Unable to anonymously clone / pull Git repositories

2014-01-26 Thread Andreas Tille 
Hi,

currently the upgrading of the web sentinel is stalled since I get for instance:

$ git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/blends/projects/gis.git git-test
Cloning into 'git-test'...
fatal: remote error: access denied or repository not exported: 
/blends/projects/gis.git

I also tried:

$ git clone git://git.debian.org/git/blends/projects/gis.git git-test
Klone nach 'git-test'...
fatal: remote error: access denied or repository not exported: 
/git/blends/projects/gis.git
$ git clone ssh://git.debian.org/git/blends/projects/gis.git git-test
Klone nach 'git-test'...
...


Any idea why this has stopped working (since a short time - it worked
about three days ago at least).

Kind regards

Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140126093544.gg24...@an3as.eu



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140126093544.gg24...@an3as.eu

Re: Unable to anonymously clone / pull Git repositories

2014-01-26 Thread Ross Gammon 
Hi Andreas,

Gitweb is also down:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/

Something happened yesterday. I saw a mail on another list that said
#alioth were aware of the problem, but I have not seen any other
notifications.

Ross

On 01/26/2014 10:35 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
 Hi,
 
 currently the upgrading of the web sentinel is stalled since I get
 for instance:
 
 $ git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/blends/projects/gis.git
 git-test Cloning into 'git-test'... fatal: remote error: access
 denied or repository not exported: /blends/projects/gis.git
 
 I also tried:
 
 $ git clone git://git.debian.org/git/blends/projects/gis.git
 git-test Klone nach 'git-test'... fatal: remote error: access
 denied or repository not exported: /git/blends/projects/gis.git $
 git clone ssh://git.debian.org/git/blends/projects/gis.git
 git-test Klone nach 'git-test'... ...
 
 
 Any idea why this has stopped working (since a short time - it
 worked about three days ago at least).
 
 Kind regards
 
 Andreas.
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52e4dc98.1040...@the-gammons.net

Re: How to selectively silence git-multimail messages ?

2014-01-26 Thread Raphael Hertzog 
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014, Russ Allbery wrote:
 Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
 
  Sometimes, I can guess in advance that a push will generate a flood of
  emails that will not be very relevant at best and annoying at worse on
  my packaging team's mailing list.  For instance, merges from upstream's
  master branch, with hundreds of commits that do not change the contents
  of the debian directory.  Sometimes, to avoid them, I log on Alioth and
  disable temporarly the commit hook.
 
  Would anybody be able to improve the system so that, when pushing with the
  --quiet option, the individual emails for each commits will be skipped ?
 
 I've been wondering about this too.  Something to send out only a summary
 mail message if a given push results in, say, more than 20 commits would
 be very nice.
 
 The last time I pushed the upstream merge for OpenAFS, I think it sent
 about 200 mail messages with all the upstream changes since the previous
 release.

There's no good answer unfortunately. There's this ticket requesting
the possibility to filter commit notices per branch:
https://github.com/mhagger/git-multimail/pull/15

But it hasn't seen any recent progress. And somehow I fear it would work
correctly only if you take care to push the upstream branch first
in a separate push.

The possibility to limit the number of commit notices also looks like a
good idea, I filed it here:
https://github.com/mhagger/git-multimail/issues/41

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Discover the Debian Administrator's Handbook:
→ http://debian-handbook.info/get/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140126102035.gb31...@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com

Bug#736671: RFS: asused/3.72-11 [ITA]

2014-01-26 Thread Sebastien Badia 
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 08:06:21AM (+0800), Paul Wise wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Sebastien Badia wrote:
 
  * URL : http://www.ripe.net/tools/
 
 According to the upstream FTP site, asused has been 'decommissioned'.
 I wonder if the package should be replaced in Debian by whatever
 replaces it upstream?
 
 ftp://ftp.ripe.net/tools/OLD/

Hi Paul,

Indeed, you're right.
I've just uploaded a new version on mentors, according your comments.

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/asused/asused_3.72-11.dsc

Thanks !

