Bug#773378: RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.46-1
Hi Vincent!
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:18 AM, Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org wrote:
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi Robert,
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ledgersmb
* Package name: ledgersmb
Version : 1.3.46-1
Upstream Author : Chris Travers ch...@metatrontech.com
* URL : http://www.ledgersmb.org
* License : GPL-2+
Section : web
It builds those binary packages:
ledgersmb - financial accounting and ERP program
Just a few small questions/comments from skimming through the debdiff:
- You added a small dpkg-maintscript-helper snippet to
debian/ledgersmb.postrm, specifically checking if dpkg is new enough
to support mv_conffile before using it; what happens if dpkg isn't
sufficiently new enough to support that / is that something that
should just fail?
You can simply add a Pre-Depends:
${misc:Pre-Depends} (which will add a pre-dependency on the
appropriate version of dpkg)
That would do that simply because that form of it (mv_conffile) is
used in the mantainer scripts?
if you want to use
dpkg-maintscript-helper and not have to worry about whether dpkg is
new enough (and avoid that if dpkg-maintscript-helper supports
mv_conffile logic).
That version doesn't quite go back far enough for where I may want to
support the package. Although it's getting less likely to be an issue
over time. I'll admit I haven't needed to help with support on
squeeze or lucid recently; are you thinking that I'm worrying too
much about a situation that isn't very likely and that would need to
be supported differently in any case? (For instance, a separate
backport for it, if necessary.)
- Why bump the version number in debian/NEWS when there isn't a new
entry, and nothing else in the file has changed aside from the
timestamp? That seems likely to just annoy apt-listchanges users.
To ensure that it is taken as being current and will be seen again
as necessary. (I've corresponded with people who didn't look at it
until I pointed it out that the info was there.)
Also, note that since Debian is in freeze right now, if you wish to
target unstable, any (RC) bugfix uploads that you wish to get into
jessie would then have to go through testing-proposed-updates (which
the release team apparently really doesn't like). Are you sure you're
ok with that?
None of the three bugs I'm seeking to close with this upload are RC,
so I had not anticipated being able to update the package in jessie in
any case. (The new package upgrade I'm working on now involves an
upgrade from v1.3.x to v1.4.x; this upgrade for 1.3.46 is currently
the last in the 1.3.46 series.)
--
Robert J. Clay
rjc...@gmail.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/cal4bjxnrcbpwc6ssk7eg+bus3y9q1_27atjut5ndazxxk9v...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#773611: RFS: histring/1.1.1-1 [ITP] - general purpose highlighting tool
I don't intend to sponsor this package, but here's my review: * Tong Sun suntong...@users.sourceforge.net, 2015-01-02, 15:38: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/histring/histring_1.1.1-1.dsc Typos: warrented - warranted neccessary - necessary hilighting - highlighting bolded - emboldened [I'm not sure about this one] expresstions - expressions markerns - markers compilied - compiled Copyright information for at least getopt* is missing from d/copyright. You build-depend on autotools-dev, but don't actually use it any way (AFAICS). Please rebuild the configure script from source. You might want to use dh-autoreconf for this purpose. How was your .orig.tar generated? It is different than the one uscan downloads. I am allergic to the debianize verb, and also wonder why two items are needed in the changelog... So I'd like to propose to replace them both with this one: * Initial release (closes: #759166). What is the purpose of your debian/source/options? It doesn't seem necessary to me. The explicit clean target in debian/rules doesn't look very useful to me either. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150103172503.ga6...@jwilk.net
Re: Fwd: Sage/SIngular: static vs dynamic
