Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta8+20160727+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client
Hello, On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 09:09:31AM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Thank you for your advice. I will not force-push commits from now on. Cool, thanks :) > > (I can obtain the tarball from mentors, but you might consider > > adding it to your git repository using pristine-tar(1).) > > Since it is a debian-source (ds) package, I am not sure which original tarball > should be provided with pristine-tar. Anyway, I put both the ds-modified and > the original tarball with pristine-tar inside now. (Check the > pristine-tar branch.) I meant the tarball that you want to have uploaded to Debian. > FYI, this software is debian-sourced because it used to contain some > useless scripts (custom hacky scripts for deb / rpm / targz packaging) > and a jar file (which is not acceptable in Java packaging). The > ds-version merely delete those files. You can do this if it's convenient, but you don't need to -- it's only non-DFSG-free files that have to be filtered out. You can just not install the .jar, which might be easier than making a +ds tarball everytime upstream makes a new release. Also, you could consider using .xz compression for the orig tarball to save space on the Debian mirror network. You can set that in gbp.conf if you're using gbp to generate tarballs. On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:58:00PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > > Is the GitHub repo that this package is based on a fork of Nevernote? I > > think you should change the Homepage: field to point at the GitHub > > repo. Or are they controlled by the same person? > > They are controlled by the same person and actually they are the *same > project*. Actually the author is still using nevernote page on > Sourceforge to distribute pre-built nixnote2 packages. I filed https://github.com/baumgarr/nixnote2/issues/198 > > Your version number indicates that you are packaging a beta release. > > Generally, only full upstream releases are uploaded to Debian > > unstable, rather than testing releases/release candidates. Is there > > some good reason for using this version? > > Upstream is keeping "beta" string in version for several years and > there is no sign that he/she will make a "non-beta" release in near > future. However the function of nixnote2 is complete and everything > works well now. Personally I think it is suitable for the release. Okay. > > The description of the "exclude opencv linking" doesn't explain why > > opencv support is disabled "for now". Please explain. > > In upstream trunk the opencv-related functions are disabled and > removed. The developer intends to make it into a plugin, so I disabled > related builds. What's more, I noticed that Debian is preparing > opencv2-3 transition, so my personal preference is to pack the > opencv-related plugin after the transition is completed. The opencv patch has now disappeared. Was that deliberate? > > Vcs-* should point at your packaging repository, not the upstream > > git repository. > > Yes. I am pointing to my packaging repository. Sorry! > > You're installing README.md but this file contains no useful > > information. The README.txt file looks more useful. Does that get > > installed to the help/ dir? I couldn't tell without building the > > package, sorry! > > I did not install README.txt, since this file mainly describes the situation > of source (not the binary). Should I install it anyway? I was thinking that the index of other documentation might be useful -- it explains the purpose of theme.ini. shortcut_howto.txt etc. colors.txt is an example file so it should go into /usr/share/doc/nixnote2/examples. There are some problems with your copyright file: - You're using an outdated format, and the URI in Format-Specification: doesn't work. Please check policy for the current format. - You need a "Files: *" paragraph, and "icons/*" doesn't need to be a separate paragraph. - You should add yourself to the copyright for debian/*. - There is a syntax error too :) In the GPL-2+ paragraph. - Looks like the manpage is copyright Vincent Cheng. Docs go in /usr/share/doc/nixnote2 not /usr/share/nixnote2 -- you're installing several to the wrong place, but some to the right place. The comments in your d/rules file are great. Have you filed an upstream bug about the broken `make install`? You could provide them with your d/install file to help. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature
simple-scan/3.21.90-1
Hello Adrian, hello @all, I have a new version of simple-scan ready for a review. * New upstream release: - Updated translations. - Use recent features of gettext, dropping intltool. * Refresh patches/0005-zlib.patch. * Dropping intltool: - debian/control: Remove intltool from Build-Depends. - debian/rules: Remove intltool. * Remove upstream applied patch: - debian/patches/0100-typos.patch. Build with sbuild and pdebuild or ok. The checks with lintian also. Piuparts ends with error about left files (owned by: glib-networking, dconf-gsettings-backend) after purging. +--+ | Summary | +--+ Build Architecture: amd64 Build-Space: 24304 Build-Time: 43 Distribution: sid Host Architecture: amd64 Install-Time: 264 Job: /db/entwicklung/linux/debian/simple-scan/simple-scan_3.21.90-1.dsc Lintian: pass Machine Architecture: amd64 Package: simple-scan Package-Time: 322 Piuparts: fail Source-Version: 3.21.90-1 Space: 24304 Status: successful Version: 3.21.90-1 Finished at 2016-08-24T03:24:23Z Build needed 00:05:22, 24304k disc space The package is uploaded to mentors[1]. Please can someone review this package? Many thanks. CU Jörg [1] https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/simple-scan/simple-scan_3.21.90-1.dsc -- New: GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB 30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D GPG Key: 8CA1D25D CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56 Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31). Jörg Frings-Fürst D-54470 Lieser Threema: SYR8SJXB IRC: j_...