Bug#869739: RFS: python-agate-sql/0.5.2-2
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the following package: * Package name: python-agate-sql Version : 0.5.2-2 Upstream Author : Christopher Groskopf * URL : https://github.com/wireservice/agate-sql * License : Expat Section : python Please check out the package by visiting the following URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/python-modules/packages/python-agate-sql.git Changes since the last upload: * Bump standards version to 4.0.0, no changes required * Build the docs using the upstream Makefile * Mark doc package multiarch foreign * Release to unstable Regards, Ghis
Bug#869737: RFS: python-agate-excel/0.2.1-3
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the following package: * Package name: python-agate-excel Version : 0.2.1-3 Upstream Author : Christopher Groskopf * URL : https://github.com/wireservice/agate-excel * License : Expat Section : python Please check out the package by visiting the following URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/python-modules/packages/python-agate-excel.git Changes since the last upload: * Bump standards version to 4.0.0, no changes required * Build the docs using the upstream Makefile * Mark doc package multiarch foreign * Release to unstable Regards, Ghis
Bug#869734: RFS: python-agate-dbf/0.2.0-2
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the following package: * Package name: python-agate-dbf Version : 0.2.0-2 Upstream Author : Christopher Groskopf * URL : https://github.com/wireservice/agate-dbf * License : Expat Section : python Please check out the package by visiting the following URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/python-modules/packages/python-agate-dbf.git Changes since the last upload: * Bump standards version to 4.0.0, no changes required * Build the docs using the upstream Makefile * Mark doc package multiarch foreign * Release to unstable Regards, Ghis
Bug#869201: RFS: etcd/3.1.8+dfsg-3 [NMU]
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 19:22:46 +0530 "Harish Sriram" wrote: > > Hello Andrey, > > The nmu package version name is fixed. Thanks for pointing. > > Thanks, > Harish the mentors page now shows this lintian error: E binary-from-other-architecture What happened? -- tobi
Bug#867270: ITA: babl/0.1.28-4
Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hallo Keng-Yu, as Andrey already mentioned, it is not enough just to put in your name as new Maintainer and have the package the same otherwise. You need to include improvments to the packages, then the package is eligible for an upload. I know this is hard as the package seems to be in good shape, but there are some hints: - Take a look at the reproduciblity issue. Maybe they are fixable, maybe they are not worth (because gcc will be fixed soon) - The -dbg package could be replaced by the automatic dbgsym one. (- Maybe in combination with short debhelper format) - compat level 10 would be nice - there is some commented-out stuff in debian/control. Can it go? Please take a look at them and then remove the moreinfo tag again when you have an updated package. -- tobi
Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.0-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cyclograph": git://git.debian.org/pkg-running/cyclograph.git It can be built with gbp. Changes since the last upload: This is important because it is currently affected by and RC bug, which is closed by this upload. cyclograph (1.9.0-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium [ Federico Brega ] * New upstream release * Added cyclograph-qt5 ui * Debhelper compat version updated to 9 * Updated Standards to 4.0.0 * Updated gtk to webkit2 version 4.0 (closes: bug#866635) * Added vcs field to debian/control -- Federico Brega Sat, 15 Jul 2017 16:16:41 +0200 Regards, Federico Brega
Bug#863982: RFS: sphinx-autorun/1.0.4-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Followup-For: Bug #863982 I updated the package on mentors to 1.0.4-1. -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (100, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.11.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#869394: RFS: tinydb/3.2.0-1 [ITP] -- Lightweight document oriented database optimized for your happiness
Control: retitle -1 RFS: tinydb/3.2.0-1 [ITP] Control: tags -1 + moreinfo The package should use Python 3, see https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-python3.html If the package contains only a Python module, it should be packaged as a module, including the package name. Priority should be optional. The Pre-Depends: line is strange. Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10. Please update to the current Standards-Version version. debian/copyright is totally wrong, starting with the first line (the current format URL is https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/). "Fixing" tests by removing them is wrong. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#864532: (no subject)
Hello Hon, I reviewed the package, and after the fixes we discussed and the legal conversation[1], I think this package is ready to go to the NEW queue. Thanks for your contribution to Debian. [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2017/07/msg00022.html signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#866601: RFS: segyio/1.2.0-1 [ITP: #864710]
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Control: retitle -1 RFS: segyio/1.2.0-1 [ITP]
Please don't build the Python 2 module, see
https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-python3.html
Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10.