Hello Bernhard, On 03/01/15 09:14, Bernhard R. Link wrote: * Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net [150102 19:26]: I am currently packaging Singular (the real target being Sage); I am finalizing. Note that I am not familiar with this particular CAS. Are you starting from scratch or are you building on top of http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/singular.git/ ? I am starting from scratch. Nevertheless, I keep an eye on the GIT to avoid unnecessary discontinuity. My material will deposit there once it is decent. I have just realised that the Singular CLI is built static (by default): I am very surprised because I expected a (regular) dynamic built. Does anyone know the reasons for building a static version rather than a dynamic version of the Singular CLI ? May Debian provide both ? Linking binaries against other libraries from other sources should usually be dynamic (unless there is a good reason for the opposite). Linking against libraries from the same source does not really matter. Producing libraries gets more complicated. (And AFAIR sage actually needs a dynamic library of singular). Agree. Nonetheless, in the current upstream source, it is explicitly built static. Never mind, it will come dynamic for Debian. Cheers, Jerome Bernhard R. Link -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54a7c060.6070...@rezozer.net
Re: Fwd: Sage/SIngular: static vs dynamic
* Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net [150102 19:26]: I am currently packaging Singular (the real target being Sage); I am finalizing. Note that I am not familiar with this particular CAS. Are you starting from scratch or are you building on top of http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/singular.git/ ? I have just realised that the Singular CLI is built static (by default): I am very surprised because I expected a (regular) dynamic built. Does anyone know the reasons for building a static version rather than a dynamic version of the Singular CLI ? May Debian provide both ? Linking binaries against other libraries from other sources should usually be dynamic (unless there is a good reason for the opposite). Linking against libraries from the same source does not really matter. Producing libraries gets more complicated. (And AFAIR sage actually needs a dynamic library of singular). Bernhard R. Link -- F8AC 04D5 0B9B 064B 3383 C3DA AFFC 96D1 151D FFDC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150103081430.ga2...@client.brlink.eu
Bug#774503: RFS: mgrs/0.0~20131209-80d5465-1~exp1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mgrs Package name: mgrs Version : 0.0~20131209-80d5465-1~exp1 Upstream Author : MetaCRS Developers meta...@lists.osgeo.org URL : https://github.com/proj4js/mgrs License : Expat Section : science It builds those binary packages: libjs-mgrs - Javascript for converting between WGS84 lat/lng and MGRS coordinates node-mgrs - Utility for converting between WGS84 lat/lng and MGRS coordinates To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/mgrs Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mgrs/mgrs_0.0~20131209-80d5465-1~exp1.dsc More information about mgrs can be obtained from https://github.com/proj4js/mgrs. Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #774458) Regards, Bas Couwenberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150103152323.11709.2802.report...@osiris.linuxminded.xs4all.nl
Bug#774512: RFS: python-osmapi/0.5.0-1~exp1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-osmapi Package name: python-osmapi Version : 0.5.0-1~exp1 Upstream Author : Stefan Oderbolz oderb...@gmail.com URL : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osmapi License : GPL-3+ Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-osmapi - Python wrapper for the OSM API python3-osmapi - Python 3 wrapper for the OSM API To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-osmapi Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-osmapi/python-osmapi_0.5.0-1~exp1.dsc More information about OsmApi can be obtained from http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osmapi. Changes since the last upload: * Initial upload (closes: #774508) Regards, Bas Couwenberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150103182214.3835.60683.report...@osiris.linuxminded.xs4all.nl
Bug#773378: RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.46-1
Hi Robert,
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Robert J. Clay rjc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Vincent!
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:18 AM, Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org wrote:
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi Robert,
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ledgersmb
* Package name: ledgersmb
Version : 1.3.46-1
Upstream Author : Chris Travers ch...@metatrontech.com
* URL : http://www.ledgersmb.org
* License : GPL-2+
Section : web
It builds those binary packages:
ledgersmb - financial accounting and ERP program
Just a few small questions/comments from skimming through the debdiff:
- You added a small dpkg-maintscript-helper snippet to
debian/ledgersmb.postrm, specifically checking if dpkg is new enough
to support mv_conffile before using it; what happens if dpkg isn't
sufficiently new enough to support that / is that something that
should just fail?