@freenode.net j_...@oftc.net My wish list: - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta8+20160727+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo X-Debbugs-CC: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org 2016-08-21 1:02 GMT+08:00 Sean Whitton: > control: tag -1 +moreinfo > > Please don't edit published history -- I wanted to use `git diff` to > check the changes you had made in response to my review, but now I have > to just check the whole package from scratch. Thank you for your advice. I will not force-push commits from now on. > Could you confirm that https://github.com/hosiet/nixnote2 is the version > that should be reviewed, please? Yes. To be more concrete, commit d9e10186a9433a3ca57b8c75427e1926b0164fbc on branch "debian" is the current debian packaging branch. Commit b2d66576bb2b9a3c33fa7cc6af69f703082b54d8 on branch master is the ds-modified upstream source code, and "upstream" branch is the original upstream release. > (I can obtain the tarball from mentors, but you might consider adding it > to your git repository using pristine-tar(1).) Since it is a debian-source (ds) package, I am not sure which original tarball should be provided with pristine-tar. Anyway, I put both the ds-modified and the original tarball with pristine-tar inside now. (Check the pristine-tar branch.) FYI, this software is debian-sourced because it used to contain some useless scripts (custom hacky scripts for deb / rpm / targz packaging) and a jar file (which is not acceptable in Java packaging). The ds-version merely delete those files. The newly-packaged nixnote2 version 2.0~beta9+ds has been pushed onto https://mentors.debian.net/package/nixnote2 and GitHub, in which the only change is to enable pristine-tar support. Thanks and I am still looking forward to further review and sponsorship. -- Regards, Boyuan Yang
shotwell/0.23.5-1
Hello Adrian, Hello @all, I have a new version of shotwell ready for a review. * New upstream release (Closes: #824164, #825788). - Renew Patches. - Remove upstream applied patches: + 0001-buildflags.patch + 0005-hardening.patch + 0500-Port-to-webkit2gtk-40.patch + 0501-Dont-pack-webview-into-a-scrolled-window.patch + 0502-Have-all-soup-sessions-validate-TLS-certificates.patch + 0503-facebook-Dont-disable-XSS-auditor.patch - Close upstream applied bugs: + Fix inconsistent licensing metadata in icons/rejected.svg (Closes: #800902). + Fix crash open files with external editor (Closes: #806248). + Fix background color drawing & fix missing scroll bars in events (Closes: #823835). + Fix install shotwell-settings-migrator and shotwell-video-thumbnailer in /usr/lib/shotwell(Closes: #833236). - debian/copyright: Move copyright to Software Freedom Conservancy Inc. * Rewrite rule at debian/watch. * debian/rules: - To make build reproducible (Closes: #822948): + Fix date handling for non-English locales. + Fix files mode in temp-source tarball. Thanks to Alexis Bienvenüe. - Remove unwanted la files. * New debian/shotwell-common.postrm to rebuild icon cache after purge / remove with test that gtk-update-icon-cache exists and is executable. * debian/control: - Add itstool to Build-Depends. - Change minimal version of libgee-0.8 to 0.10. * debian/shotwell.install: - Remove missing apport/shotwell.py. * Move debian/manpages to debian/shotwell.manpages and use the upstream manpage. * Remove man page from shotwell-common to prevent overlapping file installation. * New patches/0600-remove_wrong_marco.patch to remove the wrong macro 'R'. Build with sbuild and pdebuild or ok. The checks with lintian also. Piuparts ends with error about left files (owned by: glib-networking, dconf-gsettings-backend) after purging. +--+ | Summary | +--+ Build Architecture: amd64 Build-Space: 271376 Build-Time: 350 Distribution: sid Host Architecture: amd64 Install-Time: 264 Job: /db/entwicklung/linux/debian/shotwell/shotwell_0.23.5-1.dsc Lintian: pass Machine Architecture: amd64 Package: shotwell Package-Time: 671 Piuparts: fail Source-Version: 0.23.5-1 Space: 271376 Status: successful Version: 0.23.5-1 Finished at 2016-08-23T21:47:29Z Build needed 00:11:11, 271376k disc space The package is uploaded to mentors[1]. Please can someone review this package? Many thanks. CU Jörg [1] https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/shotwell/shotwell_0.23.5-1.dsc -- New: GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB 30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D GPG Key: 8CA1D25D CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56 Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31). Jörg Frings-Fürst D-54470 Lieser Threema: SYR8SJXB IRC: j_...@freenode.net j_...@oftc.net My wish list: - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
downtimed/1.0-1
Hello Adrian, Hello @all, I have a new version of downtimed ready for a review. * New upstream release. - Remove applied patches: + debian/patches/01-usage_strings.diff + debian/patches/02-tell_about_downtime.diff * Delete debian/source/options because xz is now standard. * debian/control: - Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.8 (no changes required). - Change Vcs-Browser URI to secure protocol and cgit version. * debian/copyright: - Add year 2016. - Change copyright at * to Janne Snabb. * debian/watch: - Bump Version to 4 (no changes required). * debian/rules: - Enable hardening. - Remove oldstyle buildflag export. Build with sbuild and pdebuild or ok. The checks with lintian and piuparts also. +--+ | Summary | +--+ Build Architecture: amd64 Build-Space: 1140 Build-Time: 8 Distribution: sid Host Architecture: amd64 Install-Time: 34 Job: /db/entwicklung/linux/debian/downtimed/downtimed_1.0-1.dsc Lintian: pass Machine Architecture: amd64 Package: downtimed Package-Time: 160 Piuparts: pass Source-Version: 1.0-1 Space: 1140 Status: successful Version: 1.0-1 Finished at 2016-08-23T20:51:01Z Build needed 00:02:40, 1140k disc space The package is uploaded to mentors[1]. Please can someone review this package? Many thanks. CU Jörg [1] https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/downtimed/downtimed_1.0-1.dsc -- New: GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB 30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D GPG Key: 8CA1D25D CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56 Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31). Jörg Frings-Fürst D-54470 Lieser Threema: SYR8SJXB IRC: j_...@freenode.net j_...@oftc.net My wish list: - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#835253: RFS: steghide/0.5.1-11 [QA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "steghide" * Package name: steghide Version : 0.5.1-11 Upstream Author : Stefan Hetzl* URL : http://steghide.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Section : misc It builds those binary package: steghide - A steganography hiding tool To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/steghide Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/steghide/steghide_0.5.1-11.dsc Changes since the last upload: * QA upload. [ Aurelien Jarno ] * debian/rules: added dh_autotools-dev_updateconfig and dh_autotools-dev_restoreconfig to fix FTBFS on new architectures such as arm64 and ppc64el. Closes: #759453 Regards, Fernando Seiti Furusato
Bug#834570: marked as done (RFS: shark/3.1.1+ds1-1 [RC])
Your message dated Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:27:54 + with message-idand subject line closing RFS: shark/3.1.1+ds1-1 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #834570, regarding RFS: shark/3.1.1+ds1-1 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 834570: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834570 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "shark" * Package name: shark Version : 3.1.1+ds1-1 Upstream Author : Christian Igel * URL : http://image.diku.dk/shark/ * License : LGPL-3 Section : science It builds those binary packages: libshark-dev - development files for Shark libshark0 - Shark machine learning library shark-doc - documentation and examples for Shark To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/shark Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/shark/shark_3.1.1+ds1-1.dsc Successful build on debomatic: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/shark/3.1.1+ds1-1/buildlog Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release. (Closes: #820701) * Bump standards version to 3.9.8, no changes required. * Build documentation with doxylink enabled. * Drop excessive patching of examples. * Only install API documentation to -doc package. * Clean artifacts from build of documentation. * Disable version query via svnversion. * Fix buggy HDF5 testcase in upstream testsuite. * Cherry-pick patch series fixing current FTBFS. (Closes: #831121) * Drop debug package in favor of autogenerated dbgsym. * Disable execution of slow test cases. * Miscalleneous changes to d/rules: - Add comment for DH_VERBOSE. - Remove query for DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH. - s/CMAKE_BUILD_OPTIONS/BUILD_OPTIONS. - Remove superfluous comments. Regards, Ghislain Vaillant --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package shark has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Bug#834768: marked as done (RFS: codicefiscale/0.9+ds0-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:27:54 + with message-idand subject line closing RFS: codicefiscale/0.9+ds0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #834768, regarding RFS: codicefiscale/0.9+ds0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 834768: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834768 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "codicefiscale" * Package name: codicefiscale Version : 0.9-1 Upstream Author : Emanuele Rocca * URL : https://github.com/ema/pycodicefiscale * License : LGPL-2.1+ Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-codicefiscale - Generate and validate Italian "codice fiscale" (Python 2.x) python3-codicefiscale - Generate and validate Italian "codice fiscale" (Python 3.x) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/codicefiscale Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/codicefiscale/codicefiscale_0.9-1.dsc Or directly from git at: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/python-modules/packages/codicefiscale.git This is the first upload for this package (the it ITP bug is at https://bugs.debian.org/834710 ). Regards, -- Elena ``of Valhalla'' Grandi signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package codicefiscale has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Bug#835212: marked as done (RFS: fplll/5.0.0-1)
Your message dated Tue, 23 Aug 2016 15:02:43 + (UTC) with message-id <976162127.31184456.1471964563582.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#835212: RFS: fplll/5.0.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #835212, regarding RFS: fplll/5.0.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 835212: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835212 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fplll" * Package name: fplll Version : 5.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Damien Stehlé et al * URL : https://github.com/fplll/fplll/ * License : LGPL-2.1+ Section : math It builds those binary packages: fplll-tools - Tools to compute LLL-reduction of Euclidian lattices libfplll-dev - Library for LLL-reduction of Euclidean lattices, development libfplll0 - Library for LLL-reduction of Euclidean lattices, runtime To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/fplll Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fplll/fplll_5.0.0-1.dsc It is packaged within the Debian Science team, as part of the effort to package sagemath: Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/fplll.git Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/fplll.git Changes since the last upload: [Ximin Lio] * Install pkgconfig file. * Prepare a package for an upstream prerelease (for sagemath use) [Julien Puydt] * New stable upstream release. * Bump standards-version up. * Use https in Vcs-* fields. * Complete d/copyright. * Enable all hardening options. * Added a patch for typos. * Added a patch for the pkgconfig script. * Added a manpage for latsieve. Cheers, Snark on #debian-science --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fplll" on deferred/2, because I'm not sure you want to go for unstable. G.--- End Message ---
