Bug#749691: marked as done (RFS: kaya (fix of two RC bugs))

2014-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 2 Jun 2014 00:27:36 -0700 with message-id caczd_td892r+yhyypnxbtzz+gk1mjmrrhgp7mkbe2_nqk5m...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: Bug#749691: RFS: kaya (fix of two RC bugs) has caused the Debian Bug report #749691, regarding RFS: kaya (fix of two RC bugs) to be marked as

Bug#750160: RFS: aptitude/0.6.11-1 [RC]

2014-06-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important X-Debbugs-CC: aptitude-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors I am looking for a sponsor for my package aptitude * Package name: aptitude Version : 0.6.11-1 Upstream Author : Aptitude Devel

Bug#750160: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#750160: RFS: aptitude/0.6.11-1 [RC]

2014-06-02 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Daniel, I'd generally sponsor the upload. Built fine, works for me on at least amd64, no lintian warnings I could argue about. :-) Daniel Hartwig wrote: Changes since the last upload: * Includes fix for FTBFS with gcc-4.9. * New upstream release: - Load package tags from APT if

Bug#750160: RFS: aptitude/0.6.11-1 [RC]

2014-06-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 2 June 2014 19:29, Axel Beckert a...@debian.org wrote: There are at least the following packaging changes which is not mentioned in the changelog entry, but IMHO should: * There's a new build-dependency on libxapian-dev. This seems due to upstream changes. Nevertheless this should be

Bug#750160: RFS: aptitude/0.6.11-1 [RC]

2014-06-02 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Daniel, Daniel Hartwig wrote: On 2 June 2014 19:29, Axel Beckert a...@debian.org wrote: There are at least the following packaging changes which is not mentioned in the changelog entry, but IMHO should: * There's a new build-dependency on libxapian-dev. This seems due to upstream

Bug#750160: RFS: aptitude/0.6.11-1 [RC]

2014-06-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 2 June 2014 19:48, Axel Beckert a...@debian.org wrote: Hi Daniel, Daniel Hartwig wrote: Will add: * debian/control: New Build-Depends on libxapian-dev, replacing libept-dev. Thanks. Uploaded (mentors.d.n). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#749929: RFS: aircrack-ng/1:1.2-0~beta3-1

2014-06-02 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 01/06/14 03:47, Paul Wise wrote: On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aircrack-ng/aircrack-ng_1.2-0~beta3-1.dsc Some comments below. Other comments via private mail. Upstream website SSL is broken

Bug#749929: RFS: aircrack-ng/1:1.2-0~beta3-1

2014-06-02 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 01/06/14 04:24, Paul Wise wrote: On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Paul Wise wrote: Some comments below. More: Some bits of airoscript-ng use /usr/local unconditionally. As commented on my previous reply, the package don't installs airoscript-ng. GCC warnings: tkiptun-ng.c: In

Bug#749929: RFS: aircrack-ng/1:1.2-0~beta3-1

2014-06-02 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 01/06/14 04:39, Paul Wise wrote: On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Paul Wise wrote: On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Paul Wise wrote: Some comments below. More: One more - the ieee-data package places the oui files in a different location to where aircrack-ng looks for them. Yes, I

Bug#750136: RFS: freemind/1.0.1 [ITA]

2014-06-02 Thread Felix Natter
hi Mark, you probably should forward your RFS request to debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, otherwise probably no one might read and review it. When running dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/freemind/freemind_1.0.1.dsc I get: dscverify: freemind_1.0.1.dsc failed signature

RFS: freemind/1.0.1 [ITA]

2014-06-02 Thread Mark Clarke
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package freemind * Package name : freemind Version : 1.0.1 Upstream Author : Joerg Mueller joergmuel...@bigfoot.com * URL : http://freemind.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page * License : GPL V2+

Bug#750136: RFS: freemind/1.0.1 [ITA]

2014-06-02 Thread Mark Clarke
Thanks for the feedback, Will forward the email and look into the point identified. regards Mark On Monday, June 2, 2014 20:07 SAST, Felix Natter fnat...@gmx.net wrote: hi Mark, you probably should forward your RFS request to debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, otherwise probably no one

Bug#750352: RFS: scantailor/0.9.11.1-1~bpo70+1 [ITP]

2014-06-02 Thread Mads Hansen
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package scantailor * Package name: scantailor Version : 0.9.11.1-1~bpo70+1 Upstream Author : Joseph Artsimovich

Bug#749671: marked as done (RFS: bindechexascii/0.0+20140524.git7dcd86-1 [ITP] -- simple ASCII,binary,decimal and hex converter)

2014-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 2 Jun 2014 20:05:26 -0300 with message-id 20140602200526.21dd3a20cc053ba01c962...@gmail.com and subject line RFS: bindechexascii/0.0+20140524.git7dcd86-1 [ITP] -- simple ASCII,binary,decimal and hex converter has caused the Debian Bug report #749671, regarding RFS:

Bug#750384: RFS: gnustep-netclasses/1.06.dfsg-6

2014-06-02 Thread Yavor Doganov
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gnustep-netclasses. It builds these binary packages: libnetclasses-dev - Objective-C framework for socket programming with GNUstep (devel) libnetclasses0 -Objective-C

Bug#738561: marked as done (RFS: qpid-proton/0.7-1 [ITP])

2014-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 03 Jun 2014 04:24:05 + with message-id e1wrggb-0008hq...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: qpid-proton/0.7-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #738561, regarding RFS: qpid-proton/0.7-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the