You can simply add a Pre-Depends:
${misc:Pre-Depends} (which will add a pre-dependency on the
appropriate version of dpkg)
That would do that simply because that form of it (mv_conffile) is
used in the mantainer scripts?
Yes.
if you want to use
dpkg-maintscript-helper and not have to worry about whether dpkg is
new enough (and avoid that if dpkg-maintscript-helper supports
mv_conffile logic).
That version doesn't quite go back far enough for where I may want to
support the package. Although it's getting less likely to be an issue
over time. I'll admit I haven't needed to help with support on
squeeze or lucid recently; are you thinking that I'm worrying too
much about a situation that isn't very likely and that would need to
be supported differently in any case? (For instance, a separate
backport for it, if necessary.)
I suggest one of three different options (preferably options 2 or 3,
whichever is most appropriate):
1) check if dpkg-maintscript-helper supports mv_conffile and then use
that, otherwise fallback to handwritten logic to rename the conffile
(see [1], or look at how dpkg-maintscript-helper itself is
implemented)
2) pre-depend on a sufficiently recent version of dpkg such that
mv_conffile is always known to be supported
3) don't rename the conffile at all (if it's not necessary)
My concern is that what you're currently doing seems to be a mix of
options 1 and 3, which is possibly worse than any of them, since the
outcome of running your maintainer scripts will differ depending on
what version of dpkg the user already has installed. You either always
want the conffile to be renamed, or you never want the conffile
renamed; I can't think of a valid scenario where you want to rename a
conffile if and only if dpkg supports renaming that conffile.
- Why bump the version number in debian/NEWS when there isn't a new
entry, and nothing else in the file has changed aside from the
timestamp? That seems likely to just annoy apt-listchanges users.
To ensure that it is taken as being current and will be seen again
as necessary. (I've corresponded with people who didn't look at it
until I pointed it out that the info was there.)
That seems like something that should go in a readme file, or a
low-priority debconf notice at most. debian/NEWS is essentially meant
to be a more visible user changelog that's used to notify the user of
significant changes [2], not a recurring, identical message that is
displayed every time the user updates this package. That being said,
there's nothing in Policy that prevents maintainers from (ab)using
debian/NEWS for different purposes, so I guess ultimately it's up to
you as maintainer.
Also, AFAIK apt-listchanges isn't installed by default on Debian, so
users aren't guaranteed to see your NEWS entry anyways.
Also, note that since Debian is in freeze right now, if you wish to
target unstable, any (RC) bugfix uploads that you wish to get into
jessie would then have to go through testing-proposed-updates (which
the release team apparently really doesn't like). Are you sure you're
ok with that?
None of the three bugs I'm seeking to close with this upload are RC,
so I had not anticipated being able to update the package in jessie in
any case. (The new package upgrade I'm working on now involves an
upgrade from v1.3.x to v1.4.x; this upgrade for 1.3.46 is currently
the last in the 1.3.46 series.)
Ok, sounds fine to me then (please address the
maintscript/conffile-renaming issue though).
