Bug#855101: RFS: bcron/0.11-1

2017-02-13 Thread Dmitry Bogatov

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bcron"

* Package name : bcron
  Version  : 0.11-1
  Upstream Author  : Bruce Guenter 
* Url  : http://untroubled.org/bcron
* Licenses : GPL-2+
  Programming Lang : C
  Section  : admin

 ${S:Long-Desc}
 .
 This package contains the bcron programs.

It builds those binary packages:

  * bcron
  * bcron-run

To access further information about this package, visit the following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/bcron

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bcron/bcron_0.11-1.dsc

Alternatively, you can access package debian/ directory via git from URL:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/bcron.git

More information about bcron can be obtained from
http://untroubled.org/bcron

Changes since last upload:

  * New upstream release
  * Force dependency on bglibs-2.*
  * Refresh patches
  * Do not assume ${USER} value in tests.sh
  * Restore default bcron-spool socket location
(Drop 0002-Spool-socket-is-var-run-.bcron-spool-instead-of-var-r.diff)
  * Enable hardening=+pie

Regards,
  Dmitry Bogatov



Bug#832941: Closing inactive RFS

2017-02-13 Thread Sean Whitton
Please feel free to re-open if you have an updated source package.

-- 
Sean Whitton


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#851606: RFS: rmlint/2.4.6-1 [ITP]

2017-02-13 Thread Carlos Maddela
Dear Roger,

Thanks for your suggestions. I have made the fixes and re-uploaded the
source files as the same version (since it still has yet to be
officially released) to mentors. I have applied for access to
collab-maint (just a few minutes ago), so I probably won't be able to
push my changes for another 24 hours. For the meantime, my changes are
available in the debian branch of https://github.com/e7appew/rmlint.git.

This is the updated RFS:

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rmlint"

 * Package name: rmlint
   Version : 2.4.6-1
   Upstream Author : Christopher Pahl 
 * URL : https://rmlint.readthedocs.io/
 * License : GPL-3
   Section : utils

  It builds these binary packages:

 rmlint - Extremely fast tool to remove filesystem lint
 rmlint-doc - HTML documentation for rmlint
 rmlint-gui - GTK+ frontend to rmlint

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/rmlint


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rmlint/rmlint_2.4.6-1.dsc

  More information about rmlint can be obtained from
https://rmlint.readthedocs.io/.

  Changes since the last upload:

  rmlint (2.4.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Initial upload to Debian. Thanks to Axel Beckert for getting
it all started, and to Roger Shimizu for suggested improvements.
(Closes: #845155)

 -- Carlos Maddela   Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:04:33 +1100

  Regards,
   Carlos Maddela


On 10/02/17 00:21, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
>
> Dear Carlos,
>
> I cannot sponsor the upload. But here's my review that I hope it's helpful.
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 3:56 AM, Carlos Maddela  wrote:
>>   I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rmlint"
>>
>>  * Package name: rmlint
>>Version : 2.4.6-1
>>Upstream Author : Christopher Pahl 
>>  * URL : https://rmlint.readthedocs.io/
>>  * License : GPL-3
>>Section : utils
> Here're the items need to be fixed:
>  - license/copyright
>There're many files not under GPL-3, which need to be mentioned in
> d/copyright
>
>  - There's Vcs-* line set for collab-maint, but I cannot access it.
>Please push your work in collab-maint or other git repo, which make
> the review easier.
>
>  - There's doc/ folder, but you didn't install them?
>
> Cheers,



Bug#854807: RFS: smplayer/17.2.0~ds0-1

2017-02-13 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: tags -1 moreinfo


>Done. Experimental version uploaded to mentors.



missing copyrights, outdated copyright years
Ori Rejwan
+ * Copyright (c) 2004-2013 Sergey Lyubka
+ * Copyright (c) 2013-2015 Cesanta Software Limited

+ * Copyright (c) 2016 Cesanta Software Limited

Eike Hein 
Christian Esken 
FullMetalCoder
matt_ 

Sebastian Wiedenroth 
2013 Digia Plc

Don't know how many more


licensecheck reports many BSD-2 and BSD-3 files

G.



Bug#849493: RFS: vc/1.3.0-1 [ITP]

2017-02-13 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
[ re-sending, as I screwed up the CC, sorry to those will receive the
duplicated ]


Note: I won't sponsor this package, as for a policy I don't sponsor NEW
packages for people without a track of previous contributions.


On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:08:31AM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> 在 2017年1月27日星期五 CST 下午1:04:26,Boyuan Yang 写道:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is the owner of RFP bug for vc package (#846491) and let's push
> > the process forward a little bit.

Well, RFPs have no "owner".  It's just somebody saying "pretty please
could somebody package this and upload to the archive".

> Ubuntu just released a new version of vc (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/
> +source/vc/1.3.0-0ubuntu1). This could be reused by Debian.

Yes.
As the person who sponsored that upload to Ubuntu, I wouldn't have done
so if the RFP (that I found) was a ITP, as uploading it to Ubuntu would
have been a clear duplication of work.
Also the RFS should be marked as a blocker of the ITP, but the automated
tool doing that doesn't act on RFP packages (correctly…)

> Aleksey, are you still working towards this RFS? If yes, you may take a look
> at this Ubuntu package. If not, please disown and close this bug (#849493).

Well, I can tell you that the package in Ubuntu now is perfect to be
uploaded as it is, in particular the package at mentors is worse in the
following points:
 * Section of the binary should be libdevel, not libs
 * copyright is incomplete
 * missing watchfile
 * spurious .directory files from Dolphin (?!?)
 * the synopsis is very poor
 * dh compat 9 instead of 10

> Still I think the name "vc" and "vc-dev" should be acceptable. Changing into
> other name will cause split between Debian and all Ubuntu derivatives.

aye, they are short, but given it's already in a Ubuntu it can't really
be ignored.


-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#854693: (kein Betreff)

2017-02-13 Thread Martin Kepplinger

just to add some advertisement for this package:

tslib had been part of wheezy and only recently got development 
attention. Having tslib in Debian again would improve Debian for 
embedded.


Debian is great, not only for "rapid prototyping", and sometimes 
devices' touch screens need tslib.


thanks
   martin