Bug#813523: RFS: h5py/2.6.0-1

Uploaded thanks for your work Frederic

Bug#813523: marked as done (RFS: h5py/2.6.0-1)

Your message dated Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:56:57 + with message-id and subject line RE:Bug#813523: RFS: h5py/2.6.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #813523, regarding RFS: h5py/2.6.0-1 to be marked as done. This means

Package rebuild

Hi. Is it possible to request a rebuild attempt of a package in a particular architecture, from the same source, to check if now it builds? Best regards. -- Octavio.

Re: Package rebuild

Hello Octavio, On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 14:01 -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote: > Is it possible to request a rebuild attempt of a package in a > particular architecture, from the same source, to check if now it > builds? See: https://release.debian.org/wanna-build.txt "give back" Hope that helps,

ITP: logdata-anomaly-miner -- lightweight tool for log checking, log analysis

X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Package: wnpp Owner: Roman Fiedler Severity: wishlist Package name: logdata-anomaly-miner Version: 0.0 Upstream Author: Roman Fiedler URL: FIXME Sources URL: [Seems

Bug#813603: RFS: libcxl/1.3-1 [ITP] -- libcxl -- Coherent accelerator shared library

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libcxl" Package name: libcxl Version : 1.3-1 Upstream Author : CAPI team URL : https://github.com/ibm-capi/libcxl License : Apache-2.0 Section :

Re: Package rebuild

On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 11:24:51PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote: > Hello Octavio, > > On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 14:01 -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote: > > Is it possible to request a rebuild attempt of a package in a > > particular architecture, from the same source, to check if now it > > builds? > >

Bug#812909: marked as done (RFS: python-bitstring/3.1.3-3)

Your message dated Wed, 3 Feb 2016 16:43:27 + (UTC) with message-id <1373964186.1823901.1454517807595.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#812909: RFS: python-bitstring/3.1.3-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #812909, regarding RFS: python-bitstring/3.1.3-3 to be marked as

Bug#813548: RFS: nfft/3.3.0-5

Hi, sponsored! please let me know if you need sponsoring for the two reverse-dependencies. cheers, Gianfranco Il Mercoledì 3 Febbraio 2016 1:21, Ghislain Vaillant ha scritto: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for

Bug#812900: marked as done (RFS: python-dtcwt/0.10.1+dfsg1-3)

Your message dated Wed, 3 Feb 2016 16:44:12 + (UTC) with message-id <1951510023.1806185.1454517852646.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#812900: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.10.1+dfsg1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #812900, regarding RFS: python-dtcwt/0.10.1+dfsg1-3 to be

Bug#813624: RFS: ismrmrd/1.3.2-2 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ismrmrd" * Package name: ismrmrd Version : 1.3.2-2 Upstream Author : The ISMRMRD developers * URL : http://ismrmrd.github.io/ * License : Expat

Re: syncterm/1.0+dfsg-1 [ITP]

El 03/02/16 a las 01:25, Robert James Clay escribió: > On Monday, February 01, 2016 08:49:10 AM Fernando Toledo wrote: >> >> Hi all! >> >> I upload a new version of SyncTerm package. >> >> feel free for comments/reviews! >> >> http://mentors.debian.net/package/syncterm > > Glad to see that you

option dh_make for public domain

hello mentors I'm starting in the packaging process of a software called gifshuffle. At that mapped it is licensed under Public Domain. In this case how should I use the -C option of dh_make command? thank you so much -- *Gustavo Soares de Lima* diasporabr: gustavolima

Bug#813624: marked as done (RFS: ismrmrd/1.3.2-2 [RC])

Your message dated Wed, 3 Feb 2016 19:52:02 + with message-id <20160203195202.gb23...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#813624: RFS: ismrmrd/1.3.2-2 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #813624, regarding RFS: ismrmrd/1.3.2-2 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Re: option dh_make for public domain

Hi Gustavo, On 03-02-2016 16:50, Gustavo S. L. wrote: > hello mentors > > > I'm starting in the packaging process of a software called gifshuffle. > At that mapped it is licensed under Public Domain. > In this case how should I use the -C option of dh_make command? In the dh_make manpage says: