Bug#824983: marked as done (RFS: classic-theme-restorer/1.5.2-1 -- customize the new Firefox look)

2016-05-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 22 May 2016 06:08:46 + with message-id <20160522060844.ga30...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#824983: RFS: classic-theme-restorer/1.5.2-1 -- customize the new Firefox look has caused the Debian Bug report #824983, regarding RFS: classic-theme-restorer/1.5.2

Bug#824967: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.2.5-1 [ITP]

2016-05-21 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 6:38 AM, foss.freedom wrote: > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/budgie-desktop/budgie-desktop_10.2.5-1.dsc I've included a review below. > budgie-desktop is the flagship desktop system for Solus. Solus is an tier 1 > distro using its own packaging mechanism

Bug#824983: RFS: classic-theme-restorer/1.5.2-1 -- customize the new Firefox look

2016-05-21 Thread Sean Whitton
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for a new release of classic-theme-restorer. * Package name: classic-theme-restorer Version : 1.5.2-1 Upstream Author : Aris * URL : https://github.com/Aris-t2/ClassicThemeRestore

Bug#823467: RFS: flatbuffers/1.3.0-2 [ITP]

2016-05-21 Thread Tim Dengel
Am 22.05.2016 um 04:16 schrieb Jonathon Love: > [...] > increasing the debian version is > necessary when using d-mentors. if you make some changes/fixes, and > upload with the same version number, it rejects it saying that it has > already been uploaded. perhaps there is a workaround for this, but

Bug#823467: RFS: flatbuffers/1.3.0-2 [ITP]

2016-05-21 Thread Jonathon Love
hi andrey, On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 11:17:27AM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote: Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/flatbuffers/flatbuffers_1.3.0-2.dsc This gives 404. https://mentors.debian.net/package

Re: Best practise for a drop-in replacement of a non-free package

2016-05-21 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Ole Streicher wrote: > I intend to package the "giza" library [1] that is largely a replacement > of the pgplot library that is in Debian non-free. Does that mean that pgplot5 can be removed from Debian and the reverse dependencies transitioned to giza and moved t

Bug#824900: RFS: iroffer-dinoex/3.30-1 [ITP]

2016-05-21 Thread optix2000
> > > d/rules: > > > - why -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1? Such things should be documented > > > > For security reasons, as this is an internet accessible daemon that > > accepts user input. > What I've meant was "you replaced stronger default flag with a weaker > one". As you know about dpkg-buildflags yo

Bug#824967: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.2.5-1 [ITP]

2016-05-21 Thread foss.freedom
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "budgie-desktop" Package name: budgie-desktop Version : 10.2.5 Upstream Author : i...@solus-project.com URL : https://github.com/solus-project/budgie-desktop License

Bug#824900: RFS: iroffer-dinoex/3.30-1 [ITP]

2016-05-21 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 02:02:49PM -0700, optix2...@teitoku.net wrote: > > d/rules: > > - why -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1? Such things should be documented > > For security reasons, as this is an internet accessible daemon that > accepts user input. What I've meant was "you replaced stronger default flag

Bug#824900: RFS: iroffer-dinoex/3.30-1 [ITP]

2016-05-21 Thread optix2000
>> iroffer-dinoex.lintian-overrides: >> - you shouldn't override P tags >Which P tag did I override? no-upstream-changelog should be an I tag. Sorry, I looked again and you're right. no-upstream-changelog is a P tag. I've removed the override. Regards, Weilu

Bug#824900: RFS: iroffer-dinoex/3.30-1 [ITP]

2016-05-21 Thread optix2000
Hi Andrey, Thanks for looking over this. I've replied to your concerns in line and created a new build which (hopefully) addresses most of them. > d/rules: > - why -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1? Such things should be documented For security reasons, as this is an internet accessible daemon that accepts us

Bug#820488: RFS: roadfighter/1.0.1269-1 [ITP] -- Drive a car in a death race

2016-05-21 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
I'm worried about fonts/*.ttf. If these fonts are packaged in Debian they shouldn't be shipped in the binary package. Otherwise, there is no info that they are free, no license, no canonical name etc. In any case shipping some random fonts in the source package is troublesome. -- WBR, wRAR sign

Bug#824949: marked as done (RFS: twinkle/1:1.9.0+git20160321.0.64a0816+dfsg-2 [RC] -- Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) SIP Phone)

2016-05-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2016 18:00:30 + (UTC) with message-id <2143476523.500597.1463853630728.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#824949: RFS: twinkle/1:1.9.0+git20160321.0.64a0816+dfsg-2 [RC] -- Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) SIP Phone has caused the Debian B

Bug#824949: RFS: twinkle/1:1.9.0+git20160321.0.64a0816+dfsg-2 [RC] -- Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) SIP Phone

