Bug#815053: marked as done (RFS: python-hdf5storage/0.1.12-1 [ITP])

2016-02-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 04:34:54 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: python-hdf5storage/0.1.12-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #815053,
regarding RFS: python-hdf5storage/0.1.12-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
815053: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815053
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-hdf5storage"

* Package name: python-hdf5storage
  Version : 0.1.12-1
  Upstream Author : Freja Nordsiek 
* URL : https://github.com/frejanordsiek/hdf5storage
* License : BSD
  Section : python

It builds those binary packages:

  python-hdf5storage - high-level utilities to read from and write to 
HDF5 (Python 2)

  python-hdf5storage-doc - documentation for hdf5storage
  python3-hdf5storage - high-level utilities to read from and write to 
HDF5 (Python 3)


To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-hdf5storage

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-hdf5storage/python-hdf5storage_0.1.12-1.dsc


Changes since the last upload:

  * Initial release. (Closes: #814908)

Regards,
Ghislain Vaillant
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package python-hdf5storage version 0.1.12-1 is in NEW now,
and the package at mentors is not newer (2016-02-16) than the package in NEW 
(2016-02-16),
so there is currently no package to sponsor.

https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/python-hdf5storage_0.1.12-1.html
https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-hdf5storage

Please remove the package from mentors or mark it "needs sponsor = no".
If for some reason you need to replace the package in NEW,
then you can upload an updated package to mentors
and feel free to reopen this RFS 815053 or open a new RFS.--- End Message ---

Bug#815177: RFS: fcitx-imlist/0.5.0-1 [ITP]

2016-02-20 Thread dai 
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 02:57:04AM +0900, HAYASHI Kentaro wrote:
>   dget -x 
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fcitx-imlist/fcitx-imlist_0.5.0-1.dsc

Do you know/use pbuilder/cowbuilder?

* http://pbuilder.alioth.debian.org/
* https://wiki.debian.org/cowbuilder

pbuilder/cowbuilder tell you whether your packages can build.
Your package's Build-Depends: is not satisfied with its dependency.  Check it.

And, Do you know/use lintian?

* https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/checkit.ja.html#lintians

Your package's Standards-Version is out of date.  Check it.

When you want to upload packages, a goal is below 3 cleans.
Check and mention them in RFS message.

* pbuilder/cowbuilder clean
* lintian clean
* piuparts clean

Oh, maybe, you wrote blog articles for them.  Review them.

* http://www.clear-code.com/blog/2014/11/21.html
* http://www.clear-code.com/blog/2014/4/3.html
* http://www.clear-code.com/blog/2014/12/1.html
-- 
Regards,
dai

GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B765 B8D8 EA50 7839 619D D439 668E


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#815039: marked as done (RFS: normaliz 3.1.0+ds-1 [New Upstream Version] -- math computing tools)

2016-02-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sat, 20 Feb 2016 21:34:10 +0100
with message-id <56c8cdc2.1010...@rezozer.net>
and subject line RFS: normaliz 3.1.0+ds-1 [New Upstream Version] -- math 
computing tools
has caused the Debian Bug report #815039,
regarding RFS: normaliz 3.1.0+ds-1 [New Upstream Version] -- math computing 
tools
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
815039: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815039
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear Mentors:

I am looking for a sponsor for the normaliz package [1], a mathematical package
used by Singular. This package brings to Debian the latest version of normaliz.

Thanks in advance,
Jerome

[1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/normaliz.git

-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWyM3CAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjPtMIALJ7wh3MAIEvivvnuyKaVIve
Ss0QwIgPJ8VqXKM8xrWXmNgu7SMoP35hVC4kug8bAlofHBIpNSuKvouj/41qKueW
qm/Erj0A2V1H8efI6WdcnNtta+up7bWeg+jX851Rg2hFauizF6xhx0GYk7R9gteb
T1hQRDb3boHZBlVpYj4eEyvCLrm6gM2J3eFH4pzp9/u/iHUhZJRYFcixodi/xOBg
rmIWs4cCa7CVUpX87qTuTGed/V5fN23OLi8pR0R4zSNSKGzqzXqyCmhphVddoxpB
iaDutaqXA1qIyZloHXnPhC85SfPcGOYHt6uGqA3Spre9UcI3ThtJvYB/IIDmyeE=
=0u/R
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---

Bug#815299: RFS: openbsc/0.15.0-1 [ITP]

2016-02-20 Thread Ruben Undheim 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors and Debian Science fellows,

I am looking for a sponsor for the new package "openbsc":

 Package name:  openbsc
 Version:   0.15.0-1
 Upstream author:   Osmocom
 License:   Mainly AGPL-3+


Andreas Tille and Steffen Möller have helped me sponsoring all the libraries
needed by OpenBSC, and now the time has come to actually get OpenBSC itself
uploaded!

