Bug#807030: RFS: opengm/2.3.6-2

2015-12-04 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "opengm" * Package name : opengm Version : 2.3.6-2 Upstream Author : The OpenGM developers * URL : http://hci.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/opengm2/ * License : Expat Section : science It builds

Bug#804697: RFS: libsass-python/0.9.1-1 [ITP] -- libsass-python -- SASS for Python

2015-12-04 Thread Frederic Bonnard
Hi Gianfranco and thanks a lot for taking a close look to my packaging draft, the new packaging so far : http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libs/libsass-python/libsass-python_0.9.3-1.dsc > 1) control: > python-all, python3-all, > python-all-dev, python3-all-dev, > > I guess the all-dev

Re: Copyright of composite Makefile.in files

2015-12-04 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Monday 30 November 2015 21:06:17 Ferenc Wagner wrote: > I know of licensecheck, > but this area really cries for more automation and checking. I'm working on it. You can try 'cme update dpkg-copyright' or 'scan- copyrights' provided by libconfig-model-dpkg-perl. Hopefully these commands will

Bug#807083: RFS: isomd5sum/1:1.1.0-1

2015-12-04 Thread Ryan Finnie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "isomd5sum" Package name: isomd5sum Version : 1:1.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Red Hat Anaconda (anaconda-devel-l...@redhat.com) URL

Re: .symbols or shlibs file

2015-12-04 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto , 2015-11-30, 16:50: That said, I wonder if there's any point in passing -V to dh_makeshlibs if the package uses symbols. It doesn't seem useful. The option started to be used in version 2.4.1-1 (2008), I believe. From debian/changelog: * New