Seb

-- 
Sebastien Badia
Xmpp/mail: s...@sebian.fr


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140126111314.ga25...@grimoire.sebian.fr

Bug#736671: RFS: asused/3.72-11 [ITA]

2014-01-26 Thread Paul Wise 
On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 12:13 +0100, Sebastien Badia wrote:

 Indeed, you're right.
 I've just uploaded a new version on mentors, according your comments.

I think you misunderstood my suggestion. I suggest to talk to RIPE and
find out what tools replaced asused. Then package those tools instead
and remove asused from Debian since it deprecated.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Checking build errors - endianess problem

2014-01-26 Thread Andreas Tille 
Hi Lennart,

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 05:32:44PM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
 Endianness! I should have thought of that. I think the underlying
 library was never developed with endianness in mind. Maybe I can
 convince upstream to fix this. Not sure how useful that would be as I
 don't expect many users running the kind of analysis ProbABEL is
 designed for on a different architecture...

Perhaps you might underestimate the role of multi core arm servers.[1]
I guess in the not to distant future we should expect gene sequencing
also on arm(64) hardware.

Kind regards

  Andreas.

[1] Some random search (without any intend to be complete) brought up
for instance https://www.toradex.com/
 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140126151824.gl24...@an3as.eu

Bug#736677: marked as done (RFS: libgeo-proj4-perl/1.05-1)

2014-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jan 2014 16:27:51 +
with message-id e1w7syp-0005ow...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: libgeo-proj4-perl/1.05-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #736677,
regarding RFS: libgeo-proj4-perl/1.05-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
736677: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736677
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package libgeo-proj4-perl

 Package name: libgeo-proj4-perl
 Version : 1.05-1
 Upstream Author : Mark Overmeer m...@overmeer.net
 URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Geo-Proj4
 License : Artistic or GPL-1+
 Section : perl

It builds those binary packages:

  libgeo-proj4-perl - PROJ.4 library for cartographic projections

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/libgeo-proj4-perl


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libg/libgeo-proj4-perl/libgeo-proj4-perl_1.05-1.dsc

More information about Geo::Proj4 can be obtained from 
https://metacpan.org/release/Geo-Proj4.

Changes since the last upload:

 * New upstream release.
 * Require debhelper version 9 instead of 9.20120312.
 * Drop lintian override for debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature.


Regards,
 Sebastiaan Couwenberg
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Package libgeo-proj4-perl version 1.05-1 is in unstable now.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libgeo-proj4-perl---End Message---

Bug#736671: RFS: asused/3.72-11 [ITA]

2014-01-26 Thread Rodolfo García Peñas (kix) 
On 26/01/2014 15:00, Paul Wise wrote:
 On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 12:13 +0100, Sebastien Badia wrote:
 
 Indeed, you're right.
 I've just uploaded a new version on mentors, according your comments.
 
 I think you misunderstood my suggestion. I suggest to talk to RIPE and
 find out what tools replaced asused. Then package those tools instead
 and remove asused from Debian since it deprecated.
 

Hi Paul,

asused was removed because now the Local Internet Registers can download
their information using a web API.

This package should be removed, without replacement.

Best regards,
kix
-- 
||// //\\// Rodolfo kix Garcia
||\\// //\\ http://www.kix.es/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52e57a3c.1030...@kix.es

Bug#736437: marked as done (RFS: phonetisaurus/0.7.8-3 -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool)

2014-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jan 2014 23:50:05 +0100
with message-id 20140126225005.ga27...@jwilk.net
and subject line Re: Bug#736437: RFS: phonetisaurus/0.7.8-3 -- Grapheme to 
Phoneme conversion tool
has caused the Debian Bug report #736437,
regarding RFS: phonetisaurus/0.7.8-3 -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
736437: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736437
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: sponsorship-requests
  Severity: wishlist

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package phonetisaurus

 * Package name: phonetisaurus
   Version : 0.7.8-3
   Upstream Author : Josef Novak josef.robert.no...@gmail.com
 * URL : http://code.google.com/p/phonetisaurus/
 * License : BSD-2-clause
   Section : science

  It fixes a bug in phonetisaurus-calculateER.
  I do not think the included patch is relevant to upstream as it does not 
really solve the issue in the general case. I will inform upstream about the 
issue and also ask
if it is possible to do anything in order to fix the remaining two pedantic 
lintian warnings.