Bug#835212: RFS: fplll/5.0.0-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fplll" * Package name: fplll Version : 5.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Damien Stehlé et al * URL : https://github.com/fplll/fplll/ * License : LGPL-2.1+ Section : math It builds those binary packages: fplll-tools - Tools to compute LLL-reduction of Euclidian lattices libfplll-dev - Library for LLL-reduction of Euclidean lattices, development libfplll0 - Library for LLL-reduction of Euclidean lattices, runtime To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/fplll Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fplll/fplll_5.0.0-1.dsc It is packaged within the Debian Science team, as part of the effort to package sagemath: Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/fplll.git Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/fplll.git Changes since the last upload: [Ximin Lio] * Install pkgconfig file. * Prepare a package for an upstream prerelease (for sagemath use) [Julien Puydt] * New stable upstream release. * Bump standards-version up. * Use https in Vcs-* fields. * Complete d/copyright. * Enable all hardening options. * Added a patch for typos. * Added a patch for the pkgconfig script. * Added a manpage for latsieve. Cheers, Snark on #debian-science
Bug#835183: marked as done (RFS: dh-sysuser/0.1 ITP)
Your message dated Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:30:55 + (UTC) with message-id <1348729400.30801180.1471955455937.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#835183: RFS: dh-sysuser/0.1 ITP has caused the Debian Bug report #835183, regarding RFS: dh-sysuser/0.1 ITP to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 835183: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835183 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dh-sysuser" * Package name: dh-sysuser Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov* Url : https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/dh-sysuser.git * Licenses: GPL-3+ Section : unknown It builds those binary packages: * dh-sysuser To access futher information about this package, visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/dh-sysuser Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dh-sysuser/dh-sysuser_0.1.dsc Alternatively, you can access package debian/ directory via git from URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/dh-sysuser.git More information about dh-sysuser can be obtained from https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/dh-sysuser.git Packages runit, dh-sysuser and dh-runit should be uploaded together, since runit_2.1.2-5 will not build with dh-runit_1.5 and runit_2.1.2-6 will not build with dh-runit (<< 1). Regards, Dmitry Bogatov From: Dmitry Bogatov To: sub...@bugs.debian.org Subject: RFS: dh-sysuser/0.1 ITP X-Debug-Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dh-sysuser" * Package name: dh-sysuser Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov * Url : https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/dh-sysuser.git * Licenses: GPL-3+ Section : admin It builds those binary packages: * dh-sysuser To access futher information about this package, visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/dh-sysuser Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dh-sysuser/dh-sysuser_0.1.dsc Alternatively, you can access package debian/ directory via git from URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/dh-sysuser.git More information about dh-sysuser can be obtained from https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/dh-sysuser.git Packages runit, dh-sysuser and dh-runit should be uploaded together, since runit_2.1.2-5 will not build with dh-runit_1.5 and runit_2.1.2-6 will not build with dh-runit (<< 1). Regards, Dmitry Bogatov --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dh-sysuser" uploaded, even if I failed to see the interactions between *runit and this package. BTW you have an empty debian/docs file, please remove it on next upload. G.--- End Message ---
Bug#835184: marked as done (RFS: runit/2.1.2-6)
Your message dated Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:24:05 + (UTC) with message-id <652381758.30897258.1471955045340.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#835184: RFS: runit/2.1.2-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #835184, regarding RFS: runit/2.1.2-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 835184: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835184 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runit" * Package name: runit Version : 2.1.2-6 Upstream Author : Gerrit Pape* Url : http://smarden.org/runit/ * Licenses: BSD-3-clause Section : admin It builds those binary packages: * runit * runit-systemd * runit-sysv * getty-run * runit-init To access futher information about this package, visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/runit Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/runit/runit_2.1.2-6.dsc Alternatively, you can access package debian/ directory via git from URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/runit.git More information about runit can be obtained from http://smarden.org/runit/ Changes since last upload: * Fix factual error in runsv(8) (Closes: #814044) * Create FAQ and document in it purpose of executable logfiles (Closes: #784276) * set KillSignal=SIGHUP and KillMode=process in systemd runit to assure clean shutdown of runit tasks (Closes: #810328) (Thanks: Johannes Ziemke ) * Fix compatibility with dh-runit (>= 1.5) * Fix description in systemd unit file (Closes: #835064) Packages runit, dh-sysuser and dh-runit should be uploaded together, since runit_2.1.2-5 will not build with dh-runit_1.5 and runit_2.1.2-6 will not build with dh-runit (<< 1). Regards, Dmitry Bogatov --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runit" in deferred/1 and reschedule as soon as dh-runit is in G.--- End Message ---
