Bug#813850: RFS: amanda/3.3.8-1 -- Advanced Maryland Automatic Network Disk Archiver

[Jose M Calhariz]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Amanda have release a new upstream version.  My main sponsor is too
busy for helping me.  So I am searching for someone that can help
sponsor the new release.

 * Package name: amanda
   Version : 1:3.3.8-1
   Upstream Author : Amanda Development Team
 * URL : http://www.amanda.org
 * License : GPL
   Section : utils



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.3
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_IE.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Re: public-domain in the debian/copyright

[Gustavo S. L.]

Got it. Thank you all

2016-02-04 17:51 GMT-02:00 Russ Allbery :

> "Gustavo S. L."  writes:
>
> > Thanks Wookey,
>
> > I did this: "License: public-domain
> >  No license required for any purpose; the work is not subject to
> copyright
> > in
> >  any jurisdiction.
> > "
>
> What Lintian is trying to do (maybe not phrased as well as possible) is to
> prod you into providing some explanation for how you know that.  This is a
> very unusual situation for a work to be in, so ftp-master needs to be able
> to verify this somehow.  It saves them a lot of time if you can include
> the details of how you know this in the license paragraph, or at least
> somewhere in debian/copyright (a Comment field or whatever).
>
> --
> Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)   
>
>


-- 
*Gustavo Soares de Lima*

diasporabr: gustavolima
facebook.com/gustavosdelima
linkedin.com/in/gustavo-soares-de-lima-29ab0663
Skype: logicuschat
github.com/gutolima
twitter.com/logicuslinux
youtube.com/ghtp25

binary out of the debian/prog/*

[Gustavo S. L.]

hi mentors

after debuild the package deb its created but without the binary.
the binary created in the source the upstream.
my question is: I can force manually copy the binary for debian/prog/tree
and again debuild?
its injure some debian policy?

thanks


-- 
*Gustavo Soares de Lima*

diasporabr: gustavolima
facebook.com/gustavosdelima
linkedin.com/in/gustavo-soares-de-lima-29ab0663
Skype: logicuschat
github.com/gutolima
twitter.com/logicuslinux
youtube.com/ghtp25

Re: Test suite needs script built after dh_auto_test is run

[Barry Warsaw]

On Feb 04, 2016, at 09:08 PM, Sean Whitton wrote:

>I'm packaging a Python application, ocrmypdf [1], that has a test suite
>run by py.test.  Most of the tests fail because they try to call the
>/usr/bin/ocrmypdf script.  This script doesn't exist until after
>debhelper has run setup.py, which generates it using its "entry points
>script" feature.  And this comes after dh_auto_test.
>
>The only solution I've come up with is producing my own entry point
>script and putting it into $PATH for the test suite to use.  But that
>rather defeats the purpose of testing the actual package's contents.

There are a few approaches I've taken in similar situations.

If ocrmypdf supports Python's -m option, you could consider patching the test
suite to run `python -m ocrmydf` instead.  Season to taste for python3 and or
both if you're using pybuild.

If the package uses tox to run its test suite, then you'll have the executable
in .tox/pyXY/bin and you could try to run that instead.

As a last resort, I have disabled the build-time tests (all or only the ones
that require the /usr/bin) and then arranged for the full test suite to run
via autopkgtest/DEP-8.  It's not ideal because Debian currently doesn't gate
on DEP-8 passing, but Ubuntu does and at least I'll see failures there.

FWIW, I think it's almost always a good idea to add a simple DEP-8 smoke test
for Python packages, just to prove that the modules can be imported if nothing
else.

Cheers,
-Barry


pgpIZm8X4Uh17.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: binary out of the debian/prog/*

[Giovani Ferreira]

Hi Gustavo,

On 05-02-2016 16:07, Gustavo S. L. wrote:
> hi mentors
> 
> after debuild the package deb its created but without the binary.
> the binary created in the source the upstream.
> my question is: I can force manually copy the binary for
> debian/prog/tree and again debuild?
> its injure some debian policy?

Do you have to create a file named package.install in the debian
directory. This file should contains the correct places to install binaries.

See more in "man dh_install" and in the 5.11 section of the New
Maintainers Guide[1].

[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dother.en.html#install

I hope that helps.

cheers,

-- 
Giovani Ferreira
http://softwarelivre.org/jova2
GNU/Linux user: 337388  GPG ID: 2375A66C

Bug#813489: RFS: libhinawa/0.7.0-1 [ITP]

[HAYASHI Kentaro]

Thanks!