${shlibs:Depends} for -dev packages does nothing and there is a warning
about that in the build log.
Why is the lib installed by code in debian/rules? The upstream build
system should do that and it seems it does that, at least partially.
segyio-cath doesn't have a manpage (and lintian tells that).
Consider adding the symbols file for the library.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bug#864946: RFS: libsml/0.1.1+git20170608-1 (ITP)
Control: retitle -1 RFS: libsml/0.1.1+git20170608-1 [ITP] Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Control: owner -1 ! Please use Priority: optional. CONTRIBUTION.pdf should be removed from the orig tarball as it doesn't have a source and I doubt is even free (actually license texts we ship are also non-free, but still we have the requirement to ship PDF sources). The upstream "make all" runs the tests, we usually don't do that, but I don't know in this case why can that be bad. Otherwise the package is good. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#864839: RFS: yices2/2.6.0-2 [ITP]
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Please use the automatic debug packages.
The debian revision for an initial upload should be -1.
Please update Standards-Version to the current version.
Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10.
debian/copyright lacks Source and Upstream-Name.
Please disable DH_VERBOSE.
Please fix lintian warnings related to the descriptions.
I don't like the .install.in thing, I think you should better use
dh-exec(1) or make the upstream build system do the right thing.
Consider using dh_auto_{build,install,test} with additional args instead
of just make. CPPFLAGS are already added to CFLAGS in compat 9 when using
dh_auto_*.
The package doesn't build: "configure:5053: error: *** libpoly library not
found. Try to set LDFLAGS ***".
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bug#864838: RFS: libpoly0/1.3-2 [ITP]
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Please use the automatic debug packages. The debian revision for an initial upload should be -1. Please update Standards-Version to the current version. Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10. debian/copyright lacks Source and Upstream-Name. Please disable DH_VERBOSE. Please fix lintian warnings related to the descriptions. I don't like the .install.in thing, I think you should better use dh-exec(1) or make the upstream build system do the right thing. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#869664: RFS: ptpython/0.39~20170703-1 [ITP]
Hi Andrey,
This package is aimed at experimental because I found
a problem by chance, when executing one of my
scripts. However the same problem won't occur when
using ipython3 or python3. So ipython3 cannot be simply
replaced by ptipython3 for me.
Due to that reason, I plan to move it to unstable if no
one complains about similar problems or other bugs.
https://github.com/jonathanslenders/ptpython/issues
~/g/w/a/digit-recognizer ❯❯❯ /usr/bin/ptipython3 mnist-th-convnet.py
[ .. omitted ... ]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/ptpython3", line 11, in
load_entry_point('ptpython==0.39', 'console_scripts', 'ptpython3')()
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/ptpython/entry_points/run_ptpython.py",
line 55, in run
six.exec_(compile(open(a[''][0], "rb").read(), a[''][0], 'exec'))
File "mnist-th-convnet.py", line 49, in
net = Net()
File "mnist-th-convnet.py", line 24, in __init__
super(Net, self).__init__()
NameError: name 'Net' is not defined
~/g/w/a/digit-recognizer ❯❯❯ /usr/bin/ipython3 mnist-th-convnet.py
[ .. omitted ... ]
-> Iter 1 | loss 2.196 | Bch Train Accu 0.28
-> Iter 2 | loss 1.967 | Bch Train Accu 0.47
-> Iter 3 | loss 1.853 | Bch Train Accu 0.53
On 25 July 2017 at 13:23, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Why is this aimed at experimental?
>
> --
> WBR, wRAR
--
Best,
Lumin
Re: Bug#864428: RFS: bitfield/1.0.0-2 [ITP #864358]
Hi Vitalie,
I pick up the sponsoring process.
V> Thank you very much for your help and comments.
> libbitfield$SOVERSION (shared library)
> libbitfield-dev (development files)
V> Done. Package name changed from 'bitfield' to 'libbitfield' and SOVERSION
is set
V> to 1, so we get:
V> libbitfield1
V> libbitfield-dev
This looks good now.
> If you don't have soversioning in place, then it probably means that your
> software is still too volatile for you to think about a stable ABI / API.
If
> that's the case, then it is not a good candidate for packaging in Debian
just yet.
V> Done. SO-versioning (and versioning policy in general) has been set. ABI
/API
V> has been stabilized. Version (1.0.0) has been released.
That's also OK now.
Some further problems with the packaging:
- The link /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbitfield.so should go to
the libbitfield-dev package.
