date:20151217

Hi,

I'm trying to fix libsbml bugs and while doing so upgrade to the latest
upstream version.  Since the original tarball needs to be stripped I
moved the packaging from SVN to Git[1] (so please do not try debcheckout
which does not lead to the latest packaging status).

Unfortunately my attempt is blocked by

...

CMake Error at docs/CMakeLists.txt:212 (message):
  Cannot generate java documentation, please specify the Java_JAVADOC_JAR.


-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
...


even if I tried in debian/rules

export JDK_PATH=$(readlink -f /usr/bin/javac | sed "s:/bin/javac::")
export JAVA_INCLUDE_PATH=$(JDK_PATH)/include


as well as specifying

-DJDK_PATH:STRING=/usr/lib/jvm/default-java 
-DJAVA_INCLUDE_PATH:STRING=/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include

to the cmake call.

Any help would be welcome.

Kind regards

   Andreas.


[1] git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/libsbml.git

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

Re: dpkg-buildpackage -A : common headers case

Hi,

>So it must be done by hand: no facility has been implemented to say that

>a given indep package must be treated as arch package at buid stage ?


The indep builders might not even call the arch auto_build, so I presume it
is not implemented because it might just not even be called?

(not completely sure, I even forgot about the original question :D)

cheers,

G.

Bug#808231: RFS: mkcast/1.0.0-1 [ITP]

2015-12-17 Thread 55abhilash


Package: sponsorship-requests

Severity: wishlist

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mkcast"

 * Package name: mkcast
   Version : 1.0.0-1
   Upstream Author : a...@keyboardfire.com
 * URL : https://github.com/KeyboardFire/mkcast
 * License : The MIT License
   Section : Python

  It builds those binary packages:

mkcast - A tool for creating GIF screencasts of a window, with 
key presses


  To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  http://mentors.debian.net/package/mkcast


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this 
command:


dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mkcast/mkcast_1.0.0-1.dsc


  More information about hello can be obtained from 
http://www.example.com.


  Changes since the last upload:

  mkcast (1.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Initial release (Closes: #808227)

 -- Abhilash Mhaisne <55abhil...@openmailbox.org>  Thu, 17 Dec 2015 
11:46:46 +0530


  Regards,
   Abhilash Mhaisne

Bug#806815: RFS: lirc/0.9.4-devel-0.1 [NMU] -- Linux Infrared Remote Control

control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo


Hi Alec,


(sorry again for the long wait, I was hoping somebody else was going to help in 
this, but nobody seems to be caring about this package)


>   * Non-maintainer upload.
>   * First shot on major upstream updates.
> - Re-packaged from scratch based on new dh primitives.
> - Thanks for help on debian-mentors!
>   * New upstream release 0.9.4
> - Release 0.9.1 .. 0.9.3 was never packaged.
> - This is an experimental, pre-release package.
> - Old 'lirc' service split into separate systemd services:
>   lircd.service, lircmd.service and irexec.service.
> - New package structure: lirc, lirc-doc, liblirc0, liblirc-dev with
>   corresponding upgrade path dependencies.
> - Fixes "Not updated to last version" (Closes: #777199).
> - Fixes "Default device for mode2 is /dev/lirc" (Closes: #702140).
> - Fixes "/var/run/lirc contents disappear..." (Closes: #676343).
> - Fixes "lircrcd segfaults" (Closes: #780062).
> - Fixes "'/etc/init.d/lirc restart' is broken" (Closes: #782091).
> - Fixes "Prompting due to modified conffiles..." (Closes: #655969).
> - Fixes "LIRC installs bad udev rule" (Closes: #804397).
>   * Old lircd output socket link /dev/lirc dropped. Use /var/run/lirc/lircd.
>   * Update compiler flags: -Wl,as-needed + hardening
> [Stefan Lippers-Hollmann]
>   * Avoid negative architecture deps like [!hurd] (Closes: #634807)
> [Stefan Lippers-Hollmann]
>   * Add patch 0007-tools-remove-configs-symlink.patch + explicit link
> to walk around #801719.
>   * Changing Vcs-* headers to point to upstream packaging branch.


I asked probably this before, but did you take account about the Ubuntu delta?
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/0.9.0-0ubuntu5

(also look ubuntu1 ubuntu2 ubuntu3 ubuntu4 delta)

>Currently, this package is maintained by 
>pkg-lirc-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org which seems to be MIA. I have invoked 
>the MIA procedure by sending message to the >QA team. I have also requested to 
>be member of this group.
>
>The packaging situation has been discussed: 
>https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2015/10/msg00487.html
>
>The update is disruptive and needs manual intervention: 
>https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2015/11/msg00082.html


1)

$ dpkg --compare-versions 0.9.4-devel-0.1 gt 0.9.4-1
$ echo $?
0

you should rename in something like 0.9.4~devel or maybe something better 
explaining such as
0.9.4~{alpha,beta,RC} and release an upstream snapshot (not strictly requested, 
but "devel" doesn't mention a particular
history, just a generic one)

