dict-freedict-pol-gle dict-freedict-por-deu dict-freedict-por-eng dict-freedict-san-deu dict-freedict-slk-eng dict-freedict-spa-ast dict-freedict-spa-eng dict-freedict-srp-eng dict-freedict-swe-eng dict-freedict-swh-pol dict-freedict-tur-deu dict-freedict-tur-eng You can download all packages together with the *.dsc, *.orig.tar.gz, *.changes, *.debian.gz, *.diff.gz as one tbz2 archive from: http://crustulus.de/downloads/freedict.tar.bz2 The packaging is done via git: ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-freedict/pkg-freedict.git More information about the FreeDict project can be obtained from http://freedict.org Changes since the last upload: * new maintainer (Closes: 704967) * upstream fixed wrong translation in eng-deu (Closes: #652124) * fix [upstream] incorrect words in deu-eng and reimport it from upstream (Closes: #630374) * import of new upstream version * reworked [completely] debian build infrastructure * debian/control is now autogenerated * bump standards-version If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me or write to the mailing list: pkg-freedict-disc...@lists.alioth.debian.org Thank you in advance Sebastian signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#728360: RFS: open-axiom/1.5.0~svn3056-1
2013/12/15 Boris Pek tehn...@debian.org: There is new lintian error tags now: E: open-axiom-databases: copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl (And the same for other packages.) Fix should be simple: http://paste.debian.net/plain/70930 (But I have not checked it.) Fixed and checked! :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CALL-Q8zecofLbnr_JJdKyBPFDLsU0Y8s-v6C=E=n+sfebwf...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#728360: RFS: open-axiom/1.5.0~svn3056-1
There is new lintian error tags now: E: open-axiom-databases: copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl (And the same for other packages.) Fix should be simple: http://paste.debian.net/plain/70930 (But I have not checked it.) Fixed and checked! :-) Uploaded. Thanks for your work. Hope you will join Debian Science Team later. Best wishes, Boris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/71371387129...@web28j.yandex.ru
Re: Bug#732135: RFS: spatialite/4.1.1-5
Control: reassign -1 sponsorship-requests On Sb, 14 dec 13, 16:24:20, Bas Couwenberg wrote: Package: sponshorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, As part of the upcoming SpatiaLite transition am I looking for a sponsor for my package spatialite. Please refer to the thread on debian-gis@ for more information on this transition: https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2013/10/msg9.html Package name: spatialite Version : 4.1.1-5 Upstream Author : Alessandro Furieri a.furi...@lqt.it URL : https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/libspatialite/ License : MPL-1.1 or GPL-2.0+ or LGPL-2.1+ Section : science It builds those binary packages: libspatialite-dev - Geospatial extension for SQLite - development files libspatialite5 - Geospatial extension for SQLite - libraries libspatialite5-dbg - Geospatial extension for SQLite - debugging symbols To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/spatialite Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/spatialite/spatialite_4.1.1-5.dsc More information about SpatiaLite can be obtained from https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/libspatialite/. Changes since the last upload: * Enable building with libxml2 support. * Add 11-link-libxml2.patch to link libxml2 when building test cases. * Update symbols file for XML related symbols. * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.5, no changes required. Regards, Sebastiaan Couwenberg -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#732234: RFS: libgringotts/1:1.2.1-13
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libgringotts. * Package name: libgringotts Version : 1:1.2.1-2 Upstream Author : Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il * URL : http://developer.berlios.de/projects/gringotts/ * License : GPL-3+ Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libgringotts-dev - development files for the gringotts data encapsulation library libgringotts2 - gringotts data encapsulation and encryption library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libgringotts Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libg/libgringotts/libgringotts_1.2.1-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: libgringotts (1:1.2.1-13) unstable; urgency=low * Bump Debian version to avoid getting rejected due to a previous version (1.2.1-12). (Closes: #728027). * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.5. No changes required. -- Jose G. López josg...@gmail.com Sun, 15 Dec 2013 15:37:32 +0100 Thank you and regards, Jose G. López pgpobBMNupxtc.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#725447: RFS: task-spooler/0.7.4-1
An updated version 0.7.4-1 of the task-spooler package is available. Package page: http://mentors.debian.net/package/task-spooler The command to get this package directly: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/task-spooler/task-spooler_0.7.4-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Bump standards version to 3.9.5 (no changes) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131216024751.ga15...@shurick.grid.su
Bug#732135: marked as done (RFS: spatialite/4.1.1-5)
Your message dated Mon, 16 Dec 2013 04:26:11 + with message-id e1vspkx-0003h0...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: spatialite/4.1.1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #732135, regarding RFS: spatialite/4.1.1-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 732135: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732135 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponshorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, As part of the upcoming SpatiaLite transition am I looking for a sponsor for my package spatialite. Please refer to the thread on debian-gis@ for more information on this transition: https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2013/10/msg9.html Package name: spatialite Version : 4.1.1-5 Upstream Author : Alessandro Furieri a.furi...@lqt.it URL : https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/libspatialite/ License : MPL-1.1 or GPL-2.0+ or LGPL-2.1+ Section : science It builds those binary packages: libspatialite-dev - Geospatial extension for SQLite - development files libspatialite5 - Geospatial extension for SQLite - libraries libspatialite5-dbg - Geospatial extension for SQLite - debugging symbols To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/spatialite Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/spatialite/spatialite_4.1.1-5.dsc More information about SpatiaLite can be obtained from https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/libspatialite/. Changes since the last upload: * Enable building with libxml2 support. * Add 11-link-libxml2.patch to link libxml2 when building test cases. * Update symbols file for XML related symbols. * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.5, no changes required. Regards, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package spatialite version 4.1.1-5 is in experimental now. http://packages.qa.debian.org/spatialite---End Message---
Which targets need their requirements in “Build-Depends*” declared?
Howdy all, Which of the standard ‘debian/rules’ targets need their requirements declared in “Build-Depends” (and “Build-Depends-Indep”)? Policy §7.7 says: Source packages that require certain binary packages to be installed or absent at the time of building the package can declare relationships to those binary packages. This is done using the `Build-Depends', `Build-Depends-Indep', `Build-Conflicts' and `Build-Conflicts-Indep' control fields. What standard targets does this “at the time of building the package” entail? The “test” target? The “get-orig-source” target? What official set of standard targets obligate their requirements to be declared in this field? Note that I'm not looking for opinions about what would be a good idea; I'm looking for how this policy section is interpreted for normative behaviour. -- \ “Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?” “I think so, | `\ Brain, but there's still a bug stuck in here from last time.” | _o__) —_Pinky and The Brain_ | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/7w61qpjs8g@benfinney.id.au
Re: Which targets need their requirements in “Build-Depends*” declared?
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes: Which of the standard ‘debian/rules’ targets need their requirements declared in “Build-Depends” (and “Build-Depends-Indep”)? Policy §7.7 says: Source packages that require certain binary packages to be installed or absent at the time of building the package can declare relationships to those binary packages. This is done using the `Build-Depends', `Build-Depends-Indep', `Build-Conflicts' and `Build-Conflicts-Indep' control fields. What standard targets does this “at the time of building the package” entail? The “test” target? The “get-orig-source” target? What official set of standard targets obligate their requirements to be declared in this field? Note that I'm not looking for opinions about what would be a good idea; I'm looking for how this policy section is interpreted for normative behaviour. What's currently done everywhere in the archive is that the targets run by dpkg-buildpackage (either arch or arch-indep builds) must have their dependencies listed, and dependencies for the other targets are not listed. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87a9g11h02@windlord.stanford.edu