- A shared library should have a debian/.symbols file
(see man dpkg-gensymbols).
- The standards version should be updated to 4.0.0
- The files README.{Debian,source} do not provide any real info. They should
be dropped until they contain something useful.
- Please also remove the unrelated comments at the end of debian/rules
and the comments after the DH_VERBOSE line at the beginning.
- The files debian/*.dirs are unnecessary . Please remove.
Please fix your package and ping me when done, so I can recheck.
Cheers,
Roland
Bug#869664: RFS: ptpython/0.39~20170703-1 [ITP]
Why is this aimed at experimental? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#869664: RFS: ptpython/0.39~20170703-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ptpython" * Package name: ptpython Version : 0.39~20170703-1 Upstream Author : jonathanslenders * URL : https://github.com/jonathanslenders/ptpython * License : BSD-3-Clause Section : python It builds those binary packages: ptpython3 - Better Python 3 REPL python3-ptpython - Better Python REPL (python3) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/ptpython Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/ptpython/ptpython_0.39~20170703-1.dsc http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/ptpython/0.39~20170703-1/buildlog Changes since the last upload: ptpython (0.39~20170703-1) experimental; urgency=medium * Initial release. (Closes: #869534)
Bug#868544: closing 868544
close 868544 thanks Sponsored by czchen@. Thx! Regards, Boyuan Yang
Bug#852377: RFS: tikzit/1.0-1 [ITP]
On Monday 24 July 2017 23:10:33 CEST Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Control: owner -1 ! > > Please bump Standards-Version to the current version and I'll upload > it. Hello Andrey, As Andrew pointed out, he has already uploaded the package. I will make sure to bump the standards-version for the next upstream release though, so thanks! Best, Gard
Bug#857005: marked as done (RFS: sigrok/0.3-1 [ITA])
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jul 2017 10:21:00 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: sigrok/0.3-1 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #857005, regarding RFS: sigrok/0.3-1 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 857005: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857005 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sigrok" * Package name: sigrok Version : 0.3-1 Upstream Author : none (metapackage) * URL : none (metapackage) * License : none (metapackage) Section : electronics It builds those binary packages: sigrok - Logic analyzer and protocol decoder software suite (metapackage) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sigrok/sigrok_0.3-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Bump dependency to sigrok-cli >= 0.6.0. * Bump dependency on pulseview >= 0.3.0. * Bump dependency on sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw >= 0.1.4. * Standards-Version: 3.9.8 (no changes required). * Bump debhelper compat and dependency to 10 * New maintainer (Closes: #852828) The package was recently RFA'd by the current maintainer Uwe, see #852834, and i would like to take over the maintenance of this package and the related packages in the sigrok suite (see at http://sigrok.org/wiki/Downloads). RFSs for the other packages are already sent. Unfortunately Uwe doesn't have time for sponsoring the package, so i would like to ask the community to guide me with the first steps. To ease this i uploaded my version to mentors.debian.net, see above. The packaging work is version controlled here: https://git.zgyarmati.de/debian-packaging/sigrok-debian which repository i plan to migrate to collab-maint eventually once i'm more set in the Debian infrastructure. Please feel free to contact with any comments or questions, best regards -- Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package sigrok has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Bug#856987: marked as done (RFS: libsigrokdecode/0.4.1-1 [ITA])
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jul 2017 10:21:00 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: libsigrokdecode/0.4.1-1 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #856987, regarding RFS: libsigrokdecode/0.4.1-1 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 856987: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856987 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsigrokdecode" * Package name: libsigrokdecode Version : 0.4.1-1 Upstream Author : http://sigrok.org/ * URL : http://sigrok.org/wiki/Libsigrokdecode * License : GPL Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libsigrokdecode-dev - sigrok protocol decoding library - development files libsigrokdecode2 - sigrok protocol decoding library - shared library libsigrokdecode3 - sigrok protocol decoding library - shared library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libsigrokdecode Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libs/libsigrokdecode/libsigrokdecode_0.4.1-1.dsc More information about the sigrok can be obtained from http://sigrok.org/. Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release 0.4.1 * New maintainer (Closes: #852831) * Increment package name suffix as upstream soname has changed * Add transitional package for libsigrokdecode2 * Standards-Version: 3.9.8 (no changes required) * Bump debhelper compat and dependency to 10 The package was recently RFA'd by the current maintainer Uwe, see #852831, and i would like to take over the maintenance of this package and the related packages in the sigrok suite (see at http://sigrok.org/wiki/Downloads). RFSs for the other packagescoming soon. Unfortunately Uwe doesn't have time for sponsoring the package, so i would like to ask the community to guide me with the first steps. To ease this i uploaded my version to mentors.debian.net, see above. The packaging work is version controlled here: https://git.zgyarmati.de/debian-packaging/libsigrokdecode-debian which repository i plan to migrate to collab-maint eventually once i'm more set in the Debian infrastructure. Please feel free to contact with any comments or questions, best regards -- Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package libsigrokdecode has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Bug#857002: marked as done (RFS: pulseview/0.3.0-1 [ ITA])