Bug#835182: marked as done (RFS: dh-runit/1.5)
Your message dated Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:22:03 + (UTC) with message-id <216608194.131184.1471954923930.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#835182: RFS: dh-runit/1.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #835182, regarding RFS: dh-runit/1.5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 835182: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835182 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dh-runit" * Package name: dh-runit Version : 1.5 Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov* Url : https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/dh-runit.git * Licenses: GPL-3+ Section : admin It builds those binary packages: * dh-runit To access futher information about this package, visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/dh-runit Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dh-runit/dh-runit_1.5.dsc Alternatively, you can access package debian/ directory via git from URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/dh-runit.git More information about dh-runit can be obtained from https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/dh-runit.git Changes since last upload: * Breaking change package.runit file format to improve interoperability with other tools (supply dh_runit arguments on command line) and make format extensible. See dh_runit(1). * Introduce support for automatic generation of log scripts. * Fix typo in mkdir option. * Force shutdown of service we are uninstalling. Otherwise, it would be 5 seconds gap, when process are still alive. * Clean-up supervision directory of log process too. Packages runit, dh-sysuser and dh-runit should be uploaded together, since runit_2.1.2-5 will not build with dh-runit_1.5 and runit_2.1.2-6 will not build with dh-runit (<< 1). Regards, Dmitry Bogatov --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, >http://mentors.debian.net/package/dh-runit uploaded. G.--- End Message ---
Bug#835183: RFS: dh-sysuser/0.1 ITP
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dh-sysuser" * Package name: dh-sysuser Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov* Url : https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/dh-sysuser.git * Licenses: GPL-3+ Section : unknown It builds those binary packages: * dh-sysuser To access futher information about this package, visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/dh-sysuser Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dh-sysuser/dh-sysuser_0.1.dsc Alternatively, you can access package debian/ directory via git from URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/dh-sysuser.git More information about dh-sysuser can be obtained from https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/dh-sysuser.git Packages runit, dh-sysuser and dh-runit should be uploaded together, since runit_2.1.2-5 will not build with dh-runit_1.5 and runit_2.1.2-6 will not build with dh-runit (<< 1). Regards, Dmitry Bogatov From: Dmitry Bogatov To: sub...@bugs.debian.org Subject: RFS: dh-sysuser/0.1 ITP X-Debug-Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dh-sysuser" * Package name: dh-sysuser Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov * Url : https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/dh-sysuser.git * Licenses: GPL-3+ Section : admin It builds those binary packages: * dh-sysuser To access futher information about this package, visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/dh-sysuser Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dh-sysuser/dh-sysuser_0.1.dsc Alternatively, you can access package debian/ directory via git from URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/dh-sysuser.git More information about dh-sysuser can be obtained from https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/dh-sysuser.git Packages runit, dh-sysuser and dh-runit should be uploaded together, since runit_2.1.2-5 will not build with dh-runit_1.5 and runit_2.1.2-6 will not build with dh-runit (<< 1). Regards, Dmitry Bogatov
Bug#835184: RFS: runit/2.1.2-6
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runit" * Package name: runit Version : 2.1.2-6 Upstream Author : Gerrit Pape* Url : http://smarden.org/runit/ * Licenses: BSD-3-clause Section : admin It builds those binary packages: * runit * runit-systemd * runit-sysv * getty-run * runit-init To access futher information about this package, visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/runit Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/runit/runit_2.1.2-6.dsc Alternatively, you can access package debian/ directory via git from URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/runit.git More information about runit can be obtained from http://smarden.org/runit/ Changes since last upload: * Fix factual error in runsv(8) (Closes: #814044) * Create FAQ and document in it purpose of executable logfiles (Closes: #784276) * set KillSignal=SIGHUP and KillMode=process in systemd runit to assure clean shutdown of runit tasks (Closes: #810328) (Thanks: Johannes Ziemke ) * Fix compatibility with dh-runit (>= 1.5) * Fix description in systemd unit file (Closes: #835064) Packages runit, dh-sysuser and dh-runit should be uploaded together, since runit_2.1.2-5 will not build with dh-runit_1.5 and runit_2.1.2-6 will not build with dh-runit (<< 1). Regards, Dmitry Bogatov