Is there anyone else who would like to help me out this time? The maintainer
for the package is "Debian Science Maintainers" and I am currently the only
listed uploader. I am a DM, so strictly only one upload is necessary.


It builds these binary packages:

  osmocom-bsc
  osmocom-nitb
  osmocom-ipaccess-utils
  osmocom-bs11-utils
  osmocom-sgsn
  osmocom-gbproxy
  osmocom-bsc-nat
  openbsc-dev

For further information about OpenBSC, please see:
 - https://bugs.debian.org/806583
 - http://openbsc.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/OpenBSC

You can either download the package with:
 - dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openbsc/openbsc_0.15.0-1.dsc

or clone the repo with:
 - gbp clone https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/openbsc.git


Best regards,
Ruben

Looking for sponsors and packers..

2016-02-20 Thread Dirk Lindner 
Hi,
looking for People how can help me to bring my Debian package for
http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php/Kate+Perl-Plug-In?content=170611
stable.

Greats

Dirk Lindner

http://lindnerei.de

Bug#800966: marked as done (RFS: kimchi/1.5.1-1 [ITP] -- HTML5 based management tool for KVM)

2016-02-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sat, 20 Feb 2016 16:32:40 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: kimchi/1.5.1-1 [ITP] -- HTML5 based management 
tool for KVM
has caused the Debian Bug report #800966,
regarding RFS: kimchi/1.5.1-1 [ITP] -- HTML5 based management tool for KVM
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
800966: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=800966
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kimchi"

 Package name: kimchi
 Version : 1.5.1-1
 Upstream Author : Kimchi team
 URL : https://github.com/kimchi-project/kimchi
 License : LGPL-3.0+/Apache-2.0
 Section : misc

It builds those binary packages:

  kimchi - HTML5 based management tool for KVM

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/kimchi


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kimchi/kimchi_1.5.1-1.dsc

More information about kimchi can be obtained from 
https://github.com/kimchi-project/kimchi/.

Regards,
 Frederic Bonnard
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package kimchi has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---

Re: Bug#813900: RFS: ripit/4.0.0~beta20140508-1

2016-02-20 Thread Elimar Riesebieter 
* Elimar Riesebieter  [2016-02-06 14:58 +0100]:

> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
> 
> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ripit"
> 
>  * Package name: ripit
>  Version : 4.0.0~beta20140508-1
>  Upstream Author : Felix Suwald 
>  * URL : http://www.suwald.com/ripit
>  * License : GPL-2
>  Section : sound
> 
> It builds those binary packages:
> 
>   ripit - Textbased audio CD ripper
> 
> To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
> URL:
> 
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/ripit
> 
> 
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
> 
>   dget -x 
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/ripit/ripit_4.0.0~beta20140508-1.dsc
> 
> Changes since the last upload:
> * Should handle double discs with MusicBrainz (Closes: 639385).
> * Make depend on libmp3-tag-perl (Closes: 715339).
> * Make depend on mail-transport-agent (Closes: 756139).
> * Option --ghost tries to trim lead-in/out. Hopefully (Closes: 435779).

I wonder why no sponsor takes care of my package since 3 weeks
now...

Elimar
-- 
  Excellent day for drinking heavily.
  Spike the office water cooler;-)

Re: Bug#801253: how to handle not much used feature which depends on a deprecated technology

2016-02-20 Thread toogley 

btw. thanks for recognizing/appreciating my rather small contributions :)

Bug#814727: marked as done (RFS: opengm/2.3.6+20160131-1)

2016-02-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sat, 20 Feb 2016 12:50:45 +
with message-id <56c86125.20...@gmail.com>
and subject line uploaded to unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #814727,
regarding RFS: opengm/2.3.6+20160131-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
814727: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814727
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "opengm"

* Package name: opengm
  Version : 2.3.6+20160131-1
  Upstream Author : The OpenGM developers
* URL : http://hci.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/opengm2/
* License : Expat
  Section : science

It builds those binary packages:

  libopengm-bin - command line tools for OpenGM
  libopengm-dev - C++ template library for discrete factor graph models
  libopengm-doc - documentation and examples for OpenGM
  python-opengm - Python interface to OpenGM
  python-opengm-doc - documentation for the Python interface to OpenGM

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  http://mentors.debian.net/package/opengm

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/opengm/opengm_2.3.6+20160131-1.dsc


Changes since the last upload:

  * Team upload.

  [Ghislain Antony Vaillant]
  * Drop patch Fix-testsuite-execution-on-32-bit.patch,
applied upstream.
  * Provide examples in doc package.
  * d/rules: build examples conditionally on nocheck.
  * d/gbp.conf: use upstream tag format.
  * d/rules: simplify dh_autotest override.
  * d/control: use secure VCS URIs.
  * Fix usage of embedded jquery in doc package.
  * d/rules: move dh_numpy call to dh_python2 override.
  * d/rules: exclude examples from compression.
  * Bump standards version to 3.9.7, no changes required.

