Hello,
I've made an ITP for casperjs (#742597
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742597 ), but I have a
question on which version I should package. The current version of
casperjs is 1.0.4 but it is not compatible with phantomjs 1.9 which is
currently in sid. So, should I
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Xavier Claude wrote:
I've made an ITP for casperjs (#742597
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742597 ), but I have a
question on which version I should package. The current version of casperjs
is 1.0.4 but it is not compatible with phantomjs
Le 2014-03-27 11:43, Paul Wise a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Xavier Claude wrote:
I've made an ITP for casperjs (#742597
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742597 ), but I
have a
question on which version I should package. The current version of
casperjs
is 1.0.4
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:47:45AM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 08:35:33 +0100, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:54:03PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Moreover I observed another issue with autopkgtest which is quite
Hi all,
the Debian packages for netCDF
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/ are currently at 4.1.3,
a version released some three years ago
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/release-notes-4.1.3.html.
A bug report was filed against this a few months back
Your message dated Fri, 28 Mar 2014 04:25:14 +
with message-id e1wtoly-0004gh...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: alienfeed/0~20131106+gitf33a8ecb54-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #729083,
regarding RFS: alienfeed/0~20131106+gitf33a8ecb54-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Fri, 28 Mar 2014 04:25:19 +
with message-id e1wtom3-0004gr...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: python-praw/2.1.11-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #729082,
regarding RFS: python-praw/2.1.11-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
7 matches
Mail list logo