  It builds those binary packages:

phonetisaurus - Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following Vcs URL:

 git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/phonetisaurus.git

  Regards,
   Giulio Paci
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---

* Giulio Paci giuliop...@gmail.com, 2014-01-23, 17:46:

It fixes a bug in phonetisaurus-calculateER.
I do not think the included patch is relevant to upstream as it does 
not really solve the issue in the general case.


Agreed. Note that there are more hardcoded paths in 
train-ngramlibrary.py (which we don't ship in the .deb):


$ grep -Er '[.]/|[^!]/usr' ./script/
./script/train-ngramlibrary.py:command = ./m2mformat.py PREFIX.m2m.corpus  
PREFIX.corpus
./script/train-ngramlibrary.py:command = /usr/local/bin/farcompilestrings 
--symbols=PREFIXORDER.syms --keep_symbols=1 PREFIX.corpus  PREFIXORDER.far
./script/train-ngramlibrary.py:command = ../phonetisaurus-arpa2wfst-omega 
--lm=PREFIX.arpa  PREFIX.fst
./script/train-ngramlibrary.py:command = 
./phonetisaurus-calculateER-omega --modelfile PREFIX.fst --testfile 
g014b2b.test.fix.bsf --prefix PREFIX --decoder_type fsa_eps
./script/train-ngramlibrary.py:command = 
./phonetisaurus-calculateER-omega --modelfile PREFIX.fst --testfile 
g014a2.test.tabbed.bsf --prefix PREFIX --decoder_type fsa_eps

I will inform upstream about the issue and also ask if it is possible 
to do anything in order to fix the remaining two pedantic lintian 
warnings.


s/warnings/tags/


git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/phonetisaurus.git


Uploaded.


Things to fix in the future releases:

* utfcpp is now packaged separately, so it's time to stop using the 
embedded copy.


* copyright_hints appears to be outdated:

| WARNING: The following (and possibly more) new or changed notices discovered:
|
|  src/Arpa2Fst.hpp

* Compiler warnings:

Phonetisaurus.cpp:214:9: warning: unused variable 'ip' [-Wunused-variable]
MBRDecoder.cpp:237:32: warning: passing NULL to non-pointer argument 1 of 'void google::dense_hash_mapKey, T, HashFcn, 
EqualKey, Alloc::set_empty_key(const key_type) [with Key = int; T = fst::LogWeightTplfloat; HashFcn = 
std::tr1::hashint; EqualKey = std::equal_toint; Alloc = google::libc_allocator_with_reallocstd::pairconst 
int, fst::LogWeightTplfloat  ; google::dense_hash_mapKey, T, HashFcn, EqualKey, Alloc::key_type = int]' 
[-Wconversion-null]
MBRDecoder.cpp:698:12: warning: unused variable 'state' [-Wunused-variable]
M2MFstAligner.cpp:433:7: warning: variable 'xd' set but not used 
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
M2MFstAligner.cpp:433:24: warning: variable 'yd' set but not used 
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
PhonetisaurusOmega.cpp:287:22: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned 
integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
PhonetisaurusOmega.cpp:287:46: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned 
integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
PhonetisaurusOmega.cpp:294:55: warning: 'phi_cost' may be used uninitialized in 
this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
PhonetisaurusOmega.cpp:294:55: warning: 'phi_id' may be used uninitialized in 
this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
PhonetisaurusOmega.cpp:339:50: warning: 'phi_cost' may be used uninitialized in 
this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
PhonetisaurusOmega.cpp:339:50: warning: 'phi_id' may be used uninitialized

Bug#736671: RFS: asused/3.72-11 [ITA]

2014-01-26 Thread Paul Wise 
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Rodolfo García Peñas (kix) wrote:

 asused was removed because now the Local Internet Registers can download
 their information using a web API.