Bug#835182: RFS: dh-runit/1.5
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dh-runit" * Package name: dh-runit Version : 1.5 Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov* Url : https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/dh-runit.git * Licenses: GPL-3+ Section : admin It builds those binary packages: * dh-runit To access futher information about this package, visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/dh-runit Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dh-runit/dh-runit_1.5.dsc Alternatively, you can access package debian/ directory via git from URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/dh-runit.git More information about dh-runit can be obtained from https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/dh-runit.git Changes since last upload: * Breaking change package.runit file format to improve interoperability with other tools (supply dh_runit arguments on command line) and make format extensible. See dh_runit(1). * Introduce support for automatic generation of log scripts. * Fix typo in mkdir option. * Force shutdown of service we are uninstalling. Otherwise, it would be 5 seconds gap, when process are still alive. * Clean-up supervision directory of log process too. Packages runit, dh-sysuser and dh-runit should be uploaded together, since runit_2.1.2-5 will not build with dh-runit_1.5 and runit_2.1.2-6 will not build with dh-runit (<< 1). Regards, Dmitry Bogatov
Bug#835159: marked as done (RFS: cdist/4.3.1-1 )
Your message dated Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:54:25 + (UTC) with message-id <1893393993.30716953.1471946065535.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#835159: RFS: cdist/4.3.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #835159, regarding RFS: cdist/4.3.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 835159: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835159 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cdist" * Package name: cdist Version : 4.3.1-1 Upstream Author : Nico Schottelius* Url : http://www.nico.schottelius.org/software/cdist/ * Licenses: GPL-3,GPL-3+ Section : admin It builds those binary packages: * cdist * cdist-doc To access futher information about this package, visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/cdist Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cdist/cdist_4.3.1-1.dsc Alternatively, you can access package debian/ directory via git from URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/cdist.git More information about cdist can be obtained from http://www.nico.schottelius.org/software/cdist/ Changes since last upload: * New upstream release Regards, Dmitry Bogatov --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, >Fixed. Going to discuss with upstream about maintaining copyright file >on their side. I like it. G.--- End Message ---
Bug#835159: RFS: cdist/4.3.1-1
> control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo > >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cdist" > fix copyright and try again. Fixed. Going to discuss with upstream about maintaining copyright file on their side. -- Accept: text/plain, text/x-diff Accept-Language: eo,en,ru X-Web-Site: sinsekvu.github.io
Bug#835169: marked as done (RFS: vsftpd/3.0.3-6 [ITA])
Your message dated Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:34:27 + (UTC) with message-id <1316376214.30619126.1471944867965.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#835169: RFS: vsftpd/3.0.3-6 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #835169, regarding RFS: vsftpd/3.0.3-6 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 835169: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835169 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vsftpd" and also set up the DM permission for me. * Package name: vsftpd Version : 3.0.3-6 Upstream Author : Chris Evans* URL : http://security.appspot.com/downloads/ * License : GPL-2 with SSL exception Section : net It builds those binary packages: vsftpd - lightweight, efficient FTP server written for security vsftpd-dbg - lightweight, efficient FTP server written for security (debug) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/vsftpd Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vsftpd/vsftpd_3.0.3-6.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: * New maintainer (Closes: #824694) * Update the Debian Policy to 3.9.8 * Add libeatmydata1 in package Depends * Fixed debian/watch Regards, Keng-Yu Lin --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vsftpd" > and also set up the DM permission for me. done, but I had to add a newline on changelog line 17 @@ -5,7 +14,6 @@ - thanks Louis Bouchard and Jeremy Bicha -- Gianfranco Costamagna Tue, 05 Jul 2016 08:55:01 +0200 - vsftpd (3.0.3-4) unstable; urgency=medium * Orphan this package. seems that you removed it by error? also you are now DM for it :) thanks, G.--- End Message ---
Bug#835169: RFS: vsftpd/3.0.3-6 [ITA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vsftpd" and also set up the DM permission for me. * Package name: vsftpd Version : 3.0.3-6 Upstream Author : Chris Evans* URL : http://security.appspot.com/downloads/ * License : GPL-2 with SSL exception Section : net It builds those binary packages: vsftpd - lightweight, efficient FTP server written for security vsftpd-dbg - lightweight, efficient FTP server written for security (debug) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/vsftpd Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vsftpd/vsftpd_3.0.3-6.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: * New maintainer (Closes: #824694) * Update the Debian Policy to 3.9.8 * Add libeatmydata1 in package Depends * Fixed debian/watch Regards, Keng-Yu Lin
