Bug#787800: RFS: iperf3/3.0.11-1

Hi Vincent, On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 04:08:25PM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: Hi Raoul, On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Raoul Borenius boren...@dfn.de wrote: Hallo Vincent, Thanks for taking the time to check my package! On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 03:21:43PM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:

Re: Build on hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 ... at home

Hi, Quoting Daniel Stender (2015-07-19 17:52:16) I'm looking for a convenient way to test build source packages against resp. on hurd-i386 or kfreebsd-amd64 instead of setting up simple end user Qemu boxes and build within them. Sbuild and qemu-debootstrap somehow? there seems to be this:

Re: Build on hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 ... at home

On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:04:18 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: Quoting Daniel Stender (2015-07-19 17:52:16) I'm looking for a convenient way to test build source packages against resp. on hurd-i386 or kfreebsd-amd64 instead of setting up simple end user Qemu boxes and build within them.

Re: Fwd: Trying to run build time tests using nosetest for python-pysam

On 2015-07-20 10:54, Andreas Tille wrote: unfortunately I did not got any response from Debian Python team and I'm simply lost how to run the tests. Maybe change the dh_auto_test override to something like: override_dh_auto_test: PYBUILD_SYSTEM=custom \ PYBUILD_TEST_ARGS=cd tests

Re: Build on hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 ... at home

Hi, Quoting gregor herrmann (2015-07-20 10:14:12) cowbuilder and qemu-debootstrap work for me (with armhf and armel, haven't tried with other architectures): http://info.comodo.priv.at/blog/cowbuilder_crossbuilds_for_raspbian.html The linked article

Fwd: Trying to run build time tests using nosetest for python-pysam

Hi, unfortunately I did not got any response from Debian Python team and I'm simply lost how to run the tests. Any help would be really appreciated Andreas. - Forwarded message from Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu - Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:21:48 +0200 From: Andreas Tille

Re: Build on hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 ... at home

On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:34:17 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: Quoting gregor herrmann (2015-07-20 10:14:12) cowbuilder and qemu-debootstrap work for me (with armhf and armel, haven't tried with other architectures): http://info.comodo.priv.at/blog/cowbuilder_crossbuilds_for_raspbian.html

failing package uploads

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, mentors I am currently in the process of packaging libgtkflow, ITP-Bug can be found under [0] I had a successful package upload to the debian mentors mirror yesterday . Today i fixed several mistakes that have been reported to me. Thus i

Fwd: Packaging fest-swing and its dependencies

Hi, I did not got any response from Debian Java list until now and thus I'm trying here. The short story is that I somehow seem to need a maven.rules entry for git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-java/fest-swing-1.x.git but simply failed guessing how to do this. Any help is appreciated

Bug#793021: RFS: iep/3.6.1-2 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package iep * Package name: iep Version : 3.6.1-2 Upstream Author : Almar Klein almar.kl...@gmail.com * URL : http://www.iep-project.org/ * License : BSD

Re: failing package uploads

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/20/2015 06:43 PM, Joseph Herlant wrote: Hi Joseph, Hi Andrey Thanks for your help. It works again now. Unfortunately i cannot tell you what exactly went wrong, because i fiddled around with dput.cf and tried to use dcut because the debug

Re: failing package uploads

Hi Daniel, Can you remove the .upload file, retry to upload the package in debug mode (-d) and send the output please? Thanks Joseph

Bug#792895: marked as done (RFS: glipper/2.4-5)

Your message dated Mon, 20 Jul 2015 16:27:33 + with message-id e1zhduf-0004np...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: glipper/2.4-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #792895, regarding RFS: glipper/2.4-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Re: failing package uploads

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 04:17:50PM +0200, Daniel Brendle wrote: 3. Deleted the package on debian mentors and tried to reupload - - Dput tells me that the package is already uploaded and there is nothing to do dput checks for .upload, it doesn't ask the server, -f skips that (you should

Re: Bug#788844: RFS: gbutils/5.6.6-1 [ITP]

Hi Tomasz, Il giorno dom, 19/07/2015 alle 21.59 +0200, Tomasz Buchert ha scritto: On 15/07/15 15:11, Pietro Battiston wrote: Il giorno dom, 12/07/2015 alle 20.38 +0200, Tomasz Buchert ha scritto: On 11/07/15 00:37, Pietro Battiston wrote: [...] Just to clarify: I had understood

Bug#793021: marked as done (RFS: iep/3.6.1-2 [RC])

Your message dated Mon, 20 Jul 2015 19:27:50 -0700 with message-id caczd_tcgs8crksphdwyf+hmq+jxvjg6b7hon42b_2kmavgb...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: Bug#793021: RFS: iep/3.6.1-2 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #793021, regarding RFS: iep/3.6.1-2 [RC] to be marked as done. This means

Bug#787800: marked as done (RFS: iperf3/3.0.11-1)

Your message dated Mon, 20 Jul 2015 19:41:38 -0700 with message-id caczd_tashstsdrzezzwhwk6qcx6vtwddf3fnakq4-cmbtcg...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: Bug#787800: RFS: iperf3/3.0.11-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #787800, regarding RFS: iperf3/3.0.11-1 to be marked as done. This means