 This package should be removed, without replacement.

Sebastian, could you do the removal then? RoQA is the appropriate
removal reason.

https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals

If you actually need the package for something it would be interesting
to find out our use-case.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caktje6h_ahvshdymk0skgajh3ehbv2alf-pbyuhocwcqe3v...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#736671: RFS: asused/3.72-11 [ITA]

2014-01-26 Thread Sebastien Badia 
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 07:42:59AM (+0800), Paul Wise wrote:
 On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Rodolfo García Peñas (kix) wrote:
 
  asused was removed because now the Local Internet Registers can download
  their information using a web API.
 
  This package should be removed, without replacement.
 
 If you actually need the package for something it would be interesting
 to find out our use-case.

Hi Paul, Rodolfo,

I've not misunderstood your suggestion, but as said Rodolfo asused (and
web-asused too) was removed (since 11/19/2012¹) and replaced by IP-analyser².

The problem is that IP-analyser require a RIPE-NCC account attached to a LIR
whereas asused not (because it uses directly whois query). And IP-analyser API³
require also a authentication token…

But this use-case is shared only by ±30⁴ other persons :-)

Therefore we do anything with this package? RoQA anyway?

Thanks,

Seb

¹https://www.ripe.net/data-tools/web-asused
²https://lirportal.ripe.net/ipanalyser/
³http://www.ripe.net/data-tools/developer-documentation/the-lir-portal-ip-analyser-api
⁴http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=asused
-- 
Sebastien Badia


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140127004410.ga24...@grimoire.sebian.fr

Bug#736671: RFS: asused/3.72-11 [ITA]

2014-01-26 Thread Paul Wise 
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 01:44 +0100, Sebastien Badia wrote:

 Therefore we do anything with this package? RoQA anyway?

Thanks for the explanation, it sounds like this package should remain in
Debian instead of being removed, good luck with finding a sponsor.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#736288: RFS: libnftnl/1.0.0-1 [ITP]

2014-01-26 Thread Neutron Soutmun 
Hello,

FYI, as of the devscripts 2.14.0 [1] the keyring location for
signature verification has been moved to debian/upstream/.

Regards,
Neutron Soutmun

[1] 
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/d/devscripts/unstable_changelog

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Neutron Soutmun neo.neut...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello Arturo,

 Thanks for your great work, it looks good.
 I'm waiting for your package uploaded to Debian :-)

 Cheers,
 Neutron Soutmun

 On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
 arturo.borrero.g...@gmail.com wrote:
 Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: wishlist

 Dear mentors,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package libnftnl

 * Package name: libnftnl
   Version : 1.0.0-1
   Upstream Author : Pablo Neira Ayuso pa...@netfilter.org
 * URL : http://www.netfilter.org
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : libs

 It builds those binary packages:

  libnftnl-dev - Development files for libnftnl0
  libnftnl0  - Netfilter nftables userspace API library
  libnftnl0-dbg - Debugging symbols for libnftnl0

 To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
 URL:
   http://mentors.debian.net/package/libnftnl

 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
   dget -x 
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libn/libnftnl/libnftnl_1.0.0-1.dsc

 This package includes the first Netfilter oficial release of libnftnl.

 The library is the userspace, low-level, API to the nftables kernel 
 subsystem.
 So, for using nftables, you need libnftnl, the nft CLI tool, and a proper 
 Linux kernel.
 Note that nftables is supported in Linux kernel since 3.13.

 [ Previous to the 1.0.0 release, Netfilter renamed libnftables to libnftnl ]

 Regards,
  Arturo Borrero Gonzalez


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: 
 http://lists.debian.org/20140121235859.25648.47018.reportbug@nostromo



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAMQP0s=Un4MamewDMn_UFQ1aC68LqxH75rsMD6eWg=oidxp...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#719801: Acknowledgement (RFS: roundup/1.5.0-1)

2014-01-26 Thread Andrew Starr-Bochicchio 
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Kai Storbeck k...@xs4all.nl wrote:
 I have updated roundup_1.5.0-1 per the 17th of October with a few
 changes after getting feedback by Sebastian Ramacher.