2)
I did:
dget -x http://http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lirc/lirc_0.9.0~pre1-1.2.dsc
dget -u  
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lirc/lirc_0.9.4-devel-0.1.dsc
debdiff lirc_0.9.0~pre1-1.2.dsc lirc_0.9.4-devel-0.1.dsc > debdiff
filterdiff debdiff -i "*debian*" > debdiff.filtered

changelog: 

-- gregor herrmann   Sat, 17 Jan 2015 19:51:55 +0100
-
lirc (0.9.0~pre1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low

* Non-maintainer upload with maintainers permission.
* Add dh-autoreconf to fix FTBFS on ppc64el. Closes: #746505

-- Andreas Barth   Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:18:17 +
-
lirc (0.9.0~pre1-1) unstable; urgency=low


two lines deleted here


control:
are you sure about the autotools-dev build dependency? usually autoreconf is a 
better replacement

+# libjs-jquery(See lintian overrides)


fine to leave jquery out, but lintian is correct, and overriding is wrong.

I can sponsor with that lintian warning, but please do not override it


+# libftdi1-dev,   (Not available in jessie)


well, do not care about backports right now, we are talking about unstable and 
stretch.

+# See DBS #801588
+Build-Conflicts: libirman


I can look at this if needed, maybe fix libirman and then use it?
(BTW it is called BTS not DBS, and this kind of comments is better in the 
changelog instead of control file.

soemthing like
"build-conflict against libirman (cfr: #XXX)"


3) debian/trunk (others?)
this seems to be useless, please keep the debian directory minimal, and strip 
the debian packaging from upstream tarballs


4) watch file seems broken
Newest version on remote site is xmms-plugin-1.4, local version is 0.9.4-devel
=> Newer version available from

maybe this:
http://sf.net/lirc/lirc-(\d.+)\.tar\.gz

works better?

(forcing a digit as first number)

The upgrade facility looks nice, but I didn't try to install the new version 
(yet).
If you fix the above and reupload on mentors, I'll do some test builds and see 
how lintian/adeguate/piuparts performs
and try something on a real virtual machine.
(I have to say I like the packaging, you seem to have done a great work on 
this, even if the upgrade path requires manual intervention,
but having a script is indeed something nice and appreciated).

I hope to sponsor this package really soon (for experimental).
(ccing Stefan, maybe he has some hints)

cheers,

Bug#791463: closing RFS: udfclient/0.8-1 [ITP] -- userland implementation of the UDF filesystem

2015-12-17 Thread Pali Rohár

On Monday 14 December 2015 12:37:24 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 14/12/15 12:33, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Friday 11 December 2015 18:04:06 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> >> > you just dropping the patch into the right place.
> > I know where and how. But I do not like idea to patching original source
> > code if it is possible to compile and use it without patching.
> > 
> > Using patches has problem for inconsistency and upgrading if original
> > source code which patch modify changes.
> > 
> > And also I see using patches as last option. Are not Debian want to
> > reduce patches if they are not really needed?
> 
> I think it's appropriate to apply a patch (and submit it upstream) in
> this case, as this is certainly a bug in the upstream makefile, and it
> should be fixed.

Ok. I can send patch to upstream project which fix compilation (on
debian). But, what is wrong with my original (and current) version which
use pmake and does not need patching original software?

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com

Re: install udpxy.1.0.23

Hi, as a start you might want to give some build logs or install logs.

I see you already ccd Alex, who did a first packaging work.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687543
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687620

unfortunately the package didn't get in unstable, so there isn't much we can do 
here.

If you want to package it please start, own the RFP, do the packaging work (and 
here we can help
with it) and open an RFS bug.

If you want to install something not available in debian repositories 
debian-mentors is not the right place
(here we discuss mainly request of sponsorships, and packaging issues).

Maybe there are some debian-users lists that might be more helpful.
cheers,

Gianfranco





Il Mercoledì 25 Novembre 2015 22:24, linuxuser  ha 
scritto:
hello

Can you help me how to installed udpxy.1.0.23-0-prod.tar.gz 
I uses Debian  8.2 ,I'm trying but it is impossible

Re: cmake issue in libsbml: Cannot generate java documentation, please specify the Java_JAVADOC_JAR.

Hi Kevin,

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:44:40PM +1100, Kevin Murray wrote:
> 
> I have pushed a possible fix to the branch 'daube/possible-cmake-fix'. I am 
> not
> sure of the overall effects, the build is taking ages on my laptop, but it 
> seems
> to have fixed the immediate error.

Thanks a lot for this first and very helpful step.  Following this
strategy I was even able to work around another issue with Java bindings
which was also solved by setting a variable accordingly.