Regards,
Vincent
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling
[2]
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-news-debian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Bug#770149: RFS: python-instagram/1.2.0-1 [ITP]
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Hi Jörg, On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Jörg Frings-Fürst deb...@jff-webhosting.net wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-instagram Package name: python-instagram Version : 1.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Instagram, Inc apidevelop...@instagram.com URL : http://github.com/Instagram/python-instagram License : BSD-3 Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-instagram - Python 2 client for the Instagram REST and Search APIs python3-instagram - Python 3 client for the Instagram REST and Search APIs To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-instagram Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-instagram/python-instagram_1.2.0-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #769928). Here's a quick review (this is in addtion to the other reviews that have already been done on python-instagram): - X-Python-Version and X-Python3-Version belong in the source stanza in d/control, not in the binary packages stanzas - instead of having an empty watch file, you can point it to PyPI instead, i.e. https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-instagram - there's been a new upstream release that you may want to consider packaging Team-maintaining this package in the DPMT and using a more permissive license for debian/* were both already mentioned in earlier reviews as well. Regards, Vincent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CACZd_tC4qbEEjaDpXkqTAEFkM+P96=8jckavt6tlgxxy8ke...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#769673: RFS: lletters/0.1.95+gtk2-4 [ITA, RC]
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Hi Dmitry, On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Dmitry Borisyuk q1we...@i.com.ua wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package lletters * Package name: lletters Version : 0.1.95+gtk2-4 * URL : http://lln.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-2 Section : games It builds those binary packages: lletters - Linux Letters and Numbers - learning game for small children To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/lletters Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lletters/lletters_0.1.95+gtk2-4.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New maintainer (Closes: #755283). * Source converted to format 3.0 (quilt). * gettext infrastructure updated, which fixes FTBFS (Closes: #749360). * Use dh-autoreconf to update autotools scripts during build, thanks Matthias Klose d...@debian.org (Closes: #538667, #727450). * Fixed reading .wav files on 64-bit architectures (Closes: #701852). * Don't terminate if cannot open /dev/dsp, just disable sound instead (Closes: #712845). * Improved LANG variable handling, thanks Prathibha B prathib...@cdac.in. * Manpage supplemented with FILES and ENVIRONMENT sections. * Configuration file (llnrc) rewritten (Closes: #703384). * Standards-Version bumped to 3.9.6 This is just a very brief review: Can you also adopt lletters-media at the same time? That package is orphaned and is a dependency of lletters. Would you consider team-maintaining this package in the Debian Games team [1] as well? You'll generally find it easier to find sponsors within a team. I'm mostly concerned about the size of some of your patches in debian/patches; it makes your package hard to review, and they're probably obsolete as well (e.g. what's the purpose of debian/patches/debian-changes-0.1.95+gtk2-3.2.patch when you're running autoreconf during the build?). While reviewing lletters, I discovered that Markus put together a minimal, easy-to-review debdiff to fix various bugs in lletters in #749360, so I'll go ahead and upload that first (just so we can get some RC bugs fixed and out of our way, and so you can focus on the packaging bits that you'd like to change). Hope that helps! Regards, Vincent [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Games/Team -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caczd_td9dvmjdjrrumcrccdgzbqaruvolhmjbrsgfwxhahk...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#769009: marked as done (RFS: pylint-plugin-utils/0.2.2-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Sat, 3 Jan 2015 17:23:49 -0800 with message-id caczd_tb7_w7vpn2s+nalgpwefcdydhp+4t8yp-3bso44ook...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: RFS: pylint-django/0.5.5-1, pylint-plugins-utils/0.2.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #769009, regarding RFS: pylint-plugin-utils/0.2.2-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 769009: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769009 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package pylint-plugin-utils * Package name: pylint-plugin-utils Version : 0.2.2-1 Upstream Author : Carl Crowder emai...