2016-05-21 Thread Peter Colberg
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "twinkle": git clone https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-voip/twinkle.git cd twinkle && pristine-tar checkout ../twinkle_1.9.0+git20160321.0.64a0816+dfsg.orig.tar.xz For verification,

Bug#819406: RFS: capitan/1.0.3-dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Remake of the classic 80s platform game

2016-05-21 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo The package contains embedded libs including libogg and libfreetype2 and builds them, this must be fixed unless the built libs are not used. Also, the package doesn't build with current libpng. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#820704: RFS: subuser/0.5.6-3 [ITP]

2016-05-21 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Andrey Rahmatullin , 2016-05-21, 21:58: - Add --update option to dev command - Fix /dev/dri permissions issues - Fix encoding bug when communicating with Docker daemon - Improve support for packaging subuser Putting upstream changelog entries to debian/changelog is not an accepted practice eit

Bug#820647: RFS: libretro-gambatte [ITP]

2016-05-21 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo From d/copyright, this is not distributable as it combines GPL2 and GPL3+. But d/copyright is not correct/complete as libgambatte/libretro actually contains files under several different licenses and not just GPL3+ (and even files without a license which is bad too), an

Bug#823467: RFS: flatbuffers/1.3.0-2 [ITP]

2016-05-21 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 11:17:27AM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote: > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/flatbuffers/flatbuffers_1.3.0-2.dsc This gives 404. https://mentors.debian.net/package/flatbuffe

Bug#824900: RFS: iroffer-dinoex/3.30-1 [ITP]

2016-05-21 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
(Note that I don't intend to sponsor this package) d/rules: - why -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1? Such things should be documented - commented out -Wl,--as-needed looks strange, if it doesn't work/isn't needed you shouldn't include this line at all - you can probably replace override_dh_auto_clean with deb

Bug#820704: RFS: subuser/0.5.6-3 [ITP]

2016-05-21 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Note that I don't plan to sponsor this package. On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 04:33:26PM +0200, Stanislas Leduc wrote: > Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] > * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] > * License : [fill in] Huh? >

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Trying to disable error=format-security for clapack

2016-05-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again, after the build issues in clapack[1] were solved and I was even able to create shared libraries I wonder how I can properly set a sensible SONAME. I tried to do this via SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES but failed. Another question is how I could link against the Debian packaged f2c rather than b

Re: cdist: TeX in sid

2016-05-21 Thread Jason Crain
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 06:06:21PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > When building cdist-4.0.0, I encountered listed error with sbuild. > Seems it is issues with TeX, not with my package. Any suggestions? > > How read this '/tmp/fmtutils.C8RsuPiw' file, for example? > > Processing triggers

Re: cdist: TeX in sid

2016-05-21 Thread James Cowgill
Hi, On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 18:06 +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > When building cdist-4.0.0, I encountered listed error with sbuild. > Seems it is issues with TeX, not with my package. Any suggestions? > > How read this '/tmp/fmtutils.C8RsuPiw' file, for example? > > Processing triggers for t

Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

2016-05-21 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:09:14PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: > On 21-05-2016 11:59, Adam Borowski wrote: > > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:31:49PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: > >> But I don't think I need to write a documentation how to setup > >> the config file is easy to understand, just feeding ba

cdist: TeX in sid

2016-05-21 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
Hello! When building cdist-4.0.0, I encountered listed error with sbuild. Seems it is issues with TeX, not with my package. Any suggestions? How read this '/tmp/fmtutils.C8RsuPiw' file, for example? Processing triggers for tex-common (6.05) ... Running updmap-sys. This may take

Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

2016-05-21 Thread Lucas Castro
On 21-05-2016 11:59, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:31:49PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: >> On 14-05-2016 20:45, Adam Borowski wrote: >>> Only upon checking the syslog I see: >>> May 15 00:30:37 umbar lsm[12853]: no targets found in config file >>> yet according to comments in /e

Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

2016-05-21 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:31:49PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: > On 14-05-2016 20:45, Adam Borowski wrote: > > Only upon checking the syslog I see: > > May 15 00:30:37 umbar lsm[12853]: no targets found in config file > > yet according to comments in /etc/lsm/lsm.conf: > > # Defaults for the connect

Best practise for a drop-in replacement of a non-free package

2016-05-21 Thread Ole Streicher
Hi all, I intend to package the "giza" library [1] that is largely a replacement of the pgplot library that is in Debian non-free. Pgplot is an all-in-one package that contains among others the following libraries and header file (no pkgconfig file here): /usr/include/cpgplot.h /usr/lib/libcpgplo

Bug#822107: RFS: eja/9.3.12-1 [ITP]

2016-05-21 Thread Ubaldo Porcheddu
Hi Gianfranco, debian directory review: control: 1) unsecure VCS uri replaced with https://github.com/ubaldus/eja.git 2) outdated std-version updated to 3.9.8 3) wrap-and-sort please (just run the command wrap-and-sort) done 4) extended description too short, and wrap to 80 column pl