Finally after 1-2 hours of building I went into

...
make[4]: Entering directory '/build/libsbml-5.12.0+dfsg/build'
[100%] Generate Java-API Documentation
/usr/bin/javac: error while loading shared libraries: libjli.so: cannot open 
shared object file: No such file or directory
docs/CMakeFiles/api_docs_java.dir/build.make:61: recipe for target 
'../docs/formatted/java-api/index.html' failed
make[4]: *** [../docs/formatted/java-api/index.html] Error 127
make[4]: Leaving directory '/build/libsbml-5.12.0+dfsg/build'
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:1123: recipe for target 
'docs/CMakeFiles/api_docs_java.dir/all' failed
make[3]: *** [docs/CMakeFiles/api_docs_java.dir/all] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory '/build/libsbml-5.12.0+dfsg/build'
...

When I trow the error message above in a web search it comes up with the
log of bug #548729 which says:

This is most likely a lack of /proc.  Some ld.so features require
/proc/self/exe.

$ readelf -d /usr/bin/java  | grep ORIGIN
 0x000f (RPATH)  Library rpath: 
[$ORIGIN/../lib/amd64/jli:$ORIGIN/../jre/lib/amd64/jli]
 0x6ffb (FLAGS_1)Flags: ORIGIN

AFAIK, a mounted /proc is close to mandatory these days.  The error
message could be nicer, but this is a libc bug.

If I try inside the pbuilder chroot:

1|root@wr-linux01:/ # mount 

mount: failed to read mtab: No such file or directory
2|root@wr-linux01:/ # readelf -d /usr/bin/java  | grep ORIGIN
 0x000f (RPATH)  Library rpath: 
[$ORIGIN/../lib/amd64/jli:/usr/local/jre/lib/amd64/jli:$ORIGIN/../lib/amd64:/usr/local/lib/amd64:$ORIGIN/../jre/lib/amd64:/usr/local/jre/lib/amd64]

I can confirm that /proc is not mounted.  Any idea how to approach this
to finally build libsbml successfully (at least passing the step to
Generate Java-API Documentation?

Kind regards

   Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

Bug#808141: sponsorship-requests: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package eclipse-titan.

control: tag -1 moreinfo

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 01:45:02PM +0100, Gergely Pilisi wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eclipse-titan":

Ok, first, a question: do you do your debian packaging in git?

And, here is a review:

* trailing whitespace on the changelog line.
* maybe you're happy to discover tools like `wrap-and-sort`, to wrap the
  Build-Depends and Depends line (and sort other stuff, and removing
  trailing whitespaces in some other files)
* please don't cp files that way in d/rules, I find that ugly. instead,
  use a debian/eclipse-titan.install file.  See dh_install(1) for more
  info.  On a related note, I prefer using $(CURDIR) instead of $$(pwd)
  + this will also make debian/eclipse-titan.dirs useless
  + if you need to rename files dh-exec can help you a bit, if you want
* during the compilation there are several errors like
./TTCN3.hh:58:39: fatal error: RT1/TitanLoggerApiSimple.hh: No such file or 
directory
  is this to be expected & ok?
* is there a way to have a more verbose build, showing all the command
  line?
* you told me that you could get it to build with hardening-wrapper,
  well, to me it doesn't (see below) :)
* can you enable parallel building? (see debhelper(7))
* debian/copyright is totally inadequate.
  + personally I won't be totally happy without a copyright following
copyright-format 1.0
  + anyway, please pick a random package from the archive and try having
a look at what a copyright file normally looks like.


About ditching hardening-wrapped in favour of just using what
dpkg-buildflags do:
whatever I use the .dsc you provided, just removed hardening-wrapper or
enable the hardening build flags using DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS, the
build fails with

In file included from jnimw.cc:8:0:
jnimw.h:14:17: fatal error: jni.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
../Makefile.genrules:87: recipe for target 'jnimw.o' failed

So there is not much of a comparison to do.  Maybe you built the package
with an hardening-wrapper without the fix for #801597 ?
And btw, having a verbose build is kinda important to check for the
build flags, hardening, etc.


I might have other points to say, but let's go gradually, uh? :)

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  http://mapreri.org  : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#804644: RFS: flashybrid/0.19 [ITA]

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 06:42:36PM +0100, Thibaut Varène wrote:
> I suppose what I need is having people take over my packages and call
> it a day, tbh. With my upload rights revoked there’s not much meaning
> in being a DD.

Not really.
There are several active DDs who got their key removed due to the 1024
purge and still have packages sponsored.
Sponsoring a DD is also easier, you know that most probably the
sponsoree is already aware of good conventions, etc.

Don't give up just for this inconvenience, ask for sponsorship and as
soon as you manage to get your key back into the keyring you can come
back full steam :)



PS: @Tim: what about this RFS?

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  http://mapreri.org  : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#808243: RFS: hoteldruid/2.1.3-1

2015-12-17 Thread Marco M. F. De Santis


Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hoteldruid":

* Package name: hoteldruid
  Version : 2.1.3-1
  Upstream Author : Marco M. F. De Santis
* URL : http://www.hoteldruid.com
* License : AGPLv3
  Section : web

It builds those binary packages:

  hoteldruid - web-based property management system for hotels or B

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  http://mentors.debian.net/package/hoteldruid

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hoteldruid/hoteldruid_2.1.3-1.dsc


More information about hoteldruid can be obtained from 
http://www.hoteldruid.com.


Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream release.
  * debian/postinst: use Require syntax in apache2 configuration.
  * Removed debian/menu as requested by Technical Committee decision on 
#741573.

  * debian/postrm: use shell function to check if ucf and ucfr exist.
  * Removed echo -e from HotelDruid launcher script. (Closes: #772237)
  * Added a patch to fix some backup bugs in includes/funzioni_backup.php.
  * Changed debhelper compatibility version to level 9.
  * Added base.js to debianize patch to cut a line larger than 256 
characters.


  * New upstream release (2.1.1-1).
  * debian/control: updated Standards-Version (no change needed).
  * removed MimeType from hoteldruid-launcher desktop entry.
  * debian/po: include new template translations
 + nl.po: Dutch translation, thanks to Frans Spiesschaert. (Closes: 
#767416)


Regards,
Marco M. F. De Santis

Bug#808167: marked as done (RFS: adjtimex/1.29-7)

2015-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:59:59 +
with message-id <20151217175959.gk1...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#808167: RFS: adjtimex/1.29-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #808167,
regarding RFS: adjtimex/1.29-7
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

--
808167: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808167
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "adjtimex"

* Package name: adjtimex
* Version : 1.29-7
* Upstream Author : Steven S. Dick , James R. Van
Zandt
* URL : http://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/admin/time
* License : GPL-2
* Section : admin

It builds those binary packages:

adjtimex - kernel time variables configuration utility

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/adjtimex

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/adjtimex/adjtimex_1.29-7.dsc

Changes since the last upload:
* remove the wrong debian/dirs line in changelog of previous version 1.29-6
* debian/patches:
- Replace patch 03 with the one by Bjarni I. Gislason, which also
minimizes the time of lock over "/dev/rtc" (Closes: #724929).
- Fix potential uninitialized memory accessing
(thanks peppe , Closes: #688933).
- Avoid a few gcc warnings
* debian/copyright: Add copyright for newly added patch
* debian/adjtimexconfig:
- Move tmp file during executing from /etc to /tmp.
- Code clean up.
* debian/templates + debian/config + debian/po + debian/NEWS:
- Remove the debconf whether to start adjtimex on startup, which now
depends on the existence of /etc/default/adjtimex file. By default,
there's no /etc/default/adjtimex, which is generated by running:
adjtimexconfig.
- adjtimexconfig is still a choice in defconf, but change to false by
default because it takes 70 seconds to excute on install/upgrade.
* debian/postinst:
- Refrain from running adjtimexconfig on configure, which is triggered by
each install/upgrade
- Refrain from starting adjtimex service on configure (Closes: #785208).
- Code clean up.
* debian/postrm:
- Code clean up.
* debian/adjtimex.init + debian/adjtimex.service: Start adjtimex service
on startup only if config file /etc/default/adjtimex is ready.
* debian/adjtimexconfig.8: Update man page

For the debconf change (remove adjtimex/run_daemon) and systemd
service change (add a condition path), it's already discussed in
systemd ML [0].

Thanks and look forward to the upload!

Cheers,
Roger Shimizu

[0]:
https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-systemd-maintainers/2015-December/009932.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 02:56:17AM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "adjtimex"

mattia@chase ~/devel/RFS/adjtimex % dput adjtimex_1.29-7_source.changes
Uploading adjtimex using ftp to ftp-master (host: ftp.upload.debian.org;
directory: /pub/UploadQueue/)
[...]

Uploading adjtimex_1.29-7.dsc
Uploading adjtimex_1.29-7.debian.tar.xz
Uploading adjtimex_1.29-7_source.changes
mattia@chase ~/devel/RFS/adjtimex %

Thanks for your contribution to Debian! :)

--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---

Re: cmake issue in libsbml: Cannot generate java documentation, please specify the Java_JAVADOC_JAR.

I remember something ghc related

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787227
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773768

Cheers

G.

Gio 17/12/15, Andreas Tille  ha scritto:

 Oggetto: Re: cmake issue in libsbml: Cannot generate java documentation, 
please specify the Java_JAVADOC_JAR.
 A: "Debian Mentors List" 
 Cc: "Debian Med Packaging Team" 
, "Ivo Maintz" 
 Data: Giovedì 17 dicembre 2015, 17:26

 Hi Kevin,

 On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:44:40PM +1100, Kevin Murray
 wrote:
 > 
 > I have pushed a possible fix to the branch
 'daube/possible-cmake-fix'. I am not
 > sure of the overall effects, the build is taking ages
 on my laptop, but it seems
 > to have fixed the immediate error.

 Thanks a lot for this first and very helpful step. 
 Following this
 strategy I was even able to work around another issue with
 Java bindings
 which was also solved by setting a variable accordingly.