Hi Kai,

I came across your package on mentors, and I am interested in
sponsoring it. Though, I ran into a few issues that need to be fixed
first.

1) You seem to maintain the packaging in a VCS:

   * Move to git-dpm packaging

In that case, it is very useful to include Vcs-{Git, Svn, Bzr} and
Vcs-Browser fields in debian/control:

https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-VCS-fields

2) There are minified version of JQuery and Bootstrap located in:
share/roundup/templates/jinja2/static

As you already remove other copies of JQuery in other templates, you
probably already know that you should use the system copies.
Additionally, minified JavaScript objects that are installed with the
binary package must be built from source. Same goes for the minified
Bootstrap css files in that directory.

Also, as long as these files are shipped in the tarball, their license
information needs to be documented in debian/copyright.

3) You seemed to remove some necessary bits from your postrm to clean
up when purging the package. From piuparts:

3m20.5s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system:
  /etc/roundup/ owned by: roundup
  /etc/roundup/service/ not owned
  /etc/roundup/service/log/ not owned

3m20.5s ERROR: FAIL: Installation, upgrade and purging tests.


There maybe further issues. This is just as far as I got. I'd be happy
to do a closer review and hopefully sponsor the package once these
problems are fixed.

Thanks for your work on Debian!

-- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio

   Ubuntu Developer https://launchpad.net/~andrewsomething
   Debian Developer http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=asb
   PGP/GPG Key ID: D53FDCB1


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAL6k_Ayk1wykGHTKh7-D9vs-xq=ur+27x_taocr76qxm_ha...@mail.gmail.com

Re: RFS: geary/0.4.3-1.1 [NMU]

2014-01-26 Thread Vincent Cheng 
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Cameron Norman
camerontnor...@gmail.com wrote:
 El Sat, 25 de Jan 2014 a las 9:42 PM, Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org
 escribió:

 Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi Cameron, On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 9:17 PM,
 Cameron Norman camerontnor...@gmail.com wrote:

 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking
 for a sponsor for my package geary * Package name : geary Version :
 0.4.3-1.1 Upstream Author : Yorba * URL : http://yorba.org/projects/geary *
 License : LGPL 2.1+ Section : mail It builds those binary packages: geary -
 lightweight email client designed for the GNOME desktop To access further
 information about this package, please visit the following URL:
 http://mentors.debian.net/package/geary Alternatively, one can download the
 package with dget using this command: dget -x
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/geary/geary_0.4.3-1.1.dsc More
 information about geary can be obtained from:
 http://yorba.org/projects/geary. Changes since the last upload: * Updated
 Debian watch file to GNOME infrastructure. * New Upstream release

 Have you tried contacting the maintainer prior to sending out this RFS? If
 they haven't responded in a timely manner, please ping the MIA team and go
 through the MIA process; if they did reply and simply don't have time to
 update their package, please get them to say so on a public list / bug
 report and include a link to it in your RFS bug. Otherwise, this would be
 considered a hostile NMU.


 Sorry, new to this. I actually bcc'd the maintainer this message. In the
 future, should I just mail the maintainer with a link to the mentors page?
 Do I then need to mark it not an NMU, and change the versioning to reflect
 that?

If you're new to NMUs, you may want to read up on devref 5.11 [1]
first. The gist of it is that NMUs are your last resort given an
unresponsive maintainer, and you should exercise all possible means of
communication with the maintainer before resorting to a NMU.

I don't take this point of view myself (I'm happy if other maintainers
want to co-maintain my packages and share the workload), but you
should note that different maintainers treat NMUs with differing
amounts of hostility, and it's not good etiquette to attempt a NMU
without prior contact with the maintainer. What you should generally
do is ping the current maintainer a few times with an offer to help
(try to avoid mentioning NMU; use keywords like help,
co-maintenance, here's a patch/debdiff, etc. instead), and
continue to ping the maintainer at reasonable intervals until you
suspect that the maintainer has gone MIA, in which case you should
also ping the MIA team (who may then orphan the package, for you to
adopt).