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jul 2017 10:21:00 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: pulseview/0.3.0-1 [ ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #857002, regarding RFS: pulseview/0.3.0-1 [ ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 857002: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857002 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pulseview" * Package name: pulseview Version : 0.3.0-1 Upstream Author : http://sigrok.org * URL : http://sigrok.org/wiki/PulseView * License : GPL Section : electronics It builds those binary packages: pulseview - sigrok logic analyzer, oscilloscope, and MSO GUI To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/pulseview Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pulseview/pulseview_0.3.0-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release * New maintainer (Closes: #852833) * Standards-Version: 3.9.8 (no changes required) * Update sigrok dependencies' version * Remove obsolete patches * Add patches to fix build errors * Build with Qt5, set build dependencies accordingly The package was recently RFA'd by the current maintainer Uwe, see # 852833, and i would like to take over the maintenance of this package and the related packages in the sigrok suite (see at http://sigrok.org/wiki/Downloads). RFSs for the other packages coming soon. Unfortunately Uwe doesn't have time for sponsoring the package, so i would like to ask the community to guide me with the first steps. To ease this i uploaded my version to mentors.debian.net, see above. The packaging work is version controlled here: https://git.zgyarmati.de/debian-packaging/pulseview-debian which repository i plan to migrate to collab-maint eventually once i'm more set in the Debian infrastructure. Please feel free to contact with any comments or questions, best regards -- Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package pulseview has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Bug#856974: marked as done (RFS: libserialport/0.1.1-2 [ITA])
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jul 2017 10:21:03 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: libserialport/0.1.1-2 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #856974, regarding RFS: libserialport/0.1.1-2 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 856974: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856974 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libserialport" * Package name: libserialport Version : 0.1.1-2 Upstream Author : http://sigrok.org/ * URL : http://sigrok.org/wiki/Libserialport * License : LGPL Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libserialport-dev - Crossplatform serial port handling library - development files libserialport0 - Crossplatform serial port handling library - shared library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libserialport Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libs/libserialport/libserialport_0.1.1-2.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: * New maintainer (Closes: #852832) * Add patch to fix build on kfreebsd (Closes: #816334) * Standards-Version: 3.9.8 (no changes required) * Increase debhelper compat to 10 * Added libserialport0.symbols file The package was recently RFA'd by the current maintainer Uwe, see #852832, and i would like to take over the maintenance of this package and the related packages in the sigrok suite (see at http://sigrok.org/wiki/Downloads). RFSs for the other packages coming soon. Unfortunately Uwe doesn't have time for sponsoring the package, so i would like to ask the community to guide me with the first steps. To ease this i uploaded my version to mentors.debian.net, see above. The packaging work is version controlled here: https://git.zgyarmati.de/debian-packaging/libserialport-debian which repository i plan to migrate to collab-maint eventually once i'm more set in the Debian infrastructure. Please feel free to contact with any comments or questions, best regards -- Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package libserialport has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Bug#856989: marked as done (RFS: sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw/0.1.4-1 [ITA])
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jul 2017 10:21:02 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw/0.1.4-1 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #856989, regarding RFS: sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw/0.1.4-1 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 856989: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856989 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw" * Package name: sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw Version : 0.1.4-1 Upstream Author : http://sigrok.org * URL : http://sigrok.org/wiki/Fx2lafw * License : GPL Section : electronics It builds those binary packages: sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw - Firmware for Cypress FX2(LP) based logic analyzers To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw/sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw_0.1.4-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release. * Standards-Version: 3.9.8 (no changes required). * New maintainer (Closes: #852835). * Bump debhelper compat and dependency to 10 The package was recently RFA'd by the current maintainer Uwe, see #852835, and i would like to take over the maintenance of this package and the related packages in the sigrok suite (see at http://sigrok.org/wiki/Downloads). RFSs for the other packages coming soon. Unfortunately Uwe doesn't have time for sponsoring the package, so i would like to ask the community to guide me with the first steps. To ease this i uploaded my version to mentors.debian.net, see above. The packaging work is version controlled here: https://git.zgyarmati.de/debian-packaging/sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw-debian which repository i plan to migrate to collab-maint eventually once i'm more set in the Debian infrastructure. Please feel free to contact with any comments or questions, best regards -- Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Bug#856981: marked as done (RFS: libsigrok/0.4.0-1 [ITA])