 Finally after 1-2 hours of building I went into

 ...
 make[4]: Entering directory
 '/build/libsbml-5.12.0+dfsg/build'
 [100%] Generate Java-API Documentation
 /usr/bin/javac: error while loading shared libraries:
 libjli.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
 directory
 docs/CMakeFiles/api_docs_java.dir/build.make:61: recipe for
 target '../docs/formatted/java-api/index.html' failed
 make[4]: *** [../docs/formatted/java-api/index.html] Error
 127
 make[4]: Leaving directory
 '/build/libsbml-5.12.0+dfsg/build'
 CMakeFiles/Makefile2:1123: recipe for target
 'docs/CMakeFiles/api_docs_java.dir/all' failed
 make[3]: *** [docs/CMakeFiles/api_docs_java.dir/all] Error
 2
 make[3]: Leaving directory
 '/build/libsbml-5.12.0+dfsg/build'
 ...

 When I trow the error message above in a web search it comes
 up with the
 log of bug #548729 which says:

     This is most likely a lack of
 /proc.  Some ld.so features require
     /proc/self/exe.

     $ readelf -d /usr/bin/java  | grep
 ORIGIN
  0x000f
 (RPATH)             
 Library rpath:
 [$ORIGIN/../lib/amd64/jli:$ORIGIN/../jre/lib/amd64/jli]
  0x6ffb
 (FLAGS_1)            Flags:
 ORIGIN

     AFAIK, a mounted /proc is close to
 mandatory these days.  The error
     message could be nicer, but this is a
 libc bug.

 If I try inside the pbuilder chroot:

 1|root@wr-linux01:/ #
 mount               

 mount: failed to read mtab: No such file or directory
 2|root@wr-linux01:/ #
 readelf -d /usr/bin/java  | grep ORIGIN
  0x000f (RPATH)       
       Library rpath:

[$ORIGIN/../lib/amd64/jli:/usr/local/jre/lib/amd64/jli:$ORIGIN/../lib/amd64:/usr/local/lib/amd64:$ORIGIN/../jre/lib/amd64:/usr/local/jre/lib/amd64]

 I can confirm that /proc is not mounted.  Any idea how
 to approach this
 to finally build libsbml successfully (at least passing the
 step to
 Generate Java-API Documentation?

 Kind regards

        Andreas.

 -- 
 http://fam-tille.de

Re: cmake issue in libsbml: Cannot generate java documentation, please specify the Java_JAVADOC_JAR.

Hi Gianfranco,

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 05:45:19PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> I remember something ghc related
> 
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787227
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773768

Seems to be the same consequence as I've drawn below.  I checked in the
pbuilder chroot

diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 8916f38..3fdf167 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ endif
/bin/sh debian/bin/python_fix.sh
 
 override_dh_auto_build:
+   if mount | grep "^proc " ; then echo "proc mounted - fine"; else mount 
proc /proc -t proc ; fi
cd build ; make
cp NEWS.txt changelog



and I was able to make the api_java_doc target successfully.

Since I have not seen things like this in the ghc source I wonder if
this should be really the suggested solution to the problem.

Comments?

Kind regards

   Andreas.


> 
> Gio 17/12/15, Andreas Tille  ha scritto:
> 
>  Oggetto: Re: cmake issue in libsbml: Cannot generate java documentation, 
> please specify the Java_JAVADOC_JAR.
>  A: "Debian Mentors List" 
>  Cc: "Debian Med Packaging Team" 
> , "Ivo Maintz" 
>  Data: Giovedì 17 dicembre 2015, 17:26
>  
>  Hi Kevin,
>  
>  On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:44:40PM +1100, Kevin Murray
>  wrote:
>  > 
>  > I have pushed a possible fix to the branch
>  'daube/possible-cmake-fix'. I am not
>  > sure of the overall effects, the build is taking ages
>  on my laptop, but it seems
>  > to have fixed the immediate error.
>  
>  Thanks a lot for this first and very helpful step. 
>  Following this
>  strategy I was even able to work around another issue with
>  Java bindings
>  which was also solved by setting a variable accordingly.
>  
>  Finally after 1-2 hours of building I went into
>  
>  ...
>  make[4]: Entering directory
>  '/build/libsbml-5.12.0+dfsg/build'
>  [100%] Generate Java-API Documentation
>  /usr/bin/javac: error while loading shared libraries:
>  libjli.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
>  directory
>  docs/CMakeFiles/api_docs_java.dir/build.make:61: recipe for
>  target '../docs/formatted/java-api/index.html' failed
>  make[4]: *** [../docs/formatted/java-api/index.html] Error
>  127
>  make[4]: Leaving directory
>  '/build/libsbml-5.12.0+dfsg/build'
>  CMakeFiles/Makefile2:1123: recipe for target
>  'docs/CMakeFiles/api_docs_java.dir/all' failed
>  make[3]: *** [docs/CMakeFiles/api_docs_java.dir/all] Error
>  2
>  make[3]: Leaving directory
>  '/build/libsbml-5.12.0+dfsg/build'
>  ...
>  
>  
>  When I trow the error message above in a web search it comes
>  up with the
>  log of bug #548729 which says:
>  
>  
>      This is most likely a lack of
>  /proc.  Some ld.so features require
>      /proc/self/exe.
>      
>      $ readelf -d /usr/bin/java  | grep
>  ORIGIN
>   0x000f
>  (RPATH)             
>  Library rpath:
>  [$ORIGIN/../lib/amd64/jli:$ORIGIN/../jre/lib/amd64/jli]
>   0x6ffb
>  (FLAGS_1)            Flags:
>  ORIGIN
>      
>      AFAIK, a mounted /proc is close to
>  mandatory these days.  The error
>      message could be nicer, but this is a
>  libc bug.
>  
>  
>  If I try inside the pbuilder chroot:
>  
>  1|root@wr-linux01:/ #
>  mount               
>                 
>                 
>                 
>                 
>                 
>                 
>                 
>                 
>                 
>                 
>        
>  mount: failed to read mtab: No such file or directory
>  2|root@wr-linux01:/ #
>  readelf -d /usr/bin/java  | grep ORIGIN
>   0x000f (RPATH)       
>        Library rpath:
>  
> [$ORIGIN/../lib/amd64/jli:/usr/local/jre/lib/amd64/jli:$ORIGIN/../lib/amd64:/usr/local/lib/amd64:$ORIGIN/../jre/lib/amd64:/usr/local/jre/lib/amd64]
>  
>  
>  I can confirm that /proc is not mounted.  Any idea how
>  to approach this
>  to finally build libsbml successfully (at least passing the
>  step to
>  Generate Java-API Documentation?
>  
>  Kind regards
>  
>         Andreas.
>  
>  -- 
>  http://fam-tille.de
>  
> 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

