Bug#828700: RFS: twinkle/1.9.0+git20160520.0.be8b8df+dfsg-1 [binNEW] -- Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) SIP Phone

Hi Gianfranco, Thanks for sponsoring the binNEW upload of twinkle. I had a closer look at the lintian warning issued by debomatic: X: twinkle source: maybe-not-arch-all-binnmuable twinkle -> twinkle-common N: N:Tag to attempt to measure the number of packages that might have an N:

Bug#828889: RFS: elisp-slime-nav-el/0.9-1 ITP

On Tuesday, June 28 2016, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "elisp-slime-nav-el" > > * Package name: elisp-slime-nav-el > Version : 0.9-1 > Upstream Author : Steve Purcell > * Url :

Bug#828889: RFS: elisp-slime-nav-el/0.9-1 ITP

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "elisp-slime-nav-el" * Package name: elisp-slime-nav-el Version : 0.9-1 Upstream Author : Steve Purcell * Url :

Bug#827333: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-1 [ITP]

On Monday, June 20 2016, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 03:37:55PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> > I've uploaded the package, thanks for your contribution to Debian :) >> Thank you! I guess I will ping you again when the package has been >> accepted, so that you can

Bug#828700: marked as done (RFS: twinkle/1.9.0+git20160520.0.be8b8df+dfsg-1 [binNEW] -- Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) SIP Phone)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:34:09 + (UTC) with message-id <2111837213.5042173.1467138849062.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#828700: RFS: twinkle/1.9.0+git20160520.0.be8b8df+dfsg-1 [binNEW] -- Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) SIP Phone has caused the

Bug#828700: RFS: twinkle/1.9.0+git20160520.0.be8b8df+dfsg-1 [binNEW] -- Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) SIP Phone

I pushed another commit that removes ${shlibs:Depends} from twinkle-common. Peter

Bug#828700: RFS: twinkle/1.9.0+git20160520.0.be8b8df+dfsg-1 [binNEW] -- Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) SIP Phone

Hi Gianfranco, On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 09:21:51AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, lintian is not too happy with your changes > http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/twinkle/1.9.0+git20160520.0.be8b8df+dfsg-1/lintian The above report seems to be generated using an

Re: How to specify a generic architecture to GCC (Was: SSE3 issue with iqtree when trying to enable i386)

On 06/28/2016 11:01 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I admit I can not answer the question asked by upstream. The package in > question is iqtree[1] and they said that they have different > computational kernels implemented to respect different hardware. > Current Git[1] does not even build - may be

Bug#828863: marked as done (RFS: gmp-ecm/7.0.2+ds-1 [RC] -- Factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:20:11 + (UTC) with message-id <1258845587.5003950.1467130811635.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#828863: RFS: gmp-ecm/7.0.2+ds-1 [RC] -- Factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method has caused the Debian Bug report #828863,

Bug#828863: RFS: gmp-ecm/7.0.2+ds-1 [RC] -- Factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear Sponsors, I am looking for sponsorship for the package gmp-ecm. This package brings the lastest patch version of [gmp-]ecm that fixes some tests failures encountered on some 32bit architectures (#828717). Thanks in

Re: Next autoconf problem for today libdisorder

On 06/27/2016 10:49 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: >> - if you use autoconf/automake, you don't need to use d-moveshlibs >>for multiarch, dh_auto_configure / dh_auto_build / dh_auto_install >>will do all the heavy lifting for you (just create proper .install >>files for the packages, and

Re: Next autoconf problem for today libdisorder

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 03:42:21PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: > > (Btw. you still didn't update debian/control in git. ;-)) Ahhh, thanks for noticing ... > Well, but the reason you get help here is so you can learn from > it. ;-) And you don't have to be an expert in the autotools (while I

Bug#827907: RFS: evil/1.2.12-1 ITP

> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 05:32:32PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > 2. In d/copyright, I think you need to specify copyright years for the > > copyright holders. Just their names is not enough, since on a desert > > island ~60 years from now with no newer versions of evil available for > >

Re: Next autoconf problem for today libdisorder

(Merging replies.) On 06/28/2016 08:35 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:57:12PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: >> [Multi-Arch] >> In your package, that's already the case, so you can just add the header >> to debian/control. > > A, well, yes - I simply forgot this. In my

Bug#828841: marked as done (RFS: yamllint/1.3.2-1)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:25:50 + (UTC) with message-id <2116826129.4691041.1467116750857.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#828841: RFS: yamllint/1.3.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #828841, regarding RFS: yamllint/1.3.2-1 to be marked as done. This

Bug#828841: RFS: yamllint/1.3.2-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yamllint" * Package name: yamllint Version : 1.3.2-1 Upstream Author : Adrien Vergé * URL : https://github.com/adrienverge/yamllint *

Bug#827907: RFS: evil/1.2.12-1 ITP

> * Dmitry Bogatov , 2016-06-27, 17:32: > >Mercurial upstream repository, and tarballs are named not after > >version, but after hashes. I fail to extract anything useful from this > >page: [1] > > > >[1] https://bitbucket.org/lyro/evil/downloads > This seems to work for me:

Re: How to specify a generic architecture to GCC (Was: SSE3 issue with iqtree when trying to enable i386)

On Tue, 28 Jun 2016, Andreas Tille wrote: > I admit I can not answer the question asked by upstream. The package in > question is iqtree[1] and they said that they have different > computational kernels implemented to respect different hardware. > Current Git[1] does not even build - may be due

Bug#827907: RFS: evil/1.2.12-1 ITP

* Dmitry Bogatov , 2016-06-27, 17:32: Mercurial upstream repository, and tarballs are named not after version, but after hashes. I fail to extract anything useful from this page: [1] [1] https://bitbucket.org/lyro/evil/downloads This seems to work for me: version=3

Bug#828700: RFS: twinkle/1.9.0+git20160520.0.be8b8df+dfsg-1 [binNEW] -- Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) SIP Phone

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, lintian is not too happy with your changes http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/twinkle/1.9.0+git20160520.0.be8b8df+dfsg-1/lintian please fix the above if possible, Gianfranco Il Martedì 28 Giugno 2016 5:21, Peter Colberg

How to specify a generic architecture to GCC (Was: SSE3 issue with iqtree when trying to enable i386)

Hi, I admit I can not answer the question asked by upstream. The package in question is iqtree[1] and they said that they have different computational kernels implemented to respect different hardware. Current Git[1] does not even build - may be due to some fine tuning of gcc options needed???

Bug#828792: marked as done (RFS: yamllint/1.3.0-1)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2016 09:57:09 +0200 with message-id

Re: Next autoconf problem for today libdisorder

Hi Christian, On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:57:12PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: > > Well, autoconf in and by itself doesn't support testing, automake does, > which fortunately you're also using. > > I've added a very trivial test from the way I understand how the program > you're using works,

Re: Next autoconf problem for today libdisorder

Hi Christian, On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:41:28PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 06/27/2016 07:49 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: > > Other comments regarding the package: > > Oh btw. I just noticed that you don't install the manpage for > the library function in the -dev package (because