Re: SBuild: Post-build fails to fetch some packages

2017-07-01 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hola, Quoting Ben Finney (2017-07-02 02:57:25) > > Secondly, just using --upgrade will do nothing unless you also --update the > > chroot. > That seems like a bug; why would ‘--upgrade’ silently do nothing? I > would think it should either complain that it's useless, or implicitly > turn on

Bug#866783: marked as done (RFS: gigalomania/0.28+git.20170219.g08f4811-1 [ITP])

2017-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 2 Jul 2017 03:41:58 +0200 with message-id <20170702014158.qvcvodscuxvbq...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#866783: RFS: gigalomania/0.28+git.20170219.g08f4811-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #866783, regarding RFS: gigalomania/0.28+git.20170219.g08f4811-1

Re: SBuild: Post-build fails to fetch some packages

2017-07-01 Thread Ben Finney
Johannes Schauer writes: > sbuild maintainer here. In these cases you can always file a bug but > lets see if we can solve this here. Thank you for weighing in to this thread. > Secondly, just using --upgrade will do nothing unless you also --update the > chroot. That seems

Re: RFS: i8kutils/1.43 -- Fan control for some Dell laptops

2017-07-01 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 07:15:24PM -0300, Vitor Augusto wrote: > I understood, by your questioning about RC, that I should remove it. If > so, I agree! I am new at packaging. I put RC there as I thought I should > have chosen between ITA,ITP,QA,NMU,RC. It is not clear in the rfs-howto > that this

Re: RFS: i8kutils/1.43 -- Fan control for some Dell laptops

2017-07-01 Thread Vitor Augusto
I understood, by your questioning about RC, that I should remove it. If so, I agree! I am new at packaging. I put RC there as I thought I should have chosen between ITA,ITP,QA,NMU,RC. It is not clear in the rfs-howto that this field is optional. Then, RC removed from subject. Lintian error "bad

Re: RFS: i8kutils/1.43 [RC] -- Fan control for some Dell laptops

2017-07-01 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 12:21:06PM -0300, Vitor Augusto wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "i8kutils": > > * Package name: i8kutils >Version : 1.43 > i8kutils (1.43) unstable; urgency=low > > * Remove ui from i8kmon. > * Removed smm tool as smm.c code is

Bug#866801: marked as done (RFS: node-jsonfile/3.0.0-1)

2017-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 1 Jul 2017 22:03:12 +0200 with message-id <20170701200312.bv34zd57gs355...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#866801: RFS: node-jsonfile/3.0.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #866801, regarding RFS: node-jsonfile/3.0.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#866801: RFS: node-jsonfile/3.0.0-1

2017-07-01 Thread Julien Puydt
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-jsonfile" * Package name: node-jsonfile Version : 3.0.0-1 Upstream Author : JP Richardson * URL : https://github.com/jprichardson/node-jsonfile *

Bug#866736: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.2.9-3

2017-07-01 Thread Ross Gammon
On 07/01/2017 05:27 PM, foss.freedom wrote: > Sorry - I didnt really understand about filing a bug against > release.debian.org targeting "p-u" - I had a look here but didnt see > an example https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting There is a bit more background information in the Developers

Bug#866783: RFS: gigalomania/0.28+git.20170219.g08f4811-1 [ITP]

2017-07-01 Thread Jose G. López
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gigalomania": * Package name: gigalomania Version : 0.28+git.20170219.g08f4811-1 Upstream Author : Mark Harman

Bug#866781: RFS: weresync/1.0-1

2017-07-01 Thread Daniel Manila
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "weresync" * Package name: weresync Version : 1.0-1 Upstream Author : Daniel Manila * URL : https://github.com/DonyorM/weresync

Bug#866736: marked as done (RFS: budgie-desktop/10.2.9-3)

2017-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 1 Jul 2017 16:13:28 + (UTC) with message-id <1101826259.4461560.1498925608...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#866736: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.2.9-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #866736, regarding RFS: budgie-desktop/10.2.9-3 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#866736: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.2.9-3

2017-07-01 Thread foss.freedom
tags 866736 - moreinfo Hi Gianfranco, okey dokey, first time trying to fix something in stable :) sounds like a bit different from launchpads SRU process. I've uploaded a new version with a target of unstable. Sorry - I didnt really understand about filing a bug against release.debian.org

RFS: i8kutils/1.43 [RC] -- Fan control for some Dell laptops

2017-07-01 Thread Vitor Augusto
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "i8kutils": * Package name: i8kutils Version : 1.43 Upstream Author : Vitor Augusto * URL : https://launchpad.net/i8kutils *

Bug#866736: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.2.9-3

2017-07-01 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "budgie-desktop" here we are >the target is for stretch to fix the bug #866730 marked as Important >Tested that this builds via pbuilder-dist this is nonsense. You need to target unstable, and let the

Re: SBuild: Post-build fails to fetch some packages

2017-07-01 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi Ben, sbuild maintainer here. In these cases you can always file a bug but lets see if we can solve this here. Quoting Ben Finney (2017-07-01 13:08:17) > Andreas Moog writes: > > > Your sbuild-environment has outdated mirror information. For example > > the current

Re: SBuild: Post-build fails to fetch some packages

2017-07-01 Thread Ben Finney
Andreas Moog writes: > Your sbuild-environment has outdated mirror information. For example > the current libreadline version in unstable is 7.0-3. Does the build > work after running sbuild-update? The build dependency chain also leads to ‘libreadline’, which *is*

Re: SBuild: Post-build fails to fetch some packages

2017-07-01 Thread Ben Finney
Andreas Moog writes: > Your sbuild-environment has outdated mirror information. For example > the current libreadline version in unstable is 7.0-3. Does the build > work after running sbuild-update? The ‘sbuild’ process updates from the mirrors when it begins:

Bug#866736: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.2.9-3

2017-07-01 Thread foss.freedom
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "budgie-desktop" * Package name: budgie-desktop Version : 10.2.9-3 Upstream Author : i...@solus-project.com * URL :