Bug#808243: RFS: hoteldruid/2.1.3-1

Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Control: owner -1 !

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 05:46:56PM +0100, Marco M. F. De Santis wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hoteldruid":

I'll sponsor it, if you just change this to things:

* debhelper version 9.0.0 never existed, neither 8.0.0 did. using (>= 9)
  is more than enough.
* debian/copyright says 2001-2013, but I have to guess it exstends till
  2015 too?
* debian/changelog contains info about the unreleased version 2.1.1-1,
  please fold them toghether with 2.1.3-1

the rest looks good enough.

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  http://mapreri.org  : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#808251: RFS: clblas/2.8+ds1-3

2015-12-17 Thread Ghislain Vaillant


Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clblas"

* Package name: clblas
  Version : 2.8+ds1-3
  Upstream Author : Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
* URL : https://github.com/clMathLibraries/clBLAS
* License : Apache version 2
  Section : science

It builds those binary packages:

  libclblas-bin - OpenCL BLAS library (executables)
  libclblas-dev - OpenCL BLAS library (development files)
  libclblas-doc - OpenCL BLAS library (documentation)
  libclblas2 - OpenCL BLAS library (shared library)
  libclblas2-dbg - OpenCL BLAS library (debugging symbols)

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  http://mentors.debian.net/package/clblas

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/clblas/clblas_2.8+ds1-3.dsc


Changes since the last upload:

  * d/rules: clean residual pyc files from build.
Fixes FTBFS in reproducibility builds.

Regards,
Ghislain Vaillant

Bug#808249: RFS: libirman/0.5.1-1 [NMU]

2015-12-17 Thread Alec Leamas

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libirman"

 * Package name: libirman
   Version : 0.5.1
   Upstream Author : Tom Wheeley 
 * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/libirman/
 * License : GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+
   Section : libs

  It builds those binary packages:

libirman-dev - library for accessing the Irman InfraRed hardware
 libirman0  - Shared library to access the libirman hardware.

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/libirman


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libi/libirman/libirman_0.5.1-1.dsc

  More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.

  Changes since the last upload:

libirman (0.5.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Update to latest upstream, closes: #801588.
  * Handle conditional build of lirc plugin when lirc >= 0.9.4.

 -- Alec Leamas   Wed, 11 Nov 2015 18:16:26 +0100





  Regards,
   Alec Leamas

Bug#804644: RFS: flashybrid/0.19 [ITA]

2015-12-17 Thread Tim Weippert

Hi Mattia, 

i had talked to Thibaut and I'am willing to took maintainership for this 
packages, 
currently i'am working on an new Upload to incorporate the review from 
Gianfranco and the suggestions
he mention.