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jul 2017 10:21:00 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: libsigrok/0.4.0-1 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #856981, regarding RFS: libsigrok/0.4.0-1 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 856981: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856981 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsigrok" * Package name: libsigrok Version : 0.4.0-1 Upstream Author : http://sigrok.org/ * URL : http://sigrok.org/wiki/Libsigrok * License : GPL Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libsigrok-dev - sigrok hardware driver library - development files libsigrok2 - sigrok hardware driver library (transitional dummy package) libsigrok3 - sigrok hardware driver library - shared library libsigrokcxx3 - sigrok hardware driver library - shared library libsigrokcxx3-dev - sigrok C++ bindings - development files python-libsigrok3 - Python bindings for the libsigrok library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libsigrok Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libs/libsigrok/libsigrok_0.4.0-1.dsc More information about the sigrok can be obtained from http://sigrok.org/. Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release 0.4.0 * New maintainer (Closes: #852830) * Increase package name suffix as soname changed, add correspondig dummy package * Remove obsolote transitional dummy package libsigrok0-dev * Add binary and dev packages for C++ bindings * Add binary package for Python bindings * Patch Makefile.am to avoid build quiteness and install Python module under dist-packages * Add build-deps needed for C++/Python bindings The package was recently RFA'd by the current maintainer Uwe, see #852830, and i would like to take over the maintenance of this package and the related packages in the sigrok suite (see at http://sigrok.org/wiki/Downloads). RFSs for the other packagescoming soon. Unfortunately Uwe doesn't have time for sponsoring the package, so i would like to ask the community to guide me with the first steps. To ease this i uploaded my version to mentors.debian.net, see above. The packaging work is version controlled here: https://git.zgyarmati.de/debian-packaging/libsigrok-debian which repository i plan to migrate to collab-maint eventually once i'm more set in the Debian infrastructure. Please feel free to contact with any comments or questions, best regards -- Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de -- Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package libsigrok has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Bug#857004: marked as done (RFS: sigrok-cli/0.6.0-1 [ ITA])
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jul 2017 10:20:59 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: sigrok-cli/0.6.0-1 [ ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #857004, regarding RFS: sigrok-cli/0.6.0-1 [ ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 857004: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857004 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sigrok-cli" * Package name: sigrok-cli Version : 0.6.0-1 Upstream Author : http://sigrok.org * URL :http://sigrok.org/wiki/Sigrok-cli * License : GPL Section : electronics It builds those binary packages: sigrok-cli - command-line frontend for the sigrok software To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok-cli Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sigrok-cli/sigrok-cli_0.6.0-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release. * Standards-Version: 3.9.8 (no changes required). * New maintainer (Closes: #852834). * Bump debhelper compat and dependency to 10 * Update sigrok dependencies' version The package was recently RFA'd by the current maintainer Uwe, see #852834, and i would like to take over the maintenance of this package and the related packages in the sigrok suite (see at http://sigrok.org/wiki/Downloads). RFSs for the other packages coming soon. Unfortunately Uwe doesn't have time for sponsoring the package, so i would like to ask the community to guide me with the first steps. To ease this i uploaded my version to mentors.debian.net, see above. The packaging work is version controlled here: https://git.zgyarmati.de/debian-packaging/sigrok-cli-debian which repository i plan to migrate to collab-maint eventually once i'm more set in the Debian infrastructure. Please feel free to contact with any comments or questions, best regards -- Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package sigrok-cli has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Bug#861617: RFS: ddcutil/0.8.0-6 [ITP] - control monitor settings
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 05:49:46PM -0400, Sanford Rockowitz wrote: > 2) IIRC, I was forced to increment the Debian release by debain-mentors. A > failed submission "used up" a debian release number and blocked a corrected > submission with the same release number. Is there some way around this? mentors doesn't have such requirement. You may mean that dput doesn't reupload the same file name because an upload log exist locally. You may remove it or use dput -f. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