  [Andreas Tille]
  * Avoid mixed quote signs in debian/upstream/metadata

Regards,
Ghislain Vaillant
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
 --- End Message ---

Bug#809623: RFS: telegram-purple/1.2.5

2016-02-20 Thread BenWiederhake.GitHub 

Hello,

sorry for the long wait, real life happened. Also, note the version bump 
in the subject from 1.2.3 to 1.2.5.



Seems like it, true, but sadly is necessary. The package is in version
control, and unless we provide pre-bundled origtars somewhere (which
won't happen), this has to build the origtar by invoking "make dist" in
the source tree.


why you cant provide pre-bundled origtars? I know some project that does 
exactly the same.


We now bundle the origtar, and listen for it in d/watch


Now this is getting absurd: the whole point of dh get-orig-source is to >support people 
for who "git pull" is too complicated. But suddenly I can
assume that git is installed, although git is not pulled by build-essential?


Resolved.

Long explanation:

Back then, I (wanted to) implement dh get-orig-source by:
- git clone-ing the repository
- git checkout the required version
- recreate origtar from that
... which is error-prone and unnecessarily complex.

Starting with 1.2.5, the orig-tar is part of the release, so we can just 
use uupdate.



Now I come with a question.
You want to maintain the package only in Debian? or in all linux distro around 
the globe?


I would like to see this work helping all Debian-derivatives.
A month ago, before I went inactive for a month, (long before Ubuntu's 
DebianImportFreeze), I hoped that telegram-purple would make it into 
Debian unstable and therefore into Ubuntu 2016-04.


Well, that didn't work. Also, see below. As it turns out, pushing 1.2.5 
into Debian right now would be a bad idea.



you are doing the repack work as Debian work, this means that other linux 
derivatives
won't ever gain from the work, and they will need to do it again.


Thanks to the published origtar, this should become a bit easier in the 
future.



Pushing the tarball (complete and reduced) upstream, will save a lot of work 
for everybody
and simplify a lot the Debian packaging
(just a simple watch file, with no repack at all).


Signed :)

Due to Telegram cranking out unexpected features that break everything, 
we won't push 1.2.5 into Debian anyway, so that's why I don't bother 
with another RFS yet.


Regards,
Ben

Re: Bug#801253: how to handle not much used feature which depends on a deprecated technology

2016-02-20 Thread toogley 

Hey,

thanks a lot for your comments.

Additionally, i'll ask upstream what they think about option 1) and 3), 
or generally how important that at_console block is for them.


Again, thanks :)


On 02/20/2016 03:38 AM, Axel Beckert wrote:

Hi,

thanks toogley for trying to tackle this issue.

Paul Wise wrote:

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 3:28 AM, toogley wrote:

what do you think about that? Am i missing sth?


I would go with 1) or 3) add support for systemd-logind and whatever
other options there are for people who don't like systemd (ConsoleKit2
etc) and send that to upstream.


Indeed, thanks Paul for that comment.

wicd seems the most popular alternative to NetworkManager for those
who dislike NetworkManager's hard dependency on libpam-systemd and
hence systemd.

So to add an exclusive hard dependency on anything systemd-ish would
probably annoy a not so small part of wicd's user base in Debian and
should be avoided.

Making use of systemd features if systemd is installed, is though
welcome. This means that according configuration files should be
shipped, but wicd should not solely rely on them -- as it seems to
have happened with consolekit in the past.

Regards, Axel

Bug#815024: marked as done (RFS: autotalent/0.2-5)

2016-02-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sat, 20 Feb 2016 10:06:08 +
with message-id 

and subject line Uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #815024,
regarding RFS: autotalent/0.2-5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
815024: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815024
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "autotalent"

* Package name: autotalent
  Version : 0.2-5
  Upstream Author : Thomas A. Baran 
* URL : http://tombaran.info/autotalent.html
* License : BSD-3-clause
  Section : sound

It builds this binary package:

autotalent - pitch correction LADSPA plugin

To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/autotalent


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/autotalent/autotalent_0.2-5.dsc

Debian packaging can be found in the Debian Multimedia Team repository:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-multimedia/autotalent.git

Changes since the last upload:

  * Change uploader from Alessio to me & update Vcs URLs
  * Improve package long description
Thanks to Justin B Rye (Closes: #785260)
  * Bump standards version, no changes required
  * Fix watch file

Regards,
Ross Gammon



-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers wily-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'wily-updates'), (500, 'wily-security'), (500, 'wily'), 
(100, 'wily-backports')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-25-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-- 
Alessio Treglia  | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer|  quadris...@ubuntu.com
0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A--- End Message ---