If i'am ready i will announce it for review on the debian-mentors mailinglist.

regards, 
tim 

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 05:28:30PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 06:42:36PM +0100, Thibaut Varène wrote:
> > I suppose what I need is having people take over my packages and call
> > it a day, tbh. With my upload rights revoked there’s not much meaning
> > in being a DD.
> 
> Not really.
> There are several active DDs who got their key removed due to the 1024
> purge and still have packages sponsored.
> Sponsoring a DD is also easier, you know that most probably the
> sponsoree is already aware of good conventions, etc.
> 
> Don't give up just for this inconvenience, ask for sponsorship and as
> soon as you manage to get your key back into the keyring you can come
> back full steam :)
> 
> 
> 
> PS: @Tim: what about this RFS?
> 
> -- 
> regards,
> Mattia Rizzolo
> 
> GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
> more about me:  http://mapreri.org  : :'  :
> Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
> Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-



-- 
Tim Weippert
http://weiti.org - we...@weiti.org
GPG Fingerprint - E704 7303 6FF0 8393 ADB1  398E 67F2 94AE 5995 7DD8

Re: cmake issue in libsbml: Cannot generate java documentation, please specify the Java_JAVADOC_JAR.

2015-12-17 Thread Jakub Wilk


* Andreas Tille , 2015-12-17, 19:11:

override_dh_auto_build:
+   if mount | grep "^proc " ; then echo "proc mounted - fine"; else mount 
proc /proc -t proc ; fi


Well, you need root privileges to mount /proc, so doing it in 
debian/rules almost certainly won't work.


If /proc is not mounted in your build environment, then you need to fix 
the environment. There's nothing that can be done about it in 
debian/rules.


--
Jakub Wilk

Bug#808243: RFS: hoteldruid/2.1.3-1

2015-12-17 Thread Marco M. F. De Santis


Il 17/12/2015 18:44, Mattia Rizzolo ha scritto:

I'll sponsor it, if you just change this to things:

* debhelper version 9.0.0 never existed, neither 8.0.0 did. using (>= 9)
   is more than enough.
* debian/copyright says 2001-2013, but I have to guess it exstends till
   2015 too?
* debian/changelog contains info about the unreleased version 2.1.1-1,
   please fold them toghether with 2.1.3-1

the rest looks good enough.



Hello, I've uploaded a new package with the corrections you requested.

Regards,
Marco

Bug#808259: RFS: abi-monitor/1.6-1 ITP

2015-12-17 Thread Peter Spiess-Knafl

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]

  Dear mentors,

I am planning to bring the abi-tracker tool [1][2] to Debian, because I
think it can be very useful for maintainers of shared libraries.

As a first step I therefore packaged abi-monitor, which I am seeking a
sponsor for.

Currently I am DM maintaining a few packages: [3].


 * Package name: abi-monitor
   Version : 1.6-1
   Upstream Author : Andrey Ponomarenko
 * URL : https://github.com/lvc/abi-monitor
 * License : GPL-2
   Section : devel

  It builds those binary packages:

abi-monitor - monitor new versions of a software library, try to
build them and

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/abi-monitor


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/abi-monitor/abi-monitor_1.6-1.dsc



  Changes since the last upload:

  This is an initial upload


  Regards,
   Peter Spiess-Knafl

[1]: https://github.com/lvc/abi-tracker
[2]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2015/12/msg00062.html
[3]: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=d...@spiessknafl.at

Bug#808251: marked as done (RFS: clblas/2.8+ds1-3)

2015-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:59:55 + (UTC)
with message-id <1136203798.707865.1450385995053.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#808251: RFS: clblas/2.8+ds1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #808251,
regarding RFS: clblas/2.8+ds1-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
808251: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808251
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clblas"

* Package name: clblas
  Version : 2.8+ds1-3
  Upstream Author : Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
* URL : https://github.com/clMathLibraries/clBLAS
* License : Apache version 2
  Section : science

It builds those binary packages:

  libclblas-bin - OpenCL BLAS library (executables)
  libclblas-dev - OpenCL BLAS library (development files)
  libclblas-doc - OpenCL BLAS library (documentation)
  libclblas2 - OpenCL BLAS library (shared library)
  libclblas2-dbg - OpenCL BLAS library (debugging symbols)

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  http://mentors.debian.net/package/clblas

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/clblas/clblas_2.8+ds1-3.dsc


Changes since the last upload:

  * d/rules: clean residual pyc files from build.
Fixes FTBFS in reproducibility builds.

Regards,
Ghislain Vaillant
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi, package uploaded a few seconds ago :)

cheers,

G.




Il Giovedì 17 Dicembre 2015 20:09, Ghislain Vaillant  ha 
scritto:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clblas"

* Package name: clblas
   Version : 2.8+ds1-3
   Upstream Author : Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
* URL : https://github.com/clMathLibraries/clBLAS
* License : Apache version 2
   Section : science

It builds those binary packages:

   libclblas-bin - OpenCL BLAS library (executables)
   libclblas-dev - OpenCL BLAS library (development files)
   libclblas-doc - OpenCL BLAS library (documentation)
   libclblas2 - OpenCL BLAS library (shared library)
   libclblas2-dbg - OpenCL BLAS library (debugging symbols)

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/clblas

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

   dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/clblas/clblas_2.8+ds1-3.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

   * d/rules: clean residual pyc files from build.
 Fixes FTBFS in reproducibility builds.