Bug#834924: marked as done (RFS: lua-torch-nngraph/0~20160804-g40e4207-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:54:49 + (UTC) with message-id <252267779.30694286.1471942489729.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#834924: RFS: lua-torch-nngraph/0~20160804-g40e4207-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #834924, regarding RFS: lua-torch-nngraph/0~20160804-g40e4207-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 834924: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834924 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Debomatic-amd64: passing http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/lua-torch-nngraph/0~20160804-g40e4207-1/buildlog Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-torch-nngraph" * Package name: lua-torch-nngraph Version : 0~20160804-g40e4207-1 Upstream Author : torch developers * URL : github.com/torch/nngraph * License : bsd-3-clause Section : interpreters It builds those binary packages: lua-torch-nngraph - Neural Network Graph Package for Torch Framework To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/lua-torch-nngraph Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lua-torch-nngraph/lua-torch-nngraph_0~20160804-g40e4207-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: lua-torch-nngraph (0~20160804-g40e4207-1) experimental; urgency=low * Initial release. Closes: #827433 -- Best, Lumin --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, > >Debomatic-amd64: passing >http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/lua-torch-nngraph/0~20160804-g40e4207-1/buildlog ok for this one too. G.--- End Message ---
Bug#834925: marked as done (RFS: lua-torch-xlua/0~20160617-g0dd5f4c-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:53:54 + (UTC) with message-id <865848337.30702910.1471942434069.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#834925: RFS: lua-torch-xlua/0~20160617-g0dd5f4c-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #834925, regarding RFS: lua-torch-xlua/0~20160617-g0dd5f4c-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 834925: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834925 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Debomatic-amd64: passing http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/lua-torch-xlua/0~20160617-g0dd5f4c-1/buildlog Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-torch-xlua" * Package name: lua-torch-xlua Version : 0~20160617-g0dd5f4c-1 Upstream Author : torch developers * URL : github.com/torch/xlua * License : bsd-3-clause and mit license (expat) Section : interpreters It builds those binary packages: lua-torch-xlua - Lua Extension Package for Torch Framework To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/lua-torch-xlua Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lua-torch-xlua/lua-torch-xlua_0~20160617-g0dd5f4c-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: lua-torch-xlua (0~20160617-g0dd5f4c-1) experimental; urgency=low * Initial release. Closes: #826793 -- Best, Lumin --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, >Debomatic-amd64: passing >http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/lua-torch-xlua/0~20160617-g0dd5f4c-1/buildlog ok for this one too. (you could probably simplify the BSD-3 license in debian/copyright, no need to list it twice) G.--- End Message ---
Bug#834926: marked as done (RFS: lua-torch-sundown/0~20160713-g8353f5a-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:47:00 + (UTC) with message-id <59797.30564458.1471942020049.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#834926: RFS: lua-torch-sundown/0~20160713-g8353f5a-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #834926, regarding RFS: lua-torch-sundown/0~20160713-g8353f5a-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 834926: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834926 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-torch-sundown" * Package name: lua-torch-sundown Version : 0~20160713-g8353f5a-1 Upstream Author : torch developers * URL : github.com/torch/sundown-ffi * License : bsd-3-clause and ISC Section : interpreters It builds those binary packages: lua-torch-sundown - Sundown Library (a Markdown implementation) for Torch Framework To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/lua-torch-sundown Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lua-torch-sundown/lua-torch-sundown_0~20160713-g8353f5a-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: lua-torch-sundown (0~20160713-g8353f5a-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release. Closes: #827430 -- Best, Lumin --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, > https://mentors.debian.net/package/lua-torch-sundown > > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: ok for me G.--- End Message ---
Bug#835025: marked as done (RFS: lua-torch-torch7/0~20160803-g17ff317-2)
Your message dated Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:49:31 + (UTC) with message-id <1666785545.30773928.1471942171427.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#835025: RFS: lua-torch-torch7/0~20160803-g17ff317-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #835025, regarding RFS: lua-torch-torch7/0~20160803-g17ff317-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 835025: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835025 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Debomatic-amd64: passing http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/lua-torch-torch7/0~20160803-g17ff317-2/buildlog Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-torch-torch7" * Package name: lua-torch-torch7 Version : 0~20160803-g17ff317-2 Upstream Author : torch developers * URL : github.com/torch/torch7 * License : bsd-3-clause Section : interpreters It builds those binary packages: libtorch-luat - libluaT.so of Torch Package for Torch Framework libtorch-luat-dev - libluaT.so of Torch Package for Torch Framework (dev) libtorch-th - libTH.so of Torch Package