I've fixed the following issue which are poited out.

* Add missing close #813474
* Remove needless Tead upload

On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 13:22:35 +0900 d...@debian.org wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:46:01PM +0900, HAYASHI Kentaro wrote:
> > libhinawa (0.7.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> 
> Close ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/813474
>  
> >   * Team upload.
> 
> You are listed as Uploaders: field, so  "Team upload" line is not needed.
> 
-- 
HAYASHI Kentaro 

Bug#813813: RFS: msi-keyboard -- command line tool to change MSI steelseries keyboards color setup

[Giulio Paci]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "msi-keyboard":

* Package name: msi-keyboard
  Version : 1.0
  Upstream Author : Brad Parker
* URL : https://github.com/bparker06/msi-keyboard/
* License : BSD 3-clause
  Programming Lang: C++
  Description : command line tool to change MSI steelseries keyboards color 
setup

It builds this binary package:

  msi-keyboard - command line tool to change MSI steelseries keyboards color 
setup

The sources for the package can be found at:

  https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/msi-keyboard.git

Regards,
Giulio Paci
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
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=7IJc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#813869: RFS: hoteldruid/2.1.4-1

[Marco M. F. De Santis]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hoteldruid":

* Package name: hoteldruid
  Version : 2.1.4-1
  Upstream Author : Marco M. F. De Santis
* URL : http://www.hoteldruid.com
* License : AGPLv3
  Section : web

It builds those binary packages:

  hoteldruid - web-based property management system for hotels or B

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  http://mentors.debian.net/package/hoteldruid

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hoteldruid/hoteldruid_2.1.4-1.dsc


More information about hoteldruid can be obtained from 
http://www.hoteldruid.com.


Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream release.
  * Deleted patch backup_bug (integrated in upstream).
  * Removed file base.js from patch debianize (integrated in upstream).
  * debian/control: added php7.0 as alternative to php5

Regards,
Marco M. F. De Santis

Bug#813489: marked as done (RFS: libhinawa/0.7.0-1 [ITP])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 6 Feb 2016 12:07:00 +0900
with message-id <20160206030700.ga2...@lilith.infoblue.home>
and subject line Re: Bug#813489: RFS: libhinawa/0.7.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #813489,
regarding RFS: libhinawa/0.7.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
813489: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813489
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
  Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libhinawa"
  Here is the filed ITP bug:
  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813474

 * Package name: libhinawa
   Version : 0.7.0-1
   Upstream Author : Takashi Sakamoto 
 * URL : https://github.com/takaswie/libhinawa
 * License : LGPL-2.1
   Section : libs

  It builds those binary packages:

gir1.2-hinawa-1.0 - GObjet introspection data for libhinawa0
 libhinawa-dev - I/O library for IEEE 1394 asynchronous transactions 
(development
 libhinawa0 - I/O library for IEEE 1394 asynchronous transactions

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/libhinawa


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libh/libhinawa/libhinawa_0.7.0-1.dsc

  More information about hello can be obtained from 
https://github.com/takaswie/libhinawa

  Changes since the last upload:

libhinawa (0.7.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Team upload.
  * New upstream release 0.7.0
  * debian/control
- requires to debhelper 9 or later.
- update to the latest standards-version.
  * debian/source/format
- add missing source/format.
  * debian/copyright
- specify License: field correctly.
- add missing License: paragraph.
- note that backport.h comes from Linux UAPI header.
  * debian/rules
- simplify rules by using dh_* efficiently..
  * debian/watch
- add missing watch file.
  * debian/libhinawa0.symbols
- add missing symbol file.

  Regards,
   HAYASHI Kentaro


-- 
HAYASHI Kentaro 
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 10:24:47PM +0900, HAYASHI Kentaro wrote:
> I've fixed the following issue which are poited out.
> 
> * Add missing close #813474
> * Remove needless Tead upload

uploaded.
-- 
Regards,
dai

GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B765 B8D8 EA50 7839 619D D439 668E


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---

[6 Feb 2016] Please Study & Decide

[Bah AB]

Pvt & Psnl 1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

Bug#813489: RFS: libhinawa/0.7.0-1 [ITP]

[HAYASHI Kentaro]

On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 12:07:00 +0900 d...@debian.org wrote:
> 
> uploaded.
> -- 
> Regards,
>   dai
> 
> GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B765 B8D8 EA50 7839 619D D439 668E

I've confirmed it from new queue page. Thanks!
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html

-- 
HAYASHI Kentaro