Regards,
Ghislain Vaillant--- End Message ---

Re: cmake issue in libsbml: Cannot generate java documentation, please specify the Java_JAVADOC_JAR.

I think a non mounted proc is a bug, so probably you should fix the 
autobuilders and your build environment?
The other issue is because of perl transition started yesterday.
I think things will be better in the next few days
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/perl.html
In the meanwhile you can build from a testing environment I think.

Bests
G.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 

  On Thu, 17 Dec, 2015 at 23:52, Andreas Tille wrote:   Hi 
Jakub,

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:34:53PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Andreas Tille , 2015-12-17, 19:11:
> >override_dh_auto_build:
> >+      if mount | grep "^proc " ; then echo "proc mounted - fine"; else 
> >mount proc /proc -t proc ; fi
> 
> Well, you need root privileges to mount /proc, so doing it in debian/rules
> almost certainly won't work.
> 
> If /proc is not mounted in your build environment, then you need to fix the
> environment. There's nothing that can be done about it in debian/rules.

Right, the build-hook makes you root but probably the build itself is a
non-privileged user.

But *how* exactly can I ensure on my machine (and autobuilders!) that
/proc is mounted???

BTW, on a different build machine (running testing in contrast to the
machine some hours ago running stable) I get:

...
0 packages upgraded, 558 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 146 MB/367 MB of archives. After unpacking 1183 MB will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 libnet-ssleay-perl : Depends: perlapi-5.20.2 which is a virtual package and is 
not provided by any available package.

 libxml-libxml-perl : Depends: perlapi-5.20.2 which is a virtual package and is 
not provided by any available package.

 libxml-parser-perl : Depends: perlapi-5.20.2 which is a virtual package and is 
not provided by any available package.

 libhtml-parser-perl : Depends: perlapi-5.20.2 which is a virtual package and 
is not provided by any available package.

Unable to resolve dependencies!  Giving up...
...

This somehow sounds like #787530 but I have no idea how to fix this.

Seems I have opened a can of worms with this package. :-(

Kind regards

      Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

Bug#808259: RFS: abi-monitor/1.6-1 ITP

2015-12-17 Thread Peter Spiess-Knafl

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hi!

Thank you for reviewing my package. I have overlooked it, but its very
important.

I modified it and re-uploaded the package to mentors.

Do you consider sponsoring it? As you might have seen in the ITP/RFS,
I plan to bring the whole abi-tracker of Andrey to Debian.

Greetings
Peter

On 12/18/2015 04:52 AM, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:57:51PM +0100, Peter Spiess-Knafl
> wrote:
>> As a first step I therefore packaged abi-monitor, which I am
>> seeking a sponsor for.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Please help to update the license to GPL-2 or LGPL-2, as describe
> in copyright header and its LICENSE actully contains GPL-2 and
> LGPL-2.
> 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=eM9O
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: cmake issue in libsbml: Cannot generate java documentation, please specify the Java_JAVADOC_JAR.

Hi Jakub,

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:34:53PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Andreas Tille , 2015-12-17, 19:11:
> >override_dh_auto_build:
> >+   if mount | grep "^proc " ; then echo "proc mounted - fine"; else 
> >mount proc /proc -t proc ; fi
> 
> Well, you need root privileges to mount /proc, so doing it in debian/rules
> almost certainly won't work.
> 
> If /proc is not mounted in your build environment, then you need to fix the
> environment. There's nothing that can be done about it in debian/rules.

Right, the build-hook makes you root but probably the build itself is a
non-privileged user.

But *how* exactly can I ensure on my machine (and autobuilders!) that
/proc is mounted???

BTW, on a different build machine (running testing in contrast to the
machine some hours ago running stable) I get:

...
0 packages upgraded, 558 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 146 MB/367 MB of archives. After unpacking 1183 MB will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 libnet-ssleay-perl : Depends: perlapi-5.20.2 which is a virtual package and is 
not provided by any available package.

 libxml-libxml-perl : Depends: perlapi-5.20.2 which is a virtual package and is 
not provided by any available package.

 libxml-parser-perl : Depends: perlapi-5.20.2 which is a virtual package and is 
not provided by any available package.

 libhtml-parser-perl : Depends: perlapi-5.20.2 which is a virtual package and 
is not provided by any available package.

Unable to resolve dependencies!  Giving up...
...

This somehow sounds like #787530 but I have no idea how to fix this.

Seems I have opened a can of worms with this package. :-(

Kind regards

   Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

Bug#808259: RFS: abi-monitor/1.6-1 ITP

2015-12-17 Thread 陳昌倬

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:57:51PM +0100, Peter Spiess-Knafl wrote:
> As a first step I therefore packaged abi-monitor, which I am seeking a
> sponsor for.

Hi,

Please help to update the license to GPL-2 or LGPL-2, as describe in
copyright header and its LICENSE actully contains GPL-2 and LGPL-2.

-- 
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) 
Debian Developer (https://nm.debian.org/public/person/czchen)
Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896  C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#804644: RFS: flashybrid/0.19 [ITA]