@carlcrowder.com * URL : https://github.com/landscapeio/pylint-plugin-utils * License : GPL-2.0+ Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-pylint-plugin-utils - Utilities and helpers for writing Pylint plugins (Python 2) python3-pylint-plugin-utils - Utilities and helpers for writing Pylint plugins (Python 3) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pylint-plugin-utils Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pylint-plugin-utils/pylint-plugin-utils_0.2.2-1.dsc More information about pylint-plugin-utils can be obtained from https://github.com/landscapeio/pylint-plugin-utils. Changes since the last upload: Initial release (Closes: #768566) Regards, Joseph Herlant ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi Joseph, Uploaded both pylint-django and pylint-plugins-utils to NEW; thanks for your contribution to Debian! Incidentally, if you're still waiting for access to the DPMT svn repos at alioth, you may want to ping the mailing list and/or the DPMT admins again. Regards, Vincent---End Message---
Bug#769021: marked as done (RFS: pylint-django/0.5.5-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Sat, 3 Jan 2015 17:23:49 -0800 with message-id caczd_tb7_w7vpn2s+nalgpwefcdydhp+4t8yp-3bso44ook...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: RFS: pylint-django/0.5.5-1, pylint-plugins-utils/0.2.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #769021, regarding RFS: pylint-django/0.5.5-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 769021: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769021 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package pylint-django * Package name: pylint-django Version : 0.5.5-1 Upstream Author : Carl Crowder emai...@carlcrowder.com * URL : https://github.com/landscapeio/pylint-django * License : GPL-2.0+ Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-pylint-django - Pylint plugin for analysing code using Django (Python 2) python3-pylint-django - Pylint plugin for analysing code using Django (Python 3) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pylint-django Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pylint-django/pylint-plugin-utils_0.5.5-1.dsc More information about pylint-django can be obtained from https://github.com/landscapeio/pylint-django. Changes since the last upload: Initial release (Closes: #768567) Regards, Joseph Herlant ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi Joseph, Uploaded both pylint-django and pylint-plugins-utils to NEW; thanks for your contribution to Debian! Incidentally, if you're still waiting for access to the DPMT svn repos at alioth, you may want to ping the mailing list and/or the DPMT admins again. Regards, Vincent---End Message---
Bug#771433: RFS: xastir/2.0.6-1
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Hi Iain, On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Iain R. Learmonth i...@fsfe.org wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package xastir * Package name: xastir Version : 2.0.6-1 * URL : http://xastir.org/ * License : GPL-2 Section : hamradio It builds those binary packages: xastir - X Amateur Station Tracking and Information Reporting To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/xastir Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xastir/xastir_2.0.6-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Update to new upstream version (Closes: #761837) * Update to 3.9.6 packaging standard. * Changed priority to optional. * Corrected Maintainer: line in control file. * Removed uploaders inactive on the package. * Package source now maintained in Hamradio Maintainers' git VCS. Here's a quick review of your package: Were the uploaders that you removed from d/control asked to be removed by the MIA team, or declare publicly (e.g. on a bug or mailing list) that they wish to be removed? If not, please don't unilaterally remove people from uploaders; go through the MIA process [1] and have the MIA team ensure that the uploaders in question are indeed inactive before removing them. A number of issues with debian/copyright: - GPL version not specified - copyright owners+dates not specified - 2) Some of the programs in the scripts directory may contain other licensing information. See the individual files for details. wouldn't pass ftpmaster scrutiny You may want to consider updating d/copyright to use DEP-5 while you're fixing the above issues. Regards, Vincent [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/MIA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caczd_tcvvduaspfzyt2qqgs8roghxkygex79t4an1qn83pj...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#753731: marked as done (RFS: ocr4gamera/1.2.2-1 [ITA] -- (DPMT) python-gamera.toolkits.ocr - toolkit for building OCR systems)
