Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-03-01 Thread Mikhail Morfikov
Can you elaborate a bit on what you mean by having to build a package multiple times before it builds successfully? With pbuilder, your package should be able to be built with a single invocation of pbuilder (given a .dsc) or pdebuild (when unpacked). Anything more than that and the

Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-03-01 Thread Mikhail Morfikov
Pbuilder also supports that using hooks, e.g.: # ln -s /usr/share/doc/pbuilder/examples/C10shell /var/cache/pbuilder/hooks/C10shell ...and the next time your build fails, pbuilder will dump you in the chroot with a shell. I checked this solution, but I'm wondering how to resume pbuilder

Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-03-01 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
sbuild also has lots of nifty extra features. One I use a lot is the ability to locally build a stack of related packages against each other[1]. You can do that in pbuilder (https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks ; also allows testing locally-built packages in a pbuilder --login session), but

Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-03-01 Thread Wookey
+++ Barry Warsaw [2014-02-28 16:42 -0500]: On Feb 28, 2014, at 10:52 AM, Mikhail Morfikov wrote: I'm new to building packages by using pbuilder tool, and I have to build a package multiple times before it builds successfully, or in the way I prefer. This is one of the reasons why I prefer

Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-03-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Wookey wrote: I must admit I'm surprised so many people still use pbuilder, although I do agree that the syntax is a bit simpler for a 'standard upload' build. I still use cowbuilder because schroot doesn't support cowdancer for copy-on-write chroots and I found

Re: RFS: cl-launch (updated package)

2014-03-01 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! Faré fah...@gmail.com writes: you did well to procrastinate on my cl-launch 4.0.0-1, for after a round of bug fixes, here is 4.0.1-1. Thus, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.0.1-1 of my package cl-launch. It builds these binary packages: cl-launch - uniform frontend to

Bug#740422: RFS: osgearth/2.5.0+dfsg-1~exp1

2014-03-01 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package osgearth Package name: osgearth Version : 2.5.0+dfsg-1~exp1 Upstream Author : Glenn Waldron URL : http://osgearth.org/ License : LGPL-3 Section :

Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-03-01 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: If you can convince the pbuilder and sbuild maintainers to work together to merge all the missing parts of pbuilder/cowbuilder/qemubuilder into sbuild, That would be a great adventure! -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key:

Bug#740390: marked as done (RFS: tinyows/1.1.0-4 [ITP])

2014-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 01 Mar 2014 13:42:28 +0100 with message-id 5311d5b4.4070...@xs4all.nl and subject line RFS: tinyows/1.1.0-4 [ITP] [uploaded] has caused the Debian Bug report #740390, regarding RFS: tinyows/1.1.0-4 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-03-01 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes: On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Wookey wrote: I must admit I'm surprised so many people still use pbuilder, although I do agree that the syntax is a bit simpler for a 'standard upload' build. I still use cowbuilder because schroot doesn't support cowdancer

RE: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-03-01 Thread Bas van den Dikkenberg
I use a hook withs give me root access to build env when a build is failed Added this line to .pbuilderrc HOOKDIR=/var/cache/pbuilder/hook.d And placed the file C10shell in there with this content: #!/bin/sh # invoke shell if build fails. apt-get install -y --force-yes vim less bash nano cd

Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-03-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: I use sbuild (actually, schroot under the hood) with btrfs-snapshot chroots. Creating a new build environment really is a snap. Personally I wouldn't feel comfortable using btrfs on my main system yet and I don't have a separate system

Bug#740442: RFS: par2cmdline/0.6.5-1 [ITA] -- PAR 2.0 compatible file verification and repair tool

2014-03-01 Thread jcfp
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for par2cmdline: Package name: par2cmdline Version : 0.6.5-1 Upstream Author : Ike Devolder et al. URL : https://github.com/BlackIkeEagle/par2cmdline License :

Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-03-01 Thread Wookey
+++ Ferenc Wagner [2014-03-01 15:11 +0100]: Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes: On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Wookey wrote: I must admit I'm surprised so many people still use pbuilder, although I do agree that the syntax is a bit simpler for a 'standard upload' build. I still use

Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-03-01 Thread Wookey
+++ Paul Wise [2014-03-01 23:17 +0800]: On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: By default, the snapshot is destroyed when sbuild finishes in any way. No chance to damage the origin chroot this way. If you aren't using any of the snapshot-capable mechanisms it will. For

Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-03-01 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Wookey woo...@wookware.org, 2014-03-01, 15:28: I still use cowbuilder because schroot doesn't support cowdancer for copy-on-write chroots and I found tarball mode in pbuilder to be way too slow. I use sbuild (actually, schroot under the hood) with btrfs-snapshot chroots. Creating a new

Bug#740452: RFS: qgis/2.2.0-1~exp1

2014-03-01 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package qgis Package name: qgis Version : 2.2.0-1~exp1 Upstream Author : qgis-develo...@lists.osgeo.org URL : http://qgis.org/ License : GPL-2+ Section :

Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-03-01 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Mikhail Morfikov mmorfi...@gmail.com wrote: Pbuilder also supports that using hooks, e.g.: # ln -s /usr/share/doc/pbuilder/examples/C10shell /var/cache/pbuilder/hooks/C10shell ...and the next time your build fails, pbuilder will dump you in the chroot with a

Re: Maintainer scripts: execute command as another user: use sudo or su?

2014-03-01 Thread Emilien Klein
On 02/27/2014 03:37 PM, David Kalnischkies wrote: On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 04:07:35PM +0100, Emilien Klein wrote: In the pre- and postinst scripts, a command has to be performed as that user (e.g. make a backup of the database). […] I am wondering what the best way is to fix this. I see 2

Test builds in gbp patch-queue branch [was: Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?]

2014-03-01 Thread Ross Gammon
On 03/01/2014 10:46 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote: On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Mikhail Morfikov mmorfi...@gmail.com wrote: Pbuilder also supports that using hooks, e.g.: # ln -s /usr/share/doc/pbuilder/examples/C10shell /var/cache/pbuilder/hooks/C10shell ...and the next time your build

Re: Test builds in gbp patch-queue branch [was: Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?]

2014-03-01 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 01 Mar 2014 23:37:22 +0100, Ross Gammon wrote: 'gbp buildpackage' fails because it detects altered files in the source code. Or can I override gbp buildpackage (with pbuilder as an option) in some way so that it ignores the fact that there are altered files? Yes, you can: ==

Re: Maintainer scripts: execute command as another user: use sudo or su?

2014-03-01 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 01 Mar 2014 22:55:20 +0100, Emilien Klein wrote: One minor challenge that I faced is that I couldn't get the commands to run using su. With the help of Karsten Hilbert I understood that the issue was that the user being a system user, she didn't have a shell (default shell for new

Bug#734522: marked as done (RFS: optparse-js/1.0.5-1 [ITP: #733763])

2014-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 02 Mar 2014 04:26:30 + with message-id e1wjxyw-cs...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: optparse-js/1.0.5-1 [ITP: #733763] has caused the Debian Bug report #734522, regarding RFS: optparse-js/1.0.5-1 [ITP: #733763] to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#740422: marked as done (RFS: osgearth/2.5.0+dfsg-1~exp1)

2014-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 02 Mar 2014 04:26:30 + with message-id e1wjxyw-cy...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: osgearth/2.5.0+dfsg-1~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #740422, regarding RFS: osgearth/2.5.0+dfsg-1~exp1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Re: Test builds in gbp patch-queue branch [was: Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?]

2014-03-01 Thread Ross Gammon
On 03/02/2014 12:38 AM, gregor herrmann wrote: On Sat, 01 Mar 2014 23:37:22 +0100, Ross Gammon wrote: 'gbp buildpackage' fails because it detects altered files in the source code. Or can I override gbp buildpackage (with pbuilder as an option) in some way so that it ignores the fact that