Re: Updated key in Debian keyring, not known by ‘mentors.debian.net’

2015-11-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Ben Finney wrote: > So, ‘mentors.debian.net’ will never update from the Debian keyring? mentors currently will never update keys from any external source except manual uploads. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#804947: RFS: inform/6.31.1+dfsg-2

2015-11-12 Thread Ben Finney
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: tags 698980 + pending Control: block 698980 by -1 I am looking for a sponsor for my package ‘inform’: Package name: inform Version : 6.31.1+dfsg-2 URL : http://inform-fiction.org/ License : n

Re: Updated key in Debian keyring, not known by ‘mentors.debian.net’

2015-11-12 Thread Ben Finney
ChangZhuo Chen writes: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 04:01:07PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > > How can I get ‘mentors.debian.net’ to get my updated key from the > > Debian maintainer's keyring? > > You can update your key from https://mentors.debian.net/my. Thank you. So, ‘mentors.debian.net’ will ne

Re: Updated key in Debian keyring, not known by ‘mentors.debian.net’

2015-11-12 Thread ChangZhuo Chen
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 04:01:07PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > Howdy mentors, > > How can I get ‘mentors.debian.net’ to get my updated key from the Debian > maintainer's keyring? You can update your key from https://mentors.debian.net/my. > > I have a new signing subkey, and have uploaded it rec

Updated key in Debian keyring, not known by ‘mentors.debian.net’

2015-11-12 Thread Ben Finney
Howdy mentors, How can I get ‘mentors.debian.net’ to get my updated key from the Debian maintainer's keyring? I have a new signing subkey, and have uploaded it recently to the Debian keyring: $ gpg --keyserver keyring.debian.org --send-key AC128405 gpg: sending key AC128405 to hkp server

Re: Bug#781952: RFS:complexity/1.2-1 [ITP] -- tool for analyzing the complexity of C program functions

2015-11-12 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
On 2015-11-11, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Peter Pentchev , 2015-11-11, 11:28: >>On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:45:10AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: >>>Well, I moved complexity-doc into 'non-free/doc' (!) section. >>> >>>Lintian complains, that I build free and non-free binaries from same >>>source package

Bug#789451: marked as done (RFS: ags/0.4.2-78-1 [ITP] -- Advanced Gtk+ Sequencer)

2015-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Nov 2015 16:33:19 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: ags/0.4.2-78-1 [ITP] -- Advanced Gtk+ Sequencer has caused the Debian Bug report #789451, regarding RFS: ags/0.4.2-78-1 [ITP] -- Advanced Gtk+ Sequencer to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#781952: marked as done (RFS: complexity/1.2+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- tool for analyzing the complexity of C program functions)

2015-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Nov 2015 16:33:19 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: complexity/1.2+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- tool for analyzing the complexity of C program functions has caused the Debian Bug report #781952, regarding RFS: complexity/1.2+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- tool for analyzing the c

Bug#804390: Fwd: Bug#804390: RFS: 9wm/1.3.3-1 [ITA] -- emulation of the Plan 9 window manager 8-1/2

2015-11-12 Thread Jacob Adams
This is still open. A review would be appreciated. Thanks, Jacob Begin forwarded message: > Resent-From: Jacob Adams > From: Jacob Adams > Date: November 7, 2015 at 10:28:41 PM EST > Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org > To: sub...@bugs.debian.org > Resent-Cc: 660...@bugs.debian.or