Replace a library

2015-05-03 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
Hello, is there any documentation to replace a library (libxxx1 - libxxx2)? Thanks. CU Jörg -- New: GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB 30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D GPG Key: 8CA1D25D CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56 Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked

Re: Replace a library

2015-05-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: is there any documentation to replace a library (libxxx1 - libxxx2)? https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise --

Re: Replace a library

2015-05-03 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
Hi pabs, Am Sonntag, den 03.05.2015, 16:14 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise: On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: is there any documentation to replace a library (libxxx1 - libxxx2)? https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html

Re: Packaging Telegram Desktop

2015-05-03 Thread Christoph Egger
Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org writes: On the other side it's probably illegal to distribute any binaries from that. GPLv3 (no exceptions) + OpenSSL don't go together very well Oh and requires to patch your Qt installation? Probably not impossible to get this thing to work properly but I

Re: Packaging Telegram Desktop

2015-05-03 Thread Christoph Egger
Ahoi! Roberto De Oliveira rcdeolive...@gmail.com writes: I want to initiate on the way of Debian Mantainer, so after read few material I think that the first step is to adopt a package and Telegram Desktop[1] is RFP, maybe this package would be simple because it does not give any library or

Re: Packaging Telegram Desktop

2015-05-03 Thread Roberto De Oliveira
Thanks Cristoph, On the other side it's probably illegal to distribute any binaries from that. GPLv3 (no exceptions) + OpenSSL don't go together very well So we can not make native packages for Telegram... What about a script that download binary files and install it according to FHS? --

Re: pdebuild cowbuilder doesn't resolve build-deps

2015-05-03 Thread Francesco De Vita
Hi Vincent On 28/4/2015 23:09, Vincent Cheng wrote: I don't have the source package in front of me so I can't say for sure, but my first (and only) guess for why this would happen is if the package's clean target has additional dependencies (which don't actually need to be declared in

Re: Packaging Telegram Desktop

2015-05-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Roberto De Oliveira wrote: So we can not make native packages for Telegram... What about a script that download binary files and install it according to FHS? I wouldn't bother with even that, you might want to read up on Telegram. It has been referred to as

Bug#783225: marked as done (RFS: corebird/1.0-1 [ITP] -- Modern, easy and fun Twitter client)

2015-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 04 May 2015 04:32:47 + with message-id e1yp83j-0005gb...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: corebird/1.0-1 [ITP] -- Modern, easy and fun Twitter client has caused the Debian Bug report #783225, regarding RFS: corebird/1.0-1 [ITP] -- Modern, easy and fun

Re: Bug#784132: RFS: pyshp/1.2.1-2

2015-05-03 Thread Ross Gammon
On 05/03/2015 02:39 PM, Paul Wise wrote: On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package pyshp I don't intend to sponsor this (I guess sebastic or dapal will) but here is a review: Thanks very much for the review Paul. I mainly wanted to fix

Bug#784132: RFS: pyshp/1.2.1-2

2015-05-03 Thread Ross Gammon
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package pyshp * Package name: pyshp Version : 1.2.1-2 Upstream Author : Joel Lawhead jlawh...@geospatialpython.com * URL : https://github.com/GeospatialPython/pyshp *

Bug#784132: RFS: pyshp/1.2.1-2

2015-05-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package pyshp I don't intend to sponsor this (I guess sebastic or dapal will) but here is a review: I get 3 different tarballs from Debian, mentors and uscan: $ md5sum debian/* mentors/* uscan/*

Bug#784132: marked as done (RFS: pyshp/1.2.1-2)

2015-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 May 2015 14:22:01 +0200 with message-id 554612e9.6070...@xs4all.nl and subject line RFS: pyshp/1.2.1-2 [uploaded pyshp/1.2.1+ds-1] has caused the Debian Bug report #784132, regarding RFS: pyshp/1.2.1-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#783225: Review

2015-05-03 Thread Edward Betts
Harlan Lieberman-Berg hlieber...@setec.io wrote: - There's some misspellings in the code -- most notably, abilty instead of ability in various places, and distrubution instead of distribution in the README.md. Upstream has merged my pull request that fixes these spelling mistakes.

Packaging Telegram Desktop

2015-05-03 Thread Roberto De Oliveira
Greetings, I want to initiate on the way of Debian Mantainer, so after read few material I think that the first step is to adopt a package and Telegram Desktop[1] is RFP, maybe this package would be simple because it does not give any library or complex dependency... So I want to start, anybody