Your message dated Sat, 3 Jan 2015 18:24:18 -0800 with message-id caczd_tayz2yxr9vrc+ujqwg76bhbksn-w8mf6vssyw_qqgg...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: RFS: ocr4gamera, greekocr4gamera has caused the Debian Bug report #753731, regarding RFS: ocr4gamera/1.2.2-1 [ITA] -- (DPMT) python-gamera.toolkits.ocr - toolkit for building OCR systems to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 753731: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753731 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor of my new package of the OCR toolkit for Gamera. It appears to be Lintian clean. For changes, please cf. http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-modules/packages/ocr4gamera/trunk/ Mentors upload: http://mentors.debian.net/package/ocr4gamera Buildlog: http://www.danielstender.com/buildlogs/ocr4gamera_1.1.0-1_amd64.build Changelog: ocr4gamera (1.1.0-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low * New upstream release. + Removed doc-fix-hyperlink-target.diff, doc-plugin-import.diff, and no-wx-import.diff. * deb/control: + New maintainer (Closes: #629179). + Dropped b-d on python-support. + Added versioning to b-d on python-all-dev. + Bumped standards to 3.9.5 (no changes needed). + Use canonical URIs for Vcs-* fields [Jakub Wilk]. + Changed XS-Python-Version to X-Python-Version, bumped to 2.5. + Rearranged, wrapped and sorted. * deb/copyright: + Specified Upstream-Contact according to README. + Added new maintainer. + Improved Copyright lines. * deb/rules: + Added export for DH_VERBOSE. + Reduced to build with dh sequencer. * Removal of generated manpage(s) moved to deb/clean. An update of the Gamera package is coming up, next. Greetings, Daniel Stender -- http://www.danielstender.com/blog/ PGP key: 2048R/E41BD2D0 C879 5E41 1ED7 EE80 0F2E 7D0C DBDD 4D96 E41B D2D0 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi Daniel, I've uploaded both packages to the archive; sorry that nobody else seems to have taken a look at your packages at all since you filed these RFSs back in July! Just a few nitpicks about greekocr4gamera: it could use a standards-version bump, and debian/patches/fsf_address.diff looks like it could be forwarded upstream; I'm not sure why it's marked as Forwarded: not-needed. Regards, Vincent---End Message---
Bug#753824: marked as done (RFS: greekocr4gamera/1.0.1-5 [ITA] -- (DPMT) python-gamera.toolkits.greekocr - toolkit for building OCR systems for polytonal Greek)
Your message dated Sat, 3 Jan 2015 18:24:18 -0800 with message-id caczd_tayz2yxr9vrc+ujqwg76bhbksn-w8mf6vssyw_qqgg...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: RFS: ocr4gamera, greekocr4gamera has caused the Debian Bug report #753824, regarding RFS: greekocr4gamera/1.0.1-5 [ITA] -- (DPMT) python-gamera.toolkits.greekocr - toolkit for building OCR systems for polytonal Greek to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 753824: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753824 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hi people, I'm looking for a sponsor of my new package of the OCR toolkit for Classical Greek for Gamera. It appears to be Lintian clean. For the my changes, please cf. http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-modules/packages/greekocr4gamera/trunk/ Mentors upload of the package: http://mentors.debian.net/package/greekocr4gamera Buildlog: http://www.danielstender.com/buildlogs/greekocr4gamera_1.0.1-5_amd64.build greekocr4gamera (1.0.1-5) UNRELEASED; urgency=low * deb/control: + New maintainer (Closes: #644570). + Bumped version of b-p on python-all to 2.6.6-3~. + Dropped b-d on python-support. + Bumped standards to 3.9.5 (no changes needed). + Use canonical URIs for Vcs-* fields [Jakub Wilk]. + Added X-Python-Version. + Rearranged, wrapped and sorted. * deb/copyright: + Added email address for Upstream-Contact. + Added myself to Copyright owners of deb/*. * deb/rules: + Added export line for DH_VERBOSE. + Reduced to build with dh sequencer. * Removal of generated manpage(s) moved to deb/clean. This package is closely related to ocr4gamera (python-gamera.toolkits.ocr), which is also on RFS, please cf. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753731 An update Gamera itself is coming up quickly. Greetings, Daniel Stender -- http://www.danielstender.com/blog/ PGP key: 2048R/E41BD2D0 C879 5E41 1ED7 EE80 0F2E 7D0C DBDD 4D96 E41B D2D0 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi Daniel, I've uploaded both packages to the archive; sorry that nobody else seems to have taken a look at your packages at all since you filed these RFSs back in July! Just a few nitpicks about greekocr4gamera: it could use a standards-version bump, and debian/patches/fsf_address.diff looks like it could be forwarded upstream; I'm not sure why it's marked as Forwarded: not-needed. Regards, Vincent---End Message---
Bug#769673: marked as done (RFS: lletters/0.1.95+gtk2-4 [ITA, RC])