Regards,
Vincent

[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caczd_tbj9qa9ta65+w0s+qf1wtqkpphxyidpl0gnvrsg6fj...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#728889: marked as done (RFS: stx-btree/0.9-1)

2014-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:41:01 -0800
with message-id 
CACZd_tCcnmvP-zZM4m=x2z_umefyqusnhst2dup-tj2gb+f...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: Bug#728889: RFS: stx-btree/0.9-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #728889,
regarding RFS: stx-btree/0.9-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
728889: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728889
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package stx-btree

 * Package name: stx-btree
   Version : 0.9-1
   Upstream Author : Timo Bingmann (Mail: tb a-with-circle idlebox dot net)
 * URL : http://idlebox.net/2007/stx-btree/
 * License : boost + gpl3
   Section : libdevel

It builds those binary packages:

 stx-btree-demo - b+tree implementation in c++, demo program
 stx-btree-dev - b+tree implementation in c++
 stx-btree-doc - b+tree implementation in c++, doxygen documentation

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/stx-btree

ps:

on the http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ page, i see that version
is 3.9.5.0; but lintian tell me that current is 3.9.4, which version
should i specify and how to find corrent one ?

pps: please, cc me on reply

-- 
Linux registered user #402966 // pub 1024D/E99AF373 pgp.mit.edu



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Yury Stankevich ury...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello,

 new upload, new fixes ;)

 1. i have reverted external jquery.

 In fact replacing the `jquery.js` file created by Doxygen likely
 results in broken documentation. Packages doing that are buggy. Lintian
 will have to learn that a `jquery.js` embedded by Doxygen is a normal thing.

 2. fixed licence texts.


Built, signed, and uploaded. Thanks for your contribution to Debian!

Regards,
Vincent---End Message---

Bug#719801: Acknowledgement (RFS: roundup/1.5.0-1)

2014-01-26 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES 
Le 27 janv. 2014 04:27, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio a...@debian.org a écrit :

 On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Kai Storbeck k...@xs4all.nl wrote:
  I have updated roundup_1.5.0-1 per the 17th of October with a few
  changes after getting feedback by Sebastian Ramacher.

 Hi Kai,

 I came across your package on mentors, and I am interested in
 sponsoring it. Though, I ran into a few issues that need to be fixed
 first.

I have just filled two rc severity bug against your package. Please close
it.

Bastien
 1) You seem to maintain the packaging in a VCS:

* Move to git-dpm packaging

 In that case, it is very useful to include Vcs-{Git, Svn, Bzr} and
 Vcs-Browser fields in debian/control:


https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-VCS-fields

 2) There are minified version of JQuery and Bootstrap located in:
 share/roundup/templates/jinja2/static

 As you already remove other copies of JQuery in other templates, you
 probably already know that you should use the system copies.
 Additionally, minified JavaScript objects that are installed with the
 binary package must be built from source. Same goes for the minified
 Bootstrap css files in that directory.

 Also, as long as these files are shipped in the tarball, their license
 information needs to be documented in debian/copyright.

 3) You seemed to remove some necessary bits from your postrm to clean
 up when purging the package. From piuparts:

 3m20.5s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system:
   /etc/roundup/ owned by: roundup
   /etc/roundup/service/ not owned
   /etc/roundup/service/log/ not owned

 3m20.5s ERROR: FAIL: Installation, upgrade and purging tests.


 There maybe further issues. This is just as far as I got. I'd be happy
 to do a closer review and hopefully sponsor the package once these
 problems are fixed.

 Thanks for your work on Debian!

 -- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio

Ubuntu Developer https://launchpad.net/~andrewsomething
Debian Developer http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=asb
PGP/GPG Key ID: D53FDCB1


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAL6k_Ayk1wykGHTKh7-D9vs-xq=ur+27x_taocr76qxm_ha...@mail.gmail.com