Bug#803895: [pkg-go] Bug#803895: RFS: gox/0.3.0-1 [ITP, pkg-go] -- cross-compilation for Go

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Daniel Stender wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > Control: block 796309 by -1 > X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > Hi, > > I'm

Bug#803935: RFS [update]: pynac/0.5.0-1 -- Engine for symbolic geometric calculus for Python

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pynac" -- a previous version is already in Debian, so this is only an update : * Package name: pynac Version : 0.5.0-1 Upstream author : Burcin Erocal * URL :

Re: restart a git repository

Ok. > > Hi > I would talk with pkg-java folks on this matter > > https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/libcdk-java/filelist > their package has a libcdk-java library, so they might want to change their > source package to libcdk and let you use cdk again. > > Honestly libcdk-common sound

Re: restart a git repository

Hi I would talk with pkg-java folks on this matter https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/libcdk-java/filelist their package has a libcdk-java library, so they might want to change their source package to libcdk and let you use cdk again. Honestly libcdk-common sound weird when we have a

Re: restart a git repository

Hi, > >Yes, in this case will be confusing. But let me > >share a point of view. > > > >The upstream tarball is cdk too. The package > >was libcdk at the beginning and then libcdk5. The 5 > >is about the ABI I believe. When the ABI change, it > >will be changed too. > > > >Suggestions ? > My

Bug#803626: marked as done (RFS[ITP]: edge-addition-planarity-suite -- Suite of planarity-related graph algorithms)

Your message dated Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:02:02 + (UTC) with message-id <945825798.2504073.1446570122553.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#803626: RFS[ITP]: edge-addition-planarity-suite -- Suite of planarity-related graph algorithms has caused the Debian Bug report #803626,

Re: restart a git repository

Hi Herbert, >Yes, in this case will be confusing. But let me >share a point of view. > >The upstream tarball is cdk too. The package >was libcdk at the beginning and then libcdk5. The 5 >is about the ABI I believe. When the ABI change, it >will be changed too. > >Suggestions ? My suggestion is

Bug#790104: marked as done (RFS: lightdm-gtk-greeter-settings/1.2.0-1 [ITP] -- Settings Editor for LightDM Gtk+ Greeter)

Your message dated Tue, 03 Nov 2015 23:12:35 +0100 with message-id <56393153.6090...@debian.org> and subject line Closing RFS: lightdm-gtk-greeter-settings accepted into unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #790104, regarding RFS: lightdm-gtk-greeter-settings/1.2.0-1 [ITP] -- Settings Editor

Processes for new maintainer and upstream

I have just filed an ITA on 9wm (#660496) It has been orphaned for a while and in that time the old upstream sadly passed away. A new upstream has popped up and continues to maintain the package. Is there any special process I need to follow here because upstream changed? Thanks, Jacob

Bug#803895: [pkg-go] Bug#803895: RFS: gox/0.3.0-1 [ITP, pkg-go] -- cross-compilation for Go

Thanks for picking that up, review points and pointers ... On 03.11.2015 09:29, Michael Stapelberg wrote: >> I’ve noticed the resulting package ships /usr/share/gocode/src/… — is that >> intentional? Does it make sense to ship the library code, i.e. will other >> programs use gox as a library? On

Bug#803979: RFS: node-string-decoder/0.10.25-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-string-decoder" * Package name: node-string-decoder Version : 0.10.25-1 Upstream Author : Rod Vagg * URL :

Bug#803993: RFS: netmask/2.4.3-1 - helps determine network masks

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "netmask" * Package name: netmask Version : 2.4.3-1 Upstream Author : Robert Stone * URL : https://github.com/talby-/netmask * License

Bug#781952: RFS:complexity/1.2-1 [ITP] -- tool for analyzing the complexity of C program functions

* Gianfranco Costamagna [2015-10-12 12:38:29+0200] > Hi Dmitry, > > please check the copyrights carefully. > > e.g. some documentation files are released under FDL license (some 1.2 > and some others 1.3) Upstram maintainer was kind to apply patches and release

Re: Processes for new maintainer and upstream

On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 16:17:03 -0500 Jacob Adams wrote: > I have just filed an ITA on 9wm (#660496) > > It has been orphaned for a while and in that time the old upstream sadly > passed away. A new upstream has popped up and continues to maintain the > package. > Is there any

Bug#803620: marked as done (RFS: afl-cov/0.3-1 [ITP] -- code coverage for afl)

Your message dated Tue, 3 Nov 2015 14:45:00 + (UTC) with message-id <155695139.2383692.1446561900966.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#803620: RFS: afl-cov/0.3-1 [ITP] -- code coverage for afl has caused the Debian Bug report #803620, regarding RFS: afl-cov/0.3-1 [ITP]

Bug#803954: RFS: supervisor/3.1.3-1 [ITA]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "supervisor" * Package name: supervisor Version : 3.1.3-1 Upstream Author : Agendaless Consulting and Contributors * URL : http://supervisord.org * License

Bug#803954: RFS: supervisor/3.1.3-1 [ITA]

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, the packaging as said in a private thread looks mostly good to me. However, please restore the VCS fields, since I sent on your behalf the collab-maint join request -VCS-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/supervisor.git -VCS-Browser:

Bug#803935: RFS [update]: pynac/0.5.0-1 -- Engine for symbolic geometric calculus for Python

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, many copyrights missing: e.g. ginac/infoflagbase.* ginac/assume.* * Author: Ralf Stephan something is missing from changelog: libgmp-dev change of copyright website pre-depends dropped, section changed, shlibs

Bug#802848: RFS: gnome-twitch/0.1.0-1 [ITP]

Hi, >Thanks! >I think what helped me the most (apart from reading lots of >documentation) was looking at existing packages in the archive. >I specifically looked at packages using the SCons build system, since >that is not natively supported by debhelper (like autotools is for example). >That

Re: restart a git repository

Hi Gianfranco, > Hi, > I think libcdk5 is the correct name, because the package is src:libcdk5. > > src:cdk is another package. > https://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cdk.html > https://packages.qa.debian.org/libc/libcdk5.html > > I would avoid this confusion. Yes, in this case will be confusing.