Bug#847969: marked as done (RFS: libpam-ldap/186-2)

Your message dated Thu, 29 Dec 2016 11:29:54 +0500 with message-id <20161229062954.o7g7k7p4awl4l...@belkar.wrar.name> and subject line Re: Bug#847969: RFS: libpam-ldap/186-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #847969, regarding RFS: libpam-ldap/186-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#847969: RFS: libpam-ldap/186-2

Uploaded, thanks. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#849521: Package updated

Removed moreinfo tag since I have corrected or overrode all lintian errors/warnings. Rationale for my changes should be evident from the email exchanges above. Looking forward to any feedback and potential sponsorship  thanks so much! -Taylor

Bug#849521: Assistance with packaging ruTorrent

> Remove the file from the tarball, you shouldn't use it anyway, use the > libjs-jquery-flot package instead. Oh, nice! Thank you for pointing that out! Got it :) > > 2. Two source-is-missing errors that are false positives because of a long > > line in the source file. > Why do you think they

Bug#848687: RFS: yasnippet-snippets_0~git20161123-1

Hello Alberto, On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:43:29PM +0100, Alberto Luaces wrote: > I have now pushed a new release. Did someone else upload 0~git20161123-1? If not, you should merge the changelog entries for -1 and -2. It's just confusing to have changlog entries that never made it into the

Bug#849489: RFS: darksnow/0.7.1-1 [QA]

Hello again I shall go through it with a fine toothcomb over the next few days. Yes, this may be a better method. At the moment, I make changes as I can, which can result in loosing track of what I've done. I shall experiment with using git like this and see how I go on. With the packages that

Bug#849489: RFS: darksnow/0.7.1-1 [QA]

Hello David, On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 10:53:00PM +, David Davies-Jones wrote: > I shall go through it with a fine toothcomb over the next few days. Yes, this > may be a better method. At the moment, I make changes as I can, which can > result in loosing track of what I've done. I shall

Bug#849489: RFS: darksnow/0.7.1-1 [QA]

control: owner -1 ! Hello David, On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 09:12:49PM +, David Davies-Jones wrote: > I've tried addressing the issues you've raised and re-uploaded to mentors. If > there are any more problems please let me know Thanks for your updated package. I'm sorry not to have raised

Bug#848687: RFS: yasnippet-snippets_0~git20161123-1

Sean Whitton writes: > Hello Alberto, > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 09:31:53PM +0100, Alberto Luaces wrote: >> Thanks, Sean. I have addressed the gbp.conf and changelog issues and I >> think the realease is ready to go. > > Thanks again for your work. > > gbp.conf says upstream-branch=upstream but

Bug#848687: RFS: yasnippet-snippets_0~git20161123-1

Hello Alberto, On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 09:31:53PM +0100, Alberto Luaces wrote: > Thanks, Sean. I have addressed the gbp.conf and changelog issues and I > think the realease is ready to go. Thanks again for your work. gbp.conf says upstream-branch=upstream but your upstream sources are on a

Bug#849581: RFS: numpydoc/0.6.0+ds1-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "numpydoc" * Package name: numpydoc   Version : 0.6.0+ds1-1   Upstream Author : Pauli Virtanen and others * URL : https://github.com/numpy/numpydoc * License :

Bug#849553: marked as done (RFS: python-coards/1.0.5-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2016 21:27:01 + with message-id <1482960421.1926.4.ca...@gmail.com> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #849553, regarding RFS: python-coards/1.0.5-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#849560: marked as done (RFS: python-imageio/2.1.1+ds1-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2016 21:26:22 + with message-id <1482960382.1926.3.ca...@gmail.com> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #849560, regarding RFS: python-imageio/2.1.1+ds1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#849489: RFS: darksnow/0.7.1-1 [QA]

Hello I've tried addressing the issues you've raised and re-uploaded to mentors. If there are any more problems please let me know Many thanks David Jones On 27 December 2016 at 22:07, Sean Whitton wrote: > control: tag -1 +moreinfo > > Dear David, > > Thanks for

Bug#849521: Assistance with packaging ruTorrent

On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 02:56:17PM -0500, Taylor Kline wrote: > 1. A source-is-missing error: > > js/jquery.flot.js line length is 3134 characters (>512) > > This one occurs because the library flot (https://github.com/flot/flot), > which does not have a later release from the included release

Bug#848687: RFS: yasnippet-snippets_0~git20161123-1

Thanks, Sean. I have addressed the gbp.conf and changelog issues and I think the realease is ready to go. Please tell me if you think that something is still missing.

Bug#849521: Assistance with packaging ruTorrent

Hello JavaScript Team, I have a package pending with a Request for Sponsorship (my first package), and I am blocked with the following lintian errors: 1. A source-is-missing error: js/jquery.flot.js line length is 3134 characters (>512) This one occurs because the library flot

Bug#849521: RFS: rutorrent/3.7-1 [ITP] -- A front-end for the rTorrent torrent client

Thank you for your prompt attention! I will email the JS mailing list. On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: > control: tag -1 +moreinfo > > Dear Taylor, > > Thanks for this package. Looks interesting. > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 11:26:30PM -0500,

Bug#849560: RFS: python-imageio/2.1.1+ds1-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-imageio" * Package name: python-imageio   Version : 2.1.1+ds1-1   Upstream Author : Almar Klein * URL :

Bug#849553: RFS: python-coards/1.0.5-1 [ITP]

Hi Ben, thanks for reviewing my package. On Thu, 2016-12-29 at 02:17 +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > Please add a paragraph to the description(s) which state what “the > COARDS convention” means — enough for someone unfamiliar with that term > to decide whether they want the package. Done, please

Bug#849553: RFS: python-coards/1.0.5-1 [ITP]

Ghislain Vaillant writes: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-coards" Thank you for working to improve Debian. The package description should give the reader enough information to make a decision about whether they are interested in the package. That

Bug#849553: RFS: python-coards/1.0.5-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-coards" * Package name: python-coards   Version : 1.0.5-1   Upstream Author : Roberto De Almeida * URL : http://code.dealmeida.net/coards * License :

Bug#849521: RFS: rutorrent/3.7-1 [ITP] -- A front-end for the rTorrent torrent client

control: tag -1 +moreinfo Dear Taylor, Thanks for this package. Looks interesting. On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 11:26:30PM -0500, Taylor Kline wrote: > lintian is throwing the following 'serious' errors that I haven't been > entirely > sure what to do with: > >   jquery.flot.js source missing -

Bug#848687: RFS: yasnippet-snippets_0~git20161123-1

control: owner -1 ! control: tag -1 +moreinfo Hello Alberto, On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 04:48:05PM +0100, Alberto Luaces wrote: > After cloning the mentioned repository, one can generate both the source > and the binary packages from it issuing > > gbp buildpackage --git-debian-branch=debian