Bug#831411: marked as done (RFS: jigzo/0.6.1-7 RC)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jul 2016 18:27:32 + (UTC) with message-id <1307361273.1092004.1468607252079.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#831411: RFS: jigzo/0.6.1-7 RC has caused the Debian Bug report #831411, regarding RFS: jigzo/0.6.1-7 RC to be marked as done. This

Bug#829242: marked as done (RFS: open-isns/0.96-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jul 2016 23:49:37 +0530 with message-id <1468606777.5939.12.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#829242: RFS: open-isns/0.96-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #829242, regarding RFS: open-isns/0.96-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#831411: RFS: jigzo/0.6.1-7 RC

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: RC Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jigzo" * Package name: jigzo Version : 0.6.1-7 Upstream Author : Maarten de Boer * URL : http://www.resorama.com/jigzo * License

Bug#823742: RFS: hdf-compass/0.6.0-1 [ITP]

On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:34:10PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > I have addressed Mattia's comments regarding the tests and manpage. I > am now happy with the state of the package and believe it to be fit for > upload. > > The new version is available on mentors: > > >

Bug#827090: marked as done (RFS: runit/2.1.2-4 ITP)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:00:47 + (UTC) with message-id <1937971997.5821043.1468598447696.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#827090: RFS: runit/2.1.2-4 ITP has caused the Debian Bug report #827090, regarding RFS: runit/2.1.2-4 ITP to be marked as done. This

Bug#829081: RFS: python3-adns/1.2.3-1 [ITP, NMU] -- A Python-3 port of the python-adns package

Hi, >Merging the Python 3 modifications into the Python 2 code would mean to make a >lot of changes to the stable Python 2 code. There is a high likeliness that >the >currently stable Python 2 code would not work correctly in some rare >cases any more. So, it is better to leave the stable

uscan for a single text file

Hi, I want to create a watch file for a package that contains a single text file (which itself has the version into it): --8 version=3 http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/IAGA/vmod/igrf.html igrf(\d+)coeffs.txt \ debian debian/repackage.sh

Re: Packaging new upstream version of scid

On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:56:03 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > I did *two* NMU of stockfish for this maintainer, both were new upstream > release, and upstream was making pressure > about updating it. > > So, even if the maintainer is not officially MIA, I

Re: Bug#831370: RFS: dh-runit/0.3

> My question was if log/run is automatically picked up if it exists, or > needs to be installed with an additional command. What is done: * If you have following line in your PACKAGE.runit enable debian/runscript-directory PACKAGE you will have debian/runscript-directory

Re: Bug#831370: RFS: dh-runit/0.3

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 14:38:31 +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > > how are runit features like disabled services (via the "down" file, for > > the case that a service should be visible to runit but not started by > > default) > > At bootup (entering stage 2, more correct), every service in

Bug#829081: RFS: python3-adns/1.2.3-1 [ITP, NMU] -- A Python-3 port of the python-adns package

Hi Gianfranco, Torsdag 30. juni 2016 13.56.15 skrev Gianfranco Costamagna: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi, > > >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python3-adns". This package is a > >Debian packaging of the Python 3 port of python-adns, found at >

Bug#827090: RFS: runit/2.1.2-4 ITP

> it appears that it's time for me to let the runit package go, so, hereby > my acknowledgement to you to adopt the Debian runit package as new > maintainer. I'm positively surprised that after all these years > somebody still is motivated to bring runit integration into Debian > forward. It

Re: Bug#831370: RFS: dh-runit/0.3

> how are runit features like disabled services (via the "down" file, for > the case that a service should be visible to runit but not started by > default) At bootup (entering stage 2, more correct), every service in /etc/service is started. /etc/service contains symbolic links to /etc/sv/, so

Bug#830236: RFS: libcork/0.15.0+ds-4 -- simple, easily embeddable, cross-platform C library

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > >> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcork/0.15.0+ds-5 > > > > some hours ago, I had to retry the build on amd64 and i386 archs if I remember > correctly. > > Retrying the build was fine > (I

Bug#830236: RFS: libcork/0.15.0+ds-4 -- simple, easily embeddable, cross-platform C library

Hi, > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcork/0.15.0+ds-5 some hours ago, I had to retry the build on amd64 and i386 archs if I remember correctly. Retrying the build was fine (I remember it failed for testsuite failures) bug closed, thanks G.

Bug#830236: RFS: libcork/0.15.0+ds-4 -- simple, easily embeddable, cross-platform C library

On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 12:32 AM, Roger Shimizu wrote: > > Just applied your previous patch (partly): https://github.com/rogers0/libcork > It should work now. > Since you gave me the DM upload permision (Thanks so much!), I'll try > to upload after some more changes. Dear

Re: Bug#831370: RFS: dh-runit/0.3

Hi, how are runit features like disabled services (via the "down" file, for the case that a service should be visible to runit, but not started by default) or log services handled? Regards, Tino

Bug#831370: marked as done (RFS: dh-runit/0.3 )

Your message dated Fri, 15 Jul 2016 08:15:23 + (UTC) with message-id <676014666.5466756.1468570523572.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#831370: RFS: dh-runit/0.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #831370, regarding RFS: dh-runit/0.3 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#831370: RFS: dh-runit/0.3

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dh-runit" * Package name: dh-runit Version : 0.3 Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov * Url :