Ubuntu has some of its security flags enabled by default in the compiler
itself, so explicit hardening CFLAGS are unnecessary (but harmless):
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Security/Features
To check that this has worked, you can use
https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening#Validation
However, that's the
On Jun 11, 2014, at 10:03 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
A supplementary question - do I need to name the package python3-foo
if a python 2 version is not being provided any more? Or will python-foo
do? Previous versions were just foo and being dealt with by
Conflicts/Replaces.
This could be your
On 06/12/2014 03:44 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Jun 11, 2014, at 10:03 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
A supplementary question - do I need to name the package
python3-foo if a python 2 version is not being provided any
more? Or will python-foo do? Previous versions were just foo
and being dealt with
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package pantomime.
It builds these binary packages:
libpantomime1.2 - GNUstep framework for mail handling (runtime library)
libpantomime1.2-dev - GNUstep framework for mail handling (development
On 06/11/2014 10:03 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
Hi,
I am getting a build failure when trying to build a Python 3 only
package following the guidance in the Python Library Style Guide:
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/LibraryStyleGuide
This is the error message:
E: pybuild pybuild:256: build:
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jun 2014 04:23:37 +
with message-id e1wvj1d-0004yh...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: libr3/1.3.1-1 [ITP] -- high-performance URL
router library
has caused the Debian Bug report #748870,
regarding RFS: libr3/1.3.1-1 [ITP] -- high-performance URL
6 matches
Mail list logo