Your message dated Sun, 04 Jan 2015 04:30:45 + with message-id e1y7cpx-0006ob...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: lletters/0.1.95+gtk2-4 [ITA, RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #769673, regarding RFS: lletters/0.1.95+gtk2-4 [ITA, RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 769673: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769673 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package lletters * Package name: lletters Version : 0.1.95+gtk2-4 * URL : http://lln.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-2 Section : games It builds those binary packages: lletters - Linux Letters and Numbers - learning game for small children To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/lletters Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lletters/lletters_0.1.95+gtk2-4.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New maintainer (Closes: #755283). * Source converted to format 3.0 (quilt). * gettext infrastructure updated, which fixes FTBFS (Closes: #749360). * Use dh-autoreconf to update autotools scripts during build, thanks Matthias Klose d...@debian.org (Closes: #538667, #727450). * Fixed reading .wav files on 64-bit architectures (Closes: #701852). * Don't terminate if cannot open /dev/dsp, just disable sound instead (Closes: #712845). * Improved LANG variable handling, thanks Prathibha B prathib...@cdac.in. * Manpage supplemented with FILES and ENVIRONMENT sections. * Configuration file (llnrc) rewritten (Closes: #703384). * Standards-Version bumped to 3.9.6 Regards, Dmitry Borisyuk ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package lletters version 0.1.95+gtk2-4 is in unstable now. http://packages.qa.debian.org/lletters---End Message---
Bug#767534: marked as done (RFS: librscode/1.3-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Sun, 04 Jan 2015 04:30:47 + with message-id e1y7cpz-0006pw...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: librscode/1.3-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #767534, regarding RFS: librscode/1.3-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 767534: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767534 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: block 767299 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package librscode. * Package name: librscode Version : 1.3 Upstream Author : Henry Minsky h...@alum.mit.edu * URL : http://rscode.sourceforge.net * License : GPL-3+ Programming Lang: C Section : libs It builds these binary packages: librscode1 - library implementing a Reed-Solomon error correction algorithm librscode-dbg - debugging symbols for RSCODE librscode-dev - development libraries and headers for RSCODE To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/librscode Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libr/librscode/librscode_1.3-1.dsc The git repository for the packaging (gbp) can be found at: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/librscode.git Changes since the last upload: * Initial release. Closes: #767299 I'm already a DM, if that helps. Regards, Christian Kastner signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package librscode version 1.3-1 is in NEW now, and the package at mentors is not newer (2014-10-31) than the package in NEW (2014-10-31), so there is currently no package to sponsor. http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/librscode_1.3-1.html http://mentors.debian.net/package/librscode Please remove the package from mentors or mark it needs sponsor = no. If for some reason you need to replace the package in NEW, then you can upload an updated package to mentors and feel free to reopen this RFS 767534 or open a new RFS.---End Message---
Bug#774503: marked as done (RFS: mgrs/0.0~20131209-80d5465-1~exp1 [ITP])
Your message dated Sun, 04 Jan 2015 04:30:49 + with message-id e1y7cq1-0006qq...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: mgrs/0.0~20131209-80d5465-1~exp1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #774503, regarding RFS: mgrs/0.0~20131209-80d5465-1~exp1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 774503: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774503 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mgrs Package name: mgrs Version : 0.0~20131209-80d5465-1~exp1 Upstream Author : MetaCRS Developers meta...@lists.osgeo.org URL : https://github.com/proj4js/mgrs License : Expat Section : science It builds those binary packages: libjs-mgrs - Javascript for converting between WGS84 lat/lng and MGRS coordinates node-mgrs - Utility for converting between WGS84 lat/lng and MGRS coordinates To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/mgrs Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mgrs/mgrs_0.0~20131209-80d5465-1~exp1.dsc More information about mgrs can be obtained from https://github.com/proj4js/mgrs. Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #774458) Regards, Bas Couwenberg ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package mgrs has been removed from mentors.---End Message---