for Torch Framework libtorch-th-dev - libTH.so of Torch Package for Torch Framework (dev) lua-torch-torch7 - Torch Package for Torch Framework lua-torch-torch7-dev - Torch Package for Torch Framework (dev) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/lua-torch-torch7 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lua-torch-torch7/lua-torch-torch7_0~20160803-g17ff317-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: lua-torch-torch7 (0~20160803-g17ff317-2) experimental; urgency=medium * Symlink the document directory to the lua directory, in order to fix the lua-torch-dok support. * Diverge the symbols control file of libTH.so for amd64 and i386, since SSE and AVX instruction sets are missing on other architectures. * Override dh_auto_test to run upstream unit test `torch.test()` . * Don't compress markdown document files (*.md), lua-torch-dok doesn't recognize compressed documentations. -- Best, Lumin --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, >Debomatic-amd64: passing >http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/lua-torch-torch7/0~20160803-g17ff317-2/buildlog ok for me G.--- End Message ---
Bug#835081: marked as done (RFS: iptables-persistent/1.0.4+nmu1 [NMU] [RC])
Your message dated Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:38:34 + (UTC) with message-id <1026842251.30750380.1471941515157.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#835081: RFS: iptables-persistent/1.0.4+nmu1 [NMU] [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #835081, regarding RFS: iptables-persistent/1.0.4+nmu1 [NMU] [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 835081: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835081 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Hello, I'm looking for a sponsor for my NMU on iptables-persistent It closes an RC bug, I've validated the fix my machines with different network configurations. the debdiff is attached I've worked with iptables-persistent git repo but I won't push my changes until the updated package is on the archive. Also the binary can be downloaded from -mentors https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/iptables-persistent/iptables-persistent_1.0.4+nmu1.dsc Changes since the last upload: iptables-persistent (1.0.4+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Loads the firewall before network-pre.target, as suggested by systemd upstream. (Closes: #829640). thanks! -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/changelog iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/changelog --- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/changelog 2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800 +++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/changelog 2016-08-21 13:05:39.0 +0800 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +iptables-persistent (1.0.4+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Loads the firewall before network-pre.target, as suggested by systemd +upstream. (Closes: #829640). + + -- gustavo panizzoSun, 21 Aug 2016 13:05:39 +0800 + iptables-persistent (1.0.4) unstable; urgency=medium * [d52b9e] During flush, set policy before flushing rules (Closes: #749790) diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/compat iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/compat --- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/compat 2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800 +++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/compat 2016-08-21 13:05:06.0 +0800 @@ -1 +1 @@ -7 +9 diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/control iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/control --- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/control 2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800 +++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/control 2016-08-21 13:05:06.0 +0800 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Jonathan Wiltshire Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~), dh-systemd, po-debconf -Standards-Version: 3.9.5 +Standards-Version: 3.9.6 Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/iptables-persistent.git/ Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/iptables-persistent.git diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/rules iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/rules --- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/debian/rules 2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800 +++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/debian/rules 2016-08-21 13:05:06.0 +0800 @@ -4,5 +4,5 @@ dh_installinit -- start 37 S . stop 37 0 1 6 . %: - dh --with systemd $@ + dh $@ --with systemd diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/plugins/15-ip4tables iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/plugins/15-ip4tables --- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/plugins/15-ip4tables 2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800 +++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/plugins/15-ip4tables 2016-08-21 13:05:06.0 +0800 @@ -35,8 +35,8 @@ if [ ! -f /proc/net/ip_tables_names ]; then echo "Warning: skipping IPv4 (no modules loaded)" elif [ -x /sbin/iptables-save ]; then -touch /etc/iptables/rules.v4 -chmod 0640 /etc/iptables/rules.v4 + touch /etc/iptables/rules.v4 + chmod 0640 /etc/iptables/rules.v4 iptables-save > /etc/iptables/rules.v4 if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then rc=1 diff -Nru iptables-persistent-1.0.4/plugins/25-ip6tables iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/plugins/25-ip6tables --- iptables-persistent-1.0.4/plugins/25-ip6tables 2016-01-03 03:46:08.0 +0800 +++ iptables-persistent-1.0.4+nmu1/plugins/25-ip6tables 2016-08-21 13:05:06.0 +0800 @@ -35,8 +35,8 @@ if [ ! -f /proc/net/ip6_tables_names ]; then
Bug#835159: RFS: cdist/4.3.1-1
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cdist" fix copyright and try again. G.